Buried at the bottom of a story published the other day, the New York Times printed a curious little correction:
The Political Times column last Sunday, about a generational divide over racial attitudes, erroneously linked one example of a racially charged statement to the Tea Party movement. While Tea Party supporters have been connected to a number of such statements, there is no evidence that epithets reportedly directed in March at Representative John Lewis, Democrat of Georgia, outside the Capitol, came from Tea Party members.

Let’s go over that again:
- The Times is admitting that there is absolutely no evidence that any epithets were shouted at the Congressman by any member of the Tea Party.
- This correction demonstrates we have finally proven our point to the nation’s most eminent and influential liberal media organ: that Rep. Andre Carson lied when he told the AP that members of the Tea Party hurled the “N-word” 15 times during the March 20 health-care rally that took place at the U.S. Capitol.
That’s great, as far as it goes – a thorough vindication of the Tea Party — but it doesn’t go far enough.
- It’s not enough for the Times to make a correction having let that calumny sit out there unrebuked for weeks and months and then, way after the fact, issue a correction.
- It’s not enough because the Times continues to imply that something racially charged might happened on the steps of the Capitol, when we have shown conclusively, via multiple videos of the moment in question, that nothing of the sort occurred.
It’s not enough because the Times correction is just the beginning. The same correction needs to come from every other major media outlet that blithely repeated this defamation, including the AP, the Washington Post, The Hill, and MSNBC – not just in their news columns, but in their editorials, op-ed and opinion columns and shows as well. Until then, there will be no closure, because the Tea Party will not stop in its pursuit of vindication until the same media effort that went into propagating this lie goes into dispelling it and giving the millions of Americans – 23% of whom are minorities, according to Gallup — their good name back.
Which media outlet is going to have the courage to air the exculpatory videos?
Which will be the first to admit that Congressman Carson lied about the events of that day? That he slandered the Tea Party and had his charges believed by a gullible press corps that did no reporting and pursued no corroboration from among the 400 people and the Capitol Police officers whom Carson claimed had witnessed the event?
Why? Because it didn’t “fit the narrative.’
We are not going to stop until, in our pursuit of justice for the falsely maligned Tea Party, the MSM airs the exculpatory evidence. And to air them is just to expose a massive government-crafted fraud, it shows the moral emptiness at the core of the media. Those videos are the elephant in the room.
What’s at the center of this national racial mess is a cynical political ploy created by President Obama and elected Democrats, and executed with the help of their media allies and activist groups like the NAACP and the Congressional Black Caucus, to gin up the base for 2010 and take the spotlight off a faltering economy, a bungled Gulf oil spill cleanup, a soaring national debt, and a deeply unpopular health care bill.
The long list of victims of the Obama Administration’s race-war-by-proxy strategy continues to grow. Anyone who disagrees with Democrat politics is branded a racist. Anyone who disagrees with the health-care bill is a racist. The exposure of the manufactured N-word lie illuminates better than anything what Mary Frances Berry meant when she said:
Tainting the tea party movement with the charge of racism is proving to be an effective strategy for Democrats. There is no evidence that tea party adherents are any more racist than other Republicans, and indeed many other Americans. But getting them to spend their time purging their ranks and having candidates distance themselves should help Democrats win in November. Having one’s opponent rebut charges of racism is far better than discussing joblessness.
It has to stop.

And so I refuse to shut up over a scandal meant to silence and destroy an organization whose members consider it to be a new awakening of our most sacred founding principles. The opportunity for closure is now, and if the rest of the media is willing to follow their lead (as they have always been wont to do), the New York Times has created that opportunity.
All we ask is for the MSM to correct the record as publicly as they distorted it; to focus for one day on the convincing and overwhelming video evidence that shows beyond a reasonable doubt that the events that Congressman Carson described did not happen and that hundreds of innocent Americans have been unjustly smeared. The outlet that has the courage to air these videos compared to Rep. Carson’s allegations could be the Moses of the media to lead them to the Promised Land, and to begin to start rebuilding the MSM’s tattered reputation.
