UPDATE: Talking Points Memo has issued an update acknowledging some comments made in the post highlighted at Big Journalism were in error.

In Josh Marshall’s article “What were they thinking?” of January 27th, 2010, Mr. Marshall referrs to a wiretapping plot and four times to a plot to bug the offices of Sen. Mary Landrieu by James O’Keefe and the three other conservative activists:
-O’Keefe was allegedly using his cell phone to film the attempt to bug Landrieu’s office as it happened.
-And let’s say they got something really juicy off of Sen. Landrieu’s tapped phone line. What exactly were they going to do with it?
-But they were never going to protect you from an investigation into bugging the office of a United States senator.
-Now, one might speculate that they were going to use the bug to get leads that they would then report out and surface by other means.
-And filming the bugging as it happened definitely suggests they didn’t plan on keeping the thing a secret.
There are no allegations of any wiretap plot in the FBI affidavit, and a law enforcement official has conceded that the four men were not attempting to wiretap, bug, or intercept calls. Furthermore, legal representation for the accused has gone on record stating there were no intentions to tap phones in the Senator’s office.
We kindly ask you to issue a correction/retraction to the story.
We have been/will be making similar requests of other news sources to correct similar errors. Some, such as the Washington Post and MSNBC’s David Shuster, already have posted corrections or retractions.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
15 Comments
Retracto, the Correction Alpaca?
LOL! Why is that one of the funniest things I've ever read?
BTW… Keep up the good work!
I don't know why everyone is so upset by the media's representation of the charges against O'Keefe and the Gang. When I took a journalism class in college the very first item on the syllabus was "Jumping to Conclusions". Seems like the Lamestream Media passed that exam with flying colors.
don't hold your breath. being a liberal means never having to say you're sorry.
Correction? Retraction?
When monkeys fly.
Go get 'em, Retracto!
They need to be held accountable.
While we're at it, maybe Obama should do some dancing w/ a pack of Alpacas, and "use some better words", concerning his comment on the SCOTUS decision.
There needs to be a Retracto Fan Page on Facebook.
He's on twitter.
Alpacas are know to spit in people’s faces. Josh Marshall should be the first victim of Retracto.
Once they spread the false talking points it is hard to stop the avalanche of lies. They had a lot of help from the lame stream media.
[...] Talking Points Memo.com [...]
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by BigJournalism: Correction Request: Talking Points Memo http://bit.ly/8ZmeFQ…
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, Cris Angelini, greychampion, Chris Lockhart, goatman42749 and others. goatman42749 said: Correction Request: Talking Points Memo http://is.gd/7hVt3 [...]
Great blog, i was thinking about you the other day. I have just got interested in blogging and hopefully i am able to do so
Follow me on Twitter
so what were they doing there? it it okay to misrepresent who you are and in doing so help yourself to manipulate the equipment of a public utility in use by a private citizen? Was it okay when the Republicans infiltrated the Democrats' email system From the spring of 2002 until at least April 2003? Why would you defend an invasion of privacy?
http://www.boston.com/news/nation/articles/2004/0...
You must be logged in to post a comment.