Wilder Publications, a small publishing company based in Redford Va., is offering on Amazon.com a rather unusual compendium of The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence, and the Articles of Confederation. The Wilder edition of our country’s founding documents comes complete with a prefatory warning label:
This book is a product of its time and does not reflect the same values as it would if it were written today. Parents might wish to discuss with their children how views on race, gender, sexuality, ethnicity and interpersonal relations have changed since this book was written before allowing them to read this classic work.”

The outcry— not only from the right—has been predictably vociferous. There’s even a Facebook page urging a boycott of Wilder Publications and also offering interesting information regarding its owner, Warren Lapine, including some of his favorite Facebook pages. Other displays of outrage against Wilder are numerous and easily located via a simple Google search.
With all due respect to them, however, Lapine’s detractors have it all wrong. Rather than revilement, we owe Wilder Publications a huge debt of gratitude for this useful and long overdue caveat lector. Wilder Publications has just invented a new genre of literature: safe history.
Short of censoring The Constitution and the other offending documents outright—book banning is still lamentably illegal at this time in the United States—adding its disclaimer was the best precaution Wilder could take. In doing so, it has given us a new invention: the literary condom, a verbal prophylactic against the dangerously seminal ideas inherent in this sexist, bigoted “product of its time.”
In proof of which, consider some of the Constitution’s perilous language. Article 1, section 8 grants the Congress the power:
To establish an uniform Rule of Naturalization, and uniform Laws on the subject of Bankruptcies throughout the United States;
To coin Money, regulate the Value thereof, and of foreign Coin, and fix the Standard of Weights and Measures; …
To establish Post Offices and post Roads;
To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries;
To constitute Tribunals inferior to the supreme Court;
Look hard at that list of racially, sexually, ethnically, and interpersonally obsolete concepts: controlling the citizenship process; providing for orderly liquidation of failed companies; instituting a regulated currency; running a mail delivery service and providing a national transportation system; ensuring the proper compensation and protection of intellectual property; instituting a legal system to protect all of the above. How out-of-step with the enlightened ideas of our modern era. Reader, be warned!

Without Wilder, we might actually have believed some of the drivel put forth in this 4,500-word Democracy for Dummies Guidebook. After all, great writing must never be a product of its time. Although efforts to ban Huckleberry Finn and Tom Sawyer continue to this day in some circles, the enlightened 21st-century reader views Clemens’ stories simply as quaint “products of their time,” the rude ramblings of a racist, misogynist river cruiser — otherwise known as one of the greatest of all American authors.

Granted, the Constitution, without mentioning slavery outright, does refer to it in Article 1, Section 9:
The Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit, shall not be prohibited by the Congress prior to the Year one thousand eight hundred and eight, but a Tax or duty may be imposed on such Importation, not exceeding ten dollars for each Person.
It would take many decades for the issue of emancipation to rise to the level of passion whereby Americans would be ready to kill their fellow countrymen by the thousands, either to preserve or abolish slavery. The Constitution, in modern parlance, merely “kicked the can down the road,” much as today’s legislators have done for decades with the unfunded liabilities of Medicare and Medicaid and the Ponzi Scheme known as Social Security.
To condemn the Constitution (or admonish modern-day readers of it) for its procrastination on the difficult issue of slavery is not only disingenuous but intellectually dishonest. Milton wrote in his 1644 eloquent treatise against censorship in England, Areopagitica:
As good almost kill a man as kill a good book; who kills a man kills a reasonable creature, God’s image; but he who destroys a good book, kills reason itself, kills the image of God, as it were in the eye.
O, poor unenlightened product of 17th-century darkness! We know better today than to mention God in political argument.
Although Ray Bradbury’s dystopic world of Fahrenheit 451 book banning has not yet become reality, that day may arrive sooner rather than later in view of the Obama administration’s rush to control not only physical property such as banks, auto manufacturers, hospitals, drug companies and the like, but also intellectual real estate such as thoughts and ideas.
