Last week, Air America announced its official closure and intention to file Chapter 7. For those who had been following news surrounding the weeping willow of talk radio, this was no surprise. While making a thin-kid splash with pseudo-celebrities back in 2004, the liberal network had a rocky history, replete with scandal, two bankruptcies and acquisitions.
Last week, Big Journalism’s James Hudnall reminded readers that Air America’s problems are not new. According to Hudnall, “After a scandal involving misappropriated funds from black school children it promptly filed for chapter 11 bankruptcy two years later. Franken, Rhodes and Garofalo abandoned ship.” (Come to think of it, perhaps that last part wasn’t so bad after all).
While Air America’s demise is surely a sad day for the precious few who enjoyed leftist radio programming, there’s no need for liberal lamentations. The left still dominates Hollywood, the university system and mainstream media, where adherents can find ongoing solace and a sympathetic informational stream – a triangular dominance of sorts.

What is most interesting about Air America’s silence is the clamor coming from angry liberals, particularly those at the painstakingly partisan Media Matters for America. As can be expected, Media Matters’ Jamison Foser issued a statement that attacks conservative critics entitled, “The Right might want to hold off on gloating over Air America’s demise.”
After reading the title, I was sure I would understand exactly why, from Foser’s perspective, conservatives should withhold celebratory commentary; I was sadly mistaken. In the brief posting, Foser attempts to offer two reasons why conservatives shouldn’t make the case that there is no viable market for “liberal news” – and fails miserably. According to Foser,
You can either claim that ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/NBC/NPR/NYT/WAPO/ETC are “liberal media,” or that there is no market for liberal media — but not both. Please pick one. Thanks!
The Washington Times has been losing money for two decades. In the early days of Fox News, Rupert Murdoch paid cable companies $11 per subscriber to carry FNC (and Rudy Giuliani pressured Time Warner to carry the outlet in New York City.) Point being: conservative media outlets have succeeded not only because of market forces, as conservatives would have you believe, but because right-wing billionaires like Murdoch and Rev. Moon have been willing to subsidize them.
The simplicity present in this analysis is astounding. First and foremost, research backs up the notion that outlets like CBS News and the New York Times are biased, but even if there were no scholarship to corroborate this notion, Foser’s argument makes little sense. Most conservatives aren’t claiming that liberal media outlets can’t succeed (though the left has had a tough time pushing unabashedly liberal outlets to the top); they’re making the case that liberal radio, absent public monies, cannot stand on its own. Those are two very different ideals. Air America never picked up the steam needed to forge its way to victorious ratings. Last week, the L.A. Times said it best:
The New York-based Air America kicked off in March 2004, aiming to be the antithesis of Rush Limbaugh’s and Sean Hannity’s shows. In comparison to the staunch, multimillion followings of those commentators, Air America didn’t quite hit the mark or even come close. An insufficient number of people tuned in.
Additionally, Foser’s statement that The Washington Times has lost money for decades is a silly corroborative comment. Tell me Mr. Foser, how many newspapers are posting record profits these days? Also, it’s curious that Foser would rail against Murdoch’s support for FOX News, a network the media mogul, himself, founded. I suppose use of his own monies to invest in FOX’s future was morally reprehensible in comparison to the $875,000 that was transferred to Air America from the Gloria Wise Boys & Girls Clubs – a publicly-funded, non-profit organization that served children and seniors – back in 2004. After all, why filter the money to children in need when you can use it for political gain?
This loan arrangement was allegedly orchestrated by Evan Montvel-Cohen, Air America’s first chairman, while he was still the director of development for the Gloria Wise Boys and Girls Clubs. Apparently, Foser sees a larger moral problem with using one’s own monies (otherwise known as entrepreneurship) for the betterment of one’s business activities than he does with alleged financial shenanigans. Interestingly, Cohen was subsequently arrested on unrelated charges. The New York Post has more:
Evan Montvel-Cohen was picked up by border-patrol officers at Guam International Airport on an outstanding warrant from Hawaii. He had been indicted there last month for money laundering and the theft of more than $60,000 from a Honolulu landscaping firm, prosecutors said.

