Journalists love whistleblowers. Just not when the whistle is blown on them.
Journalists love transparency. As long as they’re not the ones being exposed.
No steadfast journalism rule is unbendable when it comes to justifying and protecting the racket that is modern journalism, specifically, political journalism in the United States today. The ends justify the means for the Democrat Media Complex. They lie when they claim to be objective. They lie when they claim to be unbiased, because these so called “truth seekers” are guilty of engaging in open political warfare. And when the whistle is blown, they simply double down. “Journolist” — like Media Matters, but more insidious, if that’s possible — is an attempt to put the genie back in the bottle, technology and “the masses” uncovered the conspiracy:

Talk radio and the Internet have allowed outsiders the ability to challenge a multiple generational shift from journalism being about the story, to journalism being crafted toward a partisan end. From Newsweek killing the Lewinsky story to the Swift Boat veterans (until the undermedia pressure got too big) to the Dan Rather implosion to the open attempt to keep the Al Gore masseuse story under wraps to the John Edwards/Rielle Hunter debacle to the Van Jones admission of missing the story to the networks ignoring the ACORN video footage to the media playing up trumped up charges of racism in the Tea Party — while ignoring exculpatory evidence — to the mother of all media-as-political weaponry: the non-vetting of candidate Obama, the mainstream media has shown that it is in an ideological death spiral. And the ground is right here.
American journalism died a long time ago; today Tucker Carlson got around to running the obituary. What The Daily Caller has unearthed proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that most media organizations are either complicit by participation in the treachery that is Journolist, or are guilty of sitting back and watching Alinsky warfare being waged against all that challenged the progressive orthodoxy. The scandal predictably involves journalists posing as professors posing as experts. But dressed down they are nothing but street thugs. They deserve the deepest levels of public consternation. We must demand that they do.
The only way that the media will recover from the horrifying discoveries found in the Journolist is to investigate and investigate until every guilty reporter, professor and institution is laid bare begging America for forgiveness. Will they do it?
If the powers that be don’t comply with this demand, we can always call Jonathan Alter and Eric Alterman racists.*






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
38 Comments
Andrew, I remember the first time you hosted Dennis Miller's show and talked about unveiling Big Hollywood (and the rumors about the other Bigs to come) and telling myself that something was finally going to change.
Seriously, thank you.
Thank you AB, for the new media and the sunlight that it is bringing to all aspects of our government, our lives, and our politics. We have the means to join together in a way that did not exist just a scant while ago, and the demoncrats don't have a way of addressing it, as it is coming from the brutal honesty of ordinary American people from a bottom's-up way that we have never had before. Again, salute and salud…
This piece reads like an overture. If I were part of the leftist news establishment, I'd be a little worried about the symphony to come.
This is delicious beyond belief. Thank you! Thank you! I vote for AB to be the next Santa Claus!
So the "objective" media weaponized itself as an instrument of progressive policy?! We knew it, but now we have the smoking gun. The digital age shall belong to the truth seekers, for the truth shall disappear no more, forever.
So these scum bags actually colluded to actually call somebody like Barnes or Rove, a racist? Totally make it up? Just to develop the alternative narrative as a distraction to help Obama? And it's caught on emails?? We can actually hear them think this crap up?? Wow… OK… so now I'm thinking —- Katie Couric's was all blank? Anyway, I think there would be good grounds for a lawsuit for slander and intentional infliction. They are public figures, but this damages their reputations on purpose.
One can only imagine what they were saying about Palin. Wow! Would sure like to see how these scumbags were plotting to assassinate her character. They were getting desperate when she was rising in the polls with McCain.
Hope AB and Tucker of the DC are planning in slow release and have much more of these data. Too quick a death for these pigs would be too kind. I expect resignations of these pigs will be in the offing — since times are tough at the Times this will make their layoffs easy!
Hua!
.
So we now have an empty suit marxist in the White House who was vaulted there with help from a bunch of straw dogs. Yea, many knew it but it is nice to find some evidence of the deception that was going on in the last election. Of course there is a ton more out there that will eventually surface.