Until we are fully delivered from the peril of books, our best safeguard against the danger of our own minds—and the backward thinking of our powder-wigged patriot founders— is Wilder Publications and its little Trojan of truth.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
96 Comments
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Big Tweeting, Frances Drake and BigJournalism, TheDean&HeadMaster. TheDean&HeadMaster said: To Save the Constitution, Liberals Must First Destroy It http://bit.ly/byEz6a [...]
"Political correctness" will be the very death of our country, well "political correctness" and our own freedoms being used against us as a weapon – weapons just as tangible and deadly as a bomb, or a missle or an Islamic fanatic with a "student's visa".
Those freedoms are outlined in the very document(s) Wilder Productions has sullied and cheapened with that ridiculous disclaimer. Much like a robed dolt injecting his or her's ideology OVER the very words contained in the Constitution, a single person or perhaps three, or maybe even NINE people at Wilder Productions have subverted this document.
It's time to take back our country, and we better get BACK to the words in the Constitution – soon. Oh, ya…by the way:
Doesn't the Constitution mention something about "No Person except a natural born Citizen, …" Ah, just cheap talk by some old white men in the olden days, RIGHT?
The answer to this is to create a response in the exact opposite vein. Little doubt we could find a publisher to do this and our purchasing power would crush this liberal commie view of our founding documents. My forward would read:
"These documents gave word and import to the greatest challenge humanity has ever faced, the successful resistance to tyranny and the establishment of individual liberty as a paramount concern. It is our hope that the reader will read these words in the manner and historical context upon and which they were written, and remember that we who bear the burden of temporarily holding that chalice of liberty will do so in keeping with these words."
Progressives should have a disclaimer as well.
"Warning. Ideas, offers, proffered by said individuals should be subject to extreme scrutiny. Harmful if taken internally. May cause loss of freedom, loss of speech, loss of incentive. Please read the Constitution before taking any and all ideas from these persons."
Much more eloquent that I could have put.
*Applause*
i am surprised they didn't either sensor the constitution, or add in the libs missing pages. you know the missing pages. where it has gay marriage, abortions, taking over failed businesses, taking over banks(not even failed ones), taking over healthcare. and when finished it might even include ben franklin's ideas on carbon taxes, and john adams message to oil companies. then there will be george washington's message to future wanna be dictators, and thomas jefferson's ideas on taking over the internet. not many people know about jefferson's insight on the future, he always talked about e-mail, search engines, and wi fi hot spots, really he did.
But with all due respect Joe, some documents need NO support or caveat, however well thought out and eloquent.
That's the point, in my opinion, of Gregg's piece. Just the Constitution – as embodied by the words as written, by great men at our founding. No varnish, no "fresh paint", no refurbishment, no little plaque placed at the bottom of the words – just the document – standing on it's own – like it's always been.
Our founding documents, The Constitution, The Declaration of Independence and Articles of the Confederation DOES NOT need a disclaimer. If anyone, after “actually” reading them completely, walks away offended in any slight way, then they need to get the HELL out of our country, liberocrats and progledites included! No further explanation nor discussion is necessary.
► This administration and Congress is a product of its time and upbringing and does not reflect the same values as the majority of the American people today. Parents might wish to discuss with their children how views on a free republic, free enterprise, independence, work ethic, honor, honesty, free speech, the right to keep and bear arms, accountability, and personal morals have been disregarded by our elected officials for too long since this book was written and how to restore adherence to our Constitution and rule of law before honoring them with this gift from our remakable forefathers.
The artiocle is too smart for my tea-bag mind. I was hoping to use it against my libereral foes, but it doesn't make no sense. Did Obam burn books is his muslim oval office today? Is that what this is about?
Did Pelosi make them gays into hero's again? Damn her.
I keep wantin' to fear them people, but so far, ain't nothing happen to me.
Since Obama was sworn in, I didn't lose my freedom to call him a Nazi. I still got Obama hatin' FOX News every night. I still got my guns that Beck said they was gonna take away. My taxes didn't go up
When is all this bad stuff gonna start? I dug a bunker under my house and stored up food because this webnsite scared the crap out of me, but so far, ain't nothin scary happened.
