A week ago, news began to break in San Francisco about a targeted gay-bashing crime that allegedly occurred on February 26.
Three cousins from Hayward have been charged in San Francisco with a hate crime and assault for allegedly firing a BB rifle at the face of a man they believed was gay, an attack the men videotaped, authorities said Wednesday.
Investigators believe the assailants chose the victim because he appeared to be gay. When the men were pulled over, police found a video camera that was used to film the shooting, investigators said.
Clearly, of course, this had to be a Christian right-wing, tea party, anti-government, bigoted homophobe from the South. Right?

The three men, Shafiq Hashemi, 21, Sayed Bassam, 21, and Mohammad Habibzada, 24, the driver, were arrested.
According to [police spokesman Officer Samson] Chan, they allegedly admitted to the crime.
“The suspects did make a confession, basically stating that they came to San Francisco to target gay people,” he said.
But what is strange about the media reports is that the identity group, nor the motives, of these three “urban youths” is never mentioned in any news accounts. San Francisco Chronicle get it right? No dice. How about the local TV stations? Get real. The Associated Press?
Ha!
Imagine, if you will, that the BB gun attackers had been white. Or from Utah. Or from Texas. Or Laramie, Wyoming. What kind of wild adjectives would have been applied? We can only surmise. Editorializing against mainstream Americans who are now out-of-favor by the media (whites, Catholics, evangelicals, Mormons, conservatives) happens everyday on America’s front pages and network news programs. But when it comes to Arab/Muslim attackers — all silence is golden for the American media.
Predictably, the gay media outlets and left-wing bloggers continued their head-in-sand approach in the reporting of this Muslim-on-gay violence in America’s homo mecca. The leading gay magazine in America, the Advocate, is silent about the identity or motives of the men aside from their names. Again, one can only imagine if these were “Christianists” on an anti-gay BB gun field trip to San Francisco.
The silence of the Muslim angle is also deafening by left-wing gay bloggers Towleroad, JoeMyGod. But at least they took notice. No such luck over at Pam’s House Blend and Andrew Sullivan’s Daily Dish. You would think Sullivan, who once claimed to recognize the threat to gays by Islamic radicals, would have picked up on the story. Nope. Andrew must not have heard about the incident. Convenient.

Folks who aren’t in tune with the American gay community need to understand something fundamental. The gay liberal activists and thought leaders that make policy and advocacy decisions have long ignored the existential threat to gays and lesbians by Islamic extremism. Liberal “gay rights” groups such as the Human Rights Campaign, the Gill Foundation, and the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force are far more concerned about attacking American Christians on a daily basis than facing the real threat to gays around the world.

I’ve never seen this kind of display in a public square in America. Keep in mind, this was an Iranian government-sanctioned, religious-law execution performed because these teenagers were accused of being gay.
The hangings of gays is routine punishment in Iran and other Islamic-ruled nations. But the American Gay Establishment is too concerned about court-forced marriage, educational indoctrination of kids and Federal funding to worry about such trivial matters as systematic killing of gays by Islamic regimes. Or the looming threat to American gays and lesbians on our shores.
Just last month, the blog Creeping Sharia reported on disturbing comments by Vanderbilt University’s Muslim chaplain.
I go with what Islam teaches,” said Awadh A. Binhazim, who is listed on the Vanderbilt website as “Adjunct Professor of Islam at the Divinity School” and an adviser to the Muslim Student Association. His comments came earlier this week at a diversity event for students.
He was asked directly, “Under Islamic law is it punishable by death if you are a homosexual?”
Binhazim said, “Yes. It is punishable by death.”
Lovely. Watch the video and realize that this is happening on a college campus in Nashville, Tennessee, not Saudi Arabia.
But hey — let’s demonize, character assassinate and hunt down American Christians who oppose gay marriage first, shall we? Priorities.
It is also important to note that the fundamental philosophies of a majority of the American gay activist community have been rooted with elements of anti-capitalism, anti-democracy, anti-war, and anti-Israeli sentiment for the past three decades. You could not have attended an anti-Iraq war rally in 2003-2007 without seeing many rainbow flags (the unofficial symbol of gays and lesbians) mixed in with pro-communist, anti-capitalist, anti-Bush and anti-American signs, symbols and chants.
