Last week, Oklahoma state senator Randy Brogdon (R), who is also a serious candidate for governor, inadvertently set off a national firestorm, courtesy of the Associated Press’s egregiously distorting his words.
An article by Sean Murphy and Tim Talley, about tea parties and militias (funny, how those two entities are conveniently linked together), implied that Sen. Brogdon, who was elected to office in 2002, is eager to help launch a kinder-and-gentler version of the Hutaree milita chapter. Or, something to that effect.

The AP story noted that state miltia supporters have chatted up the Senator, and that he acknowledged (correctly), that the Second Amendment allows for a “citizen unit.” Now here’s the colorful quote that got tongues a-wagging and keyboards a-clicking:
The founding fathers ‘were not referring to a turkey shoot or a quail hunt. They really weren’t even talking about us having the ability to protect ourselves against each other,’ Brogdon said. ‘The second Amendment deals directly with the right of an individual to keep and bear arms to protect themselves from an overreaching federal government.’
Conveniently taken out of context, it appears that Sen. Brogdon supports using brute force against the federal government and that Thomas Jefferson and the boys were actually championing the right to insurrection.
Let’s start with the caricature that the AP is hawking.
Randy Brogdon is the antithesis of a crackpot or a grandstanding politician. I shared speaking duties with him at a political dinner, and he’s modest, cordial, and principled. His voting record is pro-small government, not anarchy. He received a grade of 100% on the Sooner State’s Conservative Vote Index. His personal life is a study in stability: he’s been married to the same lovely lady for 37 years, was a businessman for more than 30 years, and has even taught Sunday School.
There are no skeletons, scandals, or secret handshakes in this guy’s closet.
After the sleazy AP story circulated, Senator Brogdon did the responsible thing — he set the record straight.
First, he noted that Oklahoma statutes allow for an “unorganized militia,” but that such an entity is prohibited from operating outside the state. Bottom line: You won’t catch a lawmaker who respects rule of law, like Randy Brogdon, indulging in any ‘storming the gates of Washington, D.C.’ talk, but you will catch him recognizing legitimate constitutional rights.
Second, he clarified what the Brogdon reform plan does entail:
I do plan to fight what I consider to be an over-reaching federal government, but I will do it with the Constitutional tools provided by the framers. For years, I have advocated adherence to the Tenth Amendment as a weapon against big government. As a legislator for much of the last decade I have routinely proposed new law. When enough of my Senate colleagues agree with me laws are changed or enacted, peacefully. Yet, this week, some people seem convinced that I would abandon the democratic process to wage actual war on the federal government, which is simply bizarre.
Third, as a result of the unwanted AP publicity, the Senator disclosed:
As this story developed over the week, I received as many as a half-dozen death threats, not only directed at me, but at my family as well. One unpleasant person said they would only be satisfied when I am swinging from a tree. Hopefully, the thought was fleeting.
In addition, “I was saddened that some in the anti-militia crowd can be as irrational and violent as those they condemn.”
Privately, friends are now suggesting that Sen. Brogdon record all future interviews with the media. Personally, I would tell him to never speak to the AP again. The media outlet, after all, bears responsibility for intentionally fanning the flames of discord.
As for reporters Murphy and Talley? Shame on them for trying to sully the reputation of a true patriot and a gentleman.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
56 Comments
The MSM is now officially the Ministry of Propaganda for the White House….
????
The anti militia crowd are ready to form a lynch mob (a vigilante group or, effectively a "militia", called out to perform illegal acts of violence) to protest his comments?
Another out-of-touch journalist-wannabe smearing militias.
If not for militias, the US would have lost the American Revolution.
If not for militias, "health care reform" as well as gun confiscation and much worse would have happened under CLINTON. I guess you forgot Waco, Ruby Ridge, etc…… It only stopped when the militias told the government in no uncertain terms to stop – ref: Knob Creek Declaration
State militias, such as those used in the Revolutionary War, are far different than the type of militia referred to here and now. So, I don't agree with that assessment.
You seem to be implying that anyone who redressed grievence to the government is a militia. I don't.
State militias, such as those used in the Revolutionary War, are far different than the type of militia referred to here and now. So, I don't agree with that assessment.
OK, that might be a point…..but in what way were they different?
