All the Halloween movies of the past decade “got nothin’” on the scary stuff the media threw at Americans over the last ten years. Hardly a week went by without some new scare being reported on to frighten the masses into throwing out their veggies, wearing masks, or thinking their hard drive was going to turn into a cyber pit bull and put a dozen stitches into their iPod. Herewith, a dozen of the most bogus:

12. Y2K
Jan 1, 2000. The decade began with a whopper. Computers were not going to be able to know how to register the year 2000 and systems as large as the Pentagon’s and as small as your cell phone were going to freak out and party like it was 1900. Of course, nothing happened. Everybody’s computers were fine and the new millennium began much like the last one, except this time we don’t have the very real fears of polio and the black plague to destroy our lives.
11. Tuberculosis Plane Guy
Spring 2007, Andrew Speaker, 31 from Atlanta gets on a plane while he has TB. He flies to Paris then on the Athens, from there to the Greek Islands to get married, then panicked that he might die if he doesn’t get help right away he flies to Prague, then into Canada (because he was worried he had been put on the no-fly list for the USA) and drives to the border at Chaplain, NY where he’s stopped for security reasons but when he looked fine, border patrol let him in the States. ABC was all over the story worried that everybody on the plane and might die from tuberculosis thanks to Speaker. Nobody got sick. Speaker never really got sick. The people sitting next to Speaker on the plane never got sick. For two weeks the stories were all about the dangers of flying with sick people. Perhaps a real threat, but in this case everybody, including Dianne Sawyer who wore a mask for her interview with Speaker, was fine.

10. Killer Tomatoes
Summer 2008. No tomatoes to be found at your favorite burger place. Salsa on suspension. Waiters and waitresses across the Land of the Free are forced to explain to their patrons that their favorite BLT would have no T. Two-hundred or so cases of people who got sick because of a salmonella-strain called Saintpaul. That was the alleged culprit here. American farmers lost millions while TV viewers were kept glued to the set to find the latest on the sequel to one of Americas great horror movies, Attack of the Killer Tomatoes II. Come to find out it wasn’t tomatoes after-all–it was peppers. Doh! Hit the back-up button here and hope nobody notices. Flea of the Red Hot Chili Peppers complained, but when it was explained to him that he was not blamed for this, he hit the back-up button as well and went to In N’ Out Burger and ordered extra tomatoes (animal style).
9. Killer Spinach
Summer 2006. I could add peanuts and strawberries to this list of scares, but we are sticking with the salad family here. Spinach from California had E-Coli from manure. 200 more people got sick but the story lasted for weeks. Oh, this was the good spinach too, the ORGANIC stuff. Carefully grown in the fields with sun streaming beams of natural energy, butterflies gently passing over to supply aromatic circulation and natural fertilizer made of….made of….well, that was the problem, wasn’t it? If you’re going to use cow manure you may want to make sure the cows were organic too, but the cows didn’t read the directive about their dung.
8. Mad Cow Disease
Winter 2003. Since we’re talking cows, might as well take care of this here. Technically it’s bovine spongiform encephalopathy (why didn’t the Bush administration make the media say this instead of “mad cow”?). This was a bigger problem in Great Britain than it was here where they destroyed 4.4 million cows as a precaution. But, when the first US case was discovered Japan stopped buying our beef for two years. It cost the US cattle industry millions. How many cases of mad cow were discovered in the USA? Three. That’s cows, not people. Zero people in the USA got mad cow. Oh, and by the way, it wasn’t mentioned much by the media, but you only get mad cow from eating the brain or spinal cord of an infected animal. As a public service here, we suggest you stay away from those parts. Besides, I’m guessing the spinal cord is not as tasty as the fillet.
7. West Nile Virus
Early 2001. Those pesky mosquitoes. We could spray them all with pesticide and take care of this, but environmentalists don’t like that, and we don’t want to hurt their feelings. As a result 287 people died in the USA after West Nile hit them. $200 million dollars was spent on health care to try to stop the West Nile virus in the US. The media worked overtime to create West Nile hysteria. Tons of stories all over the place on this issue but rarely was it mentioned that West Nile really won’t hurt you unless you’re already very old and very sick. Flea was happy to hear he was not the problem here, just mosquitoes.

