Thirty little buses in New York City…my, how they roll. Through our organization Stop Islamization of America, Robert Spencer and I have placed ads on New York City buses, offering help to Muslims wishing to leave Islam. Our ads ran previously on buses in Miami, but in New York they’ve received international notice. The religious liberty bus ad campaign was covered in the last few days by every major network: ABC, NBC, CBS (New York), CNN and FOX, as well by Associated Press, Reuters, the Los Angeles Times, Britain’s Daily Mail, Russian television, and many more–too many news outlets to list here.
It’s no surprise that most mainstream media outlets that have covered the story have just repeated talking points from the unindicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked Muslim Brotherhood front, the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR). AP said: “some Muslims are calling the ads a smoke screen for an anti-Muslim agenda.” Which Muslims are saying that? Farther down in the article we find out:
Faiza Ali, of the New York chapter of the Council on American-Islamic Relations, said the ads were based on a false premise that people faced coercion to remain with Islam. She said Muslims believe faith that is forced is not true belief.
“Geller is free to say what she likes, just as concerned community members are free to criticize her motives,” Ali said.
Geller has a history of speaking out against Muslims, and the ads are “a smoke screen to advance her long-standing history of anti-Muslim bigotry,” Ali said.
While we hear that “some Muslims” believe this, we don’t hear in this AP story about any Muslims who think otherwise. So is AP saying that the unindicted co-conspirator, Hamas-linked CAIR is the best representative of Muslims in America? Is AP actually saying that Muslims in the U.S. are haters, extremists, and terror-tied? Islamic Sharia law is very clear: apostasy is punishable by death. Why does CAIR equate being pro-freedom with being anti-Muslim? Is AP saying that Muslims in America don’t support religious freedom? Wow.
The New York Daily News, meanwhile, offered up more pure derangement from CAIR in its story about how Detroit’s SMART bus system, in violation of their own guidelines, refused to run our ads: “Detroit bus system rejects ‘Leaving Islam?’ ads as ‘pure anti-Muslim hate.’“ (We’ve filed suit against the SMART system over this.) It seems as if CAIR is writing Daily News headlines and copy–there’s a reason why the Daily News is third in the New York market. Why don’t these shills for Islamic supremacists step back and think? It wasn’t SMART that called the ads “pure anti-Muslim hate,” it was Hamas-linked CAIR’s Dawud Walid, who said of the ads: “It’s a purely anti-Muslim hate issue.”
I don’t know about you, but I think CAIR is engaged in apostate hate.
The Daily News “investigative reporters” trolled Google in their research on me and exposed the blockbuster revelation that I once made a video while wearing a bikini at the beach. The Daily News said it was “from the surf of Israel” — uh, it was Florida. They have not gotten one fact right. And that was the whole of my resume as far as the Daily News was concerned: bikini vlogging.
The intrepid reporter went on to claim that the Miami bus system at first rejected the ads. Wrong again. They were up and running when the hate sponsors at CAIR threatened and bullied Miami-Dade Transit into taking the ads down. But they went right back up when I declared that I would fight for free speech, and announced preparations to file suit.
In the Daily News story, Walid calls 1.5 billion Muslims “a minority group” –I’d say the apostates who live in fear of their lives from Muslim thugs that CAIR never says anything about are the minority group.
Rifqa Bary, apostate Muslim
CAIR wants to keep us out of Detroit because there is a crying need for our religious liberty ads in that area, which is heavily populated by Muslims. The Washington Times (a real newspaper that actually does genuine reporting) spoke to people in Detroit, and one teacher in Dearborn said:
The fear is palpable. I know there are things I am ‘not allowed’ to say. A discussion of religion with a Muslim person is often prefaced by the statement, ‘Don’t say anything about the Prophet [Muhammad].’ In free society, open and honest conversation is not usually begun by a prohibition. Threats and intimidation are just part of life here. […]
This kind of campaign and Americans support of it could assure these frightened Muslims that they have the rights that every other American has, that they will be protected, not abandoned or exposed to their leaders should they act upon their desire to be free.
And that is the reason for Hamas-linked CAIR’s ugly, irrational fury. But what’s the mainstream media’s excuse for not sticking up for this vulnerable, endangered minority: apostates from Islam?
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
64 Comments
Don't take their crap Pamela you have every right to distribute the advertising as long as the Muslims anti Semites and Atheists can distribute theirs.
They are trying to stifle your right to speech in order to conceal the world domination agenda of radical Islam and CAIR.
