Comments on: JournoList, Shame of a Nation: Today’s ‘Reporters’ Are Liberals First, Journalists Second

By: Big_Mo

Big_Mo — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 21:52:32 +0000

Hey, Kidtwist88 – you know where you can stick your offensive comment, jackass. I happened to have gotten a second bachelor's at the same time in American history. And I entered the J-school when I was an idiot liberal.

So do yourself a favor and STFU about people you don't know.

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:05:52 +0000

Why would you deny anyone an education?
Are you afraid he has the wrong skin color or something?

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:04:37 +0000

Innocent of what? We can clearly see she's a race baiter and a struggling bigot. That may be better than her husband, but still not the character that public employees should have.

So, what is she innocent of exactly?

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:03:19 +0000

No, we use facts.
You haven't shown where Fox or Breitbart has been less than accurate.

You just say it's not. Empty words from an empty person.

Facts are not your friends.

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 17:01:08 +0000

Probably visiting Dan Rather in his assisted living facility.

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:59:47 +0000

You can hear the boots as the goose stepping soldiers march past.

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:59:03 +0000

So, you must support Breitbart who simply posted a video of someone in their own words looking stupid?
And a video of the audience enjoying her stupidity?

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:58:10 +0000

But those talking points, they aren't factual.
The 'jobless recovery' means 'I'm doing fine, you're still unemployed'.
The 'green economy' means 'you can't get gas and won't have energy to heat your house'.

The 'green jobs' he promises has been tried in spain, it ruined them. They have the highest unemployment in Europe. http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/arti...

If the talking points were accurate, there wouldn't be this resistance to the liberal cool aid.

By: Roger

Roger — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:55:18 +0000

You aren't just reading conservative sites. You comment and try to spin them towards your own agenda.

And I don't mind that. We all do that. What I mind is that you don't have substance in your comments. Journalism is about reporting facts. Informing the populace. 'Advocacy journalism' is an oxymoron. To advocate towards any position is editorializing. It's not reporting.

If the New York Times had advocacy on the editorial page and still had quality reporting on the rest of the paper they would not be printing from the cheapest back alley they can find (I know, they are still in the building they used to own, so far).

By: Kidtwist88

Kidtwist88 — Fri, 30 Jul 2010 16:24:00 +0000

Oh, you went to J-School? Bad news–you're an idiot. Real reporters don't need J-School and get their degrees in other disciplines.