6. Killer Bees
Early 2002. Queen bees from Africa started mating with local bees in the Southwest of the United States and the result was not sweeter tasting honey. The bees got bad and they got mean. The venom of a “killer” bee is no worse than any other bee, but they travel in packs and attack their victims with a vengeance. Although, there is no record of anybody in the USA actually being killed by killer bees, still they carry the killer tag. They also have PR people. The Florida African Bee Action Plan released a statement blasting the media for creating “panic and anxiety.” In Brazil they have a strain of ASSASSIN Africanized Killer Queen Bees, so things could be worse.
5. Swine Flu
Early 2009. H1N1. While the government worked hard to tell us pigs were not the problem, they certainly were when this first hit in 1918. Pigs and people got sick at the same time and that was a pretty good indication that the pigs were the problem. So, they called it pig flu back then, not H1N1. Some estimates say 100 million people were killed thanks to pig flu back then, so this stuff can be nastier than pigs like Mao, Stalin, Hitler and Pol Pot combined. This time a lot of people got sick, and it created a panic, but for the most part H1N1 and its various strains of H1N2, H2N3, H3N1, H3N2 and RHCP (Flea had no comment this time), didn’t kill anybody that the normal flu wouldn’t already have killed. A lot of people got scared, got their shots, the government was not prepared (see: Government Run Health Care Brilliance!); but this was no worse than any normal year with the flu. Lots of news stories were done about H1N1 so the moral of the story is; bees have better PR people than pigs.
4. Radon Gas
Early 2000, and much of the 1990’s. Call 1-800-RADON!, screamed the billboards. The EPA told us that radon gas was “a health hazard in your home.” They even ran TV commercials showing kids playing in a comfortable middle-class neighborhood that turned to skeletons because of radon gas in their homes. I don’t think they ever really found radon gas that could kill in anybody’s home, but the scare worked. Home Depot and Lowe’s have sold tons of those little detectors for $19.99. The New York Times did an article about how granite countertops in your home were a source of radon gas. As far as we can tell no one has died from granite countertops unless there was a case where a fork lift operator in a warehouse made a tragic mistake.
3. Asbestos Insulation
Throughout 2000. This has actually been an issue for decades, but we are still paying the price today. This was once a beloved fireproof material turned supposed carcinogen. Virtually every building in America has some of this stuff in it, and it will kill our children, so it has to be removed, right? In the early 90’s Science magazine declared this “crisis” grossly exaggerated and declared that removing it from buildings probably caused more harm than leaving in there. Still, hundreds of millions of dollars, perhaps billions, have been spent in the 20 years to remove asbestos from public buildings. It costs 100 times more to remove the asbestos insulation than it did to install it in the first place. Now, you don’t want to go out and spread the dust from your brake pads on your cereal in the morning, but the connection between deaths caused by asbestos insulation in buildings has still not been made.
2. SARS
Winter 2002. Severe acute respiratory syndrome. This story first broke in November, and by June 2003 it was not to be heard of again. 774 people died worldwide because of SARS, again, mainly the very elderly and the already sick. How many died in the USA? Zero. 8 people in the US had the disease, but they contracted it overseas. Still, the visuals of people in China with the masks on are still very real. There were a lot of people here in America who wore the masks whenever they went out in public during the SARS Scare 2002! (I’m hearing the music in my head and seeing the moving graphic on the evening news). The Chinese have it right though, they never touch. They bow and nod. No handshaking going on there. Not sure if this is about the same time that the Howie Mandell fist bump started, but I think the timing is close.

1. Global Warming!
Began sometime after the global cooling threat stopped. This is the granddaddy of all faux threats. This threat works, except the planet is actually cooling. This threat also makes brilliant scientific minds like Bill Clinton say things like, “global warming could make some places colder.” Then you had the e-mails from scientists trying to cover-up the fraud and the other “scientists” who trashed their data because their hard drives were full in their old offices. What scientist trashes their data because they say they didn’t have room to store it? Have the scientists never been to Costco? You can get an external hard drive that can hold 750 gigs of data for under a hundred bucks ($60.00 with the coupon). Buy one or two of those and you could save all those temps from the Dark Ages that you worked your entire life to find (did the Visigoths carry thermometers in their sheaths?). You only trash the data if you don’t want the data to get out there and if it does not support your theories. Did Einstein trash his Theory of Relativity data because there was no room in the bureau drawer because it was already filled with his hair care products? Besides, since the planet is now cooling, maybe we can just say Al Gore fixed this, give him another Peace Prize, or something, and we can get back to driving SUV’s.
