**Post UPDATED at bottom.
“We got him. We got him.” – Mediaite White House reporter Tommy Christopher to a few people just after badgering Andrew Breitbart with a race-baiting question.
My first CPAC and my first first-person look at how the corrupt left-wing media operates. I can’t pretend that anything surprised me, because as Mama used to always say, “Evil is as evil does.” But yes, Max Blumenthal, Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher and some guy named Daryle Jenkins with something called One People’s Project stalked into CPAC like three old-media hitmen ready and eager to do some dirty work. So eager, in fact, that you could picture them the night before lying in bed at their parents’ house with visions of ambushing right-wingers in their heads.
There was only one problem: the unholy three appear to have forgotten that in this digital age everything’s changed. It‘s no longer just the elites who come heavy. We all carry videos cameras and we all have access to a distribution system Al Gore named the Internet. So a funny thing happened while Max and Daryle were driving dad’s car home, maliciously editing manipulated footage in their heads (you know, kind of like this – gee, Max, what happened to Larry O’Connor catching you in a big fat lie? ), Big Journalism published the unedited footage for the whole world to see, and what the world saw was a raw look at how Journalistic Rendition operates.

And in the case of Tommy Christopher and Mediaite, they did our job for us.
Journalistic Rendition is exactly what it sounds like. Just as the Clinton administration kept its hands clean but still benefited from the intelligence gathered from terrorists shipped off to foreign countries willing to torture – media outlets like Salon and Mediaite benefit from the dirty work they also disavow.
Salon.com shipped their character-assassination assignment off to the unaccountable Max Blumenthal, and by extension Daryle Jenkins. Hoping to punish James O’Keefe for his part in saving the Republic by exposing ACORN, Salon’s obvious desire was to smear O’Keefe as a racist in the hopes of moving the spotlight off a story they’re much less interested in: a taxpayer-subsidized organization that employs a troubling number of intelligent folks disturbingly eager to use their tax-law savvy to aid and abet those who would set up an underage prostitution ring.
And Blumenthal came through for Salon in a big way. The piece hit like a bomb and though it was obvious from the beginning that the very foundation of Blumenthal’s charges could only be supported with provable lies, the piece stayed up on Salon uncorrected for hours.
The Salon smear was so obviously inaccurate that even the Breitbart-obsessed Media Matters stayed away from it and no less than the Columbia Journalism Review found it such an affront to the very idea of journalism that they jumped in and scolded Salon as though there’s still some remaining shred of journalistic honor left to defend.
But Salon’s Journalistic Rendition had worked. After hours of soulless searching and as though they were some kind of legitimate publication, Salon eventually published a correction and the blame fell on Blumenthal and by extension Jenkins. But the fire Salon wanted lit was smoldering and after spreading his lies at the well-trafficked publication, the unaccountable Blumenthal simply moved his smear campaign over to his unaccountable personal website.
See how nicely this worked out? Salon gets to play “Who me?” as the toxic lie of racism they published enters the webstream.
Now, watch this video and listen to Mediaite White House reporter Tommy Christopher’s question to Andrew Breitbart: “What do you say to people who think James’ selection of a pimp costume has racial overtones?” The question is answered more than once and yet Christopher won’t stop. That’s because he’s only a journalist according to Mediaite’s obviously low standards. In the real world he’s a bitterly angry junior league leftist with an ax to grind.

[Side Note to Christopher and Blumenthal: It’s people like you who automatically equate “pimp” with “Black” who should be thinking through their own prejudices.]
From a personal standpoint, Mediaite’s involvement in Journalistic Rendition is the perfect scorpion and frog story. I can’t speak for the other Bigs, but Big Hollywood’s relationship with Mediaite has always been a very friendly one and so surprised was I by Christopher’s wildly unprofessional race-baiting that I was sure his hand-written badge claiming he was from Mediaite was a lie. And when I heard him bragging afterwards — “We got him. We got him.” – I was positive.
Well, the scorpion struck when this pathetic example of Journalistic Rendition published on Mediaite Saturday evening with this equally pathetic disclaimer:
For the record, the thoughts and ideas expressed in this exchange are those of Mediaite columnist White House reporter Tommy Christopher and not those of Mediaite.
Don’t you just love that disavowal? Christopher isn’t some guy who threw the video over the transom. He’s Mediaite’s columnist and White House reporter. He’s “their guy” out on assignment, and not only was Mediaite willing to publish the video, it was their lead story for hours. Shouldn’t the disclaimer have read:
While we are paying for and benefitting from the wildly unprofessional race-baiting of our White House reporter and making this our lead story for hours, we want to assure everyone that we literally brought out a bowl of water and washed our hands before hitting the publish button.
