
One of the most unfortunate results of the race card being played is the fact that the players seldom have to live with the messes they make. For purely political reasons, blacks and whites have been intentionally polarized, starting way back when David Axelrod led Deval Patrick to the governorship of Massachusetts, and now with the troubled presidency of Barack Obama. The administration has long since deployed the now well-known liberal tactic: opposition is racism.
Behind closed doors, this White House must be laughing their asses off at how easily the liberal media and activists can be manipulated to save their agenda.
White Suckers
Starting with the winning campaign of Massachusetts governor Deval Patrick through the victorious campaign of President Barack Obama (both helmed by David Axelrod), the strategy was clear: create an atmosphere where whites who don’t vote for these men will be called one of the most damaging names in America today: racist.

It even got to the point where white liberals were given license to use racial epithets against blacks who weren’t in support of Obama. After all, this was all about their being a part of history. Never mind we heard nary a peep out of them when Republicans Colin Powell was appointed the first black Secretary of State and Condoleezza Rice the first black National Security Advisor. How many white liberals celebrated Rice later becoming the first black female to be Secretary of State?
I know few, if any.
The celebration of black appointments to positions of high office was only to be authorizedby the left. By white guilters being able to point to their participation in the election of the first black president, they felt it gave them the street cred to not only dictate who is racist and who is not, but the ability to use racist verbiage with impunity under the guise of parody and/or humor.
It also gave the white left the street cred to define any opposition to an Obama/Democrat policy as racist, thus the action line that the Tea Party is the racist arm of the Republican Party. Leaving out the basic math that roughly five percent of blacks vote Republican and would thus participate in a Tea Party, the white guilt left freely calls the Tea Party racist purely due to the small number of blacks in attendance.
Do white liberals realize they’re being used to perpetuate power they don’t share? Maybe.
Do white liberals realize they’ll later be hurt by many of Obama’s policies, some involving reverse discrimination? Maybe.
But this administration knows their base. They know they’re driven by guilt and their belief that blind loyalty to a black president will forever buy them immunity from the charge of racism: “I’m not a racist, I voted for Obama!” But when his policies come crashing down on them, what will they be saying behind closed doors…?

Black Suckers
Even though he hadn’t even been elected yet, Barack Obama instantly became the most qualified person in America to talk about the issue of race and lectured the nation accordingly.
In the end, then, what is called for is nothing more, and nothing less, than what all the world’s great religions demand — that we do unto others as we would have them do unto us. Let us be our brother’s keeper, Scripture tells us. Let us be our sister’s keeper. Let us find that common stake we all have in one another, and let our politics reflect that spirit as well.
For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle — as we did in the OJ trial — or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina — or as fodder for the nightly news.
— Senator Barack Obama, 3/18/08
It was a year later that his attorney general (Eric Holder) looked down his nose and called America a “nation of cowards.” It’s quite ironic that in the following months (when issues of race would come up) the administration would pick and choose which to comment or take action on, at times prematurely, most definitely intentionally.

Seconds after admitting he knew few details of the case, President Obama sided with belligerent Harvard professor Henry Louis Gates, Jr. and accused the Cambridge, Mass., who detained him as “acting stupidly.” It culminated in the taxpayers flying both the professor and the arresting officer more than 400 miles down to the White House to have a couple of beers and a feel-good photo-op.
Obviously the election of Barack Obama didn’t result in the perceived eradication of race in America, and if black America expected “Obama money,” race allegations are best the distraction from an empty wallet (that will ultimately be blamed on whites).
The Tea Party has been called racist because of their opposition to ObamaCare, as well as the Democrats’ other big government, budget-busting policies. Al Sharpton and Jesse Jackson are unreliable loose cannons, and the NAACP has been proven a repeatedly incompetent ally in a verbal race war.
Calling millions of Americans racist couldn’t stick by itself. Obama and the Democrats needed help. Which brings us to the media…
Liberal Media Suckers
We now know, from their own words, that liberal media types have been working in concert to publicly label opposition to Obama as race-driven.
