Comments on: Supreme Court Bounces McCain/Feingold, NY Times Readers Go Nuts

By: facebook123

facebook123 — Thu, 25 Aug 2011 07:37:35 +0000

Recent Blogroll Additions……

[...]usually posts some very interesting stuff like this. If you’re new to this site[...]……

By: » ‘Campaign-Finance’ Scam: It’s Not About Money, It’s About Governmental Power - Big Journalism

Sat, 23 Jan 2010 20:05:09 +0000

[...] to believe the moonbat ravings of New York Times readers or the unhinged, Howard-Beale-like broadcasts of MSNBC’s Keith [...]

By: Waterslide Decal Paper

Waterslide Decal Paper — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 11:57:58 +0000

The information presented is top notch. I’ve been doing some research on the topic and this post answered several questions.

By: Consrvativ_KDH

Consrvativ_KDH — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:42:11 +0000

Personally, I like Exhibit J

"I keep looking for an “I’m mad-as-hell-and-I’m-not-going-to-take-it” movement by citizens (the purpose served, in the distant past, by elections), but nothing seems to have a lasting effect."

Obviously, this amoebic intelligence has not the capacity to correlate things like TEA PARTIES and the Massachusetts vote.

No wonder they're so F'd up. Apparently, reality is too much of a bitch for them to quit using drugs long enough to find a rational thought.

By: thebarbarian

thebarbarian — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 05:19:36 +0000

This McCain ruling has giving foreigners and foreign government and our enemies the right to influence our government and thus republicans cheer our surrender to our foes.

By: Bill

Bill — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:36:48 +0000

What is ti about the phrase " Congress shall make NO law" that you don't understand!

By: a1b1

a1b1 — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 04:15:35 +0000

Free speech in the Constitution until recently was considered solely a right of a person. Corporations do not have true voices, only people have voices. Those who own the corporations already have free speech as individuals. Only since comparatively recent changes were the corporations allowed to give any money at all to politicians. McCain=Feingold were not inventing anything new, they were trying to restore the original intent of the Constitution by limiting the amount of contributions. It would politically probably not have been possible to return to actually prohibiting corporations from making contributions to politicians.

By: thebarbarian

thebarbarian — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:58:15 +0000

To this republic there is nothing more sacred than individual freedom, for it was individual freedom an individual sacrifice the sacrifice of blood, body, and life that gave meaning and birth to a nation before a single word on a piece paper was written. Our sacred documents our soaked in the blood of individual sacrifice and thus it is individual freedom that must have priority over the money of business.
Business has no vote and thus no voice.
Business is a creation of government and thus part of government and thus no voice.
Business can not exist with out government, only trade between two individuals can and thus no voice.
Government can not exist without individual sacrifice and thus individual freedom has top priority.
When a business can bleed and die for this country then they should have a voice. Freedom has died today in dramatic fashion. The government parties have officially silenced the voters and declared this republic dead.

By: KEYBOARD555

KEYBOARD555 — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:33:49 +0000

Obama don't like this ruling, it levels the playing field. He working on a bill to try and stop this ruling. He said it should be ready in a couple weeks.. How much money is he going to steal from the taxpayers, to give to ACORN< SEIU, and big labor to steal elections. Get ready for more taxes, just like he wants to tax the banks for paying back that stupid tarp money.

By: JB1000

JB1000 — Sat, 23 Jan 2010 03:33:18 +0000

EXCELLENT! For the first time in history, the rich, white guy has the advantage!

C. Montgomery Burns
Springfield

Like corporations, unions or use rich people had no influence over the political process before this ruling. I would rathe see who is putting up the cash than for a corporation or some Socialist Greek Billionaire hiding behind the "Committee for everything good in the world" 527.