Here’s what happened yesterday morning along the so-called Blue Line, the internationally recognized, UN-codified border between Israel and Lebanon. Israeli soldiers were trimming trees and clearing brush as they routinely do, because that kind of natural cover has been used by Iranian-backed Hezbollah soldiers to kidnap Israelis and start wars.

Behind them there was a group of commanders who were supervising the operation, because Israeli protocol calls for troops working near the border to be supervised from afar – again, in case Iranian-backed Hezbollah soldiers try to kidnap Israelis and start wars.
Israel’s physical border fence is very specifically built several meters on the Israeli side of the border inside the Jewish State’s territory, so that the Israelis can safely trim trees and clear brush, because – you know.
At some point soldiers dressed in Lebanese Armed Forces uniforms launched an ambush, with snipers trying to kill the supervising commanders in the distance. The Israelis promptly retaliated, wounding several of the LAF-uniformed soldiers. Then the Israelis – after receiving an explicit request from the other side of the border – suspended their fire so that the wounded could be evacuated. The Lebanese used the momentary humanitarian gesture to again open fire on the Israeli troops – this time it was an RPG at an Israeli tank – and the Israelis again retaliated. Israel is reporting one IDF soldier killed, one wounded.
There’s a post to be written about how this is the predictable outcome of the U.S. pouring weapons and logistical training into the LAF, even though the Lebanese political hierarchy and several LAF units long ago fell under Hezbollah’s control. Of course some of that security assistance will inevitably find its way into a battle with Israel. Of course it will be. But that’s not this post.
This post is about how Reuters is again using their viciously anti-Israel stringers to dishonestly try to blame the violence on Israel. It’s a pitch-perfect repeat of their Jihad Flotilla performance, when they and the rest of the MSM used the early hours after the incident to valorize the ostensibly unarmed activists who of course turned out to be death-worshipping terrorists.
Knowing the now-confirmed facts that you know, see if you can spot what’s wrong with this Reuters caption:

This was an out-and-out ambush either by Lebanese soldiers or Hezbollah soldiers dressed like Lebanese soldiers. It was pre-planned – you can tell as much by how the commanders were fired upon and not the trimming team – and there was even a photographer on hand. Reuters somehow got that picture, evaluated it, and came to exactly the wrong conclusion. The Israelis were on their side of the border, in a so-called enclave, exercising legitimate authority on their sovereign territory. Even the Lebanese have admitted as much in the past, though they don’t like it and complain about how it increases tensions or whatever.
But Reuters immediately published a seemingly conclusive photo and caption insisting the exact opposite. Strange how their mistakes always coincide with anti-Israel propaganda.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
28 Comments
Well what say you Reuters? Is it your desire to assist the LAF and Hezbollah because your stance is anti-Israel?
Or………
Your reporting is shoddy and unprofessional?……………..Pick one please and let us know.
Either way I won't be looking at anything with the name Reuters attached to it for an accurate accounting of events.
Screw Hezbollah – next time they decide to poke Israel in the eye – wipe them all out. End of story.
Along with any UN "peacekeepers" that get between them and Hezbolla or the Lebanese…
nothing good will come from this…
The Powers That Be are manipulating BOTH sides to provoke a thoroughly unecessary war that will have profound effects on the region- and the world. If Israel is backed into a corner, she will use her sizeable nuclear arsenal (300 weapons or so) to defend her territory.
A radiated middle east serves NO ONE's interests. Except for a small, evil cabal that wants a Clash of Civilizations so as to destroy everyone's wealth and seize control. We, as a people, must not allow this to happen. Resist the propaganda that is urging war. The results would be devastating…
The collapse of the MSM is not just about bias: it is about how these people have let the religion of their ideology make them become enemies of the truth.
No fact checkers here. That picture probably does depict a soldier, and he is clearly on the other side of a FENCE that runs along the border, but that fence is not THE border. Way to go, Reuters. We can always count on you to turn a blind eye to violence and aggression if there's a way to blame Israel.
Roto Reuters is at it again. Pathetic. GO ISRAEL. Stomp the aggressors into pulp.
Of course the media do, their views mirror the left and Obama's view of Isreal.
The Lebanese have admitted the Israelis were on their side of the border: http://www.ansamed.info/en/news/ME.XAM13310.html
Of course now they still want to blame the Israelis despite UNIFIL having been informed well before the incident. Apparently they fail to realize that is evidence that the action by the Lebanese forces was planned in advance, making them guilty of not only the admitted abuse of a humanitarian truce, but also of conspiring to commit an act of war.
Would this be the same Roto-Reuters that published the faked pictures from the 2006 conflict?
Would we be talking about that Reuters?
