In the Wall Street Journal, Jena Pincott tries to answer Freud’s famous question — “What do women want?” — and comes up with a surprising answer: in developed countries, they want men who look more like women:
Why Women Don’t Want Macho Men
New research suggests that women from countries with healthier populations prefer more feminine-looking men.

… After crunching the data—including the women’s facial preferences, their country of origin and that country’s national health index—the Face Lab researchers proved something remarkable. They could predict how masculine a woman likes her men based on her nation’s World Health Organization statistics for mortality rates, life expectancy and the impact of communicable disease. In countries where poor health is particularly a threat to survival, women leaned toward “manlier” men. That is, they preferred their males to have shorter, broader faces and stronger eyebrows, cheekbones and jaw lines.
But what does health have to do with masculinity? The link is testosterone, the hormone behind manly muscles, strong jaws, prominent eyebrow ridges, facial hair and deep voices. Testosterone is immunosuppressive. This means a man must be healthy and in good condition to withstand its effects on his development. Testosterone is also linked to other traits related to strength: fitness, fertility and dominance… Masculinity, however, can come at a high price. Women often think of high-testosterone types as uncooperative, unsympathetic, philandering, aggressive and disinterested in parenting.
The theory is that in countries with good health-care — here we go! — women have to worry less about the longevity and overall health of their mates, and therefore can afford to ease up in the testosterone department in favor of the more metrosexual types:

In the Face Lab study, women with the weakest masculinity preferences tended to live in some of the healthiest countries: Sweden, Finland, Denmark and Austria… Meanwhile, women with the strongest masculinity preferences tended to hail from the countries with higher disease and mortality rates and some of the poorest scores on the health-care index: Mexico, Brazil, Bulgaria and Argentina.
As we approach Easter, this video homage to one of history’s great metrosexuals, as portrayed by the inimitable Jay Robinson:
That would be Caligula, of course. For those who can’t get enough:
Your thoughts welcome here.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
192 Comments
B&&&*s**t!!
Give me big strong men with big shoulders like my husband of 40 years. Keep your girly men. No thank you. Who did they survey? Rosie O'Donnell?
If they had surveyed Rosie they would have discovered she prefers manly looking women, not girly men.
BS…you're right AliciaColon.
I don't believe this for a minute. I think this is what "They" are trying to convince young women they want…so our whole population dies out. Give me a nice hairy chest…thank you very much.
Conservative, Christian women love masculine men!
And that's where natural cycles kick in. Because of course, that preference for girly men, will tend to elevate less effective, less aggressive, even less intelligent males to the top of society.
Which in turn means that that society falls apart or falls prey to more primitive societies with a stronger emphasis on masculinity, which are lead by more manly men.
This is happening right now. Look at Europe, countries cited here as having pronounced female preference for girly boys are being overrun and taken over by mohammedans from strongly males supremacist societies — to the extent where the mohammedan butch males can rape and assault in the street with relative impugnity. Even the police hesitate to call them to account.
The correlation between effeminacy and societal collapse is proverbial and has been for centuries.
We're just too girly be be so rude as to mention the fact.
They didn't poll my wife, obviously.
I don't care what the research says, we want masculine men who will lead, protect, provide, and bear the responsibility for us and for our families.
Hahaha…please NOOOOO! LOl.
That is ridiculous. BTW, what does "healthier populations" mean? How condescending of "them."
It is well known that women, if given the chance, would anytime go for homosexuals instead for men who are interested in ladies – Michurin's, Lisenko's and University of East Anglia' studies show this very clear –
This also explains Sean Penn's make up and views, Rachel Madow's hairy shoulders and Shaliapin deep voice –
Still – why I am every day prouder and prouder that I am not a Democrat wallowing in MSM New Values and New science?
Probably I am a mental – Sandra Bernhard can explain this easy –
Et pourtant… why I am every day prouder and prouder that I am not a Democrat?
I was always told that a woman wants a man, that is more of a man than they are.
Oh, and you want to start down a path of inquiry that will get you banned from respectable society forever?
Start thinking about the correlations between the facts of that study and political/voting patterns and their effects on America!!!!!