In order to be gay and part of “the community” in America, you must first renounce “the mainstream,” your individualism, liberty, capitalism, the Constitution, the basic right to vote and your patriotism. All those checked? Join the club!
To fight against Islamic terror against gays is completely foreign to the DNA of the American gay establishment. To them the enemies are Republicans, white and straight men, and the US military.
When it comes to the threat of Muslim-on-gay violence in San Francisco or around the world, the American gay community truly takes a “don’t ask, don’t tell” approach.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
564 Comments
"America's homo mecca?" Dude. Seriously.
Oh please, Shafiq Hashemi, Sayed Bassam, and Mohammad Habibzada are very common names at my Christian church.
A Christian/Muslim pact might just save America. But it's only a dream.
Looks like the gays are showing their bigotted intolerance to religious people.
Well if San Francisco isn't, what is? Why the comment? Is it the word "Mecca" combined in an article about Muslim youths offensive? That's like being offended by calling Chicago the mecca of deep-dish pizza.
The enemy of my enemy is my friend. If conservatives are worried about Islamic fundamentalists, then the gay activists are with them. I'm sure if you ask them, they would tell you this would never have happened if Bush hadn't invaded Iraq.
The term race- traitor has been coined, does this mean gays attacking christians for their beliefs and blow off (no pun intended) muslim murdering are stupid, thus irradicating the steriotype of gays being above avg. intelligence. But there are exceptions, I've met many a smart conservative gay.
[...] My second post is up at Big Journalism! I’ll give you a preview, but you have to go there to read the whole thing. Imagine, if you will, that the BB gun attackers [in San Fran] had been white. Or from Utah. Or from Texas. Or Laramie, Wyoming. What kind of wild adjectives would have been applied? We can only surmise. Editorializing against mainstream Americans who are now out-of-favor by the media (whites, Catholics, evangelicals, Mormons, conservatives) happens everyday on America’s front pages and network news programs. But when it comes to Arab/Muslim attackers — all silence is golden for the American media. [...]
Let muslims, liberal and gay media continue to "hide their heads in the sand". It will just further their self-imposed marginalization. We can already see their decline. I hope it continues.
I wonder, will Morris Dees and The Southern Poverty Law Center be on the scene to investigate?
The mind-numbing 'political correctness' of the the Left in general, and homosexuals in particular, can get them killed…
…and all of us, eventually.
Islam is both a political system and a religion. It is a statist, totalitarian system that seeks to destroy all other religions and political systems. Cooperation with statists leads inexorably to statism. In short, Islam is by its nature incompatible with both Christianity and with liberty, and thus with the guarantees of liberty in the US Constitution.
I thought it was rather clever of the author, actually. LOL
No, it would never work. Christianity wants you to choose to do right. Islam compels it, often on pain of death.
Liberals would rather be politically correct than ALIVE.
Do these gay 'activists' think that somehow they will be spared from Islamic facists, once the US government is destroyed or neutered?
Silence in the face of a real and lasting threat, promotes ignorance and willful blindness.
Gays are an integral part of the Liberal/Progressive statist movement. Thus, they are in favor of anything that weakens the guarantees of liberty found in the Constitution and in the fabric of our history. Islam is both a religion and a statist totalitarian political system that seeks to destroy all other forms of religion and government. Islam weakens liberty in the US, and thus the Gay/Progressive movement doesn't just ignore it, they condone it.
To every statist, promoting Progressivism isn't just the main thing, it's the ONLY thing they are interested in. Gays are no exception. Neither are any other Progressives who also happen to belong to any other "minority" group. None of this should be a shock to anyone, by now.
يبدو تلك الماعز حدب المسلمين في الامر مرة اخرى. الله أكبر! لا استطيع ان ننتظر لنرى سان فران نان في الثوب.
At least he was finally honest in his answer. I asked a Muslim who was on a local talk radio show how they dealt with the Principle of Abrogation, and only got the runaround. Too bad, his honesty won't be heard or believed by the gay community, useful idiots indeed.
Liberal and the MSM are not playing for the American team.
