Because the legacy media focused on the persona of Barack Obama and the “historic” nature of his candidacy, rather than anything substantive, it willfully neglected to thoroughly vet his specific campaign promises. Like Washington Irving’s character Rip Van Winkle, the MSM’s critical thinking slept through the campaign, anesthetized by the popular cult of hope and change.
Here’s an example of the MSM just now awakening to what it missed: On March 11, 2010, a Reuters article entitled “Obama facing uprising over new NASA strategy” stated that:
U.S. President Barack Obama is trying to tamp down an uprising in politically vital Florida against a new strategy for NASA that has rankled space veterans and lawmakers and sparked fears of job losses.
Obama’s decision to kill NASA’s Constellation program to launch astronauts into orbit and return Americans to the moon has prompted soul-searching about whether the United States is prepared to cede a pre-eminent space role to Russia and China.
A “new strategy” for NASA? Maybe it will be “new” for NASA, but it’s an old promise Obama made during the campaign.
Obama’s primary campaign document was entitled “Blueprint For Change.” The document was widely ignored by the MSM. The last paragraph of the 15-pages section entitled “Barack Obama’s Plan For Lifetime Success Through Education” read:
IX. A COMMITMENT TO FISCAL RESPONSIBILITY
Barack Obama’s early education and K-12 plan package costs about $18 billion per year. He will maintain fiscal responsibility and prevent any increase in the deficit by offsetting cuts and revenue sources in other parts of the government. The early education plan will be paid for by delaying the NASA Constellation Program for five years, using purchase cards and the negotiating power of the government to reduce costs of standardized procurement, auctioning surplus federal property, and reducing the erroneous payments identified by the Government Accountability Office, and closing the CEO pay deductibility loophole. The rest of the plan will be funded using a small portion of the savings associated with fighting the war in Iraq.
Now compare that paragraph to what candidate Obama said here. Not a match.
USAToday did note the plan for NASA at the time, but only in passing.
To pay for his education program, Obama would eliminate tax-deductibility of CEO pay by corporations and delay NASA’s program to return to the moon and then journey to Mars.
“We’re not going to have the engineers and the scientists to continue space exploration if we don’t have kids who are able to read, write and compute,” Obama said.
Nearly two years ago a piece in a new media outlet, American Thinker, highlighted Obama’s plans for NASA. But the legacy media missed the consequences to NASA and Florida of “delaying” the Constellation program to NASA and Florida.
Meanwhile, Obama carried Florida in the 2008 election.
It’s just one more example of the willful negligence of the MSM, and why it become less relevant, daily.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
53 Comments
The main stream media, our Fourth Estate, our Nations Watchdogs…are nothing but a bunch of nitwits who have made too many trips to Bohemian Grove.
The media is too busy stumbling over each other to quote Dems who are voting for the worst legislation our nation has ever seen, rather than noticing news.
Or like Mr. Savage said a couple of nights ago, "the Fourth Estate has become the Fifth Column"
And wouldn't you know it, "my" representative, Suzanne Kosmas, SOLD her health care vote on a promise not to cut the NASA budget in Florida.
All I can say about Kosmas is that she is both cheap, and easy.
Her congressional career is over, so I wonder what else she was "promised."
Now we won't have real healthcare or a space program…
Only rationing and empty promises…
I'm leaving for Alpha Centuri tonite…
>It’s just one more example of the willful negligence of the MSM,
Nope- sounds like the MSM deliberately buried the Constellation lede to put Florida in Obama's column
democrats only support programs that give them patronage and kickbacks via government unions.
they are elite insiders like the dems. god forbid they lose access to the power-players by telling us the truth.
the shuttle sucked. the new program will provide a far greater capabilities.
Thank you, Ruebacca, for your critical, detailed and insightful analysis.
Ah, you have multiple personalities, we see.
Jones, I thnk you're on to something. Thanks. Archy
Yesterday, Charles Krauthammer declared the MSM to be "supine and credulous" in covering this health care train wreck.
Mr. Krauthammer was being far too charitable.