What do you think is the proportion of males to females among successful entrepreneurs, in any age slot, from retirees to freshly graduated womens-liberated kids.
Start thinking about the correlations between female electoral participation and entry into public office and the growth of socialist/statists taxation and regulation policies.
Then tell all of your respectable liberal friends goodbye. 'Cause they'll never speak to you again.
I lmao the whole way thru thinking this was something from the Onion. Not me. I like my men all man. Preferably with boots on and driving a bad a$$ car.
Women who want a girly man have issues with their own sexuality. I'm still laughing! Thanks for the humor.
[...] women with the strongest masculinity preferences tended to hail … See the original post: » Decline of the West, What Women Want Division: Caligula! – Big … Share and [...]
Oh, lest I forget to mention it, I like the author's economy of thought in accounting for the phenomenon in question.
Sorry…but Caligula was bi-sexual, so…this actor did an excellent job…yes Caligula was cruel, evil with not morality at all. If anybody see this as a macho…they are SO WRONG lol! Macho man look and act like Pedro Armendariz Sr. & I have no idea who did this "study"… for me…. I like real man like my husband a "Warrior" a "Soldier" a “Hero” I can count on him, I’m protected with him, if there is a problem, I know he takes care of it.
Oh, fer cryin' out loud!!!!! Who the heck comes up with this nonsense?! This has GOT to be the most ridiculous crock o'bull I've heard in a llllllooooonnnnngggggg time.
Gimme my big ole burly man ANY day!!!
Here the WSJournal's take on this "study".:
"Well, on the front page of the Journal’s Weekend section this morning is a feature on how women from healthier populations prefer feminine-looking men. The piece is illustrated with a grid showing facial features of such feminine-looking men..
There is, in the bottom image of the lower quadrant of a male face, an unmistakable—if you pay attention to such things—dimple and odd right ear.
http://www.vanityfair.com/online/daily/2010/03/mu...
Without a doubt, the Wall Street Journal has selected Arthur Sulzberger as a prime example of its idea of a feminine-looking man.
Pure coincidence?"
"skinny, flat and angry"?
Gimme my big ole burly man ANY day!!!
Bawney Fwank feels the same way!
[...] Original post: » Decline of the West, What Women Want Division: Caligula! – Big … [...]
SO, THAT explains the cowardice of Sweden, Denmark and Norway – in the face of a full fledged Muslim INVASION.
"why I am every day prouder and prouder that I am not a Democrat?" Piece of cake and I'm sure you know the answer. Ask yourself this–of what is there to be proud? Think about all the things that have been on their political agenda for the last 50 years (or longer) many of which should have never been political issues (which is very telling in itself).
I've heard that, too, and it sounds about right. I think there's just a touch of that glowering-dog thing. If they don't think you can compete with them, in any way, why would they want to be with you–in that woman's estimation, you're probably a punk.
Just askin'–is that a Pissie Chrissie Hitchens article? I believe he writes for VF, doesn't he?
The mistake being made by these people is assuming correlation means causation.
These "healthier" societies also happen to be the ones where people are more sheltered from physical hardships, as well as being the nations most inundated with popular culture.
Is a woman from Sudan going to want a strong man whom she believed could protect her? Hell yes.
Is a woman from Sudan likely to know who Johnny Depp is, or why she should be enamored with such a little twerp? Hell no.
On the other side of it, it is women in developed nations who are most sheltered from violence and who therefore may tell themselves it doesn't matter whether or not a man possess speed, strength, or physical courage. So too is it these women who are fed a constant babble of pop-idol worship via television, magazines, etc.
Sooo, what kind of women in this "healthier" society do men want? Are they going to try and sell it that these girly men prefer their women butch, hairy and make-up free? I mean, how stupid. Women are always going to prefer manly men and real men are always going to prefer beautiful women. That's just the way it is. Who is this article really trying to appeal to? Wimpy liberals, that's who.
The progs are getting pushy again. this article is just some pre-propaganda for the new Eugenics.
I don't think so – I just went to look and the site is temporarily down, no matter – Hitchens is a lunatic.
Funny.