DANG!!
I realize the 10Commandments tablet is not a book, but it is very old and dated,
inappropriate for these times, so a disclaimer must be in order to warn readers of how changing values in modern times,
make this tablet of ancient words, unenlightened and arcane…
When a book publisher fails to get the grammar right in a disclaimer you just have to wonder who is calling the shots. (Or is that whom?)
The Obama Administration summed up in one picture:
http://www.flpundit.com/journal/2010/6/13/the-soc...
I hear Venezuela is lovely this time of year.
it's like sooo yesterday …
That had to leave a mark!
Several humorous and insightful cartoons on what Obama and the Democrats are doing to "Liberty" in this country at http://drawfortruth.wordpress.com/category/libert...
Some are funny . . . others are so true they could almost make you cry! Check them out for yourself.
do we need this disclaimer for the bible?
We're seeing what happens when you don't elect an American to be President. One thing I'm sure of is that this pathetic creature, who presently holds that office, is not a true American in his heart.
In this wonderful age of electronic communication, who needs book-banning? One little keystroke and it all just—goes away!
Obama might have squeezed out in Hawai`i, but like you say, he's NOT an American at heart – he's a fraud, he's phoney baloney…I bet you he "gets rich(er)" and moves to Europe or the Carribean or somewhere funky.
Any book or work with "values" related materials embedded, will need such a disclaimer…
Speaking of douche………………..What a loser you are. Good to see that you still have your head buried in your a$$.
RandyL2
When I heard about this, I thought they were pulling my leg…
Sadly, not….
Why are liberals not merely stupid and bigoted, but so hopelessly unfunny in their lame attempts at parody?
C'mon, troll- at least TRY to defend Wilder. Explain *why7* the Constitution etc are dangerous documents, out of step with the modern world.
"My taxes didn't go up"
Only because you don't have a job. Those of us who actually work are paying higher taxes already- and the BIG hikes are yet to come.
Jesus, liberalism really is a mental disease.
He'll most likely move to Indonesia, since he already has citizenship.
Some of Lapine's' favorite things:
1,000,000 Strong Against Offshore Drilling,
Making Drug Testing Mandatory for Corporate Welfare,
Let Constance Take Her Girlfriend to Prom!,
Dreams of Decadence Magazine, Ritchie Blackmore Official Site,
GLAAD (Gay & Lesbian Alliance Against Defamation),
Democratic Party of Virginia,
Unitarian Universalist Congregation New River Valley,
Barack Obama
What a useless fucktard.
"In matters of Power, let no more be heard of confidence in men, but bind him down from mischief by the chains of the Constitution."
– Thomas Jefferson
Today’s leaders of the Democratic Party are not at all progressive. In fact, their ideology is regressive – a throwback to an ideology popular in the 1920s and 30s and 40s. Their vision is that people they consider the “ignorant many” should be governed by people who see themselves as the “enlightened few.”
I've seen that disclaimer on the Constitution almost everywhere. It never ceases to get my blood boiling.
Companies making a disclaimer on some of their more racially-charged or otherwise controversial products from ages past due to the social climate of the times? Acceptable to a certain degree. I have some of the Disney cartoon collections on DVD, and some of the cartoons can be a bit surprising if not a hair disturbing (such as one in which Mickey Mouse turns a gun on Donald Duck as a threat) so they added brief blurbs about the humor of the times before those cartoons as opposed to cutting any of them. And it's their right to do so since it's their product.
Companies putting a disclaimer on the Constitution? I find that downright offensive. The Constitution is the Supreme Law of the Land, not a product that they produced. If they're worried that it'll spark controversy (though WHY eludes me), then they shouldn't be re-printing it in the first place.
lol…and a statue of his favorite person – himself.
Nice job of trying to make things stupid troll. Any other stupid things to say?
James,
Excellent post up top.