Keep on keeping on no matter what they do or threaten to do to you!
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, Hot Stocks and TheDean&HeadMaster, BigJournalism. BigJournalism said: Dhimmi MSM Stenographers Get Talking Points from Hamas-Linked CAIR http://bit.ly/duKA2W [...]
…And fill the wall to the brim with concrete…
DM
Unfortunately, when an incurable disease strikes a population…
Isolation from the "doomsday" element is in order…
CAIR is an OBVIOUS TERRORIST support organization intent on the Islamification odf the U.S.
In the misty far off future these Islamic terrorists see their portraits on the wall of a mosque (like the one coming up AT GROUND ZERO – WTF???) heralding them as "pioneers".
They will have long gone on to their boy virgins in Allah-land but the see the U.S. as the new western capital of Islam, the new Mecca – so to speak.
CAIR MUST BE STOPPED – NOW – Thank you Pamela! (I'm a SIOA member).
Works for me HPD…
Personally, I am done turning the other cheek…
Jamesb,
Well said.
I am now a SIOA member as well.
Jul 3, 2008
CAIR: Obama should embrace his Muslim heritage!
Friday, April 09, 2010
CAIR applauds Obama
The Council on American-Islamic Relations welcomed a decision from U.S. President Barack Obama to strike terms like "Islamic radicalism" from the National Security Strategy.
MAY 26, 2010
John Brennan,White House Advisor on Counter Terrorism said the Obama Administration doesn’t "describe our enemy as 'Jihadists' or Islamists," because (as he argued) Jihad is a holy struggle, a legitimate tenant of Islam, meaning to purify oneself or one's community." He added that "the use of these religious terms would "play into the false perception"
I do not know what President Obama's faith is, but CAIR sure has an ally in the White House. How does John Brennan see CAIR purifying one's community if not by the "community" accepting the full tenets of Islam?
It's really a very small group of people that are causing the problems in this country.
That sounds like what the British said about George Washington.
And it only took a small group to bring down the Twin Towers.
The Dimocrats embrace illegals and Muslims because they know the huge majority of both groups will vote their way..
Both groups demand goodies, and the Dims are only to happy to provide in order to secure that vote, but CAIR and the Muslims know appeasers when they see them, and support the Dims for their own end…
That would be Sharia Law..
Think of BO as a muslim. Has there been one photo of him and his family attending a church service since he attained office? I haven't seen one..
The radical muslims in the US seem to be a fairly subststional and diverse group. I would not consider them to be a small group, rather numerou small cells.
http://97.74.65.51/readArticle.aspx?ARTID=33699
OMG Ms Geller, I'm becoming quite a fan. All it takes is one voice, one person to start shouting from the rooftops.
*cheers*
You are being heard, understood, and acknowleged.
HUA!
[...] Read Full Story >> Big Journalism [...]
Actually I believe he has been to church twice. He has stated that he does not want to disrupt the congregation. He has no problem disrupting the golfers tough. It must be that the Halo shines to bright at the church, not as shiny at the golf course in the sun. LOL
John Brennan believes there is such a thing as a "moderates" within Hezb'Allah and that we can somehow cause them to be promoted up the ranks of the genocidal Islamist organization and then maybe they'll buy us a pony…
It's really only a very small group that are open about what they intend or, at the least, what they support.
Great work Pamela!
It's sad. As I step back and look at the Obama Administration's take on issue after issue it becomes clearer, each and every day, that they go out of their way to protect the rights of terrorists, criminals (many who aren't even citizens), and everyone who works against the core of America.
Calling them ignorant would be too nice. I used to call them willfully ignorant, but I think deliberately ignorant is a better word…
Cool D.M. it's gotta be done.
My parents have been married for like 55 years and my Mom saw pix and video of Obama and the First Wookie leaving Easter service and she said "There's something wrong with that marriage".
She's very sage with stuff like that – then the old campaign worker/Obama affair semi-non story came to light. Hmmm…
I want a unicorn like Obama is getting…
I used to have a fairly liberal view of other people's religions. I figured they were all just different paths to G-d, and however misinformed, they were at least well intentioned.
Then I read the Koran.
This is a battle we cannot afford to lose.
Pamela Geller is a hero.
Try looking up "Islamberg, NY" or any of the 150+ jihadist training camps that operate IN the USA… Wish I still had the map of all the KNOWN jihadist militant camps throughout the country.
