Journalists deserve to be treated with respect. Liberals deserve to be treated with respect. But leftist bullies… Well, they deserve nothing more than to be treated like the bullies they are. Because behind the press pass and race-baiting questions, that’s all they are: partisan bullies.
Tommy Christopher is a little more than just an “unabashed liberal.” Juan Williams never called me a “teabagger.” And for some reason, the guy on record repeatedly denigrating what was the Tea Party spirit of CPAC 2010 with sexual, pornographic slurs, was sent to cover CPAC 2010. For your perusal, a quick Top Five:
“Teabaggers”
5. April 11th, 2009 – Headline: At the Tea-Baggers’ Meeting: Brainwashing Devices Are Coming
I was all set to write about how the media’s mockery of the “Tea Party Movement,” re-dubbed “Tea-bagging” by the sexual-slang-ignorant Griff Jenkins, is threatening to turn the sac-obsessed revolutionaries into sympathetic figures. I mean, we get it. Tea-bagging has 2 meanings. Actually, it really only has one.
But then, Political Machine trollbuster Cube sent me this video, which is too good to pass up. I’ll scold my fellows tomorrow. Today, we feast on tea-baggy awesomeness. The fun really starts at about the 3:30 mark.
4. April 15th, 2009 — Headline: Tea-Baggers Clash With Counter-Protesters in DC
You can give Christopher the benefit of the doubt on this one because he might not write his own headli—Oh, wait, that very same day:
3. April 15th, 2009: And I’ll be posting a confrontation between teabaggers and counter-protesters later today.
And here he is on Mediaite the week before CPAC:
2. February 9th, 2010: Look, it’s a free country, you’re allowed to say “retard,” but I’m also allowed to say you’re a gutless jerk for it, and I’m also allowed to say that Sarah Palin can take her crocodile tears for the families of the disabled and dip some tea bags in ‘em. Apparently, those folks will swallow anything.
Is anyone surprised that all of this arrogant contempt for everyday Americans who simply disagree with Christopher on the size and scope of the federal government culminated in Reason #1 – with someone who automatically equates “pimp” with “black” to project his own prejudices onto others.
What do you say to people who think James’ selection of a pimp costume has racial overtones?”
Kevin McCullough warned us about Christopher’s nasty and unprofessional “gotcha” tactics from his own experience with him at CPAC 2009. So what happened at 2010 doesn’t appear to be a fluke.
And what did McCoullough get for calling Christopher out? He got called a “Nobody Dickbag.”
I must say again that being at CPAC and seeing firsthand how these people operate was a revelation, and a reminder that those engaged in the war to expose and defeat them are fighting the most righteous of wars.
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
65 Comments
I know Tommy Christopher is the lowest of the low, but please don't give him any more attention. He's an evil little troll. The "Big" sites are much too important to feed him.
I guess Tommy Douchetopher is the #2 douchebag right behind Keith Olberdouche.
I don't know why the anger at the term "tea bagger". If we "tea bag" then that means someone is getting "tea bagged". Let's use it this way and those filthy traitors will stop. Yeah, I'm a tea bagger! Open wide progressives!
0311 — The term is an elitist slur — the elites denigrating everyday Americans … children, veterans, stay-at-home moms.
Those who use the term expose themselves for who they really are — We're just throwing sunlight on them.
Thanks John.
They get me so torqued up I want to say @#$^@#*$(%)^_&&^%^&$*^%#$#%$% !
Fight these "douchebaggers" every where you see them…did you read the comment section from the "Cube" site..
try that anti-teabagger" crap on me and mine …
This is the most ink that little "Tommy Boy" has ever received. He loves the attention that his actions have gotten him, as does his employer Mediate.com. Your request is honorable, but now that little ants like Christopher can see the attention they garner by attacking conservatives it will only get worse from this point forward.
Because we are more couth. I cringe every time I see someone on the Big Sites use foul language.
I've never met a Liberal that wouldn't run away it the slightest hint of danger. Wussbags! all of them.
yep…see who signs up for the Marines and Army these days …brave dedicated American kids who know damn well where they're going – in country buddy, into harm's way – not four years of booze and broads at Ft. Dix.
Bill "Ol' Poondog" Clinton – quote – "I LOATHE the miltary" – hey Bubba, the miltary loathes you back –
and your skank wife too.