To this post I would add "it's not his CHOICE where or by whom he was raised." A child of extremist…fill in the blank….parents HAS NO DEFENSE against indoctrination. Obama was clearly indoctrinated from an early age by a succession of "HANDLERS" who spoon fed him THEIR version of life, the universe, and everything, and ISOLATED him from all experience except those orchestrated to "create" the perfect puppet.
The movie "Sandlot" might as well be written in ancient Norse to Obama. He HAS NO MEMORIES of a common American childhood. Hell, even the Kennedy family played football! Obama never went to camp, never sat in a general population schoolroom, never had a tree house or shot off a wad of Black Cats on the 4th of July. His whole life….WHOLE LIFE was politican and religious indoctrination, rallies, union meetings, political activism…from the earliest formative stages to now…he HAD NO REAL CHILDHOOD except maybe surfing and even then it was on private beaches…he's clearly no "SURFER DUDE."
How can anyone REASONABLY EXPECT him to get "here" from "there?" How can anyone reasonable expect him to relate on ANY HUMAN EXPERIENTIAL LEVEL to the rest of us who spent our childhoods in pretty much the same way…..a uniquely American way? How many of us ever attended political rallies before we were in college, if then? How many of us can relate to beer busts and back seat bingo???
))
It's like if we went to another planet and tried to "lead" the people there, knowing absolutely NOTHING ABOUT WHO THEY ARE INSIDE THEIR OWN SKIN. We are asking too much.
Obama has NO weapon to bring to this fight. Still no reason not to fight it, but understand he isn't willfully rejecting us and our views….he simply has no way to relate, empathize or sympathize to them or us. He is, in the truest sense of the word, clueless.
his head might not be in his, but obama's
ya. things are just peachy right now. no problems, all's well. Moron.
R
Much better ….Bravo!
Yeah, there was that pedophile Marxist, who I'm sure, filled his little head with more than Socialist idelogy.
Actually I'm gonna say James that at this point we DO need a Constitutional Convention. We need to lose a couple of ill considered amendments and we need the Enumerated Powers Act. I know the danger such a convention, but just taking the first "amendment" in this article, on that needs to GO, and several more, and one that needs to be strengthened…..the reward outweighs the risk. I think John144 spoke to how we can "limit" the scope of such a CC and minimize the "unintended consequences" element of it. But IMO, it may be time to polish the silver, precious and valuable as it is, putting a bit of a sheen back on it will serve us well going forward, now that we have seen how courts, congresses, states, and Presidents have and no doubt will continue to abuse it's core intent.
Dicey but much needed. And if we approach it as one would a cleanup of the Mona Lisa, we can do it. More important, if we don't, pretty soon you won't be able to see her face at all.
thank you. Watching Obama fidget and squirm during the playing of our National Anthem tells me ALL I need to know about him, clearly he's not one of "us". Not at heart.
I sent you a previous reply, that was most likely deleted due to a hope for a speedy demise for his sugar daddy, Soros.
'WHO" is correct….Subjective case…
"WHOM"—Objective case…
he is still getting his welfare check so nothings changed for him
those are only guidelines to be altered as needed to changing times.
Ah, good. My observation will not be totally lost on the unwashed masses.
And as we all know, might is the past tense of may.
"Parents might wish to discuss…." (Parents might have wished for something but they may wish to do something else.)
The publisher may wish to find a new copywriter.
Interesting metaphor with the Mona Lisa. Let me tell you why. I took a class on Roman history – in Rome. I learned alot about art, and a few weeks later I went to the Lourve and watched the rest of the tourists PUSH PAST each other to snap a photo of the Mona Lisa.
They were pushing past Raphael, Michelangelo, and various masters of the Renaissance.
The Constitution – as written – and further interpreted and ruled upon – is suffient in it's current form, in my opinion. Opening up the process to attacks from leftist ideology is a huge risk. Besides the ratification process is along and hard road – remember the ERA in the late 70's? Still not ratified.