Now that was righteous, but I don't buy the excuse about the disruption. He doesn't mind disrupting everything else when he goes to support candidates in CA or do one of his constant campaigning trips.
Yes, I remember the alleged affair. If memory serves, it disappeared from the LSM very quickly. Interesting don't cha know.
A statement of relativity which means nothing.
So we must come to this point where we understand there are 4 categories of religious belief:
1) Those of extreme beliefs in God and strive to take control of government to enforce their beliefs. They are not satisfied until their religion is dominant and will do what ever it takes to ensure others are made to believe as they do.
2) Those whom believe in God but understand that the journey is a personal experience and all people have the right to choose what ever religion makes them happy. These folks are the most intune group to the intent of the Founding Fathers where they understand that we are each individuals with our own human energy and we have choices to use that energy in positive acts or in negative acts. Thus our only separation from mankind and the animals is that belief in a God that allows us to make choices that respect the natural laws of human energy such that competition is something that can provide the right level of feedback to grow and become better and that profit is something that is used to grow their ability to serve mankind more as well as be able to provide for one's family.
3) Those whom do not believe there is a God, but believe it is Man's RIGHT to pursue the belief in God and that the government should not be involved in negating this right nor enforcing it. In short, "In God we Trust" would remain on the currency since in short we do believe in a God that can help us manage the free market.
4) Those whom do not believe in God and believe it is their duty to ensure the rest of the nation realizes that there is no God. They seek to obtain control of the powers of Government and of Journalism to espouse their godless theories that allow them to gain control of their environment at the expense of those whom they seek to help. This element of control separates them from those whom do not believe in God but support the notion that there is a higher power at work that helps guide and manage free markets. These folks believe that the open market is evil since mankind is not at the helm and they seek to gain power over institutions such that they can ensure equality all the while enriching themselves by justifying their efforts since they have purity of heart. These people are the most destructive to a nation for they do not have a God that may have ultimate retribution. They only have their own self guided intuition, which in the beginning can be very self righteous, but in the end the draw of power always pulls them to the dark side of vice which ultimately corrupts their right minded decisions. Leading themselves to ultimately become that which they despised at the start of their endeavors.
So which is it for those whom seek to turn the world to Islam? The 4th option seems the most likely. Where they seek to turn everyone to their religion and use what ever means necessary to do so.
This is why this form of religious belief and intent is so dangerous.
Those Muslims that in their heart wish to control the mechanisms of government to force the masses to obey their form of religion. Not all believe this.. .but the most radical do…
Why has this not been discussed?
Because in order to discuss this you have to discuss the option that government does not need to be in control of everything. That there is a possibility that the governed can proceed with their lives quite well without the help of government. So the Journalism that we witness cannot go to this level of analysis because they all have the inherent assumption that BiG government is a necessity that large control over individuals is required for our survival.
And the truth is that this Liberty we seek as the founding fathers sot only belongs to those whom advance positions 2 and 3 of the 4 quadrants. That those whom are in position 1 and 4 have no place here in America and have no place defending our liberties. For they seek to destroy our liberties.
This is not bias, this is not racism, this is not hate, this is logic!
We do not accept those whom hold positions in #1 – Believe in my god by force or position #2 – Believe in no god by force. Thus, these positions are not tolerated within the realm of governance.
They can be protected by the constitution by free speech, but it is the duty of those whom govern to protect Liberty and these theological positions threaten the Liberties we desire.
Publius
I, too, was shocked by what I read. It is interesting that so many people belong to this group without embracing this teaching. I know they are used to being threatened if they kick up a fuss, but where is their passion for their god? The Christians are very adamant about who is a Christian, and those who use it to do ungodly things. Or at least the Bible tells us to use our discernment to separate the real from the fashionable or dangerous.
He has no problem disrupting anything and everything on tv when he feels the need to 'talk'! Won't do a press conference but once a year, but 'talk' to us every dang day!!
Well done Publius – I'm wondering if you perhaps mixed the numbers up in your final assessments –
just curious, as the numbers seem to contradict what you are stating. Or, maybe it's just really late and I misread it!
Yes it does…
And I suspect it will get MUCH more ugly…
Andrew McCarthy, a former federal prosecutor who prosecuted the "Blind Sheikh" and 11 other jihadists understands very well what islam is all about and what we are up against as well as understanding how woefully uneducated most of America is about islam and it's goals and why the left is working with them.
Please listen to his presentation at the Heritage Foundation here — http://www.heritage.org/Events/2010/05/The-Grand-...