Until this injustice and cover up is remedied, until the many thousands of Americans who are a part of the Tea Party movement have their good names cleared, there can be no closure.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
407 Comments
I'm sorry, Andrew, but that correction doesn't go far enough for me. They are still implying that epithets were made. None seem to exist on any of the recordings out there. They imply that there were indeed racist insults thrown but there's just no evidence that they came from members of the Tea Party. Which leaves open the possibility that these imaginary epithets were yelled by members of the Tea Party, there just isn't any evidence.
It's a very slimy "correction" indeed.
Everyone is racist, regardless of their skin color or political inclinations. There, can we just get over it and move on?
Keep after the MSM and don't give them time to regroup. Press 'em and press 'em hard.
We are behind you 100% on the Sherrod issue.
What a racist statement.
Actually, according to the Race Merchants, only white people — ALL white people — can be racist because somehow they have power that "the black man" doesn't.
Somehow, this message hasn't gotten through to my black friends who can care less what the Race Merchants say.
Ah…the trolls are busy this morning. Since the label "racist" doesn't mean anything anymore, let's move on to "all liberals are douchebags…and liberal trolls are extra-douchy". Now there is a label you can really hang up for the world to see.
The LSM is just another tool of the progressive left and they will do anything and destroy anybody that tries to stop them. The Tea Party and people like AB and Sarah Palin scare the hell out of them. The majority of people see right through this BS and are are getting their news from anywhere but the "legacy" media. Will the LSM admit that they were wrong regarding the Tea Party? Does Satan plan on buying some ice skate?
Remember November!
You're exactly right Andrew, the correction doesn't go far enough, and it was way too late. But We cannot expect the media to ever change their tone, because they are not journalists. They do not report the news. They do not cover stories that do not advance their narrative. If they are forced to abandon the narrative temporarily, they bury the story, and treat it as an exception. They are already in the tank for reporting that the Tea Party is racist. If they happen to mention that one particular Tea Party federation rejects racism, they will treat it as a fringe of the movement, not representative of the whole, and that it should be regarded as anything but representative of the movement.
THAT WILL NEVER CHANGE. These charlatans will never change their stripes. The new media simply need to drown them out.
How many people read the NYT? How many read Breitbart sites?
Excellent, Andrew! Don't let these MSM weasels squirm out of their race-baiting fraud.
You are a hero and a national treasure to all fair-minded and freedom-loving Americans.
Keep up the great work!
Right on Andrew! Keep up the good work!
However, what you ask will never happen, the MSM is totally vested in leftist ideology and the ruination of the greatest civilization since the dawning of civilized man. The MSM are our enemy, and as we flip this country back to the right, must be dealt with.
Actually, what I think should have happened is this. They can report that Lewis and Carson CLAIMED" epithets were used as long as they also clearly state there is not only no evidence to support the charge, and subsequent emergence of videos of the event tend to essentially confirm just the opposite. In other words, I am okay with fair, even if the left isn't. It is technically almost impossible to completely disprove the charges. Unfortunately, since the left uses race as a political weapon, fairness and facts are not part of their equation.
***The CheesecakeLarry Concept on Liberals***
Like a dog worrying an old soup bone or Linsay Lohan gnawing on an empty bottle of white zin, the left will not let go of the race card. It is a perfect foil for them. They need to hate. And who better to hate? But their imagined haters! Hate the haters. Yup. The left can't stop hating, period. They bus SEIU protesters to Arizona to spread hate and lies. They ban salt, bacon, smoking, prayer, the flag in any and every place they can find. Why? To self-propogate their hate. You can't be a liberal without hating something. Right now, as star center on their buffet table is The Bigs. We find teams of trolls trying (and failing) to derail and infuse racist hatred into forums. We see commentary after commentary on how terrible it is to be a conservative, just saying as much must mean you're a racist.
And having their progressive president (a black/mixed/whatever) man aid them constantly only fuels their hatred.To admit they were wrong would be like having Keith Olbermann salute the flag, both are unimaginable and both would probably cause projectile vomiting on the named parties. What we can do is continue to point out their foolishness. Their ignorance. Their own hatred. Their own racism. Most people already get it. Most aren't as stupid as the MSM thinks they are. The MSM, the president obama, his lackeys, and his adoring followers look like fools. The only thing we can do is act as a mirror and illustrate, not only to others, but to themselves, what true idiots/bigots/racists look like.