Something else I learned at CPAC is that my boss knows exactly how to treat the media. And I only say that because what you won’t see on YouTube are the two days Andrew spent with a writer from Slate who was both friendly and professional, and in return received every spare minute Andrew had.
Then there are the “We got him” media-types, those under the mistaken belief that a byline, badge and race-baiting questions somehow make up for their deficits as human beings. They were also treated the way they deserved. After all…
We are at war with them because they are at war with truth.
UPDATED: Tommy Christopher’s “We got him, we got him” that I reference throughout this piece should not be confused with his saying “I got you” in the video of his confrontation with Andrew Breitbart. Christopher’s “We got him” happened minutes later in a hallway around the corner after things had broken up.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
462 Comments
Wow, someone from the liberal left's media outlets was friendly and professional? Say it isn't so!
So there is reason to 'hope' for their 'change!'
GREAT piece John and excellent point about the racial aspect Christopher associateing PIMP=BLACK GUY. Just who is the racist now Christopher?
OOPS typo – associating….UGH
John, these progressive gutter snipes have nothing! This race baiting is their final assault. Andrew was magnificent in all his altercations with these mad dog animals. The more they do this to conservatives the more they look like fascist thugs. I believe they never expected Andrew and Larry to stand their ground and go on the offense. These thugs are furious for James and Hannah bring down Acorn and they want to go after Andrew thinking he is the 'brian' behind all this.
With these sites all you guys keep putting the TRUTH out there in your writings and video recordings. What was so funny that that all the conservatives all had their trusty iPhones and cam corders out there video taping all these events from so many angles. It's like a video hit squad, as long as Andrew and the rest of us who get into these situation stand our ground with the facts we will destroy these progressive thugs who have gone unchallenged for decades.
Andrew, larry , you and many more where young teenagers during the Reagan years and I always call this group of kids today 'Reagan's Kids' since that is where most of your age group learn about conservatism. Reagan left his mark in someone like Andrew and he fired the first shot heard 'round the world at CPAC and the was has begun. We can't ever retreat from these animals or show any weakness. We must be on the offensive and wade into them on all levels.
I was suppose to go to CPAC this year with the film, but I couldn't raise the funds for two of us to go. It would have been great to meet everyone there. There is always next year and I have a year to throw my own bombs out there.
This event was a major success for America against its internal enemy the cult of leftist malcontents, Andrew flash a light on these cockroaches and the world is seeing them as they really are.
From the ACORN tapes, it seemed that the ACORN workers believed that a white man could be a pimp. They ought to know as they were willing to do business with O'Keefe and Hannah Giles. And it was at more than one ACORN location.
These journalistic terrorists are begging for a concentrated opposition research effort…
and I'm talking an investigative "colonoscopy"… let's see what these fools are up too…off camera.
Oh no. If you use the term 'white man' you must be a racist!
They're doing the same to the conservatives who dare touch their ricepaper.
It's simply Scientologist tactics, adapted by the left.
Excellent article and story Mr. Nolte.
Its about bloody hell time the right started fighting back. And here's exactly how you do it. Using the truth.
He's not associating pimp with African Americans. They're associating everyone who doesn't agree with them as racists. It's code word that means the enemy so anything goes.
In reality modern liberals are the biggest racists I've ever met. They are consumed by race. They constantly worry they might slip their PC language. Which means they are constantly thinking about race, which is the definition of racism.
Exactly all along they have hit up conservatives walked away happy and smug after the polite conservative allowed them
to smear them. They came to CPAC thinking , hah just another day of conservative smashing, little did they know what they would confront. THE NEW NEWSWORLD ORDER.
I don't think we will see much more of this, they are hiding under the covers right about now. Wondering what the hell just happened. Mommy and Daddy are sitting on the bed assuring them "Darling really we checked there is no one named Andrew under the bed, no, dear he's not in the closet either , really we checked.
These people are disgusting and the lowest forms of life. They purport to represent truth, but actually do the opposite.
MSM is little better. Dan Rather is proof they are scum and don't play for the American team.
Agreed. Andrew and Larry took the fight right back to them. I was thrilled to see the video over the weekend. Beautiful.
I try to caution bloggers over here to understand and identify the type of modern liberal they may be dealing with. Many are very nice, decent, hard working family types who've just never bothered to think their positions through to their logical conclusions. Do not alienate this type because you're going to need them, they are your Reagan democrats.
But the other type, like these people are incorrigible. For these type go straight for the jugular. Just like Andrew and Larry did.