No. It's like calling Chicago America's coon mecca, not like calling Chicago the mecca of deep-dish pizza. It's the use of a derogatory term to refer to any minority group. It is wrong. Plain and simple. It discredits the author, his article and this website for allowing it to be posted. It hurts all of us, it lessens what we are trying to achieve here. Tolerating it on this website makes us all look like ignorant bigots. That is what feeds the liberal hate machine; it allows them to show this kind of posting as evidence.
when contemplating the future, one wonders what will be the response from gays when Muslim youths round up homosexuals throughout the world and execute them. Will they continue to vote for the likes of Obama? Or, as has been the case in the past, will they will run to their parents (conservatives) to save them. One curious thing I came across recently, was that in Afghanistan there is an enclave of homsexuals who run around much like they do in San Fransicko. When the Taliban was in power they were afraid to confront this particular tribe. Was this becuase the Taliban are closet homsexuals? I don't think so. I think it is because this tribe actually had lots of weapons and were prepared to defend themselves. This obviously can't happen in San Fran or europe because the dummy's are the ones insisting noone have guns. Oh what a crazed world.
Stated goals of the Communist Party, from the Congressional Record, 1963, include:
25. Break down cultural standards of morality by promoting pornography and obscenity in books, magazines, motion pictures, radio, and TV.
26. Present homosexuality, degeneracy and promiscuity as "normal, natural, healthy."
The gay rights movement and modern "acceptance" of homosexuality owes everything to Progressivism. It is their master, and gay Progressives are its very willing slaves.
Your link didn't work………
Muslim societies are backward and regressive. In the next 40 years India, China will reestablish there cultural greatness but the Muslim world will remain retarded as it has spent the last 1300 years.
I can think of no greater curse than to leave with Islam.
Ah, it must be the word "homo." I didn't know "homo" and "coon" were cut from the same cloth, at least for some people. Me? Not so much. And if you think the "liberal hate machine" needs to source this site as evidence of hate, you're living in a fantasy world. They make it up as they go along.
I agree with you.
The liberal hate machine is located in Oz. They don't need this site. Just aske Eric Massa.
It's amazing to me how people will stay silent to their own detrimate to satisfy some politically correct code . Where are the comments from the gay people? Why don't you speak out against muslims the way you do christians? That question has always baffled me. Christians vote against gay marriage, muslims vote against gay life. Is there really any comparision?
OMG! You said the "R" word!!!!
If anything, "Paul" proves the point that this article is making.
He sees the picture of two teenagers being hanged ("accused" of being homosexual) in Iran. Does that motivate any "outrage" from this guy?
No.
It's the "audacity" of this site that dared use an "offensive" word.
How absurd.
"Now cut that out" – Jack Benny
One need only to look at what has happened in Great Britain to see the future of our world. They are so PC that they are destroying their country. And where have the likes of NOW and NARL been when seeing what the Islamic nuts do to the women of their culture? As mentioned above, Islam is not a religion! It is a way of life with courts, juries and executioners all in one. It is a religion of what you cannot do in every aspect of your life and it proscribes the punishment for that transgression. Any Muslim will follow the laws of Sharia before the laws of our nation. If the gays are too dumb to realize that then they will pay with their heads, literally.
Two words: Geert Wilders
too bad the talking heads at Fox have been bashing him.
these aren't sheepherders in Laramie, Wyoming………….well maybe that's not the best choice of locations.
welcome to the barbary coast, really this time.
Damn. The only arabic I know is numbers. Had to figure out which floor I was going to in elevators, or how far away we were from our destination on street signs in Dubai.
Progressives, populists, intellectuals, elitests, liberals, gays, all these social/political groups pushing for a Socialist America should be careful what they wish for.
Somehow they think a new Socialist America will look to them as heroes and leaders, that they will reap the rewards of a government run utopia which will take care of their every need.
They really should study history and find out who will be rounded up and exterminated FIRST, pre WWII Russia would be a good place to start. Social parasites, enemies of the people, government bureaucrats, minorities, deviants, rounded up and either shot or sent to the Gulag labor camps to die, about 20 million in all.
I'm guessing that your public indoctrination school education did not spend much time on that part of history, right? Other than a few rulers, Socialism only allows silent, dumb workers.
Video – The Obama Deception
http://usataxpayer.org/?0071119896
Be Good Pinkos, Hand in Your Guns
http://usataxpayer.org/?0079012351
A veritable Homosexual Revolution!
Socialism
Ah, Abrogation. The 'dirty little secret' that the muslim apologists don't want anyone to know about.