Years from now, assuming that "Change" hasn't taken over writing of history books and if truly objective historians write about this era, how the MSM willingly, in an orgasm of fuzzy feel-good group-think, allowed itself to be co-opted by the left's radical agenda will provide vast fields of academic fodder for theses, books, programs, and other studies of one of the key elements leading to the downfall of the American Republic.
The fun house-mirrored echo chamber currently crowded with most of the historically and economically ignorant Fourth Estate will seem as strange to them as the era of Prohibition seems to us.
Oh this vote is historic alright, make no mistake about that, but it isn't going to be the kind of historic Obama is hoping for.
I find it ironic that a president who campaigned and complained about outsourcing, is outsourcing our space program to the Russians. The worst part of it is he didn't get anything for it, like a boot on the back of the neck of the Iranians. This is what happens when you elect a man child for president that has no history of any business of any kind. Sorry, but community organizing is not a business, it is simply organizing the rabble, replete with torch, for more bread.
I would add "God Help Us All!" but in reality we had better be saying "God Help Obama!" because the unrest in this country has only just begun.
Actually the shuttle 'poof'd" twice.
Besides fixing the hubble telescope debacle, what did it accomplish?
The 'International" aka US +Russia space station is going to the Russians, and is better serviced by the Russians.
Great post. Thanks. Illustrates the whole point very nicely.
The sooner the "Progressive" MSM dies off (Goes bankrupt and out of business), the sooner the truthful informers can fill the void vacated by the liars, protecting the political agendas they support, while claiming neutrality!!!!
I hate to ever agree with the One on anything (believe me) but he was actually right on cutting NASA. That mess of an organization has been a laughing stock to the science community for years. This is the same organization that put up a completely useless "international space station" which ended up being neither international nor a space station. The Constellation program was ridiculous from the onset and everyone knew it except for the NASA leadership apparently. If NASA wants to be relevant again it's going to need to cut the pseudo science. Unfortunately that's not likely to happen in the current national environment. I think it's time private companies took up exploration. NASA likely is too far gone to be recovered.
However, as usual, the One got it entirely wrong when he said: "We’re not going to have the engineers and the scientists to continue space exploration if we don’t have kids who are able to read, write and compute…"
Compute!? Can the One even "compute"?? I rather doubt the One can handle a simple algebra problem but I digress. Space exploration is one of the things that drive students to science in the first place. It's what drove me to it in fact. Saving NASA is going to require something the One (and others) can't admit: politics trumps science in NASA. Until science is more important NASA will continue to be irrelevant.
If we didn't waste 10 billion a year supporting Isr4el in the Middle East (actually, MUCH more when you include the wars we are fighting for them) we could afford such things. Such is the price of religious quackery like the notion a certain people are entitled to certain land (who else gets this sort of 4ffirmative Action set-aside? NO ONE.) So, it is appropos for the new Dark Ages we are entering where NASA funding is cut so we can fight religious wars.
They will regret their foolishness, if Obama succeeds.
It's not outsourcing to him – he is one with the world.
Native Americans had and have land set aside for them. That's one to disprove your point. You sure do hate Israel. Who would you have us support in that region? Hamas perhaps? I haven't heard you complain yet about all the money we send to Egypt as well, how about them do you hate them as much as Israel? Or is it just the Jewish people in general that you hate. Or is it specifically that your trying to bring back a time when it was ok to hate the Jewish people say circa 1940? Land is taken by force and possessed by force there is no other way about it. Stop with the Jewish hate you brain washed Jim Jones follower sorry Alex Jones. Are you an info warrior?
I don't know where I stand on NASA anymore, I think that they are an important organization but after they jumped in bed with the AGW crowd everything they have to say now days has become highly circumspect. Scientist seem to have crossed the very important line of trust when they started politicizing science. True science does not see left or right only verifiable and repeatable results.
We could be talking about value of the Mauritius Rupee, and Randy would respond with "I hate Israel, why can't Israel die…"
One track, thy name is.