Hey, you KNOW how I feel about Soros. He is, quite possible the most dangerous person (that we know of) in the WORLD. He games EVERYBODY but seems determined to HURT the U.S. and profit from it while he's at it. He should not be wasting oxygen. Morte`, gone, eliminated.
awesome avatar. that's one tough looking hombre` ;p
The last time I went after him on the Bigs, I must have broken the record for having more comments deleted in one day. The day I read his obit, will be cause for celebration.
lol…..your story of the Mona Lisa is my experience also. In fact we were damn near trampled. When we finally got to see it….it was frankly a "ho, hum" moment compared to Michelangelo.
I think I prefer "big art" like architecture, murals, etc. Even on canvass the only Picasso I really like is "Gernica" and that only because it's so "bigger than life." The actual building and sculptures of the Guggenheim museum in Bilbao are far more moving to me than the art it houses, and I prefer Dali's sculptures to his paintings.
On the Constitutional convention I would say this, I agree the "limits" placed on any convention would have to be narrow. John144 I believe said you could actually limit it to "revisiting" only one amendment or article. He seemed fairly certain it could be structured to protect it from a far left OR right extremist attack.
Having lived through both desegration and the ERA I see it can be 'held" and "amended….but as you point out….why bother if it may not even be ratified for decades if every. But how then did we end up with legislation that reflects these amendments? ERA may not yet be ratified, but the laws that emerged have teeth and frankly if anyone plays the race, sex, blah blah card in a situation where someone can be sued….they WIN BY DEFAULT. Nobody wants to touch that one and they will turn themselves inside out, stand reason on it's ear to avoid doing so.
How did any state or fed agency pass laws based on an amendment that is not yet ratified? Obviously I know even less than I thought about legal matters, lol. I just don't see how it got codified without being actually ratified. Weird.
They should put stuff like "RACIALLY CHARGED" or "SEXUAL CONTENT" on stuff like this just to get the youngsters to read it! If you can't figure out that a document written over 200yrs ago may have some stuff in it that does not conform to our current norm's you need to keep reading and expand your reading list!
It's the same logic used to keep Wyle Coyote of the TV, and I miss Wyle (POOF!)
The ratification was designed to be long and hard. The entire idea behind our federal concept of government is to slow everything down, preferably to a stand still, though some actions are bound to make it through the congressional maze.
At the constitutional convention the only thing they could agree on is they couldn't agree on anything. They realized the debate would never end. And if by some strange luck, a problem could be solved, there would be another 1,000 or so waiting in the wings. Congress was designed as a place where those who disagreed could yell and scream at each other.
The thinking went that if the politicians were busy screaming at each other they wouldn't have time to interfere in our lives. That's also why DC is located on a drained swamp. The humidity is miserable half the year, forcing congress out of session. The founding fathers were brilliant.
Its that damn air conditioning that screwed everything up. It meant politicians could stay in Washington year round.
I actually took a class centered on the Founding Documents and history there of, and the obvious theme running through the process was the very reason for the Revolution itself; to create a process that could be NOT be subverted and a process created with the fresh memories of the tryanny of King George III in mind. Neither the Declaration nor the Constitution actually "outlaws" Kingship, they didn't need to – although the idea was "kicked around" and then discarded.
Free men came together and created a Republic (not a democracy – see what they say about pure democracy in the Athenian model) and the founding document is not to be lightly treated and screwed with – lest we have Revolutionary France or revolutionary Russia, both doomed exercises in overthrowing the status quo.
If you haven't already, check this book out if like. I can't recommend it enough.
http://www.amazon.com/American-Creation-Triumphs-...
The author picks about dozen important events in the founding of America and then does one chapter on each. The one on the Constitutional Convention is fascinating. When Madison presented his idea he'd done exhaustive research on self government through out history. He came to realize that neither a democracy (mob rule) nor a republic have histories of lasting.
Democracies fail because it devolves into tyranny of the majority over the minority and republics fail because they either start wars between themselves or fail to come together in times of common peril.