I had to live a lifetime and wait for this survey, to finally find out why women don't like me.
After all this time, I just thought it was my wit and prose that turned them off.
/sarc off………………….temporarily……………….
Healthier populations?
I think that means "looking prosperous". You know, fat , ugly chicks……………
Ya, could be…I was thinking about sitting on a wall on the Champs Elysees last summer watching the girls walk by (some really spectacular looking) but others – usually waliking really fast and pissed looking, a few with small dog under arm, dodging creeps and and begar women from North Africa…. not that "healthy or happy" looking.
I guess this must explain why I prefer Latin and/or Arabic women, since they seem to prefer me. You think that might be it?
By the way, anyone remember that as where the little weasel was being told not to raid his girlfiend's medicine cabinet for skin creme? I mean, what the hell is wrong with soap and water?
The new movie How To Train Your Dragon does just what this article points out. It's agreat movie but the hero is a small feminine boy set against a villiage of husky viking men. They learn from the boy how to handle the dragons.
For all the old-fashioned girls & boys in BigWorld…
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=QjWn-ueeeLw
Sounds like another libster study in stupidity to me. All the women that I know in my own family prefer macho men. They have a word for metero types. I'll give you a hint. They live on planet Uranus. Oh and the movie. Jay Robinson slole the show from some very huge stars of the day. Great performance.
Newest blogs soon to appear in the endless mounting pointlessness of Breitbart's media empire: Big Cliche' and Big Sneer.
I have been there, years ago, and seen the same sight as you just described. I always wondered why they were all packing those foo-foo dogs around with them. Certainly not for protection. The only thing I could figure, was that was the only companionship they could attract, and they had poke-chop bone necklaces, or the dogs were on the menu. You know, a French delicacy, like filet-de-Trigger………
Hey now. You should be thankful for Breitbart for giving you sites to troll! If they didn't exist then all you'd have in your life is sniff your fingers in your parent's basement while fantasizing about a Pelosi/Reid three way.
I don't think Anderson Pooper-Chuter has much to say about women.
Nonsense. Any guy who believes this article is going to get stepped on by women. Women want masculinity in a man. The only reason she'd be attractive to a metrosexual is because she knows she has a better chance of ordering him around, and he'd be a better provider. But the chances of her cheating on him, disrespecting him, and eventually leaving him are almost 100%. And if she doesn't leave him, they're going to have a miserable relationship.
Oh yes…a "heathier" society. An androgynous population. Hey how about a society of hermaphrodites ?
Yeah I imagine the Lefties would be extremely pleased with such a world.
It seems whatever perversion the human mind can imagine….that's what they want.
No limits, no morality, Hell on Earth as art.
Social preferences are not a specialty of the WSJ. And while certainly academics can find women to survey who want, or at least say they want, pantywaists, this is certainly not definitive. Women I know ( a little older) are looking for real men. Their biggest appointment is how few men are willing to get serious.
Um, no…
Point well taken.
I figured though he would certainly voice in with an opinion on "manly-men" versus "feminine men". Perhaps we would get a better cross section of opinion, if we polled Janeane Garafalo and Rachel Madcow……..
I'm going to posit that it has to do with the advent of the pill (and other widespread use of contraception) in the 60's. When the most basic, essential thing that differentiates men and women is obliterated, and everyone is effectively neutered, all sorts of confusion results. It even affects the animal kingdom!:
http://www.seattlepi.com/local/124939_estrogen04….
Of course CBS merely says it's "chemicals" in the water:
http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2009/11/25/evening...
Mr. Ross' story above goes hand in hand with the rise of all sorts of other gender issues that we see today.
And of course it's been documented many places that the pill makes women pick bad (feminine?) mates:
http://www.livescience.com/culture/080812-contrac...
Maybe the Catholic Church knows what she's talking about after all….<scratchchin>
"jerb" just about said it all – don't you realize 'Panop' how stupid you sound calling a blog that you are obviously reading AND commenting on "pointless"…
….Soros' just HAS to get a better quality of troll soon – these morons are giving the term Useful Idiot a bad name…
Alan Alda the perfect effete metrosexual, he’s definitely in touch with his inner self.