Perfect.
Like Jake Tapper, who made his bones as Salon's in-house attack dog in the early '00s, Tommy Christopher is another guy whose friendly treatment from the Right mystifies me.
I supported Christopher when he got fired from AOL for criticizing the conservative hate-f*ck article that was published last Summer, but that support wasn't a license for the guy to practice his own special blend of scumbag pseudo-journalism.
To the Lying Leftist Media from the BigWorld: "Suck on this….BLAM !" ( hat tip to Robert "Travis Bickle" DeNiro )
And you just used it, so you must be a racist too.
Welcome to the club!
This is straight from the left wing playbook. When you don't have a cogent argument, or if you get busted spreading a lie, simply accuse the other side of racism. It is a cheap way to score points with the HuffPo/Daily Kos/Salon crowd, but it does not fly in the real world any more.
Since the accusation of racism is not working much anymore, the new idea that seems to be making its way into the left wing media is that we conservatives are not racist per se because we disagree with Obama's agenda, we are simply too stupid to understand it, and we are resentful of Obama because he is so smart. We prefer dumb guys like (Yale educated) George Bush because he is more like us. Which do they think will bring us around to their point of view; calling us racist, or calling us stupid?
Tommy Christopher is a minor-league (even in the blogosphere) race-baiter trying to make a name for himself. He was a ruthless hater back in his as close to he will ever get to glory days at AOL (going so far as to run a photo of McCain with his cancer scar highly visible to show what a "monster" McCain was). He had a little group of haters over there who were so head over heels for Obama, they could not do anything else but bash. He went on a binge about how horrible Hillary Clinton was, then when she dropped out assumed all of her supporters would immediately go for Obama, and if you didn't you were a racist of the worst kind. Nevermind that at least with HRC we knew what we were getting, sure it was a petty criminal from Arkansas, but hey, we knew that.
I'm not surprised to read this. His mission in life is to try to catch a conservative being a racist. Poor Tommy, still no luck.
Maybe it's time he just woke up and realized most conservatives don't give a damn about race.
Hi EdSki, we all need to take this to them. This is a street fight and we can't give any quarter to these animals. I came out of Boston Democratic politics and we were all conservatives fighting the Kennedy progressive machine that owns that state like a mafia. I would work with candidates who by the time the 80s came around we were called "Reagan Democrats" by that time I came out here to Hollywood with my conservative ideals as I have today but a registered Democrat. I have been fighting this leftist progressive ever since I submitted my first script to a major studio in 1980. All the people I ran with out here in the early to mid 80s were all democrats and republican conservative Reagan supporters. I funded three films during the Reagan years,
I got bogged down in the 90s with FORGOTTEN HEROES when Clinton raise taxes so high that the level where I would find my funding dried up. I have been on the offense with these malcontents since the late 80s and 90s and I have pissed off a hell of a lot of people in the studios who wouldn't pick up my film anyways because i refuse to make it into a anti-troop film.
I am glad after all these years there are millions of conservatives who are fed up and are now taking this to the progressives and thank God for Andrew and Larry drawing the line in the sand and this is a message for all of us to understand and these thugs too…… 'from this line we do not retreat" these are the orders of the day.
I can't wait until I get into it with these people, they are going to deal with a Boston Democrat that fought the Kennedy goons.i
Good points!
After reading this article, I just keep wondering…How many times have we believed the lie? Before Breitbart, before the internet, we were clueless.
"We are at war with them because they are at war with truth."
Gotta love that line!
I love that last line. "We are at war with them because they are at war with truth." It expresses a foundational truth that more conservatives need to learn.
This left wing journo's are the scum of the earth.
i've worked my whole life on wall st.(NYSE, AMEX,CBOE) as a floor trader and before any of us makes trade #1 we sign a constitution basically stating that i won't lie, cheat, or steal. in my part of the industry if you break these rules you're gone for good. doesn't journalism have something similar? how many times can you put out a "mistake" of a story and get away with it? floor traders, at the very least, are honest simply because cheating a customer cheats a trader. price fixing was the most common complaint. even if the "mistake" was an honest one there are only so many strikes a batter has. who is responsible for punishing these people? i don't see any reason for this type of "journalism" to stop since it seems it's obviously allowed.
I hate to differ with you, Darogr, but Hillary is a grand felon from Chicago. The rest is spot on.
Gosh, it's a good thing no one on Wall Street ever lies. I'm sure Goldman Sachs told all the people buying their inflated securities that Goldman knew they were going to collapse, and in fact were going to cash in by betting against them.
RtofAtila,
The answer is simple:
You are both stupid and racist.