"Lebanese Army troops fired warning shots at Israeli soldiers" -Reuters
Yes, fired AT Israeli soldiers. They are only warning shots if they miss.
also, warning shots with RPGs?
futuer evidence that Isreal has no right to self defence (or existance) in the mind of Rreuters.
Who wrote this headline Helen Thomas?
youre forgetting about the nutjob in Iran that thinks nuclear war will bring about Islamic aramgeddon.
In his crazy little head he wins too.
Written by Thomas and edited by Hezboobla.
no one is forgetting the advocates of the so-called '12th Imam'- a sect the Ayatollah Khomeini banned as fruitcakes…
The muslim-marxist hook up has given us an ugly baby.
If Israel was the mad-dog racist psuedo-Nazi nation the Arabs and their MSM supports claim, both Hezbollah and Hamas – together with much of the "civilian" populations in which they live – would now be dead. Rueters has a long history of anti-Semitism. Nothing has changed.
You can't get those "peace keepers" they run too fast.
Information is power and Brietbart and other sites that are truth-talkers, empower us to be able to take the fight to these charlatans. Do not be dismayed, these types were in the woodpile for a very long time…..now that they are scurring around, we know them for the socialist rats that they really are. This now enables us to use the weapons of truth to negate them. They have rekindled the patriotic fervor in millions of Americans! This will be their final undoing! We are with you Israel!__Semper Fidelis!
Ummmmm . . .
Deuteronomy 20:19
When you lay siege to a city and wage war against it a long time to capture it, you must not destroy its trees, wielding an ax against any food producing tree. Do not cut down a tree in the field, unless it is being used by the men who confront you in the siege.
Deuteronomy 20:20
However, if you know that a tree does not produce food, then until you have subjugated [the city], you may destroy [the tree] or cut off [what you need] to build siege machinery against the city waging war with you.
Or, if you prefer the King James Version:
19 When thou shalt besiege a city a long time, in making war against it to take it, thou shalt not destroy the trees thereof by forcing an axe against them: for thou mayest eat of them, and thou shalt not cut them down (for the tree of the field is man's life) to employ them in the siege:
20 Only the trees which thou knowest that they be not trees for meat, thou shalt destroy and cut them down; and thou shalt build bulwarks against the city that maketh war with thee, until it be subdued.
Its not that you are wrong in your interpretation, it is that you failed to completely quote the relevant verse, and then failed to quote the following verse for context, and thus absolutely and completely CONTRADICTED the clearly given rule, as well as absolutely failing to acknowledge that it refers to sieges, and not border defenses, and absolutely failing to recognize that it refers exclusively to trees used for food, and not random shrubbery that may or may not be a theoretical source of food.
Its actually rather stunning how utterly wrong you are, missing three critical points (food trees, sieges, exemption if used by the enemy), and improperly redacting the passage to remove that context.
So, it comes to this, one can not rely on Reuters, the AP or any of the traditional news sources for reliable information.
Thats good to know. Now we don't have to waste one second reading their stuff. Even it they're right half the time you don't
know which half the time you are reading.
Pretty soon MSM will be rendered obsolete anyway as any knucklehead can geton Yahoo and post what he saw happen.
Yeah and the knucklehead doesn't need a degree and doesn't even have to be biased. Amazing how these journalists cry about the blogosphere being full of knuckleheads and then turn around and prove themselves to be nothing but shills for a leftist agenda.
I blame Jimmuh Cartuh – the biggest p*ssy ever to occupy the WH, at least until 21 Jan 09.
As a Jew, I do not believe in Hell.
With that in mind:
There is not a special place in Hell for Jimmy Carter.
There is a special Hell just for Jimmy Carter.
So where is Barry-Bob going to go?
I think that Carter was the worst president in my lifetime, but Barry-Bob will surpass all expectations of excedding Carter. Or is that racist thing to say?
Carpet Bomb Beirut…. with a side of Cluster Bombs.. the Muzz hate the clusters…
Once again CONTEXT clarifies a poor attempt at CHERRY PICKING.
Thank you.
Fair enough, I withdraw the objection.
(Note that the comment was deleted, (I couldn't revise it), and your replies are still here.
Please I ask that reasonable people do this when they are wrong. And most people here are wrong occasionally, but more than they would wish to admit.
I would still object to using "agent orange" as the trees inhabit a different moral sphere than humans, as stated here:
http://jhom.com/topics/trees/bal_tashkhit.htm
However, if the Lebanese use trees against Israelis, the tree and the attackers may be destroyed. This loss of a tree, therefore, is on them. Add it to the murder of innocent soldiers in peacetime.
You must be logged in to post a comment.