Of course, all of that failed to make its way into Foser’s drivel. Apparently, Americans are to believe that left-wing billionaires like George Soros do not exist and therefore cannot fund massive liberal think tanks and other related bastions of leftist garble. According to DiscovertheNetworks.org:
…Soros and his Open Society Institute pour millions of dollars into the coffers of MoveOn, the Center for American Progress, and Democracy Alliance. In turn, these organizations funnel some of that money to Media Matters.
The notion that FOX News has become popular merely because billionaires are behind it is insane at best. And just to be sure you caught the hypocrisy — did I mention that Media Matters is also alleged to have major investors backing its work as well? Kettle or pot, Mr. Foser?
In recent times, Americans have come to trust FOX to break stories mainstream media simply refuse to touch; this carries over to special events, particularly those with partisanship at their core. This is exactly why the Huffington Post reported on Massachusetts’ special election coverage constituting the network’s “…biggest night since Election Night 2008, averaging a staggering 6.161 million total viewers in primetime. For comparison, that’s almost double CNN (1.503 million total viewers), MSNBC (1.138 million total viewers), and HLN (668,000 total viewers) combined.” People trusted FOX News to give adequate and fair information about Scott Brown more than they did the other networks.
The FOX News business model has worked. Unfortunately, liberal talk radio has proven unsustainable – even in the New York City market. Air America’s failure should serve as a lesson to the left, not another vapid opportunity to defend tattered pride. If anything, FOX’s model has helped the left raise MSNBC’s insanely low ratings, as the network has added more leftist ideologues to its roster. It will certainly be interesting to see where the left goes from here.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
46 Comments
The fact is there was no viable market for True 'hate radio', even among the leftists, liberals and Democrats. You'd have to hunt on shortwave to find anything even remotely like it on the Right.
When you are born of a false premise, have absolutely ZERO entertainment value and are constant;y ripping at the fabric of your own country, you have set up a recipe for failure…
Screw Air America! Who wants to listen to their crap anyway?
"You can either claim that ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/NBC/NPR/NYT/WAPO/ETC are “liberal media,” or that there is no market for liberal media — but not both. Please pick one. Thanks!"
Actually it can be and is both. ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/NBC/NPR/NYT/WAPO/ETC are all in a state of decline, meaning their market is shrinking. They're liberal and without a market.
Theres so many liberal web entities keeping "right wing media" honest, its hard to believe they will all be here in 2011. The world doesn't need 40 liberal sites. MM is one of the few with billionaire funding, so they will be here… but a few of them have their days numbered.
My only regret is that before their demise, they'd be announcing the demise of George Soros. Death can't visit that vile creature, soon enough.
What AA and their faithful failed to realize is that people want a little entertainment with their politics. That's why Rush and Sean are so popular. Sure, you get your red meat with stinging political commentary, but you also get your chocolate cake in the form of a Paul Shanklin parody or Hannity's Man On The Street bit.
Also, most conservative talkers take the position that the United States and it's people are inherently good. Really, who wants to sit around and listen to how much you and your country suck?
LIberal entities generally prefer to spend endless time arguing rather than spend any time creating or building something.
"Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh"
That's the sound of "dead air" from AA.
The Nation is just a little bit better off today.
Not Over.
If people don't wanna come out to the ballpark, how ya gonna stop 'em?" — Yogi Berra.
Case in point: WHJJ in Providence went BANKRUPT after converting to “All Scare America All the Time” in a state where democrat master lever pulling is an epidemic. AT one point HJJ ratings were LOWER in Providence than a BOSTON sports talk station with a marginal signal and ads were few and far between. After they went under they were purchased by a group which runs Rush (go!) Shawn and Levin. Now they are selling time and making money despite the fact that there is another talk station in Providence, WPRO, which is ALSO conservative and also makes money.