Tou are infact so stupid that you cant even see your on inhearent racism.
Its sad realy, it is.
If you would just go back into the woods and be quite the rest of us could enjoy Obama's plan to make America just like the Eutopia that is both Sweeden and Greece.
What? Huh? Both those countries are bankrupt and have had riots in the streets?
er, um, uhhh- never mind.
I watched all the videos. You guys were great. Thank you for doing what I've been wanting to do for a long time. Keep holding their feet to the fire – you have my full support. Salon has now gone into a moveon level and doesn't deserve my click. I'll continue to visit Slate.
Who is this speaker you mention?
Can you list where exacty he called for a poll tax or literacy test?
I doubt it.
99% of the people a CPAC want every Living American, of age, to have one vote and only one vote.
To that end many of us support a show of ID at the polls. But thats the extent of voter discrimation here.
You must be a living citizen regestered to vote and have vaild ID.
Your baseless smear will carry little weight here.
Well done – but…I have a question – why is the mainstream media so pro-Democrat leftist? I've found an article on the internet accusing William Paley of CBS radio of pro-Democrat bias IN THE 1930's, and from all that I've seen leftist pro-Democrat bias has been a fact of life for some 80 years (poor Nixon – his speech after the loss of the California governor's race was before we knew about media bias – you have to feel sorry for the guy) – but how did it start, and more important WHY?? Why did take someone from Australia to discover the capitalist philosophy of find a need and fill it and find that selling to conservatives is a great way to make money. Why would CBS stay with Couric and her low ratings instead of putting on a conservative oriented show and make a fortune. HEY MICHAEL HOW ABOUT SOME CONTEXT??? Why is the media so left when they could make lots of money being something else? Don't give me the drinking koolade excuse there's has to be something more, and someone should take a look at it, and tell us how we got here. WHY WHY WHY and How! There's a book in this – or at least a documentary (pretty please????)
And its a good thing the Obama is comming down hard on the Golden Sachs bonuses paid out.
Its not like he just dismissed it saying "eh, I know those guys."
You might want to get a better example.
PS Your a t00l.
Ahh, yes. Thank you spaceracer for clearing that up.
Something I don't want on my resume, but they do belong to msm. I prefer honesty and integrity, but they can stack their resume with this crap.
I second that, and arrogant, self serving detestable scum too. The problem is that ALL mainstream journo is leftist, and pro-Democrat, and as Levin says – they (still) set the agenda. – they more than anything else are the root cause of the problems we have, and do the most to make sure we can't fix the problems – the minute a program gets cut, or even slowed, we see endless examples of supposedly "poor' people being affected by whatever got cut. These people are going straight to h*ll. There are no words that can express the utter hatred and contempt we feel for them.
Why anyone other than the players involved would care anything about any of this is beyond me.
Mediaite….
Just happened to see this gem over there: http://www.mediaite.com/print/soundbite-depth-of-...
There's a link to the original NYDN article provided. No examples of Maddow "wit" are provided by the author.
Didn't know that calling Americans upset over high taxes and record deficits "teabaggers" was considered to be high wit by the left, but I guess now that Wm F Buckley's gone, the world has lost it's best most recent standard-bearer.
I always assumed that satire dictated the costume that James chose for the ACORN sting. If an ACORN employee would actually help someone wearing that joke of an outfit, imagine what they would do for the people that weren't such outrageous sterotypical jokes. Hell, if it had just been one office, I would have thought that the employees were just going along with the joke like you go along with your altzeimer's inflicted grandparent. But it happened again and again and again. Honestly, ACORN should be more embarassed about how they were busted than the actual busting itself. Just sayin'.
Another lie.
"Maybe it's time he just woke up and realized most conservatives don't give a damn about race."
Impossible for Progs to fathom. They're obsessed with race, and to their way of thinking, so must everyone else be.
The Prog is so self-centered that he projects himself onto everyone else. And of course, he thinks he's the smartest guy in the room, so if anyone disagrees with him, it's either because they're stupid or because they're too dumb to see how smart the Prog is.
We are ALL the media now. Everywhere there is a progressive, there also will a patriot be, with a camera. I myself have infiltrated some progressive haunts in my area. They wanted war, they have it.
So how is it that someone can be both "some guy named Daryle Jenkins with something called One People’s Project" and an old-media "elite"? Which is he?
It's downright funny to see a Brietbart fan complaining about ambush journalism.
He didn't wear that absurd outfit to any ACORN offices. It's a shame he's misled you on that point.