You're doing a great service continuing to point out the absurdity of all their racism attacks.
No matter how one views the entire Sherrod situation or how you've dealt with the Congressional Black Caucus, you've now gotten many people, even left leaning media to start to admit that the left is starting to look bad through this, not tea partiers or conservatives. And you've gotten a lot of right leaning journalists to aggressively attack the race baiters for the first time ever.
Perhaps now we will have some democrat minority voters actually look at the situation thoughtfully and maybe even step off the democrat plantation and think for themselves.
It needed to be done, and you've done what nobody has been willing to do.
Keep it up Andrew.
One day, when people understand the scale of black on white violence, we can actually start to push-back against this community of thugs and zombies.
Those isolated incidents you sometimes come across of blacks beating whites aren't isolated…they are acting-out what they have been force-fed in their "homes" and / or black "churches".
Someone, sometime, has got to tell the truth about the scale of the problem of black on white violence. I've had enough of isolated incidents (chaff) of police brutality, or some crazy whites going after a black man. I've had enough of the distraction about black on black crime.
Talk about white on black crime is MEANT to keep us all quiet, and subservient. It works. It's part-and-parcel of the "whites are all racist" and "blacks are all victims" narrative.
Let the truth be told about the ENDEMIC violence perpetrated by blacks on whites and covered-up by the media.
Unless of course your Robert Mugabe, a black panther member, a member of La Raza, or Al Sharpton. Then your a community organizer who rips off the racists to get pay back to be able to use racism to advance a progressive/socialist idea of communities. :0) Oh and of course unless your a crooked black politician, like Jeffords, Waters, or Rangel, than your just another victim of racism when you get caught. ;0)
Get psychiatric help or a dog Mr. Breitbart. You swim in the mud with the rest of the media and it is ridiculous to assume a bunch of dirt bags like WaPo, NYT, NBC and the like will do anything that approaches the truth. In the last two weeks we have born witness to the uncovering of one of the biggest criminal conspiracies of the modern age (JournOlist) and the reaction has been some more dirt and froth that pads the profit margins of the media.
No grand juries have been impaneled…
No special prosecutors have been named…
No FEC or FCC complaints have been filed…
You can't whine about draining the swamp if you are willing to stand there and look the other way.
Sorry, it doesn't work that way. If you aren't going to stand up and make accountability happen, then we have a right to ask what skeletons may be in your closet that are causing you to act in this seemingly hypocritical manner.
The translation of Mary Francis Berry's statement is: "Democrats don't give a damn about joblessness."
is andy saying the media acted stupidly? but unlike obama, andy has the facts before he speaks. now where is the beer summit? i would say invite cleaver over, along with obama. have some laughs, and admit openly that you are a racist, that you hate crackers too. then ask him now how about that crazy doj, and those new black panthers? or whats up with all the spending?
That is the way I read it too.
And do not ever forget that: It's still all Bush's FAULT!
What exactly is "criminal" about the JournOlist? It's certainly repugnant in the extreme that the press would cover the truth about candidate Obama – but criminal? I don't think so. If these news organizations were getting campaign money, then it would be criminal. But they didn't. Freedom of speech means freedom for ALL.
The only way to combat this media collusion and coverup is by exposing it, and Mr. Brietbart is one of a handful of people doing exactly that.
It is a criminal offense to intentionally use the mail, newspaper, wires and/or television to intentionally defraud the public for the purpose of personal gain – it's called wire fraud.
It is a criminal offense to further use said devices to avoid the detection of criminal activity – it's called conspiracy.
It is a criminal offense to act in a coordinated manner (under FEC statutes) with a political campaign to intentionally provide false or misleading information that constitutes a conflict-of-interest unless said contribution is a disclosed campaign contribution and said disclosure also provides notice to reader/listener/viewer of said contribution.
It is a criminal offense to act for fraudulent purposes at the cost and risk of another person or person's property for one's personal gain – conspiracy.
It is a criminal offense under the Organized Crime Control Act of 1970 to act in collusion, for a criminal purpose, in an active, continuous and voluntary manner to defraud the public – RICO.