Shout it from the rooftops, my brother.
Socialist
social
5ocialist
olist
ocialist
ocialism
Alas, the term "gay" is generally accepted to mean anyone who is homosexual. I agree that not all homosexuals are Progressives/Liberals, but certainly anyone who is part of the gay rights movement is, by definition, a Progressive. One cannot be in favor of granting special rights to minority groups of any sort without being a statist.
My understanding from homosexual friends and acquaintances is that acceptance into the "family," the "gay community," is conditioned on a great deal of conformity with the politically correct values that most people associate with the gay rights movement. It is very, very tough (from my understanding) to be openly conservative and yet be a member of the gay community.
Doubtful. As the article succinctly points out, there will be no outrage from the left unless the accused is from podunk, Idaho, or a 'right-wing' hate group, like white people, or…..white people.
Progressives, populists, intellectuals, elitests, liberals, gays, all these social/political groups pushing for a SociaIist America should be careful what they wish for.
Somehow they think a new SociaIist America will look to them as heroes and leaders, that they will reap the rewards of a government run utopia which will take care of their every need.
They really should study history and find out who will be rounded up and exterminated FIRST, pre WWII Russia would be a good place to start. Social parasites, enemies of the people, government bureaucrats, minorities, deviants, rounded up and either shot or sent to the Gulag labor camps to die, about 20 million in all.
I'm guessing that your public indoctrination school education did not spend much time on that part of history, right? Other than a few rulers, SociaIism only allows silent, dumb workers.
Video – The Obama Deception
http://usataxpayer.org/?0071119896
Be Good Pinkos, Hand in Your Guns
http://usataxpayer.org/?0079012351
"The hangings of gays is routine punishment in Iran and other Islamic-ruled nations"
heh – there are no gay people in Iran, ah who cair's
Yes, it is a dream because it would only work in fantasy.
Islam and liberty go together like Bill Maher and humility.
Gays are used by liberals when they need them as a mascot for a liberal cause.
Whoa, whoa, whoa. This can’t be right! Ahmadenijad said there were no gays in Iran.
Unfortunately, alot gets lost in the reverse Google translator.
Allah-u akbar comes back as "Aleilulia" (sp).
Didn't Ach! My Gin is Bad say that there were no homosexuals in Iran when he was at Columbia a few years ago?
I think we all know why, but the homosexuals in the audience at the time sat on their hands.
Good point… the picture is what stuck with me… it's probably going to distrub me all day…
Prosecute these muslim perverts. Stick them in prison so they can be welcomed with open, whatever.
No, they will still ignore it. Their dedication to Progressivism is all that matters to them. By this, I mean that the "gay movement" homosexuals will ignore it; other homosexuals really have no voice in the MSM.
[...] Big Journalism: Media and gay rights movement are afraid to confront violence against gays when it is done by Muslims. [...]
UltraC, inspectorudy, et.al
I am a lesbian and my politics run towards the traditionalist/conservative side. I waved bye-bye to the last of my liberal illusions 15 years ago. I agree with much of what you all have had to say and I am a lonely voice in the wilderness when it comes to my gay brethern. I have few gay friends because of my politics. Let me throw a further theory out there. What could gays and Arabs possibly have in common? The desire to have sex with underage boys. Why else do the major gay groups make room for NAMBLA under their tents (even if they are kept very hush, hush)? And everyone knows from their history that Greeks and Arabs had sex with young boys as a matter of course. The Greeks do not have that attitude anymore, but the Arabs…..did you ever wonder why they degrade their women so much? They hate women and love men. Anyone with me?
"…then the leftist gay activists are with them."
But they're not, are they? They're missing in action because leftist gay activists believe the higher priority is to destroy the traditional way of life in America – just like the Islamic fundamentalists.
So, you point is correct: "The enemy of my enemy is my friend." The enemy of Islamic fundamentalists and leftist gay activists is the same – the traditional way of life in America. Thus the leftist gay activists do not criticize Islamic fundamentalists and Islamic fundamentalists are reluctant to criticize leftist gay activists in the West.
I remember when people just did'nt want meddled with, and that was their goal, not special priveledges. Activists want special rights and get in your face with whom they are, what occurs with consenting adults in private is generally accepted, except by people who hate themselves. An activist who wants a church to go against established mores or they should be destroyed hates themselves and should be prayed for and helped to accept themselves as one of the variety of God's children who is loved for just existing.