Christopher whined and whined about how he was "fired" from AOL after that, when in reality, AOL just dropped their entire political section. He was let go along with all of the other political bloggers. He lied about why he was let go like he lies about everything else.
I managed to get myself banned from Mediaite. What did I do? Did I use vulgar language? Did I wish death on the POTUS? Nope. When I emailed Mediaite's managing Editor Colby Hall of which rules I ran afoul after he informed me I had been banned from the site, "We find the commenting experience is more pleasant when you're not around."
If you want to see what Colby Hall meant by that, by all means <a href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&q=site%3Ahttp://www.mediaite.com+LNSmithee&btnG=Google+Search... Mediaite for my comments. You'll find that in almost all cases, they (especially the particularly mendacious Beck-bashing, Palin-pissing < href="http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&q=glynnocchio&aq=f&aqi=&oq=">Glynnis "Glynnocchio" MacNicol) can't counter my arguments, and those that do generally do so in-between insults and character assassination.
OK, let's try that again: http://www.mediaite.com+LNSmithee&btnG=Google+Search... target=”_blank”>http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&source=hp&...” target=”_blank”>http://www.mediaite.com+LNSmithee&btnG=Google+Search&aq=f&aqi=&oq=
"In reality modern liberals are the biggest racists I've ever met." When confronted as much as the Lefties are these days, they can't hope to further their cause with logic/reason–it's not in their repertoire. We gotta turn up the heat–we're incrementally neutralizing them. Damn that pesky truth and logic. Although it's kind of taxing, some days, this is getting to be fun, shootin' down the flatliners.
If you have had the misfortune of reading Christopher's drivel during his tenure at AOL's Political Machine, now Politics Daily, you already know what a twisted pretzel he is. What is apparent from the jump with Christopher is that he is living a fantasy ego projection of himself as "the great journalist", and occassional 125 lb. tough guy (he has a black leather jacket, for credentials).
There is a sad tale of arrested development apparent in Christopher's unending childhood, equally apparent in leftist's everywhere. Something is missing, and as with all leftists, we can start the list with ethics/morals.
In Christopher's defense, he did write an article condemning Playboy for it's vile musings on hate sex with conservative women, but that seems to be his token contribution to ethical journalism, or common decency. Ironically, Politics Daily's feminist BlogFuhrer, Melinda Hennenberger, fired him for his efforts.
Speaking of Politics Daily, and Blogfuhrer Hennenberger, they have developed an ominous strategy for suppressing conservative comments that Cass Sunstein would be envy. The "Fairness Doctrine" for the internet is being employed, and perfected on AOL's blog. Conservative comments are deleted, edited, and blocked, for being critical of the PD, Progressives, or Obama.
Since AOL was spun off from TimeWarner, and a secret group of investors took over, they have slanted heavily to the left, and are implementing Sunstein's "nudge" strategy. Their policy against racist, sexist, or the ever so specific "not over the top mean", comments is strict for Obama critics and nonexistant for Palin/conservative/tea party bashers. Apparently they fired Christopher for being too stupid to understand their policy of strict duplicity.
Lots of things are funny to those with an IQ less than their age.
Great stuff, John, especially the choice of pimp picture — SLAM!!!
Raheem Abdul Mohammed: [Night Shift's] the story about two pimps and wasn't no brothers in it? I don't know whether to say "Thank you" or punch you in your mouth, man.
Exactly. That's the entire key to the left, their secret weapon, their Maginot Line, their game book – emotions.
They don't base their arguments on science or facts or logic, they base it entirely on emotions. And the kyrptonite to emotions are, logic, facts and reason. Use those as your long sword and shield, and you can not lose, unless their emotions are stronger than you. In other words if they can plead their emotional argument better than you can plead your stronger case of facts.
What we have here are stunning examples of that in action. Take no prisoners. Take no excuses did Blumey publish that accusation on the web, yes or no. See how he hims and haws, and eventually has to leave? Because he can not come up with an emotional response to "Yes or no?"
That's how you take down these big wigs, hard core lefties.
Take them down with their own facts.
Beth, Beth, Beth, don't you think the story is ACORN and their nefarious practices?
I've heard Tommy Christopher several times on Ed Morrissey's show. I like Ed a lot but have to wonder how he tolerates Christopher. He always talks over and interrupts others and does it in that smug sanctimonious tone (like many liberals do). He's not especially bright either, just spouts the standard DNC talking points.
[...] more background on where this irrational belief that James O’keefe is a racist came from, read John Nolte’s blog published today on [...]
The internet is liberation. No wonder Obama wants to control it like Iran and the Chinese do.