Never heard of this jerk. Never want to hear of him again.
I refuse to own a label they gave us. It's not like we have any personal point of pride to make by trying to own it, and even if we did, they would refuse to get the point and simply snicker harder.
She wears those pantsuits so she doesn't have to shave those stumpy legs.
I'm actually with you. When I find some idiot lib say teabagger I say, "And please don't choke on them while we ram then down your pathetic throats."
I understand that the term is being used to denigrate… but it's like the "N" word or the "R" word… when you let it get to you, the person using the term wins. Give it right back. Because I'd much prefer being the teabagger than the teabagged.
Truth be told, it really wasn't nice of these liberal/marxist to advise us of their Professional Expertise that they just wanted to share it with us. They are so proud they learned it at their Father's knee. But if they insist on calling me a "tea bagger" then I have every right to call them "hindlickers". Enjoy your meal Christopher.
I checked out mediaite when it first started, and enjoyed some of the posts. I tried to correct the leftist non-truths and provide reality when I could. There was some fun content and there was some extremely irritating stuff too. The replies to Tommy's post were some of my last. I couldn't take the foul element that resides over there, any longer.
Tommy's post that you have as #1 was so irritating. He wrote all that, but yet I never recall seeing a post where he called out Rahm for using the term, or for Obama making that Special Olympics crack, but he went after Palin and Rush….
Christopher criticized Olby once, but he is still a big fan, so that should tell you all you need to know about him.
I tried… I gave it a shot. blech.
And that whole "we got him!" crap? that is just gross.
really, no one knows- or cares- who this loser is…
But now he is somebody, he can hang with his loser pals and say see- we got Big Hollywood and John Nolte's knickers in a knot. All because of puerile, juvenile 5th grade potty humor not worthy of this site or it's denizens.
Turn on the light! Make the roaches scurry to their dark corners…
Okay, I read a few of your posts, and I'm confused. If their slur implies that I'm a "tea-bagger" in the way that I understand it to be insulting, why would I call them "NUT SACKS" in response, since this has a complementary, and equally offensive/insulting insinuation about it? I'm trying to be delicate here, but do you understand what a "tea bag" is and what the "bagger" is engaging in?
Oops, meant to reply, see below. And yes my question is sincere…
Galtfan, it’s a play on words in regard to ACORN and yes I do realize the terminology is used as a crude “sexual” reference…
They can take it any way they like but I know precisely what I mean by using my remark as a response to their insult against us.
I’m not playing patty cake with fascism anymore and if it takes some brutal verbal warfare to win this, so be it.
That was weird my reply to you wound up below too, what's up with that?
Ok, or "Nut Sacks" Missy8s – you da gal! (you are a gal, Missy8s, right?)
uhhhgg… (shuddering at the thought – like "Bubba" does)
We need to turn these rules from chapter one of "Rules For Radicals" on their head in this war…
Take away their weapons, take away their ability fight on their terms…
The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
In war the end justifies almost any means.
Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
The morality of a means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition as being unethical.
You do what you can with what you have and clothe it with moral garments.
Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."
Alinsky was a terrible example of a human being but his is what they are using against us right now and we MUST counter them in order to change the game and put them on the defense for a change…
Make no mistake we are in a fight to the finish for the republic and we MUST win or lose the republic.
Tommy Christopher practices the liberal brand of jaundiced journalism. It's understandable that BIG Journalism would want to bring him down, but the effort is futile. There is no down from the bottom.
So many leftists and so few artillery shells.
Never heard of this guy. I take your word for it he's a rat turd.
THAT I get! And I agree. I read some obscure, third-rate Rand ripoff 3-4 years ago and they warned this was coming and would accelerate. The prediction was that the absolute break point was around 2016-2020. Fight any way we must! If we lose, humanity is lost for generations. If we don't lose, we still keep fighting, cause they'll never stop…
My question had to do with "NUT SACKS" and "tea-baggers". I wouldn't respond that way cause, sorry to be explicit, in my book the "nut sack" is a scrotum, and that is what is "dipped" in the tea-bagger's mouth. Sorry, just too f***ing gross for me… I'll find a better firebomb.
I'd teabag Mika Brzezinski.
I'm ok with teabagger, after all I call most democrats DICKSMOKERS, and the really socialist ones, TURDBURGLARS.