I would've said "Bill Maher and humor", but yours works too.
Only if there's some money to be made out of it
the hypocrisy of the gay community is so obvious… like the feminists who ignore the Palin bashing.. and the CBC, who like to yell 'racism'! at every turn, but seem to ignore any kind of racial statements when they come from a liberal. these groups all lack convictions, as much as they try to appear righteous.
Are you kidding? They* murdered gay Dutch politician Pim Fortuyn- not a peep from the Dutch gay community. Gangs of Mahometan 'youths' roam Amsterdam beating up gays- silence.
You see, Muslims are a Certified Victim Group and can do no wrong. Since as people of (perceived) color they rank higher on the Oppression Scale than white homosexuals, they get to attack them at will- this is the perverse 'moralty' of the Left.
*Yes- although he was killed by a kook environmentalist, it was at the behest of the Followers of Mahound.
Hey lost, wouldn't that be the "Barbary Boxer Coast"?
JohnK144 wins. Flawless Victory.
When Christians to got Israel they are spat on.
http://www.haaretz.com/hasen/pages/ShArt.jhtml?it...
If it doesn't fit their paradigm, they won't choose to acknowledge it. Muslims are the fellow oppressed; therefore, they are brothers in the fight.
Projection.
USSR funded rabble rousers were behind the Unionization movement in the US. They believed that the Industry Bosses and the workers would never compromise with each other and a war would result. However, compromises were made and both sides benifitted. For a while.
USSR funded rabble rousers were also behind part of the Civil Rights movement, trying to create violent confrontations that was to degenerate into a race war. Why? Russians despise Blacks and they would never treat Blacks as equals. They projected that into the US, being misled by the slavery era.
The "intellectuals" who came up with the two points you mention believed that those two points would destroy the US, because they were control freak prudes who believed that "uncontrolled behavior" was destroying the USSR. They did not realize that none of that was really important.
("Promiscuity" and "Degeneracy"? Specifics, please. Some would argue I am a degenerate for admiring the butt on a woman young enough to be my grand daughter.)
It has been speculated that one of the newer suicide bomber recruiting tactics is for an older man to rape a young boy and then shame him into thinking that he needs to blow himself up to gain redemption.
Agreed. I didn't really notice it when I read the first time, I had to go back and look for it again.
Well, considering muhammed said that not only will they get 72 virgins, but also young boys "like pearls", speaks volumes.
Hatred of God is the gay communities number One and ONLY issue
Islam and San Francisco – I can't think of 2 groups more deserving of each other.
When I hear this stuff, I really do pity these folks. Not the hard-minded extreme activists and leaders, but the poor youth of America who experience same-sex attraction. These kids get led down the garden path and shoved into a "gay box" that tells them "you're gay- here's how you should act, where you should hang out, and what you should care about". I think there is a lot more peer pressure to conform within the gay community than there is within a traditonal values household.
Actually JohnK144 proves my point. How does he know I'm not outraged by the photo? Talk about liberals making it up as they go!
Also, this site is here to point out the hypocrisy of the liberal MSM and to hold them accountable. Do we do that by being hypocritical and not holding ourselves accountable?
The author uses a slur while ridiculing the MSM for not covering what is not a hate crime. If it's illegal to commit homosexual acts in Iran and the punishment is death and they committed those acts then it's not a hate crime to put them to death. It's repugnant, ignorant and disgusting, but it is not a crime in Iran. They are a sovereign nation with their own laws, however stupid I think they may be.
Why don't you tolerate their religion if you expect others to tolerate yours? You don't like it so much when someone points out your own hate and intolerance. This site doesn't need hateful bigots, it needs intelligent input from credible sources. Dumbells who don't even know they're using offensive language when they are don't belong here. (Remember how upset these sites got when Harry Reid made his comments about Barry O. Can't have it both ways, ladies). You make us real conservatives look bad.
" who cair's" +1
That's sick and perverse enough to be credible!
"Bill Maher" and "photogenic".
You spit on the English language.
Nah, they are currently fixated on Oath Keepers…
Is that Kevin Jenninig's sweetie Harry Hay in the marchers photo?
http://www.towleroad.com/2009/02/report-al-qaeda….
http://news.sky.com/skynews/Home/World-News/Iraq-...