I agree that they are implying that the Tea Party is still a racist movement.
Stop the presses!
What is this? Do they need a correction of the correction now? This "correction" is nothing more than, "We know that the Tea Party is racist, but we just can't prove it." This is, I think, why there are liberal agitators trying to place racism at Tea Party rallies. They think they "know" the truth, but without evidence, they have to make it up themselves.
Have realistic expectations. The NYT isn't going to agree that they intentionally lied and misled people about the healthcare debate. They would then have to say why: Because they wanted to tar opponents of the Obamacare bill as racist in order to pass the unpopular bill through misdirection!
The NYT would then need to admit they intentionally hid the ACORN mess which Anita Moncrief released to them. The NYT would need to admit they hid the story about Obama's possible affair with a staffer who was suspiciously relocated out of the country. The NYT would be forced to admit they aired stories about McCain's campaign finances while hiding stories about Obama's clearly illegal financing which lied about receiving and giving funding to ACORN.
Then the NYT would need to admit they did all of this, ALL of it, including causing their own readership to revolt and their own profits to be destroyed… Purely in order to push for Marxist changes in the USA.
This would be admitting illegal activity, admitting being accomplices of illegal activities, and admitting they are not just partisan but actually Marxist.
So if they can't swallow all that, be glad they can admit to having lied in a backhanded manner.
Perhaps they could change from Marxism to a new form of enlightened worship: http://colonize.wordpress.com/
This video proves nothing. As you know, the audio is being picked up by the mic which I assume is either on the camera, or attached to the camera. So what we hear is chants from the proximity of the videographer. We really don't know what the Congressmen are hearing, now do we?
For the NYT, this is BIG! Whether they admit it or not, they pay attention to AB and Fox for that matter. They know what they are doing and they may be starting to realize it can't last forever. Just keep the pressure on and never relent.
And I'd hardly consider what the Times "corrected" to be an admission that no epithets were hurled. They say it can't be proven that they came from Tea Party members.
Me too. Maybe they're taking baby steps. It had to just kill them to say even that much. They will never,never call a black man a lier. Unless he's a conservative that is.
How does Andrew Breitbart swim in the same mud as blatant frauds like MSNBC and the NYT?? Last time I looked, he's the one exposing them for their fraud. How is that "looking the other way"?
Your venom is misplaced bro….
"You can't whine about draining the swamp if you are willing to stand there and look the other way. "
What on earth are you talking about? You speak as if Breitbart has the ability to bring a grand jury or name special prosecutors hiimself…
He has had dozens of articles here by many authors giving the Journolist situation more exposure, condemning it the entire time, and that is his job! I guess he's scum to you unless he personally "makes accountability happen"? What would you have the all powerful magic Breitbart do?
I think you may be the one needing psychiatric help sir.
Breitbart you have cojones.
Ignore the evil leftist bastards Andrew, we know the truth, we were there the leftist media wasn't…
The fact that a WaPo article was posted only FIVE MINUTES after the so-called "incident" is VERY DAMNING and they can try to push the lie all they want, "IT" NEVER HAPPENED!
The silence of Lewis, Cleaver and Carson in relation to this "story" says it all, they are afraid of the truth being exposed and they will stop at nothing to silence anyone that does not "tow the line"!
These pricks need to go to prison!
And since it can't be proven, don't you think they jumped the gun when they "reported" that it did come from Tea Party members? Is that what you call journalism? Seriously??
Is there any proof that the N word was hurled at ANYONE that day??
**crickets**
My point was that he makes money off these situations/controversies so it struck me as being a bit lame.
Be prepared for the next line of attack, Andrew.
They're going to start saying "Let it go" and try to make you look obsessed. They're going to say that's old news, yesterday's story. That Americans want to move on to solve the real problems facing them today. When pushed, they're going to say, "But we did issue a correction" (no doubt citing these meager, equivocal comments buried in paragraph 13 on page B10).
Keep up the fight. Be ready for that line of argument.
Good work!
Yes, if they reported that the racist epithets came from Tea Party members, then they were wrong. And no, so far no proof has surfaced. I doubt any will. But the video above does not prove they were not made. That's all I'm saying.