Spliffy,
With all due respect, I don't reckon you fully savvy the definition, or implications therein.
Another bully with childhood issues trying to join the ranks of the A-List-Leftist bullies.
The more The Won's numbers sink, these bullies will become more desperate to disparage ANYONE who stands in their messiah's way. We should all be prepared for anyone of these bullies to be confrontational with us at a Townhall Meeting, Anti-Tax/OCare Rally, or other any peaceful gathering. After all, these bullies love attention.
Thank you for continuing to point out these pathetic creeps and their smears. If they were really journalists, with any talent, they could convince the public by a recount of the truth.
Missy8s..I holpe this make some sense…It's been a long day…
The very name 'TeaParty Movement" stands for people who want fiscal responsibility, low tax rates, strong national defense, and abiding by a strict reading of the Constitution.(.And a great moment in American History)..
These are principles we as "TeaPartiers" STAND FOR…The left stands for NOTHING principled, therefore slapping a tag on them that really means anything is a fools errand.
The term 'Teabagger" is tremendously derogatory, fits the image they are trying to denegrate and they know it REALLY pisses us off, so they are unlikely to stop.
Changing the name from "TeaParty Movement" is the only way to take this verbal weapon away from them. But that, I'm afraid will be impossible now.
Besides, we're the ones "teabagging" them…
Yeah that seems to be the response on this HPD, I'm retiring this one…
I'm retiring this one but I will explore some other ways to rattle the crazies….
The term has been retired…
Tommy Christopher is a slimy poo-snapper we'll all soon forget.
These marks must be tagged, though.
Shucks, I missed all the fun.
Love the new Death Star avi, M8!
I'll tell you something. I've never had one single lib call me a teabagger to my face. Of course being 6'2" and 225 might have something to do with it,but I don't think so. I don't know any of my TEA Party compatriots that have actually had a lib call them that to their face. The lib douches are cowards that hide behind words and govmt Gestapo power and I despise them more for that than anything they stand for!
I'm sorry but I see nothing here any worse than most conservatives will say about liberals, many in this very thread even. It all amounts to immature name calling from both sides.
Thanks, do share. If I come up with a good one I will offer it for your review…
…"Is not the whole point of the Kurtz quote that Rush is gaining popularity? Does the fact that the information isn’t some official “ratings” somehow prove the whole premise false? Well … no. Of course not! Christopher has merely proved that Kurtz was a klutz who called something ratings which was not, in fact ratings.
I’ve seen this strategy of marginalizing Rush’s popularity before. Over at the Daily Beast, Max Blumenthal published a story claiming that Rush is less popular than Bill Ayers or Jeremiah Wright, something I thoroughly debunked here and here. I spoke with Blumenthal on the phone, in fact, and he agreed that his story was wrong, and that Limbaugh was actually not less popular than either of those two. Of course, it doesn’t matter. It’s a Known-Fact™ still in use by the other side. Lies becoming truth is a specialty on that side of the political spectrum, as they continue to prove…."
http://www.redstate.com/absentee/2009/03/07/dems-...
More manipulation by Boogers Blumenthal and Christopher this time last year.
Aaron, prove it! Moral Relativism doesn't sit well with conservatives.
I have been think about a new "brand" for the movement too…
Why not "Liberty Spree"?
I'm pretty sure that one is untouchable…
I'm likin' the "Liberty" part but "spree"? We'll work on it…
On the contrary, we should give him all the attention he craves–and then some!
Tommy Christopher is a racist–he thinks only black men are pimps.
Spread the news.
Aaron,
It's a shame that you lack the common sense required to figure out that there is a vast difference between ordinary name-calling by some anonymous individuals on a blogsite….
….and a crude, derogatory sexual reference embraced and utilized as a weapon by both the Mainstream Media and by the formidable Leftist political apparatchik to attack and diminish a grass-roots political movement that opposes much of what the Left represents.
Tell me, Aaron…are you also as casually dismissive when somebody uses the words N**ger, F*g, or B**ch in your presence?
Because to me, there's no difference at all.
Don't know if it means anything but one of the vids was pulled from You-Tube.
Yup!
Ed Morrissey over at Hot Air likes Christopher, but I cant stand his writing. He's a liberal and a hack.
One speaker called it the "Conservative Woodstock". But unlike the first one, "our women are beautiful." Apparently this freak has a thing for Phyllis Schlafly.