The more I see the MSM and check them out on the internet, the more I realize how disgustingly similar they are. To wit, Global Warming news is scant in the American media, but is the biggest story in the world and it is being censored in the American MSM. They should be ecstatic that the Earth is not burning up, instead they are panicked they will lose their grip on everyone's lives.
Where is the likes of Jon Stewart on this, eh?
.
Yeah, they believe in the concept of "fair game".
Unfortunately for them, we're on to them
I'll probably be labeled a racist for this, but I personally don't think long-term welfare recipients should be able to vote on who becomes president, or who to send to DC for Congress. If you don't pay federal taxes, why should you have a say on who and how those taxes are spent?
And how about having everyone who's registering to vote take a basic civics test to prove that they have a rudimentary understanding of how our government actually works? Why should someone who doesn't understand our government's function be allowed to choose who can run it?
The only one misled is you. I don't remember him claiming he wore the so-called costume into any of the offices.
Anyway, you keep on fretting about his costume. We'll keep our focus on the real issue here. An organization so corrupt that they'd aid and abet child prostitution.
No . It's about the clothes. Duh
no worries Tammy….I gave up at correcting typos long ago. Content is king. And wireless keyboards are still junk.
Wish I was old enough to vote for Reagan. Bouncing off the walls here too.
Let me guess…
Too much acid as a baby?
How did he mislead us? He has video tapes of him in the office so we know what he was wearing, obviously you haven't watched the videos and neither had these "journalists".
Good comments.
The world thanks you for your cluelessness. You provide conservatives with many moments of laughter without even trying; but that's that being a progressive makes you — clueless and flailing about.
Why aren't the boards of directors at these companies firing the COO's and CEO's of these loser corporations and running a pro-America conservative line up? It's amazing. Anyone who owns stock in these businesses needs to have their head examined.
Glad i could help.
[Side Note to Christopher and Blumenthal: It’s people like you who automatically equate “pimp” with “Black” who should be thinking through their own prejudices.]
Actually it's this "side note" that is the foundation and another example of the left's obsession with skin color.
Breitbart doth rock hard.
The keynote speaker at CPAC urged the return of poll taxes and literacy tests for voting, two of the most common (and now outlawed) practices for keeping blacks from voting. The reason we accuse people like this of racism is because they publicly proclaim a longing to return to the days of Jim Crow.
'Let all the poison that lurks in the mud – hatch out'.
- Emperor Claudius: I, Claudius [Robert Graves]
This is the funniest thing I've read in a long time. Who would have known those crafty CPAC organizers were able to obtain and read Sen. Robert "Grand Dragon" Byrd's memoirs from the podium? Brilliant.
I don't understand the Mediate guy's question…
he asks if O'Keefe dressing up as a pimp was racist…
well, he was dressed up as a white pimp, as there are a lot of white pimps, and I don't think anyone said he had makeup on to pretend he was black… right?
so, this can only mean that the Mediate guy equates anyone who is a pimp as being black…
so, tell me, who would be the racist in that case?
Hey WalrusRaper,
Did you even bother to read what fissionfool said besides "Wall Street?" I know it's hard for Marxists to contain themselves when someone mentions the center of American free enterprise. But if you're going to comment on this forum, at least make sure your words accurately reflect the content on which you're commenting. It's called rhetoric. Go back to high school, learn about something other than Protests 101, then try again. Otherwise, leave the debate to the adults.
You pose a good question. Please allow me to respond.
Your logic assumes one would act in their own self-interest while running a company. Unfortunately, ideology trumps logic and rationality. Hence, the demise of what was once the world standard in journalism. In this context, however, the brilliance of free enterprise is exhibited in the rise of alternative media.
My thoughts exactly.
I really hate to say this, because I love what Andrew is doing for New Media, but he needs to learn to calm down in public. Watching that video with Tommy Christopher made me cringe… for Andrew's sake. It wasn't his position or the points he was making; I agree with him completely. It was his tendency to let his emotions get the best of him and turn him into a ranting lunatic. Which, unfortunately, is how he ultimately came off. If he truly desires to spread the conservative message to the unconverted, he REALLY needs to get a grip. It hurts to say this. I like the guy. But it's the truth.
Who's the racist? Was Tommy Christopher saying he thinks only African-Americans are pimps? Didn't he imply that when he asked if O'Keefe's dressing like a pimp was racist?
So, here we are. Tommy Christopher is a racist.
Hell, Hannah looked so damn good in those videos that those ACORN folks had to have thought that any male hanging with that babe had to have somethin' goin' on….
I would say this isn't really that much of a victory. It is possible that "racist" is not considered an invective, but a judgment call in some context. After all, I don't think I'm calling names if I say "Hitler was a racist".