He has the power. Why isn't he outfront demanding a grand jury investigation of JournOlist?
I've gotten psychiatric help and it doesn't change the fact that if he was really concerned about the so-called profession he would be doing a bit more. Perhaps that's misplaced and I should just pray at the feet of the beast like everyone else.
I simply believe the Congressmen.
These two liars, Lewis and Carson are one of the main reason racism still exists amongst some whites.
You believe the congressmen regardless that there is exculpatory evidence that actually proves he's lying…
That's beyond stupid…
I can hear people chanting "Kill the Bill" and booing in those videos, so one would expect that if they were chanting the N-word, you'd hear that too.
Maybe they were whispering the N-word!
What's lame is calling yourself a capitalist and moaning about someone making money doing something that is actually making a difference for conservatives.
There is no proof that they were made. Period. The congressman says he heard it 15 times. With all of the electronic equipment surrounding the scene you'd think at least 1 would've been picked up.
There is, however, ample proof that no epithets were thrown. But you keep believing the lie, you are part of the problem dude….
In rosehips progressive mind, Letting truth get in the way of race pimping is a travesty.
Maybe. But what you should most definitely work on first is to stop being an ankle-biting jackass.
It's his JOB. He's supposed to do this stuff so we can get to the truth. What's lame is someone distracting from the topic at hand to bash Breitbart for being right.
yeah…you are simple.
Where's the exculpatory evidence Hank? Certainly not above. Unless AB has audio from the Congressmens' proximity, there is no exculpatory evidence that I have seen. Show me the evidence.
You have a good point, but I don't care what it does for conservatives. They are no more dedicated to capitalism than the other members of the ruling class and our economic freedom won't start until their tyranny ends.
Fair point.
If everyone is racist, than the word has no meaning.
I'm sorry to say, I agree with you we should "move on" in regards to the fact that the word racism has been raped until it no longer means anything.
The facts are, racism is a real thing, it has a definition, and the problem is racism has been twisted to mean everything.
If you start saying 'everyone is a racist' two things happen, you excuse all the actual racists on the left from the damage they do to society, and you give credence to their propaganda that all whiles are racist, because when you say 'everyone is racist' they'll take that as a confirmation that YOU are racist and then explain how minorities can't be racist because they have no 'power' or some such leftist BS.
The point is, the left is full of racists, it's disgusting and stupid, and I don't want to excuse them by normalise it.
Hank, your proof just doesn't exist. I am not trying to say there is proof. You are. You are wrong; I'm sorry that makes you so frustrated.
At least we have you to thank for a fair and balanced critique of the matter. If you like I'll call the White House and submit your name in nomination as a Fairness Czar. You remind me of those liberal-progressives – any dissent has to be the produce of a diseased mind, conspiracy or other such plot.
Yes, but don't you think that with an accusation as serious as this, we should assume it didn't happen until it is proven otherwise? Wd aren't talking about someone double parking here. Whenever the left accuses the Tea Party of being racist, they cite this incident as the main example. If there's no proof that it did or didn't happen, then it kind of shoots their argument all to hell, doesn't it?
Wow, didn't know my mind worked like that. Thanks Dr. Majic
No, no, no….. The congressman is the one making the accusation. It's HIS responsibility to prove it. Where's his proof? Where's your proof? You don't have any.
In all the videos of that day, not a single N word was heard by anyone except this congressman. You don't think that's a little fishy?? C'mon man, you have to do better than this.
Here we have at the core what is wrong with the sheep in the democrat party. Truth means nothing if it gets even remotely close to thier cause.
I have them occasionally….
It proves exactly that.
The lying Democrat Congressmen stated racial epitaphs were hurled at them…at the location the video was shot, at the time the video was rolling. If people were yelling "n!gger" at them – 15 times no less – then the evidence would be in the recording. And not only that, there was more than one video recorder there…many more. Still, no evidence of anyone screaming "n!gger".
Considering those facts, what is your alternative explanation for the fact that there is no audio to back up the liars claims?
This is the scariest thing about this idiots. They demand that the accused provide proof of their innocence. They believe outright the words of someone who 1) had recording equipment with him at the time and has not provided any evidence with it to support his accusations and 2) had a vested interest in delegitimizing his opposition — the Tea Partiers he's accused.