ACTUALLY… Brogdon was talking about being approached by unofficial militias to discuss becoming OFFICIAL state militias… just like the historical state militias. So Dan, it is you who are wrong.
Brogdon is 100% correct… in or out of context! I learned it in elementary school history class.
Ironically as the media lies more and more they are taking continual steps toward making what they fear a reality.
So the AP makes up stories for the speakers. No longer do they just report what people said. They put words in the speakers mouth and make their own slanted interpretations.
whatreallyhappened – nothing about Israel? This is a first for you!
From the article, "it appears that Sen. Brogdon supports using brute force against the federal government and that Thomas Jefferson and the boys were actually championing the right to insurrection."
Well, that is exactly what the founding fathers had in mind. Here are a few quotes from some of them. Believe me there are more where these came from.
"Democracy is two wolves and a lamb voting on what to have for lunch. Liberty is a well-armed lamb contesting the vote." – Benjamin Franklin
"When governments fear the people, there is liberty. When the people fear the government, there is tyranny. The strongest reason for the people to retain the right to keep and bear arms is, as a last resort, to protect themselves against tyranny in government." Thomas Jefferson
"Americans need never fear their government because of the advantage of being armed, which the Americans possess over the people of almost every other nation." James Madison
Now what do you suppose they had in mind with the right to keep and bear arms?
If it is attributed to the associated press it is skewed hard left and usually blatqntly inaccurate. They are just another socialist machine trying to drive public opinion and our nation into a European political and economic model. In other words they are a bunch of Ivy-league flakes with their heads up their arses.
“AP” = Audacious Prevaricators
I remember when names like AP were respected insted of being contributors to the yellow press(liars). They are trying to rewrite modern history, but their story is not our story and trurh ultimately prevails. The right is right and right is might! I frequently peruse the Decleration of Independance and put it into context of todays politics. King George and todays Democrats were very similar! For my part in the "revolution", I am having a bunch of hammer and sicle and swastika stickers printed up to add to bumper stickers of democrats this election season! Wachout! Here we come!
I can see November from my house.
I'd vote for Randy.
Watch the Rubio story in Florida for a similar instance of media distortion.
I'm sure we are waiting for the apology from AP for their exaggeration and creative editing of the truth.
Fortunately, civilized Americans who understand the desperation of the msm types to retain their relevance, we were able to read between the lines. It is an outrage how far journalism has fallen over the years. [There should be a flushing toilet icon.]
What's wrong with militias? They keep the government busy not harassing the rest of the citizenry….
We should call these people Freedom Haters. Get that meme going. It appears they are to me.
We should call these types of media sources Left Gatekeepers Media. Get that meme going. It appears they are to me.
So the lefties want to hang some one!! Oh that's right they have a history of that!
Looks like Obama's beloved Muslims (among others) will be allowed to opt-out of ObamaCare.
Muslims to get Health Care Exemption...http://usataxpayer.org/?0048842540
THEN: ObamaCare expressly prohibits giving federal health insurance benefits to illegal aliens who are not lawfull residents of the US.
NOW: Obama will enact "comprehensive immigration reform" that will make illegal aliens, legal residents, thus making them eligible for federal health insurance benefits.
Illegal Immigrants will get Health Care...http://usataxpayer.org/?0072194997
YOU LIBERAL DEMOCRATS HAVE GOT TO BE THE STUPIDEST MORONS EVER!
[...] In an example not far from yesterday’s fiction-piece “American Reichstag,” Izzy Lyman@ Breitbart’s Big Journalism picks up on a misleading AP story that turns an Oklahoma State Senator’s accurate depiction of the second amendment into a militia-smear (link). [...]
Don't expect the Ministry of Propaganda to actually tell any truth. Brogdon's statement is in no way controversial. That's exactly what 'A well-regulated militia being necessary to the maintenance of a free state…' means. 'Regulated' in them thar days meant regular, as in with everybody using the same weapons and being trained to use them. It didn't mean covered by 250,000 federal regulations. It made explicit the idea that the people keep and bear arms to make sure the government doesn't turn tyrannical. It's not the founder's fault that we don't speak English so good no more.