However I enjoyed his early portrayal of Hawkeye Pierce in MASH TV series, as a bird-dogging, good time Charlie, didn’t jive with the actual “man,” that is AA.
I suspect they're about to get their "reset" as it is so popular to say these days. I sure as Hell wouldn't move to the states right now but have considered leaving. While I've never had anything against Canada, I gotta admit it looks pretty good to me these days.
Amen, sister! Give me a hunka, hunka, burning love!
So, is that what happened to the Romans??!!
Hey, I bet you have to beat women off with a stick!
Go away, troll – you don't have enough testosterone to post here – even the women here have more testosterone than you!
Funny.
I'm flattered, but no
I reckon I'm an antique.
I still tip my hat to women. Still open the door for them.
Still stand uo when a woman enters the rooms, or returns to the table.
Still step aside when I'm in town, and let women pass by on the sidewalk.
By todays standards, I amuse people, and they laugh. I get snickers, and the occasional snide comment from "liberated women".
It might be old fashioned.
But where I come from, it is called manners.
Ugh. The vision! MAKE IT GO AWAY!!!
The female makes the rules.
The female is never wrong.
The rules are subject to change by the female at any time without prior notification
No male can possibly know all the rules. Attempts to document the rules are not permitted
If the female suspects that the male may know some or all of the rules, she has the right to immediately change some or all of the rules.
If the female is wrong, it is because of an egregarious misunderstanding which was the direct result of vagrant misunderstanding which was a direct result of something the male said or did wrong.
Yo, troll!
Did you hear that Breitbart is going to do a new Big Site, called BFD?
In honor of Joe "The Comic" Bidens statement this past week: "This is a Big F**king Deal"…………..
Sorry ladies took a while to answer I was to busy pumping Iron (streaches, muscles ripple across his back) If you need anything just whisle. You know how too whistle right?
I agree with everything you just wrote.
I, on the other hand, have always operated under the premise, that "There are no rules". On the rare occasion that rules are really called for, I do what the Senate does. I "Make them up as I go along, as needed".
That usually throws everyone a big curve ball………….
I am sick of metrosexuals and homosexuals and bi-sexuals and trans-sexuals, and anything that cannot figure out what gender it is. Give me a gruff old John Wayne over a George Clooney ANY day. I can't see Clooney types roughing up their manicures if their woman is being assaulted on the street.
The Euro-zone is the twilight zone.
I notice that those "healthier" societies (and I'm dubious of the ways that's measured), are also the most bureaucratic ones. In other words, feminine skills such as social ability, understanding nuances of expression, chatting amicably, and other ways of climbing the bureaucratic ladder are more valuable than masculine ways. In fact, manly ways usually get you in trouble in a bureaucracy.
So it isn't about "health" that matters, it's about getting ahead in a feminized society.
Poking him?
Or "porking" him……………?
I certainly think it is a meaningful part of the picture.
I.E.–men.
'Might give them make-up tips.
Amen, Amen Amen!!!! My man is strong, masculine, a provider and I am confident that he would protect our family or die trying. He is also loving, responsible and a role model for our boys. I suspect this kind of man is what most conservative women prefer…
I can't count the times I've heard women, who were coming of age during the 60s and 70s, according to the dictates of the femiNAZIs, say they wanted a "sensitive" man just to find that, when they got these guys home and unwrapped them, they had married either a momma's boy or a "punk" or both. Needless to say , there was a lot of "buyer's remorse."
Quite so, correlation is not causation, but it is good reason to sit up and take notice.
I think the author is on to something though. Simple economy of effort would prompt many women to select more compliant, perhaps even more visually pretty males over rougher less cooperative types if circumstances do not demand paying the price of patience and self control for the sake of getting a rougher more aggressive mate.
I wouldn't call wealth a cause so much as a factor that creates the opportunity for making certain choices — regardless of whether those choices are smart or dumb, and in what ways.
The choices themselves are the cause.
The power of modern armaments give us the choice of placing females on the front lines of combat. The wisdom of that choice is a separate question. And even then, what are ones criteria for measurement — equality of "opportunity" or aggregate efficiency in combat?