These Islamic devil worshipers are using our own traditions (freedom of religion) to corrupt it and get America into Dhimmitude. They claim the protections, yet demand special status from the government (which shamefully the government affords them. Just think about all the battles to get the Christian symbols out of the schools, meanwhile schools are installing prayer rooms for the devil worshipers, and NYC public school had a Islamic one). I also hear that Kagan supports allowing Shiara law to be valid, like it is in some parts of Minnesota, Michigan, and New York. We are surrendering our country to Progressive/Socialist and the Islamic reign. Sorry folks, no matter what the Progressive/Socialist tell you this is a Christian country and we have to stand up to the Devil Worshipers. (Disclaimer: I believe that Islam is the worship of the devil, to wit: The story of Mohammed hooking up with Allah (the Moon God) in the desert is similar to Christ meeting the Devil in the wilderness, only difference is Jesus said he would not worship the Devil and Mohammed did. Plus the Fact that Islam says their worshipers must go through fire to reach heaven (big hint there), and of course the whole kill everyone that does not worship Allah)
…then use it for target practice…
Yes, my apology. I meant to say they would are more in line with option one (1). Of course since they would like to have the world change to their religion.
Publius
I see two immediate errors.
First, you do not properly account for the full range of beliefs as to what is considered appropriate decoration. Just as the Constitution acknowledges that individuals may make an oath OR affirmation because of their beliefs, there is nothing inherently wrong in believing that "In G-D We Trust" is inappropriate at best or blasphemous at worst to place on currency. That it was not placed there until 1908, and adopted as a motto until 1956 (for the sole purpose of "distinguishing" us from atheistic communists), should serve as more than enough evidence that the Founders saw no reason to employ it.
Second, while coming close you fail to take the last step and understand that the line between religious and political ideology is merely one of semantics. One believes in a divine sanction for moral guidance or one believes in a secular text sanction for moral guidance, but the potential range of depth of belief and activity is identical. One can just as easily be Al Qaeda homocide bomber as a Weatherman, or a C&E Christian as a holiday bush atheist. The only difference is in what source they claim for their inspiration or lack thereof.
With such an understanding it is seen that your numbers 1 and 4 are identical. They refer to people who cannot comprehend, let alone acknowledge, the legitimacy of any alternate belief system. It is not merely that they disagree, or disagree vehemently, or think others are fools. They simply and fundamentally do not have a mindset that accepts that anyone can believe other than they do and still qualify as a rational, functional, legitimate human being. The consequences of such, as with any common sociopath, thus follow automatically. At best they merely restrain themselves to rhetoric, but even in that the dire promises of what will happen when "they" are in charge are always there.
Pamela: You are
1. smart
2. hot
3 incisive, AND
4. RIGHT!
I love you. Keep up the fight.
just donated, thanks for what you do.
Send them out of the country.
Thanks ,Pam.
Even in Phoenix,Az. people and friends are killed because of this. http://worshippingchristian.org/blog/?p=9609
The way it's been described to me, is:
The first half of the Koran is relatively benign stuff.
But the second half, in which it's clear that Mo'ham is becoming drunk with power, is pretty toe-curling.
I have some unique toilet tissue, and its crinkly but effective
Every body is a racist, bigot, and hate-monger. Except, of course, those who are looking to take advantage of the system (or lack thereof). This appears to include most everyone except Christians (and probably Hebrews, and Hindus), and conservatives. Islam will eventually be wiped off the face of the Earth. It will take divine retribution to do it.
We need to check the voter registration status and immigration status of all these "democrat supporters".
It's not ethnic cleansing if the deported broke the normal laws – it's justice. This is why the Israelis bulldoze houses without building permits. It's the law for everyone, and if you don't like it leave. Just treat everyone to the same standard, and look how some fully fail that standard.
BronxZionist,
My friend, like always you are correct. My apologies for integrating the concept of "In God We Trust" as it was intended to be a metaphor for those whom believe that there is no human master when it comes to markets. Thus the inherent beliefs by the founding fathers that the markets would be free to define themselves. And agreed, at the time of the Founding Fathers the "In God We Trust" was something that I can only assume they considered self evident. Which is curious that the terms "In God We Trust" came about around the same time frame that the Federal Reserve began to take hold. Something I should take a moment and read up on to better understand.