According to records obtained by The Daily Caller, at several points during the 2008 presidential campaign a group of liberal journalists took radical steps to protect their favored candidate. Employees of news organizations including Time, Politico, the Huffington Post, the Baltimore Sun, the Guardian, Salon and the New Republic participated in outpourings of anger over how Obama had been treated in the media, and in some cases plotted to fix the damage.
In one instance, Spencer Ackerman of the Washington Independent urged his colleagues to deflect attention from Obama’s relationship with Wright by changing the subject. Pick one of Obama’s conservative critics, Ackerman wrote, “Fred Barnes, Karl Rove, who cares — and call them racists.”
Is it any wonder why America is a nation of cowards? No one knows when they’ll be called a racist, hater, Uncle Tom, or sellout. Now, it seems, we’ll never know why one person can lose a job over the use of a racial slur while others can use them often under the guise of its being a “joke.”
Americans are quite capable of living in a general harmony. Two strangers of different races can sit side-by-side at a ballgame and when a run or touchdown is scored, these two people (rooting for the same team) can give each other high fives and race never entered the mix. But between an administration that picks and chooses whom to racially vilify or defend, a “Just Us” Department that picks and chooses whom to racially vilify or defend, liberal activists who pick and choose whom to racially vilify or defend, and a media that picks and chooses whom to racially vilify or defend, it’s as plain as day why America is knee deep in a race quagmire.
The cowards are the very elites — political and media — who pit one group against the other before retreating to their gated communities. It’s the rest of us that have to live with the hell those elites have raised. “By any means necessary” also involves collateral damage, and as much as liberals point the finger elsewhere, should it all go down, cowards are always the first to be found.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
54 Comments
Holy Christ. They got all of the commies in one room laughing at he path of destruction they have been on.
Trying to defend yourself against false charges of racism is a losing game….racism is in the heart and mind and no one can "see" there but you….
The best responses are 1) IGNORE or 2) LAUGH or 3) Reply, "No, YOU ARE RACIST."
I was volunteering for a local Congressional campaign last week, and I was struck by 2 things:
1) There were more people there volunteering than I had expected there to be, and
2) There were at least 5 black people there, and perhaps 15 whites.
Of course, to a Progressive, this means "blacks don't support the candidate", but to me it meant that we got word out and among 20 volunteers netted, 5 were black AND conservative. Awesome!
The use of the race card will be their ultimate downfall. Most americans aren't racist. Most americans could care less. And most americans are getting sick and tired of the manure being spread from this administration.
Their progressive/Alinski approach to governing is going to be an epic fail, only because while Alinskis' tactics may work in a classroom setting, going against something so unique as the american spirit will only end in failure.
Liberals biggest mistake is that they think that the rest of america THINKS like they do.
While liberals think in terms of race, quotas, segregation, or class (economic) envy, most of america still believes in freedom, personal responsibility, honor, hard work, and pride. These concepts are as foreign to liberals as near-beer is to Linsey Lohan.
As much as they want to believe, liberal/progs are headed towards an epic fail. It has already started.
When conservatives fail, they look to see what they could do differently the next time.
When liberals fail, they just look for someone else to blame.
"For we have a choice in this country. We can accept a politics that breeds division, and conflict, and cynicism. We can tackle race only as spectacle — as we did in the OJ trial — or in the wake of tragedy, as we did in the aftermath of Katrina — or as fodder for the nightly news."
I just wanted to highlight this quote from Obama. This is the most hypocritical, divisive, and cynical President we have ever had.
The trick is to not give a crap what others say, remember what our mommies taught us, “sticks and stones, may break my bones, but words shall never harm me.” Remember to point and laugh, and remind the leftist radical screaming any “obia or ism,’ too go pound sand, you first have to find someone who gives a damn.