The ONLY move that liberals/progressives/democrats have left is to FORCE people to agree with them. IE If only we would have prevented free speech or the right to vote, then Barack would have not failed. I do not put it past the corrupt left to attempt forcing their agenda upon the American people. They are the definition off deceit.
Hallowell says, "Foser’s statement that The Washington Times has lost money for decades is a silly corroborative comment. Tell me Mr. Foser, how many newspapers are posting record profits these days?"
And speaking of silly statements, what sense does it make to compare CURRENT economic woes in the newspaper industry with the Washington Times' LONG-TIME status as a Moonie welfare project?
More like "Err America"…
AMIRITE?
As they close the door, the accountants should open the books and reveal where the money came from and where the money went.
The article has it wrong. The left does not dominate Hollywood. Hollywood is the 600 pound gorilla that dominates the left, all virtually all publications, TV programming (news and entertainment) and movies.
Until Conservatives figure this out, they will continue to lose the PR battle. We are not fighting Liberalism. We are fighting Hollywood.
The Ministry of Propaganda has decreed that the death of Air America has been grossly exaggerated and that gloating over it's alleged demise will hereby be declared not nice and that violators will be scandalized by tabloid-style attacks on their houses.
I am praying that the lefty lib statists keep trying to fund garbage like this…I LOVE losing money sinks that the enemies of the country keep throwing cash into…as long as it isn't ours…
Breathlessly void of logic. Disconnected with human nature.
"Point being: conservative media outlets have succeeded not only because of market forces, as conservatives would have you believe, but because right-wing billionaires like Murdoch and Rev. Moon have been willing to subsidize them."
It's called RISK CAPITAL. Investment. REWARD.
There is a reason we are going to pound the progressive movement into the fetal position. The mere fact that anyone can find fault in that immediately disqualifies them from public policy. Do these freakin people know how Apple Computer started?
When was the last time a self-described Progressive unloaded on Apple Computer for making profits, avoiding taxes (READ yesterdays financial statement…..oh Progressive kiddies – it's called a 10K or 10Q) and having high-priced products. (MacBook Pro rocks!)
And we are the idiots?
You don't want to know the type of person who does. Trust me, I know them, stay away.
The lunatic fringe doesn't need "progressive/liberal/socialist/lunatic leftist radio blather while it has:
MSNBC,CNN,NBC,ABC,BCS,New York Times, USA Today, LA Times, etc., etc., etc…
The demise of "Air America" (whose name is also an insult to CIA paid pilots in Vietnam/Cambodia) was nearly a fore gone conclusion.
It's stuggles were predictable, it's audience demographic small and fickle, and it's sad existance pathetic.
Good riddance.
I don't think so, I expect these tools to be around for some time. They provide a very valuable, low cost cog, in the democratic hate machine, aka the MSM.
MM pours over every single word coming out of conservative and GOP sources. They search for anything that can be twisted and/or taken out of context. They wrap it up so it looks official, then mail it to moon bats, left wing hate web sites, party officials, and politicians.
Then the moonbats and the web sites start buzzing over it, the MSM glances over it's stately looking glasses and says "Hmmm there is buzz, I should check this out." They go to the politicians and party officials who already have the talking points rattle them off, and there's your story for the evening news and the morning papers.
Modern liberals work cheap if they believe they're fighting ''da MAN.' Web sites are cheap. So they've got the best of both worlds. Low cost, with a professional looking out put.
They ain't going anywhere.
Not quite. They look in the mirror and just know they're doing everything right. They are that bad.
It ain't over till it's over.
And its over.
Air America failed because it's on-air "talent" failed to attract an audience, proving again that talentless shills attempting to sell empty ideas is not a winning combination…..
As BHO and his "useful idiots" are proving again…..
All I can say is Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahhahahahhaha!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
"liberal think tanks" a minor point, but isn't that an oxymoron? in fact, doesn't that pretty much put the 'moron' in 'oxymoron'? how about "liberal touchy-feely centers"?
“You can either claim that ABC/CBS/CNN/MSNBC/NBC/NPR/NYT/WAPO/ETC are “liberal media,” or that there is no market for liberal media — but not both. Please pick one. Thanks!”