If we were following the beliefs of the followers now, every household in America would have an M16A1 in it, or at least an M16 or M14 or M1 Garand from the earlier generations of standard military rifles. While those rifles aren't worth much against tanks, they're a heck of a lot better than nothing against a tyrannous government. A couple of Jews with one revolver kept the Nazis out of the Warsaw ghetto for over a month. Bully-boys don't like being shot at more than is usual, being cowards by nature. And to those who pretend that it can't possibly happen here, just remember it did happen here. We had us a civil war, and while the causes and 'whodunit' continue to be debated (my personal opinion is that the Confederacy was the original aggressor), by all accounts the end result was military destruction and occupation of the entire South. While few of us feel the same loyalty to our states as our ancestors did in the Civil War, there are things all of us would fight for. And that's how it should be for a free people. The idea that we must all turn helpless victim would be convenient for those who want to rule us, but there are still far too many people who are independent-minded and won't bow to anybody, not even the Saudi King.
I am from Oklahoma and I support Randy Brogdon. He is our state's greatest hope. Go Randy!
Every gun shop I go into has a sign that praises Mr. Obama as the greatest gun and ammo salesman ever. You can't buy that kind of advertising. Way to go, Barry!
i tell anyone who will listen that the bias of the AP is what got Obama elected.
you can talk about the NYT, the alphabet networks, etc.. but the AP is carried by every newspaper in the country.. its stories are supposed to be straight news.
yet, we all know what you can do when you omit a word here…use a more colorful word there, etc. the AP does this with every story, every day.
I generally call them "Chain Kissers".
Given the price of camcorders, there is no reason a person running for any office to not have one at all times, and use it to record any interview. It would also be handy to refute or record any bizarre incident that occurred at any function sponsored by the candidate. Look how handy it's been for the Tea party events.
What the Left needs to be made painfully aware of is: Chapter 23, The Day of the Rope.
AMEN
[...] » AƖƖ Iח a Day’s Work: AP Twists Words, Paints OK. Candidate аѕ M… [...]
No, they were exactly the same, up until the Revolutionary War militias received official recognition.
People who oppose the 2nd Amendment should take the time to read "Gulag Archipelago." Solzhenitsyn describes how Soviet security officials became so bored with the ease and lack of danger in arresting people, that they resorted to making games out of the process to drum up excitement. Any fan of COPS will attest that the detailed planning and preparations which precede the storming of some drug-dealer's fortified house presents a quite different picture; one of officers concerned that the guy on the inside will have guns, and who want to make absolutely sure everybody return to their families that night. While we often object to the seemingly overwhelming use of force, the fact that our boys in blue feel obliged to go to that much trouble is telling of the different dynamic. One prays to never see the day when our police get so bored.
This is what sodomists do.
liberal low life scum making death threats, hopefully they will be traced and rounded up then slap into prison where they belong.
How about what is actually written in the 2nd Amendment?
"A well regulated Militia, being necessary to the security of a free State, the right of the people to keep and bear Arms, shall not be infringed."
No, nothing about shooting at revenooers in there.
Or random groups of insurrectionists.
The "well regulated" part clearly referred to the standard American practice of having militias organized and drilled according to standards set by the state governments, though the Constitution transferred this power to the federal Legislature. That rather explicitly excepts the private armies and hopped up gangs that have stolen the name "militia" in an attempt to justify themselves.
Then there is "security", which given the uses to which the militia may be put in the Constitution, means against foreign invaders and the very insurrectionists you want the militias to become.
What citizen militias protected against was the government using foreign mercenary forces, who traditionally survived on plunder, from being used for domestic policing.
Actually, it very much meant being controlled by federal regulations, though the exact number is open to further investigation.
This is clearly set forth by Article I, Section 8, of the Constitution:
"To provide for organizing, arming, and disciplining, the Militia, and for governing such Part of them as may be employed in the Service of the United States, reserving to the States respectively, the Appointment of the Officers, and the Authority of training the Militia according to the discipline prescribed by Congress;"
The English used there is pretty clear.