I hope that the Democrats and their friends are proud of their handiwork. They have all worked so hard at dismantling this country that they will not live this down for another 100 years or so.
Why do I get this feeling that we're now living in the Soviet Union, where the all-powerful central government controls almost every aspect of our lives and that the state-controlled media is there simply to parrot the "democratic" party line? The shameless exhibition that was put on during the 2008 presidential election by the main stream media only reinforced the idea that most journalists in this country are liberal democrats and would crush any outside dissent against their candidate for president. Forget the idea that they were "journalists" and that it was their job to be objective and uncover true facts about the candidate. In 2008, pure propaganda took over and I feared for my country.
Until now. Andrew Breitbart, FOX News, Talk Radio, and a bunch of brave conservative bloggers on the Internet are helping to stop this trend and are holding established "journalists" accountable for their actions. I almost feel like we really are living in Soviet Russia and we're printing fliers in a basement critical of the regime. How did it ever come to this in America?
This is hard proof of not only bias, but CONSPIRACY!
Keep fighting the good fight, AB. We will listen, we will question, and we will help discover the truth. This is our voices being heard. Thank you for everything!
Peeps, if you don't hit the link to the DC Caller in this article, here's what you're missing:
“I hear you. but I am really tired of defending the indefensible. The people who attacked Clinton on Monica were prissy and ridiculous, but let me tell you it was no fun, as a feminist and a woman, waving aside as politically irrelevant and part of the vast rightwing conspiracy Paula, Monica, Kathleen, Juanita,” Pollitt said.
That's right. The loss of a woman's political innocence is a sad, sad thing. To think that she had no compunction about trampling the rights of Clinton's accusers then, and only now feels remorse in being asked to get back down on the bed for another john: Obama.
Fuck her for a whore.
I've never been much of a conspiracy theorist; I'm one of those perhaps naive folks who believes, generally, that things are usually exactly as they seem. And as a broadcast media professional with more than 30 years experience, this is a sad eye-opener. I was laid off from an NPR station a year ago, and found it something of a relief because, although I was out of a job with great benefits, I no longer felt like I was selling my soul.
This, however, is the ugly new world in which we live. To the Journolist members, their ends justify their means, and their actions go way beyond anything Bernie Goldberg wrote about in "Bias." He exposed what I had always thought: that these "journalists" really did believe they were objective and impartial — it was just that their objectivity revolved solely around the secular theology in which they had been immersed since their college days.
Now, though, it has become obvious that that ideal has unabashedly given way to the political agenda, and that they really do believe that Republicans and conservatives are racist, warmongering knuckle-draggers who must be defeated at any cost.
We cannot let this go — we must get this damning story out. But again, how do we get it before those folks for whom Katie Couric and Anderson Cooper are the sole sources of news?
Does that seem too strong? I don't think so. It seems the appropriate amount of disgust at such odious, soul-dead actions. If we get squeamish about holding the line against this type of behavior we'll cede our future back to Soros.
WELL ISN'T THIS SWELL … What people have thought all along about the lame stream media is absolutely PROVED true. The media colluding against the American people, disguised as news.
And it continues today …
Andrew is the new superman. Truth, Justice and the American way!
Keep up the good work Andrew. This only serves to confirm what we knew. By further exposing the leftist agenda that engulfs the MSM, maybe? …this will serve too restore journalism, to it’s constitutionally mandated role of a free, and independent press …what fun. We’ll see!
The funniest bit that Rush uses over and over is when he has audio clips of the media, one after the other, saying the exact same thing using almost the exact same phraseology with the same very distinct keyword in every quote.
I was not surprised to see the media all in harmony, but I was curious as to the mechanics, now I know
PS: Bernie Goldberg is wrong. I love Bernie but he does not seem to think there is a conspiracy, but rather likemindedness. I would love to get his reaction to this.
Perfect.
The timing of this story simply could not be better. Coming on the heels of the Shirley Sherrod expose' and firing, this throws things into a tailspin for the liberal media industrial complex, doesn't it?