Sherrod was right, it is the Haves against the Have Nots. What does Obama have? And those against the government gangster complex have not?
why not just agree with them. if i am accused of being a racist, because i question the bloated budget. i respond, ok, yes i am a racist, now how about that budget? if i agree that i hate whitey as much as them, i then take away them from using it again on me, and now they need to answer the question.
The life of the nation is secure only while the nation is honest, truthful, and virtuous.
Frederick Douglass
False charges are right, and number three is the 'correct' answer, whether you choose to employ it or not. How racist and cowardly to hide behind the color of someones skin in order to advance an unpopular political agenda. Progressives are becoming progressively more vial.
It's articles like this that drive the leftist racebaiters crazy,sunlight on this form of manipulation neutralizes it's affect.
Paging TarHeel77, paging TarHeel77………….here ya go bud, as our most recent race policeman here on the
Bigs, I and many others will be waiting to hear your response to Mr Parks piece. Please make it thorough and
detailed, as we wish no opportunity to escape your finely tuned racist detecting skills.
Beware, he has been known to respond directly to comments.
Playing the racism card is fast becoming like porn used to be. Everyone is getting desensitized by it being mentioned everytime someone looks at you wrong.
I've discovered through my travels that the easiest way to diffuse someone playing the race card against you it to look genuinely confused, look them in the eye, and ask, "What's a racist?"
Kills it every time.
Looks like Obama found a room where he is the most competent…Statist..
"History will have to record that the greatest tragedy of this period of social transition was not the strident clamor of the bad people, but the appalling silence of the good people."
~Martin Luther King, Jr.
Missy8s — I don't think anything will come of the JournoList expose' except that We the People are AWARE and ENGAGED. We all knew that there was a Leftist Propogandist Media (LPM), these comments on JournoList just proved it in black and white. Yes, there was collusion with the Obama campaign, but a long, drawn out battle in the courts is not the answer. Not right now, at least. We must focus on November 2, 2010 exclusively, and vote the 'D-Rats OUT! That's only the FIRST step. Then, we must work on 2012, right away in early 2011. This is very important. Our country's VERY EXISTANCE is at stake.
Mom in Wisconsin
I am focused on November, right now I'm just expressing a wee bit of indignation in the face of these revelations.
I flip at least one liberal per week and that is and always has been my goal ever since becoming a 912er and tea partier.
One new conservative a week is all we ask.
What is that sound? Crickets!! Mommy must have not woke him up yet and made him breakfast. Either that or he is still trying to figure out which alias to use!
I guess they are now 'Freed Slaves' http://bit.ly/bp5Mvh
I usually tell them I can't be racist. I'm a Heinz 57. Cherokee, French, German, Italian, Welsh and Irish. Which one would you like to hate first!
Only one quibble: the racism game has been going on since the death of Martin Luther King, and the foundation of the NAACP 6 decades earlier was by communists. The civil rights movement accomplished its legitimate goal by about the time MLK was killed (in terms of legal equality) and actual racism was dissipating with time, but the liberal elites and the race industry have been doing everything they could to separated people, and they have only grown more strident as the real problem has evaporated. Barry has just pushed it over the top. I think this will kill it once and for all, and the liberal elites will go down with it.
The most successful defence when called a racist…………Stop! turn and face the attacker and calmly ask them, why have you called me a racist? In most instances they are reduced to mumbling, they are not expecting to be challeged. In the past throwing down the race card has ended the conversation, thats why they play it. Keep asking them why what you have said or done is racist. Be like the little child who keeps asking their parents "Why?" I even had one such tool reply because I said so. And what qualifies you to define racism? Just keep at them, they will retreat.
Even better- they were probably never ideological "slaves" to begin with! They all looked to be under 30, and a few were college-age. They probably have parents that don't buy into the "government should take care of me" mentality.
I’d like to advance the notion that it is ok to be a racist. I know of no law that mandates that I cannot be one as long as I don’t discriminate against any particular race or in other ways cause harm to someone of another race. If I were to say something like “I never cared much for the N people,” I don’t believe it rises to the level of hate speech. If I don’t happen to like certain people, that ought to be my choice.