As we look to the new decade and beyond, be prepared. The media will be there to scare the pants off you so that you will anxiously TiVo the next newscast. 60 Minutes once called Al Gore the PR man for the planet, and a prophet. Perhaps they just want to keep viewers scared to help ratings, or perhaps they believe whatever leftists say because that’s what they do, or both. Either way, expect your intelligence to be insulted early and often and expect the scares to continue and get more pronounced as ratings continue to fall. BTW, you want to hear a real threat? Dozens of people were killed last decade from TVs that fell on them because they were not properly attached to the wall or the stand they were on. TVs That Kill, Tonight at 11!





Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
205 Comments
Welp, people aren't referred to as 'sheeple' for no reason.
Not trying to be too picky here, but Y2K was real, trust me, I worked the issue for two or three years before 2000.
The fact that it didn't cause any big, noticeable problems is a testament to all the hard work, and tons of over time in order to make sure there were no surprises.
I worked in a data center that night too… got a free hat. :~} kinda wish i'da stashed it away.
[[[ Not trying to be too picky here, but Y2K was real, trust me, I worked the issue for two or three years before 2000. ]]]
Me, too. Nasty stuff, it was.
If i remember correctly, there was one human death (and several pets) in Arizona due to "killer" bees last year.
Thanks for the new site Andrew. Yes, this story illustrates what we have all seen in recent years: The news has become a panic machine.
I usually agree with everything Breitbart comes up with, but Asbestos was real. It affected the health of many members of my family after direct exposure. I don't want to start a discussion, but as a seeker of truth, with Asbestos, there's a lot going more on behind the scenes keeping the word from getting out than you would think.
Present company excluded, of course, no?
I got a blue glass globe paper weight and I lost a day of vacation, everybody had to work that weekend, no matter what.
During the last couple of weeks, we applying OS patches to 20 or so AIX servers, multiple times a day. I was the support guy for a team of firewall specialists, so everything that wasn't a firewall rule add or subtract, fell to me.
I remember updating a Lotus Notes database to track OS level and applied patches. I'd get a call in the morning, change the db to these levels, so they could document which ones had been done. A couple of hours later, change it again. Later in the afternoon, change it again. On and on for two weeks.
Nope, I believe no Sarge, it's probably time to face up to the fact that most of us have been a part of the problem in some way or another.
i'm still ticked about number 8. thanks to that bit of junk science, i can't donate blood any more. even though I lived in europe over 20 years ago!
I'm waiting to panic over Swine Flu Killer Bees that cause Global Warming. As I get older I prefer to condense things.
My only quibble was with Y2K. It was very overblown, but there was a problem. The problem was fixed. I, personally, started putting four characters in the year fields of some data in 1979. (The data was supposed to be useful for 70 years.) It was NOT a crisis, just something people had to work on.
I worked on that Y2K stuff as well and know the problems. Not a fun time for anyone having to work on fixes.
The point being made in the article though is that the media over-hyped the Y2K problem to the point that many literally believed planes would be dropping out of the sky on New Years Eve. From what I watched on the news and read in the papers back then, instead of reporting what the Y2K problems would likely do if not corrected, the reporters were doing their best to report every worst case scenario they could dream up simply to scare the public. From planes crashing and power plants blowing up along with your grandmother's pacemaker going on the fritz, the reporters weren't reporting, they were super-hyping the story.
CS – the sensationalism is the point of the article and each point has exceptions i think. I was a router-to-router data network guy, and it Y2K was pretty well a non-issue in that world. Frequent Cisco patches were about as difficult as it got for us. But man, did we ever have to be on top the latest news every day for a couple years. The appearance of panic seemed to be important to the higher titles.
That's just the MSM earning a living. They report that about everything. And if there isn't something real they can latch onto they'll make it up.
The biggest problem was had with it was networking was still relatively new industry, and it was growing so fats and furious, well let's just say the documentation wasn't exactly a high priority. Add on top of that the boss hired three hackers (one nearly convicted) to build the entire networking division around, and we had a mine field waiting for us. These guys actually misplaced an entire account once. No one could remember where the hell it was. I spent two years looking for that server. Finally found it at Victoria's Secret in NYC.
My point is, what the real danger was – was computers out on the internet and on intranets that know one knew about. Some one set it up in the past, they're the only who knew about it, they move on, get laid off, join another company, and all the knowledge about it was lost forever. That was the scary part to me, because we wouldn't even know where to begin to look.
But yeah, the MSM was in over the head on that one just like the other 11 instances. I agree with that.
Did you forget the avian flu? didnt the media tell us how many millions of us little peeons were going to die because of birds? Ive got a suggestion-maybe we should find out how many have died because of FRAUDULENT MEDIA STORIES. Maybe lets find ALWHORE frozen in his driveway and do a “story” about “climate change”.