Actually, it proves the market is saturated already and there is no need or support for yet another liberal outlet.
Also, this clown is bitching about what Rupert Murdoch or the Rev Moon do with their own money – he’s apparently painfully unfamiliar with the capitalist concept of “loss leader”, or even “advertising”. Rumor has it Fox is doing quite well once enough people got exposed to it…..
"The New York-based Air America kicked off in March 2004, aiming to be the antithesis of Rush Limbaugh’s and Sean Hannity’s shows."
I'd say they really did manage to be the antithesis of Rush and Sean. One has listeners, one doesn't. One is entertaining, one isn't. One features rational discussion, one doesn't. And now we can add One is on the air, one isn't!
Mr. Foser states that you can’t have it both ways. CNN/CBS/ABC/NBC/WaPo and others can’t be liberal and still say that liberal talk isn’t a draw.
I wonder if it’s possible the reason liberal talk radio never succeeds is because they’re just repeating the same thing that the networks and the major newspapers are all saying? Why would someone need to watch it on TV, read it in the newspapers and then also listen to it on talk radio?
On the other hand, Before Fox News, there was nowhere else for Conservatives to get news and information besides Talk radio. It explains why Rush and Sean and others were/are such a draw while Rhodes and Maddow and others can’t pull in enough listeners.
So Air America is still a bunch of cheaters who took money from a kids charity.
Stay classy, Dead Air America.
Being liberal and confused as they are, methinks they look at the collective ratings of all in this liberal group and believe they must be doing something right. In the meantime, Air America is one of the first picked off; who is next?
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, greychampion, mike trin, Juli , lmcginnis33 and others. lmcginnis33 said: Media Matters’ Vapid Response to Air America’s Crash http://is.gd/75q5i [...]
It's really too bad they closed up shop. It's that many more insane people running around with nothing else to do.
The fact is that conservative radio was never the competitor for Air America. That is like saying Caterpillar and Toyota are competitors. If you need earth moved you shop Caterpillar; if you need a high tech clown car you shop Toyota.
Air America's market share competitor was NPR, and what happened is a harbinger of what will happen to medicine when the government becomes the bottomless pockets competitor of free-market insurance.
Exactly
Going Once …. Going Twice …….
NPR can be enjoyable at times, though the last few years Bush, then Palin Derangement Syndrome ran rampant and I just couldn't listen anymore. My point is, NPR was like the sensible grown-up, the liberal professor you might disagree with but had pleasant enough experiences with, while Airhead America was just a bunch of obnoxious, shrill, abrasive, spoiled brats like you used to see in college in the mid-90's who drank soy lattes in between their gender studies seminars. (and were usually white, from affluence, tattooed and had an aversion to good grooming and basic hygeine, you know, Janeane Garafalo types).
Redeye Robot Theater!
The New York-based Air America kicked off in March 2004, aiming to be the antithesis of Rush Limbaugh’s and Sean Hannity’s shows.
Err America was,/i> the antithesis of Limbaugh and Hannity – it sucked. How much more antithesis can you get?
Guess you're in trouble when your audience consists of Al Qaeda and Janeane Garafalo…
It was important for fat AlFfranken [Democrat Jew-MINN] to steal from an inner city [black] Boys and Girls Club to "get paid". Typical NON vet commie lib democrat on the public payroll. REV Wright
Great article,Thanks for share,
Promotion Time! Discount Tiffany Jewelry For Mother's Day!
Silver Tiffany Jewelry will tell you what's your mother really need.
More messages from:http://www.toobling.com/
Great article,Thanks for share,
Promotion Time! Discount Tiffany Jewelry For Mother's Day!
Silver Tiffany Jewelry will tell you what's your mother really need.
More messages from:http://www.toobling.com/
Great article,Thanks for share,
Promotion Time! Discount Tiffany Jewelry For Mother's Day!
Silver Tiffany Jewelry will tell you what's your mother really need.
More messages from:http://www.toobling.com/
You must be logged in to post a comment.