Apparently, it's a tactic used for recruiting both men and women. It depends on how credible you find the reports of course.
Really? I did not know that.
How familiar are you with Mo Dees? He is a thoroughly dangerous man.
While it is refreshing that you are commenting on attacks on gay people I can't help but suggest conservatives are as hypocritical as the Left. The Left condemns antigay bigotry when Christians do it and often fall silent when Muslims are involved. The Right condemns antigay bigotry (sometimes) when Muslims do it and then try to enshrine it into law when Christians are involved.
Some would be right, only in the old days we would have called you a "dirty old man." That being said, all of have sinned and come short of the glory of God. I do not claim to better than people who engage in sexually deviant behavior, I'm just glad that homosexuality isn't destroying me the way it has destroyed the lives of close friends of mine.
I'm not sure what you mean by saying, "They did not realize that note of that was really important." I would respectfully disagree that "none of that was really important."
So Paul, a gay author (see his bio) refers to SF as a gay mecca and you think its hypocritical? Dude your thought process needs some work.
If gays get bashed in San Francisco, do they make a sound?
Familiar enough to know Dees and his Organization usually goes after who ever he considers to be 'hateful, extremest or racist'.
Amen. I think you hit th nail on the head about peer pressure. It has always seemed to me that the only nonconformists in society are those who refuse to belong to any group whatsoever. Groups are by definition "conformist."
For example, the whole Goth thing. Goths are supposed to be nonconformists, yet they all dress alike, have the same hairstyles, makeup, beliefs, and so on. I guess they would say that their GROUP is nonconformist. So now we have nonconformist groups made up of —-> conformists. Ridiculous, and for many, very sad.
"How does he know I'm not outraged by the photo? Talk about liberals making it up as they go! " Why yes, since that was what you focused on was a word, not a crime.
And I don't care what "the law" is in Iraq. It has nothing to do with tolerance and NOT tolerating the death penalty for sodomy is the way I roll.
Frankly, I find nothing remotely conservative about you, Paul.
why did they only have a bb gun obama stimulus should have provided at least an ak 47
They have no qualms about raping women, especially in front of the woman's man.
They seek a "Rainbow Coalition" of Progressives to counter the number of non-Progressive freedom loving normal Americans. Because America is dominated by non-Progressives, the Progressives cannot allow any dissension in the ranks whatsoever.
Now THAT's gay bashing.
Here is a link for you:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.a...
If you are not familiar with it, you might like it. it is my favorite resource site.
Mo Dees in my opinion is nothing but a kinky haired Hebe, a shakedown artist of the first order, who taught Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson how to play the game. The Southern Poverty Law Center ranks at the very bottom of all 501(c) 3 charities ranked. Dees shakes down folks, and uses the money as his own personal piggy bank.
He is a POS.
Here is a link for you:
http://www.discoverthenetworks.org/groupProfile.a...
If you are not familiar with it, you might like it. it is my favorite resource site.
Mo Dees in my opinion is nothing but a kinky haired Hebe, a shakedown artist of the first order, who taught Al Sharpton and Jessie Jackson how to play the game. The Southern Poverty Law Center ranks at the very bottom of all 501(c) 3 charities ranked. Dees shakes down folks, and uses the money as his own personal piggy bank.
He is a POS.
Argh. Yup. "none"
The Filipinoes I work with are from that part of the Phillipines where homo behavior is just a personal idiosyncracy. It has no apparent effect on anything else (including their religious lives), on or off the job. I've also worked with many homo's (of both genders) on other jobs without noting any problems.
People who are problems on the job due to sexual inclinations can be of any persuasion, and either gender. They just don't control themselves.
Now, drugs, they are a problem and I've seen a lot of people destroy themselves that way.
A complete overstatement and oversimplification, to be sure, but not gay bashing, IMHO, because there is an element of truth. I find it difficult to see the open hatred that many gay activists display toward Christians as anything but a sign that those folks hate God. You can argue that gay hatred of Christians is just a reaction of Christian "hatred" of gays. But Christians don't hate gays.
When it comes down to it, really, gay activists are Progressives, and Progressives hate God. That's the real source of the hatred.
(heheheh) "Non-conformists" who look like clones. Always good for a chuckle.
You must be logged in to post a comment.