Agreed, the fixes (we called the patches at IBM) were coming out 2,3, sometimes as many as 5 or 6 a day.
And I agree it was over hyped, but that's how the MSM makes their living, scaring the hell out of people.
Studies have proven, head lines like "Nothing to see here, real quiet day." don't move a lot of product.
I guess the reason I bring this up all the time is because I believe its going to happen all over again in about another 10 – 20 years (don't remember when) with UNIX based systems, if they haven't been fixed already. Back in 1999-2000 UNIX based systems kept their time by counting the seconds from some date I think in 1972. And when the number of seconds passes what a 64 bit register can hold, out goes all time related functions.
But that could be all fixed by now, I don't know. Several years ago we moved from firewall applications running on standard servers to network appliances, primarily Cisco gear.
Thank goodness we have Fox News for level-headed, non-panicky coverage of the news, especially during the day when "fair and balanced" journalism of the highest order reigns. Fox never attempts to scare its viewers about topics like those named above. The network has its priorities in place, and realizes the things we really need to be afraid of are, in no particular order:
Car Chases in Houston, LA, and Miami
Obama
Pelosi
Reid
Saul Alinsky
Democrats
Liberals
That Commie guy appointed by Obama
Alec Baldwin
Barbara Streisand
Anything with the "Clinton" surname
Anything with the "Kennedy" surname, even if it is dead
Environmentalists
Unions
Public Education
Socialized Anything, except for Firemen, Policemen, and the NFL Players (Association)
ABC
CBS]
NBC,CNBC, MSNBC
Avatar
France
Sean Penn
Leonardo DiCaprio
Jimmy Carter
Bill Moyers
feel free to add to the list!
You forgot to give honorable mentions to CFCs, flesh eating bacteria, Ebola, DDT, acid rain and the countless other hoaxes perpetuated on the gullable American public my the pigs of the MSM in their quest for ratings.
Speaking of panic (no, seriously), a local television reporter and her camera-man just left my house.
We live in fly-over country and yes, my neighborhood lost power during the night under severe wind-chill conditions. Maybe it's a slow news day? Her questions centered around people's …panic, I guess?
"What are you doing to prepare for another crisis?" Hubby and I just rolled our eyes and laughed.
"The same thing that happened last time. Turn on the gas-fireplace, light the candles, and read or play board games."
I'm not kidding when I tell you she showed concern, "You're not freaking out?!"
Ah, the media.
Social comments and analytics for this post…
This post was mentioned on Twitter by IdaFlo: The Top Twelve Faux Media Scares of the Past Decade http://bit.ly/6d2E4u…
don't forget bears
We're all gonna die…if its salsa that takes me out, so be it!
Good stuff. Those of us who have fought our way through the pea soup fog of public school, college and legacy media propaganda know that one must never trust these sources of so-called "information". Most of it's lies, and isn't a lie isn't true because it's spun six ways from Sunday. Kudos to Big Media for dusting the cobwebs off this truth and changing the light bulbs in its display case.
Enviromentalists are scarey. I dressed as one on Halloween…with a Barbara Streisand mask for added effect.
I don’t think the Y2K issue was bogus by any stretch of the imagination. I personally was involved in fixing software used by a central financial-securities-services institution to handle this problem. If we hadn’t done what we did, the entire stock trading capabilities in this country would have screeched to a halt on January 1, 2000. I know that sounds overblown and ridiculous, but I am speaking from personal experience. If I were not personally involved in fixing this issue in the place where I work, I probably would have a hard time believing the statement above, but having seen and done what I saw and did to fix this issue back then, the Y2K issue was definitely not bogus. The key point in this case is, we fixed it before January 1, 2000. Thus it became a non-issue by the time January 1 rolled around. If we had just sat on our hands, this would have been a disaster.
oh look, another obozo sycophant
idiot alert – just another America hater trying to attack the Real Americans news outlet of choice
or – is that you, obama? ….. or maybe……….."not proud of America" michelle?
how bout – America goes down the tubes if we dont………elect obama?
I don't think he meant asbestos isn't dangerous. It was the fact that removing the asbestos caused more problems than if it had been left alone. Leaving it alone insured the fibers were dormant. Removing it put the stuff in the air and that made things worse.
Don't you know from the commercials that air ceaselessly on cable news that asbestos causes mesothelioma and you must lawyer up?