I'm not a Soros-paid troll, although I do believe such things exist. I'm just interested in a more effective style of confrontation.
We have to stay light, loose, and agile. Yes the left is infuriating if we are trying to have a real discussion. But none of these guys looked like they wanted to have a real discussion. When a lib says "You are a racist." A better approach is to say "Wait… wait… I get to read your mind now. I got it… you're a Twilight fan!"
If they don't get the point, follow up with "Who is a better judge at what you believe, me or you? So it would kind of figure that I'm a better judge at what I believe and what motivates me. You can *take* me as a racist, but just like someone calls me a thief and I'm not a thief , they can't make me a thief by repetition. If you've got some cogent arguments, I might care to address them. You're free to believe that I'm a racist, and I'm free to believe that you've got a Twilight poster up in your room."
If Blumanthal wants to make a "mindset" out of one persons action, that's silly. Confront him on that. Show him that Hannah wasn't encouraging it but discouraging it. I know that you guys all think that we have a sub-space racist channel that we all communicate on, but some people do things on their own. See this silly argument that liberals engage in is precisely something that they deny when it's turned around. If one guy at a McCain rally *might* have said "Kill him!" about Obama, that somehow reflects the whole crowd. But when hateful trash stays up on Kos' site for *days*, it's not Kos–it's just one guy.
I never argue to someone's face that they are anything other than what they represent themselves to be, but it if it pertinent, I will tell them if my impression conflicts, but *I* own my interpretations. If they tell me that they find me a racist, they might have told me that they find themselves reasonable, but I'll tell them that they seem to be someone who takes disagreements for deep-deep-seated hatred, and I wish them luck trying to live the world.
Apples to oranges. O'Keefe didn't get in anyone's face and berate them for the opinion that he had of them. He let them reveal their tolerance for corruption in their own words. It's funny when somebody finds something ironic when the two things really aren't equal.
But that's libspeak for you "I think O'Keefe engaged in ambust journalism" => Andrew Breitbart engages in ambush journalism. But you're welcome to your inability to make an equivalence. It's funny.
Amazingly, the origins and purpose of all this chaos are predicted and accounted for in the best selling, prophetic, political Conspiracy Thriller book, BLACK ROAD 2012, which I bought on amazon, and was a real goose-bumpy, totally absorbing ride: http://tinyurl.com/amazon-BLACK-ROAD-2012
Exactly. At worst, O'Keefe was insensitive. At best the ACORN employees sound like they condone sex trafficking of minors. Really, really, out of proportion outrage.
Beth, welcome to the left side of the IQ bell curve,
Progressivism is a mental illness. It is commonly referred to as cranial anal inversion and most commonly found in east and left coast populations. Hmmmm, some thing of a delimma for the human beings trying to share a planet with these idiots. The internet is the great equalizer-it is our daily reprieve from the "traditional" media ,the fascists that think their brilliance will carry them another day. All of the fish wrapper newspapers from the large markets are across the country are bleeding red ink-I hope they all go out of business-and no, investigative journalism will not die along with them. Quite the contrary. Most of the brain brawl team on the left doesn't even know what the term progressive actually means, it just sounds cool. It sounds counter culture and antiestablishment……micro dot, smoke some dope,turn on tune out. How about learn how to live in reality and stop taking all those meds…….grow up,show up,and shut up,and listen for once.
[...] Salon, Mediaite And The Left’s Cowardly Practice Of Journalistic Rendition [...]
Suddenly the world is so interconnected and sometimes, in an embarassingly overexposed kind of way. These three uncoordinated, bumbling muckateers, ill versed wannabe provacateurs of totally retro MSM, ambush assassins of black journalism, the Darth Vaders of MSM, became on cue, race baiting bigots. What made it worse, they seemed to be reading tattooed messages from the palms of their hands:). They are truly derranged. Their mission is to destroy. They insist on fighting a constant battle against the truth. They want to distort the reality and meaning of everthing. God, what a treacherous manifesto. From under what rock in America did these muckateers come from? For the first time they are being meaningfully challenged and they are beginning to lose. And the war has just begun. They are losing their power.
I will give you a big part of the answer you seek. Journalism schools and there teachers and professors the vast majority are liberal democrats so for the most part that is what they produce. They got s foot hold in the occupation so even the fledgling reporters that came from the schools that had some center bearing and desired to be even handed wanted to fit in and advance there careers so they went along with the program to be a big time reporter.