If asked if I am a racist, I can honestly say no. Yet I can be if I want to.
The left, instead of holding successful Blacks as beacons and role models for the rest of America, they chastise them for being Uncle Toms, Oreos and race traitors. It's like an infinate loop. How can anyone avoid these racist tags and still become successful since it requires people to embrace REAL American values of hard work and capitalism?
My response to anyone saying that is: "IS THAT ALL YOU GOT? TALK TO ME WHEN YOU HAVE A REAL POINT."
Those that foster and fester racism for the sake of a vote need to be sent to prison. The MSM has commited sediton against the American people (minus the 30% who live by these traitorous creeds) and need to be prosecuted, fined and sent to prison.
And the Lord knows, we have our work cut out for us!
—
Mr. Parks said:
It even got to the point where white liberals were given license to use racial epithets against blacks who weren’t in support of Obama. After all, this was all about their being a part of history. Never mind we heard nary a peep out of them when Republicans Colin Powell was appointed the first black Secretary of State and Condoleezza Rice the first black National Security Advisor. How many white liberals celebrated Rice later becoming the first black female to be Secretary of State?
—
I think its been at the point for a while (some of the invective hurled at Clarence Thomas was venomous).
My fear is that the obnoxious behavior of this adminsitration w/ repect to race will make whites more likely to be racist against black people. It will breed terrorists (to coin an old Left Wing argument against GWB's policies in Iraq).
Are you practicing the fine art of using "wit on a twit"? You should know that it's way to early for it to be up and mobile. He's had a hard night of over sleeping. : -)
What the narcisistic fool doesn't realise is that the room is full of Yes-men that will throw him under the bus as soon as his time as Useful Idiot is over.
He can join Shirley under there….
I find Obama and the media bootlickers beyond galling…
I never thought I would detest a President more then DollarBill Clinton
but this Obama, well, words can't describe my dislike and bitterness…
At least have the intellectual honesty to pick a position and stick with it. Do you believe in American exceptionalism, or as this author writes, that America is a "Nation of Cowards?" We are great, in part because of our liberal commitment to diversity. And we will remain so, even over the obstruction of race-baiting Republicans.
I understand that black viewers constituted just 1.4% of Fox News's primetime viewership this season. Given the GOP's complete lack of appeal beyond its base of unhinged white bigots, it seems clear the party has no choice but to double down on racist fear mongering. Maybe it will work in the short term, given the current economic headwinds. But your base of fearful old folks is dying off. Good luck attempting to build a lasting majority with that formula.
The MSM is nothing but a herd of journolistas and "Children of the corn" progressives.
All the liberals knew, but spiked, the John Edwards story. Chuck Todd's (MSNBC) wife was an operative working for John Edwards and they all had the inside scoop but did nothing. Even Larry O'Donnell (MSNBC) admitted on air that they all the network liberals knew about it, it was common knowledge," but they hushed it up.
This means their all activist liars.
Being practical would necessarily include looking at the Department of Justice crime statistics "by race". If I avoid green people because green people are ten times more likely to murder you or your family, does that make me "racist"?
If so, then I am.
Now, how about this socialism problem? How about eligibility to be President? How about Journolist? How about incompetence? How about 30 rooms for Michelle at a Spanish resort at $1850.00 per room per night for 7 days? You do the math.
"Good luck attempting to build a lasting majority with that formula."
so you place winning over being right as the more appropriate goal?
"Nation of Cowards" are Eric Holders words, and his view of America, that the author is highlighting.
How does having a message that is more popular with some, but not others, automatically and uncritically translate into racism? The last time I checked, nuclear disarmament is not particularly popular with all demographic groups. Does that mean its inherently racist? How about automobile mileage policy? How about ice skating? motor cross? Nascar? Studying nineteenth century poetry? Since there is a lack of minority participants, they obviously must be. An idea must appeal to all equally to not be racist? What a false argument.
