Comments on: Rethinking Bush: Why Didn’t the President Fight Back Against the MSM?

By: garment business daily

garment business daily — Wed, 17 Aug 2011 23:00:19 +0000

Websites you should visit…

[...]below you’ll find the link to some sites that we think you should visit[...]……

By: las vegas

las vegas — Wed, 12 May 2010 08:56:13 +0000

As a graduation trip I (an older adult) am taking 4 18 year young women to Costa Rica. By the time we get to the beach we will have spent 5 nights in the Avenal/Monteverde area hiking, and zipping through the jungle. I would like a recommendation for a very nice place to stay with available night life nearby, nice beach/pool, and possible spa? Thanks

By: Soothsayer

Soothsayer — Sat, 06 Mar 2010 20:39:31 +0000

Bush gave us the worst of LBJ and Hoover rolled into one. He saddled us with two military quagmires and an economy on the brink of ruin. Any one of those disasters would have qualified Bush to be a terrible president. All THREE of them make him the worst president in US history. And that's not even counting ignoring dozens of clues that could have prevented 9-11, warrantless wiretaps of US citizens, the criminally slow response to Katrina and the outing of Valerie Plame.

By: Lorben

Lorben — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 19:00:03 +0000

Flim Flam I presume? Oberst Mostrich?

By: LaughOutLoud

LaughOutLoud — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 18:02:53 +0000

Because he wanted to give bridge trolls something to think about, so their pathetic lives would have some semblance of meaning…

By: altfreq

altfreq — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:52:23 +0000

eor said: "Keep in mind that he rebuilt the military that Clinton had decimated. He put our surveillance capabilities back in place."

eor, do you have any proof of this?

eor said: "And for 8 years the democrats did nothing to help with anything–just bashed him."

If this is true, why did the Democrats support bush's unnecessary war in Iraq? Do you have any examples of the Democrats "bashing" bush?

By: altfreq

altfreq — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:48:53 +0000

HiPlainsDrifter said: "[bush] aggressively kept us safe."

If that's true, why did bush allow terrorists to murder 3,000 people on 9-11?

By: altfreq

altfreq — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:45:48 +0000

Lorben said: "I didn't agree with all of GW's policies, many were to liberal for me, but I knew he had a handle the security of the country…"

If bush had a handle on the security of the country, why did he allow terrorists to murder 3,000 people on 9-11?

By: altfreq

altfreq — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:43:35 +0000

I guess that means southern gentlemen go AWOL, snort coke and drive drunk – all things bush did.

By: altfreq

altfreq — Sat, 27 Feb 2010 17:41:48 +0000

Mago said: "I didn't always agree with his policy (or the lack thereof) but the insane lies perpetrated by the media should have been addressed and frequently."

Mago, what did the media lie about?