So he came up with a third way, a democratic republic. The strengths of a democracy with the limits of a republic. I am constantly amazed at their brilliance. They took all the ideals of enlightenment and made a working model out of them. What a time it must have been to live in. All the various ideals and philosophies of western civilization coming together at just the right moment and circumstances, with exactly the right people.
Makes a pretty good argument if you ask me for the existence of God.
Thanks, a gun-totin' ground squirrel matches me perfectly.
Obama is the sock puppet of soros.
bwahahahahahahahaha
Brilliant!
outstanding Ed, really outstanding. thanks, and yes democratic Republic – exactly. clarification and restatement that is accurate and clear. too bad more of our current government on both sides of the "aisle" weren't reconnected to our founding principlals.
Pehaps TexasStomp is right; we should put it all on the table and let freedom reassert itself – as you say – put it all in God's hands – again.
HuffPo called, they want their village idiot back.
I disagree. I think the Constitution is pretty much perfect the way it is. I certainly wouldn't want any modern hack politicians anywhere near changing the frame work laid out by those geniuses.
About 4 or 5 years ago there was a ballot item on holding a new state constitutional convention in New York, we voted it down. It was rigged, nearly 100% certain the current crop of elected officials would be the delegates, so they'd get to rip out everything that impeded their theft. I wouldn't expect anything different at the federal level.
What we need to do is to follow the constitution to the letter of the law. It's strict where necessary "Congress shall pass no law…", and a little malleable where needed it 'cruel and unusual punishment.' That phrasing is brilliant. It leaves it to every generation to decide what is cruel and unusual, and that's how I think it should be.
I've spent the last 10 years studying and debating these issues with a hard core libertarian – who finally convinced me I was on his side – and here's the problem as I see it.
The ultimate vanguard, the ultimate protector of the freedom and liberty of We The People, is in fact We The People. Politicians will not save us from politics. On the contrary, they are the enemy here. It's not left vs. right, conservative vs. liberal, democrat vs. republican. Its about We The People vs. the ruling elites.
As American citizens, this is our job. No one is going to come in and save us, we have to do it ourselves. Fortunately, the Constitution is on our side, and its more and more looking like the Supreme Court is too.
When politicians campaign promising free government money, it's our job to say no. And if other voters think we're nuts for turning it down, its our responsibility to educate them.
"I know of no safe repository of the ultimate power of society but the people. And if we think them not enlightened enough, the remedy is not to take power from them, but to inform them by education." – Thomas Jefferson
Now let's get to work!
Per libunatics, the Constitution needs "updating" (i.e., eviscerating in favor of a dictatorship of the proletariat).
They believe that the document was written by a bunch of greedy white males whose sole intent was to keep blacks and women enslaved.
"Dated" or not, "this book" provides the best blueprint for human interraction and the best template for "society" ever devised by the puny mind of man, as has been proven over and over again throughout the history that has followed it. It has created more prosperity and human dignity than any other system in the history of the world, because it recognizes timeless and universal truths, and allows for the "rights" given to us by God or Nature, or whatever universal force you prefer. "Evolution" is not designed to be a suicide pact either…It requires that we keep what's good in order to continue to evolve. Selecting for what's wrong causes devolution, and makes all the analysis of "dated" ideas suspect.
I can only imagine how Madison, Jefferson, Franklin, and Washington would feel about the disclaimer on our U.S. Constitution.
These truly are the times that "try men's souls."
Crap -
Intelectual real esate , thoughts and ideas hmmmm??? Oh yea, broadband control thanks to the White House and their end around the Supreme Court. Folk's I've been screaming it loud for over a year food is gold, you have not seen anything yet: 2011 and tax increases. Internet control. Screaming inflation mid 2011, don't believe just watch. We are only mid-way {Obama adm.} and things have not!!!! moderated from the White House. God Bless us All.