Just look at that NASA stooge James Hansen, and his lifelong quest to squeeze the world's governments for more and more money to combat his mythical anthropogenic global warming.
Though, I think that NASA could still play a critical role in space exploration. The problem with the "Let the Free Market" handle it approach is simple, space exploration is extremely risky. Businesses are subject to their bottom line, and to take a risk as monumental and expensive as putting a man on Mars, with no clear profits to be made from such a venture, is something most businesses won't be prepared to do.
Now if we develop the technology to make good use of the various sources of energy in our solar system, then we'll have the economic impetus to push beyond our current limits. Businesses will have something clear to gain from investing in space exploration.
Speaking of Israel, we should make them a partner in revitalizing our own space program. Theirs has been quite successful, putting up their own home-built network of spy and communications satellites, which makes them one of only eight countries with space-launch capability. And their overall budget is much smaller than other nations, meaning they've managed to keep cost-overruns down.
The Apollo program was the last to yield any useful technology incorporated into ciivilian life. NASA has since become another bloated federal agency collapsing under it's infrastructure into irrelevence.
Firstly, getting government out of the way and letting private industry lead our space efforts will pay off in a way that we've not seen since the government turned over the Unix-based green-screen internet over to the free market.
Secondly, we are headed for a needed civil war in this country.
Uh…they have an established country. The citizens of that country aren't entitled to keep their country's borders as they are? Then will you please tell Canada to hand over British Columbia? It's a beautiful area, but we'll have to change the name. And how about we take over most of Australia. If they aren't entitled to keep their country as is, I'm sure they won't mind giving it to us. Oh, and I kind of want Ireland all for myself. That shouldn't be a problem, right?
There is a huge difference. The Native Americans were actually HERE. We haven't created a separate nation within the US for Chinese which would be comparable to the outsiders who populate the UN creation of "Israel."
Who would you have us support in that region?
Who would you have us support in Africa? Caught you off guard, eh? Where does this false premise spring from that we have to support in that region when we don't elsewhere? Why don't we mind our own business?
Hamas won the elections – I guess you oppose democracy now? (BTW, Israel supported Hamas.)
We send a fraction of the money we send to Israel to Egypt. We ONLY send them money BECAUSE we support Israel. It is the added cost of this inexplicable support of Israel.
Standby, Randy. Middle school will be back in session soon.
So, I guess they don't need that $10 BILLION a year in welfare payment, huh?
From which gate?
So tell us, we all really want to know: Is ignorance truly Bliss?
Before you said it was $3 billion, now it is $10 billion. The former was correct, the latter is not.
Considering that $3 billion dollars is what congress spends on toilet paper and Pelosi's botox, and that Israel gave us the Core 2 Duo processor, co-developed the Arrow with us, developed the drip irrigation now standard in all agriculture and has managed to piss off neo-Nazi idiots, I consider my tax dollars well spent.
"There is a huge difference. The Native Americans were actually HERE."
Jews have been living continuously in Israel since the time the Exodus.
"Hamas won the elections"
Considering that Hamas's mission statement calls for the creation of an Islamic theocracy in place of the Jewish democracy, I'll say this speaks poorly of the Palestinian Arab electorate's own views of democracy, and their people being duped by their Arab "brothers" into becoming a permanent refugee death cult and paramilitary wing of Jew haters.
"Who would you have us support in Africa? Caught you off guard, eh?"
Umm…no, not really, no. Name me an African nation surrounded by other hostile African nations that has repeatedly survived invasions from those nations, which suffers terrorist attacks daily from those nations and whose annihilation is the goal of those nations and subsidiary terrorist fronts? Oh, and that African nation also has to be a multi-ethnic democracy with strong cultural ties to Western Europe and America. Okay, I'll awaiting your answer.
Or an education system
It is a typical utopian socialist philosophy to axe such endeavors which are deemd 'unnecessary" (NASA, the military, et al), shuffling their meager budgets to social programs. The bad economy is simply an excuse – a good economy would have sufficed as an excuse, as well.
GF
I believe it leaves from "HeavensGate" 9PM PT..