No, they are willing to take his word for it and anyone he says anything about is required to prove their innocence. How far can this fascistic attitude progress. Scary indeed.
There are millions of people who are extremely upset about this and "could" take on submitting an FEC or FCC complaint, and I'm sure some have had lawyers look into it. You wouldn't hear about it until it happened, and if it doesn't happen it's probably because lawyers don't think they have a case.
Either way, your implication that Breitbart must be the one to lead the charge is pretty lame. He's doing his part, and for all you know he may have already looked into that. He wouldn't broadcast it if he did, so you're living off of assumptions here as it is.
Do you go to every other conservative website and tell them they need psychiatric help and call them hypocrites as well? Or just here? Have you written letters to everybody at the major news networks doing the same? Newspapers?
Have YOU filed an FCC complaint?
So let me get this straight. You admit you have absolutely no proof that the N word was said to this congressman. There are videos with audio that show the N word was not said at all.
But I'm the one that's wrong?? Did you hit your head this morning or something? You make absolutely no sense.
It's frustrating to see an individual knowingly accept a lie and then try to defend it. I feel for you man, I really do….
Brietbart, you should buy the NYT for $1, and pledge to pay off all their debts by publishing superior conservative stories, and you should install yourself as editor and replace the staff except for those who can publish the truth.
http://colonize.wordpress.com/
You want the accused to prove their innocence. That's what you're saying. How your mind works in order to come up with that is nothing I want to know.
I could care less what I remind you of. You're still a whining, ankle-biting jackass.
Tell us, Oh Whining Ankle-Biting Jackass…what is that YOU are doing that outstrips Mr. Breitbart's efforts at exposing the leftist rats for the public?
Retracto Alpaca baby. Good job — NYT is on it's way to taking the big nap in the ink room in the sky.
Newsweek was sold for $1, NYTs would be lucky to get that much.
That grown people will willingly defend an outright lie is disgraceful.
And they have yet to prove they happened at all. Which is why this correction is slimy and bogus. You read it exactly as they meant it and they meant it for puppets like you.
Yes, actually I did pursuant to Section 378 of the FCC statutes. I submitted it last week and have yet to hear of it.
Maybe yours got there first.
First, note the phrase "racially charged." In NYT-speak, that can mean a political disagreement between a white (or even non-white conservative) and a liberal black politician. There is no need for the disagreement to have any racial component.
Next, there is no evidence that any epithets were hurled at Lewis or anyone else. To the contrary, the weight of evidence is that Lewis and other members of the CBC lied. The Times qualifies with "reportedly." And who, exactly, reported an epithet? The Times, the CBC, and the media outlets you mentioned.
Back to the nebulous phrase "racially charged." The NYT wrote Tea Party members "have been connected to a number of such statements." The implication is that these were racist slurs, but even the NYT knows it has to use "racially charged" because it can't prove what it implies: racism.
The NYT issued a half-assed apologia, but that is progress. Real progress will be when left-wing media outlets have the cojones to challenge CBC members who made these claims. That day isn't here yet, Andrew, but fortunately you already have the cojones to usher it in.
It's just astounding isn't it?
This was all premeditated. They took the'martyr's walk' to start it all off. They didn't have to walk through that crowd. And nobody called them the n word. Calculated, every bit of it.
"Drain the DC Swamp"
I agree that those who denounced what they thought was racism ought to be at least as loud in denouncing those who manufactured racial slurs.
On that note, Lewis and Carson should resign. To slap the false label of 'racist' on a group in order to sidetrack a debate about the direction of the country is just plain evil.
Then perhaps I should have said "us conservatives", referring to the vast majority of the readers out here.
I get your frustration but I agree with Hank that it is misplaced.
On Daily Caller I am rainmaker1145
On The American Spectator I am Clinton nee Publius
On IOWNTHEWORD I am Publius
On Townhall I am Clinton
On FoxNation I am rainmaker1145
On POLITICO I am rainmaker1145
On Washingtonpost.com I am rainmaker 1145
On The American Thinker I am Clinton.Lovell
On MediaBistro I am Lammen Gorthaur
I have posted on this matter in every venue. I don't recall your posts, but I assume you wouldn't just throw out those statements unless you were posting on those venues as well – even the liberal rags like Washington Post and Politico. You might visit Politico and see how I have treated Mike Allan, Jonathan Allen, Ben Smith and Laura Rozen. I'm there every day.
well, I switch to Firefox and then I can't comment. I comment in IE and my computer crashes and I lose the comment. damn.