Sticky stuff.
And then there are good old inertia and entropy to be taken into account.
Lot's of people have thought so and argued persuasively for that idea, especially the Romans themselves.
Shoe betcha.
Some girly man must have done the study.
I want no man who spends more time with the blow dryer than I do.
Too bad the masculine men they so love are into each other.
That's cause I was giving her my pole.
Everything I have ever observed of human relations supports that idea.
There are occasional exceptions. But they are rather rare and very specific in nature.
There is little doubt as to the soaring levels of testosterone among GOP women, just ask Ann Coulter's adam's apple.
Please communicate same to the youngest women of your acquaintance, however young you may be yourself.
Otherwise they are all the more likely to be deceived by the heartless progressive bitches on TV.
Anything so princess doesn't have to go out and get a job apparently.
Body hair is now a parisan issue? Why would the whole population die out because young women select less hairy men? They will still be able to procreate, hairy chest or smooth, no?
Meg, I'm not a woman but your "suspicions" are absolutely correct. Metrosexuals are spacetakers. As much as I personally like money, if that's all you're good for, you're worthless. See also Barack Hussein Obama. Glad you're happy with your choice.
This is NOT a new thing! The late 1700's and early 1800's had their "dandies," and plenty of French novels in the 1800's detailed how women liked their men a little bit fem. wikipedia.org/wiki/Dandy
Sorry, couldn't read this article after looking at a pic of boy george and then a follow up of alan alda parred w/the term mertosexual…just turned my stomach. Maybe the best article of the year, decade or even century. I'll never know because of those pics and words…
Bad study its not true.
and don't think she's not grateful.
joeblough you nailed it. While feminism did some good things, sorry ladies, it's is also a significant factor in the decline of America and other Western countries.
My wife is from Brasil, so you know I have to agree 100% with this story.
This is a lame survey done to fill space and buy time, (before Nov),
for the libs by the libs,
may they all perish from the Earth…or go to Canada..
Where healthCare is "free" and taxes are high…A veritable lib (dis) utopia..
God, I hope they fall for it…
Okay, so the top 10 Hollywood male box office draws look like girls.
10. Viggo Mortensen
9. Denzel Washington
8. Terrence Howard
7. Matthew McConaughey
6. Hugh Jackman
5. Brad Pitt
4. Johnny Depp
3. Clive Owen
2. George Clooney
1. Daniel Craig
Uh huh. Sound like another doofus government study just to get funding.
I don't think there's anything remotely girly about Mortensen, Washington, Owen or Craig.
No snickers from me! I love real men. Real men aren't afraid to be old fashioned and real women know how to appreciate that and take it as it's meant. A compliment.
You've got that right. Add in that he's a God-fearing man who takes his church responsilities seriously, and that's exactly what I'm looking for. I've never been interested in pretty boys. I don't want some Brad Pitt lookalike, I want a real man. Why are the "leaders" of our society pushing us so hard toward the metrosexual ideal? How is that appealing to anybody?
It has nothing to do with that. I have no problem working if I need to, but I want to be at home with my children while they're young. I don't want nannies to raise them, and I don't want my husband feeling like he can't care for us. I don't want a man who's prettier than I am, and I don't want a man who doesn't look and act and smell like a real man. It's not attractive. I want to marry a man, not a pretty little boy.
So that's why Ben Shapiro finally lost his virginity.
You were told right, at least by my womanly experiences.
This particular woman likes you just fine, Cowboy. =)
Um…you do realize that on your side is Rosie O'Donnell, Barbra Streisand, Janeane Garofalo, Rachel Maddow, Nancy Pelosi, Joy Behar, Oprah, and Hilary Clinton, right?
And look at how the French turned out.
I wonder if the study took variability of testosterone levels by race into consideration.
Why is it that movies about Rome have everyone talking in British English? I've always found that mildly amusing to the point where I can't take films like that seriously.
Mago
Would you understand if they spoke in say, British Latin??
Strega
I think that was the point, except for George C, most of the reat are macho, althought macho-lib..
You must be logged in to post a comment.