The most racist policies in the country is the entitlement slavery that the left has shackled Americans without providing any means of escape. Insidious.
That person is a loon.
I like the tag "Children of the Corn Progressives"
…may I borrow it?
Everyone needs to take a look at your post, it's a shining example of the mindless irrational thought process rampant on the left. At no point do you have anything constructive to add to anything. Your hate-filled screed of idiocy is a mish-mash of paranoia and common left-wing rants.
It's actually a good thing you don't know how to think for yourself, the shock to your feeble brain would put you in a coma. Then again a world without your brand of stupidity would be a better one….
From My Perspective, The Photo look's like The Joke is on You, The Gullible American People, which They lied & connivied & decived All the way to were THEY are Today. And not for the benefit of the American People or Our Country.But there FOR THERE Opportunistic Selfs !
You are free to be a racist. And you are free to get punched in the face when you say something stupid.
God Bless America!
I think you missed my point. I am not a racist-never have been. You can believe it or not. If I were a racist, however and I did not commit a crime, how could you tell if I was secretly a racist or not. Further more it is not a crime if I simply hold racial views.
Stupidity is not a crime either. Punching someone in the face, the last time I checked is.
My point is I dont care if you say I am stupid or a racist; I know I am not either.
Love you like a brother, man.
"Do white liberals realize they’ll later be hurt by many of Obama’s policies, some involving reverse discrimination?"
One quibble. There is no such thing as "reverse discrimination" or "reverse racism". Someone either is racist or isn't. The group being discriminated for/against is immaterial. Remember, the "reverse" of racism is indifference to race. Stop using their language and call them what they actually are!
Tarheel must be checking the left wing talking points provided by George Soros's gang.
Stupid liberal putz says: [At least have the intellectual honesty to pick a position and stick with it. Do you believe in American exceptionalism, or as this author writes, that America is a "Nation of Cowards?" ]
The term Nation of Cowards was a statement made by Democrat Holder in discussing race. So it is used now as a reminder that the very party that made the statement is having that statement tossed back into their faces. This statement is not being applied to all of America and only a moron (progressive mindless brain-dead putz such as you) would not be able to catch that drift of it's usage here.
Avoiding risky situations is not being a racist. However, calling every black person the names that you tend to call them is racist. We have seen your posts and the good conservatives on this site, such as myself, will continue to expose you as the racist piece of shit that you are. Any questions?
Your point is partially true but also kind of anal.
Reverse racism is a concept that is readily and commonly understood as racist behavior by a group that is historically known as having suffered racism themselves. The term makes sense and describes more fully who the players are and what the sin is, more specifically. In this case, a group that supposedly suffered racism themselves should be even more aware of the sin of racism found in their own group. Any questions?
I look at that photo and see a sea of white faces. Well, one half white guy. What would Chrissy Matthews have to say about this obviously racist group, with their token half white dude at best.
Oh, I was thinking of different ways such a person would respond because I wanted to link this to a message board I frequent.
The first thing I thought of was that they would dismiss her as a "radical" (like they do the NBPP) and that she's not part of the government anyway so it doesn't mean that Obama is agreeing to this, etc.
The fact that JournoList shows how much power is out there regarding this issue and since Obama hasn't handled these things very well, it seems obvious that he likely agrees with what Berry is saying.
I agree. I always ask them to provide proof of my alleged racism. And they do just fumble over themselves and can't form a coherent sentence after that.
Drives them mad!
No questions, just a statement. What I said isn't partially true, it is completely true. Racism is racism no matter what color you are period, end of discussion. There IS no reverse to it. To accept the word couched in their terms is to accept that good old, run-of-the-mill, ordinary "racism" is white only. What BS. And I, for one, am tired of it.
Has anyone ever compiled a reliable list of the 400+ jounolist members?
You must be logged in to post a comment.