The true cost is way more than $10 billion when we include the wars we are fighting for them (and they still want us to attack Iran for them).
Israel "gave" us the Core 2 Duo? LOL! First off, Israel doesn't GIVE anyone anything – they sell it. Secondly, even if you think Israel "gave" it to us because Intel put a plant there how much did THAT cost American tax payers when the plant could have been in the US? See, this cost of supporting Israel is WAY more than the $3 billion on the books.
Jews have been living continuously in Israel since the time the Exodus.
A small amount were living there AND living in peace with their neighbors – it was the Zionists who moved in (mostly convert Jews) who caused the problem. These are people who lived in Russia and the Bronx and Turkey and have no connection to the Jews mentioned in the Bible.
Considering that Hamas's mission statement calls for the creation of an Islamic theocracy in place of the Jewish democracy
If it is "Jewish" then it is a theocracy.
Name me an African nation surrounded by other hostile African nations that has repeatedly survived invasions from those nations
These people who created Israel choose to be surrounded and they chose to make enemies by running off the people living there.
Throwing around "terrorist" has lost its meaning. Israel dropping White Phosphorous on people is terrorism.
Israel can't not be at the same time "multi-ethnic" as you try to imply and a homeland for ONE group. The very existence of the Settlers proves their intent is NOT peace and not being multi-ethnic.
Government and large corporate industry have become one of the same, who is controlling who? What economic system do we really have? Do we have a capitalist free market system?
Corporatocracy" is a better definition of our current economic system, rather than free enterprise capitalism. The number of anti-free enterprise, pro-corporate laws and policies of our government is extensive. When extensive legislation exists to protect corporate interests, our system of "free market" capitalism is compromised. There are many examples of such corporate protection.
When huge amounts of taxpayer funds are given to business interests, the free market is compromised. Many "private" entities survive almost exclusively on taxpayer money. The defense industry is one such example. The only thing "private" about the defense industry is that profits go into the pockets of "private" individuals. Many other industries also gorge themselves at the taxpayer-funded feeding trough. Much of the money that funds HMO"s, health care insurance, and pharmaceutical cartels comes directly from the taxpayer, not private individuals.
You call socialism giving tax payer money to the poor, what than do you call tax payer money that goes to the rich??
Get the politics out of NASA. The private sector should supply (mostly does) the hardware and software. NASA needs a clear set of goals and missions. One of the few things I don't mind my taxes going for as it drives private sector innovations (and future consumer technology) and can be a source of patriotic pride.
Red
I had no idea they were cutting education too..
Good, get rid of the corrupt union bosses…
Yeah, that shuttle sure sucked considering it lasted like 30 years… not bad for 70's technology.
Poofed twice out of how many missions? Sending people out of the atmosphere strapped to a huge fuel container is dangerous no matter what the vehicle they're in.
The Apollo capsule "poofed" on the launch pad, and almost poofed on number 13.
America should NOT be giving up its stake in the space race. Doing so will set up back where we can't catch up.
I know you hate Jews and all… but $10 billion is a drop in the bucket compared to a trillion in "health care" reform no one wants.
Nothing like reading the rantings of an antisemite first thing Sunday morning.
We won't be going back into space. Our time in the sun is now over. But, it will take a long time before we run out of other peoples money. Smile, and don't look your grandchildren in the eye.
I'm leaving for Alpha Centauri tonite…
Ah, my favorite victory option for the Civilization games.
Insurance is not a word usually associated with the power and glory of Hollywood – at least not to outsiders. To insiders, especially those involved in the behind-the-scenes decisions of who will be the stars and what movies will be made, it connotes a sine qua non reality of the entertainment universe. After all, once the media dressing is stripped away, what is the New Hollywood about other than minimizing risk? The stars are no exception to this rule. Sure, it may help a career to have talent, a well-connected agency, and a hot media image, but unless an actor can get insurance, he or she can’t play a part in a major movie.
Recommeneded websites…
[...]Here are some of the sites we recommend for our visitors[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.