Breitbart Punches Back on Maher’s ‘Real Time’

This is a prime example of why liberals don't want to argue using facts and logic – they KNOW they can't win that fight. It's easier to call names, using hit 'n' run tactics with a bumper sticker mentality. After all, to liberals, the ends justify ANY means. I'm amazed that Breitbart was even asked to be on Surreal Time w/Bill Maher. They probably won't make that 'mistake' again!

Maybe the people who actually fired Sherrod should be the ones apologizing.

Liberalism reminds me of rabies.

It is time to turn the tables on people like this "woman". Use Alinsky's tactics against her. Isolate her, personalize her, freeze her, then destroy her and people like her.

We need to call these people "racers". Mock them for believing that an opposition to or criticism of His Royal Highness, Our Lord God King Barack Hussein Obama the First is based solely on race.

A good place to start is to go to Amazon and leave a review of this racers book, commenting on how ignorant this racer is, and tell people this racer"s book is a waste of time. Give this racers book 1 star and so on.

Flanders is cheap and tacky. She is not interested in a fair, sane and sound debate; only as many lies she can tell. Bill Maher is still silly and stupid and getting more stupid by the minute thinking I suppose he is clever bringing people who are even involved. Andrew is great.

But speak to Breitbart's point about wanting to know which classes Obama took in college. Why would it matter?

I think Maher made a great point about him taking a Bible class in college (and now he's an atheist). I took a Russian lit class in college….does that mean I'm a Communist?

When will Andrew get his own show on talk radio? We need him to be front and center 365, this hit and miss
is inspiring, but he could reach a wider audience if he was easier to find.

Happy Trails, All!
; )

Since there were 5000 reprters that showed up in Wasilla AK to attack Palin, and during that same time there were zero people in Chicago…doesn't that say something?

Doesn't that show the bias that is in the mainstream news today?

Sportscaster's talk about professional athlete's college careers… personally I'm a bit more interested in the presidents background than that of a NFL linebacker.

They talk about their college athletic career; they don't talk about which classes they took in college.

So talk about how Obama voted when he was a U.S. Senator, or a State Senator – those things are relevant; what classes on took in college is not. But of course, that he hasn't made his college records available must mean there is something sinister he's trying to hide according to Tea Party thought, I'm sure.

More likely, it means you're a tsarist.

More like a Bolshevik, wouldn't you think? Also took a few American Lit classes just to keep up the subterfuge.

I'm pretty sure Bush didn't release his college records; I believe they were leaked by someone else. Probably a liberal who wanted to show Bush wasn't a very good college student.

Here's one little tidbit: (Negotiating with the Soviet Union??? Oh my God….Chamberlain all over again.)

Michael L. Baron, who taught the year-long honors seminar in American Foreign Policy that Barack Obama took during his senior year at Columbia, recalled in an NBC interview Obama's "easily acing" the class and receiving an A for his senior paper on the topic of nuclear negotiations with the Soviet Union."

I don't think it would matter, as the people who voted for Barry saw something in him that most (any?) conservative didn't see, (first black president? Smoked Pot? Hope and Change? talented speaker??? a Christian?????) and wouldn't be swayed anyway. Or maybe they would? If perhaps they could have seen the Soetoro Thesis- At least we could hope that it would have swayed some of the independant to have a window into this guys mind. No matter. I was convinced from the words from his own mouth that he was a socialist agitator. A Communist Organizer (a few letters different from his claim of being a Community Organizer)

Laura Flounders.

What is he implying? That blacks (that's right, I refer to myself as white, and someone who is black, black) are more dangerous?
Ahhhh – exactly my impression, nearly every time I hear Maher talk about "what the Blacks should do." I think his most condescending, raaaaaacist remark, though, was back in December, when he was bemoaning the fact that Urkel wasn't "gangsta" enough:
"I thought, when we elected the first black president, as a comedian, I thought in two years that I'd be making jokes about what a gangsta he was. Not that he's President Wayne Brady, but I thought we were getting Suge Knight."
Right. Suge Knight. Former CEO of Deathrow Records, known for pistol-whipping the competition, dealing drugs and guns, and hanging Vanilla Ice by his ankles off a 20th storey balcony. (Not that I wouldn't have loved to see that, but probably not if the dangler were the President).
And not just Maher – there were many MSM talking heads saying that Obama should "go gangsta" during the healthcare debate.
And you're absolutely right – these a**holes are literally saying that Obama needs to start behaving less "White", and more like the, to them, "typical" Black person.
I just cannot grok what sort of self-delusion a Black person has to be operating under, to not see the inherent race-condescension and barely-concealed contempt underlying such statements.

the birther issue was mostly made up to deflect the dicourse. what many people have questions about is his citizenship, not birthplace. did his family renounce citizenship when in indonesia? how did they get back? why have all the passports been destroyed? what is up with all those social security numbers?
also, questioning his acceptance to columbia and harvard is not all about how "smart" he is or his grades. this is again a way to change the subject. there are many with great grades who cannot get in. it takes letters of recommendation from influential people. who did obama know that helped him in that regard? those are the questions concerning his school records.
breitbart did manage to briefly bring up cashill. too bad he was awkwardly stumbling around trying not to look like a kook in front of people who already think so to actually bring up the relevant points of contention that cashill considers.
cashill makes a great case for questioning the authenticity of both books. including timelines and nautical themes. too bad breitbart couldnt bring those up. after reading his book, why would breitbart not admit that a strong case has been made for authenticity of "dreams?"

totally.
i was praying maher would get called out for that stupid interview with the governor (from massachussettes?) earlier in the segment.
he actually said " you know the president, was he a good student?"
how pathetic and intellectually irrelevant.
how does simply knowing somebody give you the right to comment on whether or not they were a good student?
breitbart more than bent over backwards to make sure he separated himself from the birthers and especially to let the crowd know he thought obama was "very smart."
who cares? i will judge his intellect according to his policies. like trump said. we have a lot of very stupid elected officials.
but instead of talking policy, let"s spend an hour discussing whether youre a teabag top or bottom…..hilarious.

"So talk about how Obama voted when he was a U.S. Senator, or a State Senator – those things are relevant"
His track record there aint pretty either.

"But of course, that he hasn't made his college records available must mean there is something sinister he's trying to hide according to Tea Party thought, I'm sure."
Then why did he seal them? You'd have to be a lemming to think he did it for no reason. And given what this POS is proud of, the fact that he would conceal something about his sordid life of thuggery should disturb anyone with a working brain.

"Why does he feel the need to defend Obama against all injuries great and small?"

White guilt.