On par with Oliver and Sean's Excellent Adventure where through a pot induced haze Fidel Castro assumed the appearance of a Communist Charlemagne. Education according to Wilder is obviously only as good as the limits you place on it. It's understandable that people who view themselves as "gods" fail to comprehend the seminal foundational work for all democracies, with it's acutely judicious understanding of human nature, it's excesses, and abominable failings. The men who wrote the constitution were of superb character, intellect, foresight, thought, decency, wisdom, circumspection, talent, independence, loyalty, curiosity, learning, humility, and commitment to a new vista for history.
On par with Oliver and Sean's Excellent Adventure where through a pot induced haze Fidel Castro assumed the appearance of a Communist Charlemagne. Education according to Wilder is obviously only as good as the limits you place on it. It's understandable that people who view themselves as "gods" fail to comprehend the seminal foundational work for all democracies, with it's acutely judicious understanding of human nature, it's excesses, and abominable failings. The men who wrote the constitution were of superb character, intellect, foresight, thought, decency, wisdom, circumspection, talent, independence, loyalty, curiosity, learning, humility, and commitment to a new vista for history.
Lol, I actually bought that version a few months ago, it has the exact page that Beck shows now.
Don't give them any ideas! That's all we need, "The Gnostic Constitution."
No you can't imagine them, because they never existed. They are merely an oral history passed down from generations and their writings were the quaint but inaccurate transcriptions of that history by noble but imperfect men. Therefore it is incumbent on us to divine the True Meaning of their words. Modern scholarship has determined that Thomas Jefferson was actually a loose collection of Virginia philosophers who argued over ale in local pubs, and scribbled dirty words on outhouse walls. These words have been variously reinterpreted and spun into the purported Writings of the Founding Father's. Truth is, they were never interested in personal freedoms and responsibility, they were for social justice, and we can't truly understand the meaning of their words unless we view them through the social justice prism. (excerpted from my forthcoming book , "Are You Smarter Than The Founding Father's – Then You Just Might Be A Liberal!")
Well stated.
Let's hope that Wilder Publications gets a condemnation from Obama like Joe The Plumber, Rush Limbaugh, and Fox News got. They would be guaranteed success if they get on Obama's hit list. How do I get on it? I could use the extra money it would bring in.
It's amazing how much man has "NOT" advanced in quite some time. All of these documents that are mentioned here cover the same issues now as they did when they were written. As long as the Bible and our Founding Documents have been around do we still not have homsexuality, abortions, prostitution, greed, lust, envy, taxes, murder, theft and every other vile thing that man can do to each other?
If these documents are so "Dated" why is the modern ENLIGHTENED man still doing all of the same crap he was doing thousands of years ago! HMMM, sounds like they may need to re-think their disclaimer.
The Constitution is no longer current and the founding fathers were backward men with antiquated ideas. Whatever. They obviously knew the best guard against all sorts of chicanery was compliance with the Constitution. Good on you, RandyL2.
red ink spill http://3.bp.blogspot.com/_Zy_i5me_-Nk/S_Qz1WyLbSI...
On par with Oliver and Sean's Excellent Adventure where through a pot induced haze Fidel Castro assumed the appearance of a Communist Charlemagne. Education according to Wilder is obviously only as good as the limits you place on it. It's understandable that people who view themselves as "gods" fail to comprehend the seminal foundational work for all democracies, with it's acutely judicious understanding of human nature, it's excesses, and abominable failings. The men who wrote the constitution were of superb character, intellect, foresight, thought, decency, wisdom, circumspection, talent, independence, loyalty, curiosity, learning, humility, and commitment to a new vista for history.
I may be in a tie with you James, for the person who detests soros more!
It is his life's dream to destroy America, and get rich doing it –
Sad to realize, it doesn't stop with that pathetic pig, there are others –
maurice strong is a danger to humanity as is joyce and sunsteen – they must have been multiplying somewhere laying in wait, and now, they are crawling out from under their rocks!
Kevin, read this quote from BHO, then re-read Jefferson's words.