Okay, but the Congressman isn't the one pushing the issue, is he? Maybe that's because he knows anyone who has proof, wouldn't provide it to him. It was a hostile crowd, afterall.
But you can't prove he's lying.
Read below.
I agree with the earlier statement that the New Media will drown them out. That's happening every day, as it has been for some years now.
Perhaps it is. Perhaps it is.
Let me be the first to say,
I am a racist…….I prefer the HUMAN RACE!!!
Do you hear the N word in ANY of the videos?
No but rainmaker1145 has bravely filed an IntenseDebate complaint against Breitbart, risking valuable reputation points and the scorn of strangers everywhere.
Geez, Breitbart could really take a lesson from this guy on what it really means to be brave.
The libs will never apologize. They will only accuse you of the stuff they are actually doing.
So now you're a mind-reader.
Why is it so difficult for you to just re-examine your position on this based on the lack of any proof the N word was used at all that day? Why are you holding onto a losing argument? Why? Are you that far gone down the liberal path that common sense eludes you?
C'mon man, I have faith in you. Think it through. Use some common sense and not some fantasy projection as to what the congressman was thinking. It won't kill you to admit you've got it wrong, no one is going to dance an Irish jig or gloat or any of that crap if you admit you're wrong. Who knows? It might even help you see other things more clearly.
Your 100% correct Hank, rosehips is a Loony Lefty. We too can yell, "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot"."rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". "rosehips is a racist bigot". Let rosehips prove he/she/it is not racist. Because he/she/it most assuredly is racist.
Not just cajones, but devotion to the truth and the courage to direct both toward the preservation of freedom. That is immensely more persuasive than the Obama adulation coming from the guys who tuck theirs between their thighs and wonder aloud about the tingling.
Wow. You filed and complaint…and you post on internet forums.
How earth-shattering.
Thanks for letting the Sun come up this morning.
The only epithets that were hurled both then and now have been against Tea Party members. But you can make fun of us, insult us, try to marginalize us, or denigrate us, and it will not matter one bit. The Democrats and their toady union goons have tried everything in their power to destroy the Tea Party movement. But like the Christians in the Roman Coliseum as the lions were unleashed upon them, they stood tall, refused to budge, and did not give up their faith in a cause that was bigger than themselves. Sure, you may knock off a few, but there will always be somebody to take their place. That's what Obama and the democrats always fail to understand. There will always be more of us and we are not going away. Deal with it, Mr. President.
I'm glad to hear it.
You're welcome. If you would like to learn how to debate and file complaints I'll be happy to instruct you.
You "betcha"!
tell ya what hank, if you promise to dance a jig and put it on youtube, I will concede that the Congressmen might be lying. I just don't believe that they are. They aren't the one's pushing the issue. They don't have proof. Probably never will. You will not get them to retract, I'm pretty sure of that.
MyKu:
Who's Next? Bring 'em on!
Bruce Lee them one at a time;
two if you're froggy.
For some reason you seem to think I've made the same complaint as you or taken the same stance as you, therefore I should have been posting along with you on all those sites? I was simply responding to your accusations at Breitbart and suggested that I hope you're treating every conservative media personality the same way and asked if you've done anything yourself.
According to you you have tried hard to do both to some extent, so I'm proud of you and glad you at least show some consistency. You could possibly frame your argument at the beginning that "Breitbart AND all the other conservative media personalities are doing nothing about it" instead of just singling out the author of that particular site, and perhaps you'll look like less of an idiot.
like I said, the mic was with the camera, not with the Congressmen.
yeah mousie, I don't even want to know how my mind works sometimes. Have you sought help with your flossing addiction?
The accused are the Congressmen. They are accused of lying. They can't prove it. They aren't pursuing the issue, AB is.
You must be logged in to post a comment.