So I guess the writing is on the wall; the Democrats are going to get hammered on Election Day, right? I wouldn't be too sure about that. There are far too many monkey wrenches that are ready to be thrown into this engine. The most amusing thing to observe during the CPAC festiviities last Thursday was their subtle attempt to disassociate themselves from the so-called "Tea Party Movement" without flatly rejecting it. What is going on here?
Here's what's going on: The cooler heads within the Republican National Committee know damned well that the Tea Partiers are a ticking time bomb just waiting to explode. It's not merely the fact that most of these people are dumber than doggy dung, it is also the ugly reality that so much (although not all) of that movement is based on the nasty philosophy that has embodied the white supremacist movement for decades. You could hear it in the remarks made by the protesters at the September 12, "March on Washington". You could see it in the signs they carried. Most of these twits refuse to even acknowledge the fact that the president of the United States is an American citizen!
Like Neville Chamberlain appeasing der fuhrer at the Munich conference in 1938, the RNC is frantically searching for a "peace in our time" moment. They have quite a dilemma before them to be sure. On the one hand they need to keep these knuckleheads "inside the tent pissing out" – so to speak. On the other hand they have to avoid alienating the moderates. Like the demented uncle living in the attic, they must do everything humanly possible to make sure that any contact with the neighborhood kids is limited if you know what I mean.
The Tea Party people are already claiming credit for Scott Brown's victory in Massachusetts a couple weeks ago. They are determined to steer the course of the GOP in November, come hell or high water. If they are allowed control of the party, their extremism will only turn off a huge segment of the voting population. If they are denied that opportunity, they will splinter off into third and even fourth party uprisings. Have you ever watched an elephant try to walk a tightrope? It's more fun than a barrel of donkeys!
http://www.tomdegan.blogspot.com
Tom Degan
Goshen, NY
[...] Top Five Reasons Non-Leftists Shouldn’t Take Interviews With Mediaite’s Tommy Christopher [...]
let me try that again since I'm rife with typing errors this morning…
"you mean how people in this very thread have among other things diminished the liberals by calling them douches, dicksmokers, and turdburglers?"
Annie I did prove it, quoting this very thread. People hear of one journalistic bully and they don't talk about him, they talk about liberals at large. What I'm asking for is absolute moralism, i.e. don't sling names while telling someone else they shouldn't.
"Journalists deserve to be treated with respect. Liberals deserve to be treated with respect."
No they don't. Giving them any respect is how we have gotten ourselves into the kinds of messes we are in today. They are stupids and disrespectful all of them. Turn that tide around and give em what they give.
In the real world his kind of bile would get him a lesson in manners via pool cue across his forehead. But, I seriously doubt he's spend anytime in the real world. We have another Taxed Enough Protest in DC on April 15th, I'd be very happy to discuss politics with him there…
I prefer dirtbaggers,myself.
As Ed Morrissey about the time he had to protect Tommy Christopher from my wrath at the 2009 CPAC.
you mean how people in this very thread have among other things diminished the liberals is one even if you happen to not agree with it) by calling them douches, dicksmokers, and turdburglers?
I'm sorry but this still amounts to nothing more than, "how dare that (insert derogatory remark) refer to me with a derogatory remark".
It's not that hard to see the absurdity here.
Looks like the new Prog strategy for trolling is to Team DouchBaggers, Tommy Christopher is Tom Degan's little bitch to protect from the big bad Rethugikkkans, that's your MO isn't it Degan? As for thenext election, I don't we need to worry about what will happen afterwards, with the Lame Duck in the WH and likely to be the last D-rat in there until after you and I have departed.
Why bother with that long winded post? One only has to read the first paragraph to see you are a garden variety troll.
Funny or ironic or both but do they not understand that if we are the teabaggERS, that makes them the teabaggEEs???
poor libs
Don,
I think the slang works this way (not logical but it's how it works).
The "teabag" is the ******
The "teabagger" is the person performing the action on the ******.
The "teabagee" is the person being performed on.
Just like **********.
[...] my recent bar brawl with Tommy Christopher — a Mediaite blogger who has been promoting the notion that James O’Keefe’s ACORN [...]
[...] my recent bar brawl with Tommy Christopher — a Mediaite blogger who has been promoting the notion that James O’Keefe’s ACORN [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.