" But, the Supreme Court never ventured into the issues of redistribution of wealth, and of more basic issues such as political and economic justice in society. To that extent, as radical as I think people try to characterize the Warren Court, it wasn’t that radical. It didn’t break free from the essential constraints that were placed by the Founding Fathers in the Constitution, at least as it’s been interpreted, and the Warren Court interpreted in the same way, that generally the Constitution is a charter of negative liberties. Says what the states can’t do to you. Says what the federal government can’t do to you, but doesn’t say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf."
- Barack Obama –
Thomas Jefferson was a remarkable man. He could hardly have been more prescient.
Why are liberals not merely stupid and bigoted, but so hopelessly unfunny in their lame attempts at parody?
Because it's hard to parody people you hate in a manner that's funny. The hate just leaks out like a poison and kills the comedy.
I say we all get back to talking like John Wayne and Gary Copper. Only people with something to hide wish to use language that obscures..
Good luck with that.
Air America will advertise your false history screed for free…
Print up a couple million copies in advance please to keep the crowds down.
Don't forget to reference primary source documents on the founding fathers that are ALL OVER out there to get accurate…
Never mind you won't do that because it will expose you as a fraud and a false prophet of proglodyte libtard bullsh!t…
Are you smarter than a 5th grader? I suspect not…
Randy,
EXXXXXXXCELLENT!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
RandyL2,
You make a most excellent point here.
The documents of the founding fathers were meant to throttle and holdback man's sinful nature and the ease with which we tend to corrupt our own situations.
They KNEW we would fall and tried to prevent it with strong documents and guidelines.
"Thomas Jefferson was a remarkable man. He could hardly have been more prescient." Amen.
They ALL were.
Thanks, RandyL2. I heard about Obama's statement right after he made it–the only reason I could even believe he said that is because I've seen, for years, that this is how Demmunists look at things. Most of them are just greedier and more megalomanical (same thing in this case) than they are altruistic but, then, that's mostly always been the case hasn't it?
Brain damage from the hypoxia. 'Too much methane.
It is not really hard to figure out what the people of this country really want.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP-IM7maxbI&fe....
"Obama is a radical communist, and I think it's becoming clear. That's what I told people in Ilinois, and now everybody realizes that it's true. He's going to destroy this country and we're either going to stop him or the United States of America will cease to exist."
- Dr. Alan Keyes
It will have to be a three way tie on Soros. While I do not post my objections to him, I have been doing a bit of research into who he is and what he stands for. He has made Billions off the suffering of people. First in WWII as he helped his "fake-Father" gather the belongings of the Jews, and called it the "best time of his life" to his betting against America in the financial industries. He is a war criminal and should be stripped of his US citizenship NOW.
Top Post Larry. I think that liberals should wear a identifiers like the Jewish folks did during WWII. At least that way my children would know whom to run from. Liberals are un-healthy for children, pets and other living things
You forgot the "sarc" Gumby.
The ONLY good thing that came from my reading up on that pig is to know that he spent 10Million of his stolen money to defeat George W. Bush, and he FAILED.
Keeps me believing that good will always overcome evil
It's hard to believe just how much damage our own government is doing to our national economy! We're taxing the very things that make our economy grow – work, savings and investment – and we're strangling job growth with complexity and tax compliance costs.
Our tax system even gives foreign producers a price advantage when they sell their products here. We're killing off the "Made in America" label through our self defeating tax system, and this must change.
In a country well governed, poverty is something to be ashamed of. In a country badly governed, wealth is something to be ashamed of.
Confucius
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AP-IM7maxbI&fe....
Thank you.
— On Mon, 6/14/10, IntenseDebate Notifications <notifications@intensedebatemail.com> wrote:
Who are we as a nation? Here is a little reminder. http://remembernovember.com/
Who are we as a nation? Here is a little reminder. http://remembernovember.com/
Visitor recommendations…
[...]one of our visitors recently recommended the following website[...]……
Websites we think you should visit…
[...]although websites we backlink to below are considerably not related to ours, we feel they are actually worth a go through, so have a look[...]……
You must be logged in to post a comment.