The usual suspects – the distinguished Journolist Alumni – were plotting a balls-out attack on Republicans and the Tea Party Movement. And race was, of course, their chosen weapon.
So much for that.
Much thanks to Tucker Carlson.
I am now officially ashamed of some things I have written about him in the past.
He is my new hero.
Fifteen years ago, when I was first starting to recover from liberalism via listening to Rush Limbaugh, there was a sense of "Someone else sees things the way I see them." That we are able to openly express a sense of living under Soviet-style control is proof in itself that we are still free people. As long as we can communicate with one another without fear, we can continue learning how to work together to take back our government, our education system, our culture. Thank God for alternative media!
…I hope that it's like the "1812 Overture", complete with cannons (Eric Alterman: "In-n-n-coming!").
With a whore, you usually know who you're dealing with, what you're getting and what you have to pay. Calling Pollitt a whore is an insult – to whores. It's one thing to sell yourself; it's another to sell the rest of us which is what these "journalists" did. They're pimps and procurers and should be dealt with as such.
Just because the mask has been removed, does not mean this group-think will stop.
When you are steeped in leftist Kool-Aid and the only thing missing is the plan of attack, it's
a fairly simple matter to direct the front line shock troops (journolists) thru phone calls, faxes,
and emails to make sure the talking points get properly parroted…
They'll pretend it no longer goes on, but the very fact that we read about ONLY here on the BIGS and the DCaller,
is proof positive they are still ignoring big stories that would prove embarrassing the narrative..
Thanks AB, maybe you should up the reward for the list….One of these rats will take the bait…for sure..
If you work for The Nation, being on something like Journolist isn't big surprise — it's been the home of far left lunacy for generations. If the writers there weren't casually throwing around the idea of using the race card on their enemies on a place like Journolist, you'd probably want to call them up to see if they were feeling under the weather or having some sort of crisis of liberal faith.
The more disturbing ones for the big media outlets are the Journolist members from the sites they want the public to believe are non-partisan, like Ezra Klein's Washington Post, or Politico, who had people on Journolist who either participated in threads like the one exposed by The Daily Caller, or knew about threads like that and saw the real-world results and then said or did absolutely nothing. They may not have overtly been part of a plan to target Obama's perceived enemies as racists, but they saw nothing worth getting worked up about in those threads, if someone like Fred Barnes (jeez, Ackerman thought Fred Barnes was a radical conservative?) has their career ruined by a manufactured racism charge they know is phony.
I think we all knew there was something nefarious and under-handed at work here.Nice to be able to put your finger on it.. Has Brian, Katie, or Charlie mentioned this conspiracy on the 6:30 telecast?
We don't have a TV, but I'll bet NOT..
Good point. Maybe treacherous is a better fit.
Heh. I don't have a television either, but it would be nice if the rest of the populace got a chance to make up their own mind about the facts. Not holding my breath. . .
This is a ludicrous nonstory. In concise summary, The Daily Caller alleges that openly liberal commentators attempted to influence the agenda-setting of straight news reporters. This commonplace occurrence is not an obscene rarity.
In order for the unwashed TV drones to find out about it, they'd have to hear about it.
I don't think it will be given a high priority, if it is mentioned at all. Just in passing…
.And for sure no outrage.
“The time is now near at hand which must probably determine, whether Americans are to be, Freemen, or Slaves; whether they are to have any property they can call their own; whether their Houses, and Farms, are to be pillaged and destroyed, and they consigned to a State of Wretchedness from which no human efforts will probably deliver them. The fate of unborn Millions will now depend, under God, on the Courage and Conduct of this army” — Gen. George Washington, to his troops before the battle of Long Island
They're confirming with their comments things that the right has been suspecting all along.
One of them is that the left uses the knee-jerk racist card as a tactic, not because of any perceived racism, but as a tactic to attempt to discredit their opponents.
Another one is that many journalists have no intention of objective reporting. They are not in it for the news. They are in it to be propagandists. The are not in it to show people the truth. They are in it to fool people with lies.
Being dishonest is not a crime.
Just stop buying their products. It would also be useful to maintain a list of these types of people so we know which media outlets to avoid.