Regarding your second point, again I have to admit that I agree… but if we take a look at the overall premise of the 4 quadrants (I will post a diagram shortly). The 1st and 4th are of men/women of the same minds. But I separate them because I think we as a population see only those whom are of religious extremism as dangerous. I would argue that those with no religion and an equal desire to change the governed to their point of view of humanism are equally as dangerous.
Publius
Hello Publius,
I am not sure whether a specific reason was stated in any papers or presentation as to why the Founders did not place IGWT. I suspect it is for the reasons I noted – there are many for whom it is sacreligious verging on blasphemous. It should be noted that the motto of the U.S. then was E Pluribus Unum, which still appears on our currency, so that would have been sufficient.
However, I do not think it is so great a "coincidence" that it appears at the same time as the Federal Reserve. Remember, that was the "Progressive" era, and they were more than happy to try and use religious appeals to advance their agenda at the turn of the century.
For the second, I agree that they are just as dangerous. That is why they must be put together, just as National Socialists are properly grouped with other Marxists for identification purposes, despite the conflict between the two variants in WW II. That connection must be made at the most essential level to best make it clear to people how and why the threat posed by the adherents of two otherwise disparate groups is so great.
BronxZionist,
Good point. The term IGWT may have been an attempt to legitimize a single currency.
And yes agreed that the two counter philosophies reside in a similar mind, that man can be controlled or domesticated to conform to a single theology. These similar minds through human existance have tried to control the populations using the following rule as defined by the Founding Fathers:
Under the Laws of Liberty – Sub Section – Principles of Faction and Insurrection
(As we defined under several postings under Big Government)
Rule #2 – The Cure for Controlling Factions
There are two methods in which to cure the existence of factions, the first would be to remove its causes; the second would be to control its effects.
Rule #3 – The Method for Removing Factions
Historically there have been two consistently used methods for removing the causes of factions, the first method is to destroy individual liberty, through the materialistic elimination of the owner ship of property, in order to extinguish the mechanisms that allow factions to thrive and the second method is to give to the citizenry a idealistic norm where there would be equal opinions, passions and interests such that no faction would be able to grow separately from the idealized norm.
Such that those that have the same mindset as #1 – Control of Man through God or #4 – Control of Man without God believe that they have the right to control someone else's property and they have the right to put forward idealistic norms to equalize opinions, passions and interests. This is the group think, the life is better if we all believe the published norm and that to own property or pursue the riches that property brings is in of itself the root of evil for mankind. They of course would be willing to be the stewards of that property or stewards of your own God given natural human energy.
Thus, per the Laws of Liberty we have the final Law #8 from the subsection Principles of Faction and Insurrection:
The controlling of faction’s impact by denying the faction life –
The third option for controlling faction’s negative effects would be to construct a political system that would control factions by not allowing them to take hold in the first place. With the duration of political positions short and the strength of political positions diluted among many individuals who must share in the power and responsibility, no one individual or group can place an anchor of faction to the detriment of the individual, group or Nation. With the primary premise of this function, to set to blowing ashes the flames of passioned factions, to ensure that encroachments on liberties such as the freedom of religion and freedom to obtain and hold property [and grow wealth] through open economic means are thrust into a labyrinth of hurdles of checks and balances such that resulting legislation would result in no legislation or would transform the legislation into something that ensures the smallest minority is heard and protected from abusive controls.
And as such was the intent of the Constitution that the Founding Fathers have written.
AND… This is Important… The reason they were such believers IN religion and the necessity of the freedom and responsibility that it takes to live a life in LIBERTY. That those whom advocate the #2 and #3 positions on Theology would have a place for Liberty to thrive. But those whom take the positions of CONTROL such as the #1 and #4 positions we have talked about, would surely destroy the nation and it's original intent. As such, I would argue that these positions of #1 and #4 have been the history of Mankind. That this position of knowing what is best for the governed at the expense of the governed has been a political position for all of mankind's history.
The beauty of the Constitution is that it figured out a way to keep the people, if they so believed, in the positions #2 and #3. And in so doing the population will live a life with LIBERTY. If the population were to abandon God or take a position that they know GOD such that they can take the controls of government to determine the mechanisms of a man/woman's life and the markets that support him/her, in the end it will destroy the nation as it has done for several millennium before.
This is the key I have been searching for… This is the Philosophy I have been trying to discover.
Thanks for pushing the point… I have the structure to move forward on the second chapter.
Publius
I think it is something more fundamental than that.
There are two ways to approach belief and expression of an ideology:
1. While believing you are right (pretty much a requirement), you understand, acknowledge, and accept that someone else, in the full possession of their reasoning and humanity, can believe "something" else.