Both Alexander Hamilton and James Madison proposed the very simple idea that state's militias would be a last resort to the catastrophe of a federal government directly opposing the Constitution:
If the representatives of the people betray their constituents, there is then no resource left but in the exertion of that original right of self-defence . . .The citizens must rush tumultuously to arms. (Alexander Hamilton, Federalist, no. 28, 178–79. 26 Dec. 1787)
That the people and the States should for a sufficient period of time elect an uninterrupted succession of men ready to betray both . . .Extravagant as the supposition is, let it however be made . . . Let a regular army, fully equal to the resources of the country be formed; . . . To these would be opposed a militia amounting to near half a million of citizens with arms in their hands, officered by men chosen from among themselves, fighting for their common liberties, and united and conducted by governments possessing their affections and confidence. (James Madison, Federalist, no. 46, 315–23, 29 Jan. 1788)
The press has long since ceased being the Fourth Estate and has become a Fifth Column. As far as I'm concerned, they are the only thing lower than a used car salesman or a politician.
Last time the Democrats felt the need for a vigilante group to hold onto power, they formed the Klan.
OUCH! Sucking chest wound!
Love it!
Why then is it specifically prescribed in the bill of rights….which is a list of individual freedoms and protection from the federal government? The people were and are the militia. The militia insomuch as it is stated in the second amendment refers to a convening aparatus by which the people may or could come together in common self protection and preservation; this first clause means to state the nature and importance of such a right, not the explicit and exclusive limit therein. The second clause even uses the term the right of the "people" to keep and bear arms shall not be infringed. Why would they refer to a milita in one breath and the people in the other unless they were one in the same? Article 1, section 8 refers to it much in the same way. It is prescribing ways in which the states would provide protection for one another under the authority of the federal government. The Army is raised from it's people and as such the Federal government being collectively responsible to the states for their protection would be reasonable in doing so.
Nothing in the 2nd Amendment in any way precludes the Article I, Section 8 grant of and reservation of power to the federal and state governments for the exclusive control of armed forces in the United States.
Just because there is no inherent right to form a private army, street gang, or lynch mob, or to act as a lone gunman, in no way infringes on any right to own a weapon, or to belong to the Constitutionally specified militia, or regular army.
It should also be noted that if they are one in the same, then you are stating the position that the 2nd Amendment is a collective and not an individual right, and what it refers to is a prohibition on denying anyone who desires access to joining the militia, and by extension the standing army, violations of which actually do exist at this time.
Gorelick: Obama Should Speak to Militias
“I see these things as waves, and I believe we’re having another wave right now, it feels that way to me, and I’m hoping there’s something short of a catharsis — which in the case of Oklahoma City and the abortion clinic bombings and others has been death — that will stop that pendulum swing,” said Gorelick. http://www.mainjustice.com/2010/04/19/gorelick-ob...
Gorelick – Mistress of Disastor 2008 –
It's not often that one person plays key roles in two — count 'em, two — trillion-dollar disasters. Welcome, my friends, to the world of well-connected Democrat Jamie Gorelick. http://directorblue.blogspot.com/2008/09/jamie-go...
Are they working up to a "crisis" to occur around election time one might wonder…
Great article Izzy. Thank you. Keep them coming so we can get our message out.
[...] may recall that Key’s colleague, state senator Randy Brogdon, was falsely typecast just last week by the same AP as a backwoods gun nut – eager to use force against the federal [...]
[...] may recall that Key’s colleague, state senator Randy Brogdon, was falsely typecast just last week by the same AP as a backwoods gun nut – eager to use force against the federal [...]
[...] week Izzy Lyman, a writer for Big Journalism, blasted the Associated Press for “distorting” Randy Brogdon’s words supporting the creation of a state militia [...]
thankyou very much, I have to say your blog is amazing!
Check this out…
[...] that is the end of this article. Here you’ll find some sites that we think you’ll appreciate, just click the links over[...]……
Improve your vision naturally!…
Thanks. Left you a trackback to help your readers improve eye vision naturally….
Blogs ou should be reading…
[...]Here is a Great Blog You Might Find Interesting that we Encourage You[...]……
Get your online degree!…
Left you a trackback for your readers to help them get an online degree….
Memory Foam Mattress Reviews Precise base. I see something many hard on outlined blogs informal. It module always be moving to translate content off their writers and drill a something from their . I’d prefer to use whatever with all the knowledge in…
Precise base. I see something many hard on outlined blogs informal. It module always be moving to translate content off their writers and drill a something from their . I’d prefer to use whatever with all the knowledge in my weeny weblog whether you do…
Minecraft Texture Packs Thanks solon for this online. I pet every bit of it….
Thanks solon for this online. I pet every bit of it….
You must be logged in to post a comment.