The conspiracy was revealed to me when I observed questions on ABC, NBC, CBS and CNN within five minutes of each other on Sunday Morning talk shows: 'Please comment on the NAACP's allegation that the TEA Party is racist' or words to that effect. This is harking back to the Begala/Carville/Daschle DNC fax machine to the networks telling them their daily talking points.
Are you seriously comparing Freddy "The Beetle" Barnes to Kitty Genovese? Sometimes, I don't even know.
We don't know that no liberals spoke up, and even if they hadn't, it wouldn't matter because there never was a campaign to paint Fred Barnes as a racist. Ackerman is an excitable guy, that's all. We knew all this before. Let's focus on the real bias in the em-es-em.
Wow. This is just sickening. I already knew that these "journalists" were biased as all hell. What I didn't know is that they were conspiring — literally conspiring — behind closed doors to spin the news beyond all recognition.
It's a metaphor, dude. I'm not suggesting Spencer Ackerman literally wanted to hide down in some Long Island Railroad station in Queens waiting to snuff out Freddy's life (oh, wait, that was Michael Tomasky saying the Journolist clan should "kill ABC" over the Obama-Clinton debate questions. And, no, I don't think Mikey was being literal there, either).
If some of the other members of Journolist were horrified, outraged, or at least a tad bit miffed at Ackerman's scheme, we would have heard something about this in the Spring of 2008, just after the thread was active, and not in the summer of 2010, a year after the website was outed and a month after it was shut down over l'affaire Weigel. The fact that — for whatever reason — there was no public mention of this, let alone repudiation, for 26 months shows that at the very least, if the other list members weren't at least mildly sympathetic to the idea, they were intimidated that the other J-list members would retaliate against them if they ratted anyone out, and as a result, said nothing.
You know, she gave Clinton a virtual "Lewinsky" as surely as Monica did. And she's not some giddy little prepster, but a "serious human being" or some other virtuous assessment of herself. And there she admits to being on her knees before Clinton, and now Obama.
Ask Monica what names she was called by the Left.
Journolist Members
1. Ezra Klein 2. Dave Weigel 3. Matthew Yglesias 4. David Dayen 5. Spencer Ackerman
6. Jeffrey Toobin 7. Eric Alterman 8. Paul Krugman 9. John Judis 10. Eve Fairbanks
11. Mike Allen 12. Ben Smith 13. Lisa Lerer 14. Joe Klein 15. Brad DeLong
16. Chris Hayes 17. Matt Duss 18. Jonathan Chait 19. Jesse Singal 20. Michael Cohen
21. Isaac Chotiner 22. Katha Pollitt 23. Alyssa Rosenberg 24. Rick Perlstein 25. Alex Rossmiller
26. Ed Kilgore 27. Walter Shapiro 28. Noam Scheiber 29. Michael Tomasky 30. Rich Yesels
31. Tim Fernholz 32. Dana Goldstein 33. Jonathan Cohn 34. Scott Winship
Sources:
(http://www.politicsdaily.com/2010/06/25/the-death-of-journolist-does-privacy-end-at-the-edge-of-your-th/)
(http://www.politico.com/news/stories/0309/20086.html)
(http://yglesias.thinkprogress.org/2010/06/after-journolist)
(http://hotair.com/archives/2009/03/17/politico-the-secret-liberal-journalist-cabal/)
(http://www.slate.com/blogs/blogs/kausfiles/archive/2009/03/26/journolist-revealed-inside-the-liberal-media-email-cabal.aspx)
(http://justoneminute.typepad.com/main/2009/03/who-doesnt-love-the-journolist.html)
(http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/michaeltomasky/2010/jun/25/usa)
(http://www.frumforum.com/the-inside-scoop-on-journolist)
(http://twitter.com/TimFernholz)
(http://twitter.com/DanaGoldstein)
(http://www.talkleft.com/story/2009/9/22/142845/064?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+TalkleftThePoliticsOfCrime+%28TalkLeft%3A+The+Politics+of+Crime%29)
(http://www.frumforum.com/responding-to-john-hawkins)
You must be logged in to post a comment.