Like the problem in the Catholic church they discovered while investigating why so many homosexual abuses of young boys was the seminary schools was controlled and run by homosexuals that hit on the normal heterosexual student and many of those would drop out. The also were willing to accept homosexual priest and those that swore they were not practicing homosexuals and took them at there word bad mistake. Now they are trying to correct the problem by removing the homosexuals that run the seminary schools. The same must be done with Journalism schools. Conservative students must be given a chance
Well Jon Stewart is a left wing democrapper. He is just where they want all there good little minions right by there side.
Christopher claims he was fired over the article condeming Playboy, but did any of the Political Machine writers go over to Politics Daily? I believe Christopher and Knowles were the only two. Knowles was at least a real writer. I don't believe he's there any more (if Politics Daily even exists, I don't even know).
Christopher was let go simply because they did not take the Political Machine bloggers to Politics Daily. It appears they wanted to up their game with more legitimate writers. Tommy just didn't qualify. The timing did make it look like he was fired for condeming Playboy, but I really don't believe that's the case.
You are right about him being a twisted pretzel. He was the most twisted one in the bag.
excellent point Philip, and that's, to me, why his argument doesn't fly. It's a racist calling someone else a racist, and then getting indignant when that is pointed out.
Problem is, there's this mindset these days that if you can't argue your point, you toss out the racist accusation, and that's supposed to be the end-all of the argument, look at me, I won. It's getting old, really old. When you cry wolf too often, people stop coming to your rescue.
THIS IS SPOT ON: " Side Note to Christopher and Blumenthal: It’s people like you who automatically equate “pimp” with “Black” who should be thinking through their own prejudices."
James O'Keefe dressing as a pimp was helping to "save our Republic"? And I thought crazy lefties were over dramatic. That may be the most ridiculous piece of "commentary" I have read all year.
ACORN rigs elections. O'Keefe brought down ACORN.
Maybe he really did save our Republic.
Columbia Journalism Review is little more than a yellow journalistic version of a pimp defending the honor of his $5 wh@re.
ACORN losing the contract to forever rig the US Census in favoro of Leftists saved the Republic, and then some.
And I wrote this piece before ACORN pretty much annnounced their going out of business sale. So I now double down on it.
[...] who simply disagree with Christopher on the size and scope of the federal government culminated in Reason #1, that led to someone who automatically equates “pimp” with “black” to [...]
Where is Superman when you need him fighting for "TRUTH, JUSTICE & THE AMERICAN WAY". If it's Glen Beck I don't think he fit's in the tights and Bill Orielly can't fly so I guess it's up to us to fight the good fight against the Progressive menace! The fight if for our childrens freedom and the weapons of choice are open discussion and the ballot box.
These "reporters" (i.e. spineless amebas who inbetween playing xbox360 24/7 stake out Conservatives knowing they will be able to manipulate the footage and over after it has aired on 99.9% of the media (how is Liberal, Socialist, Communist Anti-Christian, and Anti-Jewish) shows for hours until the TRUTH came out. What wonderful "checks and balances they have". Obama is a CHAIN SMOKER and the press has not gotten ONE picture of him smoking. WHY? Obama's Aunt is ILLEGAL ALIEN and was ordered DEPORTED. She is appealing that order with Attorneys that somebody is paying and all the while she is getting benefits that are for US CIITZENS ONLY! Where is the press on this case? Serial dispensers of deceipt, corruption, greed, and anti-God anti-American anti-Religion including being Anti-Jewish.
May God bless this great Country and every child born…and yet to be born and may the spineless serpent tongues stop their constant lying and seek out God. Amen
GE owns NBC and GE's CEO sits on meetings with Obama in the White House. GE, should Global Warming "Emperors New Clothes" survive the avalanche of FACTS, stood to make a MINIMUM of 8 TRILLION DOLLARS within the first five years.
Secondly CBS and ABC supported Obama WHOLLY and even sell Obama merchandise online at their websites.
The CONTEXT is that In Bush's first year there were 18-1 NEGATIVE articles against him by the major newspapers, tv stations, etc. In Obama's first year there have been 8-1 POSITIVE articles about Obama by these same "people"/.
Here is another context Obama gets nominated 9 days after being president and wins the NOBEL PEACE PRIZE. Where is the CONTEXT in that?
Obama is a Socialist and his own books, and speeches, confirm such (excluding those written by a white guy who manhandled a Hillary Clinton cardboard cutout during the campaign which Obama takes with him EVERYWHERE.
If Bush tried that the Press would SCREAM at him 24/7 and laugh him off as an idiot.
You shout CONTEXT and you get FACTS….in context.
Nuff said.
You must be logged in to post a comment.