2. While believing you are right, you cannot conceive, on any level, that anyone else could possibly believe "anything" else, and still be considered rational.
The first leads to true multi-culturalism, cultural pluralism, and indeed freedom as a whole.
The second is the basis for identity politics, mass murder (from genocide to "cultural" revolutions), and generally tyranny as a whole.
And yes, I agree, although understated, underrated, and too often subverted, the Constitution, as well as the Declaration of Independence, are predicated on the acknowledgement that simply because he believes otherwise, my neighbor is still my neighbor, still another human being, and thus still entitled to the same considerations those who believe as we do are entitled to. That was a shocking concept then, and I suggest still a rather shocking concept today.
BronxZionist,
Yes… Well done!
If I may, I would like to use your two quotes. I will reference your Blogger name.
Publius
[...] » Dhimmi MSM Stenographers Get Talking Points from Hamas-Linked … [...]
Feel free.
Indeed you can use my real name, as that is one part of the culmination of my years of study on the matter, and I have no problem being identified with it.
I would add just one little bit to the second:
". . . and still be considered rational, or even in many cases, a 'human', entitled to all attendant rights and privileges."
That is a key element that identifies the dehumanization tactic employed to justify the extermination, or whatever euphemism is currently in vogue, of dissenters.
(My window timed out and I had to redo the post, and I forgot to include that the second time I wrote it.)
Here is the link to the diagram that I was talking about…
http://www.scribd.com/doc/32287697/Political-Impa...
Please let me know if there are any additions or changes that would advance this thought.
Publius
*faints*
About 5 years ago, as I was reading through all the political treatises, it suddenly occurred to me:
Economic systems are a function of political structure. (Also all economics can inherently be expressed in capitalist terms, as they are predicated on production and distribution of capital, they just vary in who "owns" what.)
Political structure is a function of philosophy (be it religious or secular).
And here you have it!
You approach it from a persepective of belief in a divine presence, but that is exactly what I was trying to express as a function of the overarching social theory.
Obviously I like it.
I would have to study it and contemplate it, but at most I would suggest enhancing those side tabs with commentary on the economic function a bit more.
Yes, Agreed… But I worry that the diagram will become too complex.
I am thinking that both sides would warrant their own diagrams to further delineate these perspectives.
For me, this revelation and formation in my mind was something that I have realized is as true as the need for oxygen and water. But in a world focused on whom would control the natural energy of other humans, there is so much chatter that people cannot think or understand some of these basic tenants.
Much credit goes to you as well my friend since your prodding proved the incentive to formulate this diagram. I have a unique skill in doing so.
Shall we try to do the other two diagrams? (Not today, but over the next couple of weeks.)
Publius
Yes, I know, it could easily get too busy.
And yes, perhaps complimentary diagrams.
)
Or maybe a layered diagram? (Not that I know how to do that.
And yes again, I feel the same way. Only by understanding the underlying principles can we fully appreciate the choice we make.
Thank you, I am glad I could help. Doubly so now that I see this result of our combined effort. There is a reason to embrace e pluribus unum as a motto.
And certainly, I would very much like to see the others expressed to complete the structure and presentation.
Diffuse the CAIR arguement. Also post bus ads with help for "Leaving Judaism?", "Leaving Catholicism?", "Leaving Buddhism?", "Leaving Mormonism?", and, my favorite, "Leaving the Amish?"
First, ads asking people to consider other faiths already exist, including atheist recruitment ads. Indeed CAIR ran ads inviting people to Islam which included declaring the Abraham, Moses, and Jesus were "really" Muslims.
Second, none of those groups have religious law that mandates killing apostates. The worst any of them currently inflict is shunning, which while not particularly pleasant is so absurdly far from death as to make any comparison perverse at best.
[...] Dhimmi MSM Stenographers Get Talking Points from Hamas-Linked CAIR [...]
Stay strong Pamela!
HB 1388 recently passed letting
Obama bring Palestinians linked
to Hamas into the USA as refugees.
AMEN!
Victory at all costs,victory in spite of all terror,
victory however long and hard the road may be:
for without victory, there is no survival.
—-Winston Churchill (1874-1965)
[...] Religion, deaconjohn’s posterous, Bare Naked Islam, Maggie’s Notebook, A Big Message, Big Journalism, Big Government, PRNewswire, Refuge From Islam, International Free Press Society, Winds of Jihad, [...]
You must be logged in to post a comment.