If it seems to folks that Y2K was a small blip on the radar, it shows just how awesome those who worked on it! Thanks to ALL who worked on this, for your genius and diligence to keep our world going without a hiccup in 2000.
Well, yeah, Cthrag, nobody's perfect, but, hey, we ARE here…. LOUD and PROUD… fightin' Spartacusically (izzat a word?) and …..
….hold on, I lost my train of thought….. I'm listening to RadioDisney and " Battlefield " is on….nothin' like it to get your blood up….better'n Bagpipes……where was I….
Do I need to point out that the decade isn't over yet? Unless you normally count to ten by going from 0 to 9, we still have a year left.
2011 will start the new decade and given all of the fun political news, this list might change.
You know, other than managers thanking us (as opposed to giving us raises or bonuses) this is the first time any one has ever said that.
You're very welcome.
And… you fail right out of the gate.
Y2K was indeed a real threat. The reason the world didn't stop on 1.1.2000 is because we fixed it. So how about some credit, eh?
I personally worked on the Y2K issues facing one of the largest companies in the world. We did extensive testing of equipment and systems to determine those that were "Definitely Going to Fail" (as we labeled them), those that could fail (due to interactions with others systems) and other at-risk systems… and rest assured that the Definitely-Going-to-Fail systems were extensive and would have ended the company (and you, me and the tech world) had they not been fixed.
And to that end, we spend 16 months fixing those systems. It was real. It the problem wasn't addressed, it would have been catastrophic. We fixed it.
Thanks for not recognizing it.
I must admit that is one thing I let get to me from the media (though it wasn't panic by any means.) So I am glad to know that it wasn't unfounded.
Have a great day EdSki!
Spartacusically is definitely a word now, and a good one at that.
I'd beg to differ with the list.
Hope and Change would have to rank right up there, at number one……….
Great piece. The sensationalizing scare tactics are so disgusting. And at the end of it, the government always steps in to 'launch a probe' or make a law to 'keep it from happening again'. And, as always, freedoms are diminished and taxes are raised.
Look at another of their hysterical jaunts into psychodrama: Hurricane Katrina. Reporting rumor as fact, blaming the Bush administration when blaming the Governor of the state would have produced help much faster by shaming her into actually fulfilling the protocol for allowing the federal government to help, and ignoring all the new information that showed their reporting was less than sane. Then they gave themselves awards and pats on the back for their incredible ground-breaking coverage. They really think their lowest point was their highest. Pretty nuts.
Dude,
Add… Shemp Howard, Mitzi Gaynor and Sterling Holloway in drag…and you've just listed the entire cast of my last night's opium dream !
Coincidence?….or Synchronicity….?
You really have to watch that Alec Baldwin man, a real piece of work right there. I don't think FOX is immune to forces that impact media and your basic "if it bleeds it leads" syndrome, of course when someone steps in and deflects from the point of the matter by slathering FOX and FOX alone with criticism, it's pretty damned apparent where their head is at…..yea you Brad.
Oh wow, Lotus Notes. Is Novell even a viable company anymore? I would have guessed Outlook or Entourage has pretty much taken over. Or in some cases, Thunderbird.
You guys are totally missing the point……….. back in 99 many poor firms in other countries failed to update their systems which caused electrical computer crashes omitting radon gas from the power outlets into a tomato farmers laptop. When flying from his country to the US he was bitten by a bee. He was alergic so imediately he had to go to the ER in Mexico during his layover and took the oppurtunity afterwards to business with a pig farmer. The 2 got married in 04 and started a business of drywall installation. Not familiar with US materials Asbestos was unnoticed in the first Verizon cell phone plant( a client of the 2). Not expecting cell phones to be so popular, Verizon didn't have time to recall all phones so now for the past 5 years satalites and cell phones have been shooting asbestos through the ozone layer thus causing global warming.
How was that? do you all think I'm ready for MSN yet?
That is the real danger of IT. In my company, I am a contractor, and they have one sysadmin. Thats it. Me (a contractor) and him. Ifeel like Rodney Dangerfield "No respect I tell ya."
Death by guacamole !
Oh, the humanity !
Okay all you Y2K heroes are missing the point. The MSM was over blowing the issue while you were diligently working behind the scenes to prevent it. Most people figured the Engineers would take care of it but the false scare was real.
That wasn't true ?
Surely there must be something the matter with you that your not freaking out like, totally. You must still suffer from a holdover infection of 'self-sufficiency". No matter no worry, a few more bills plunged through congress and you'll get the 'cure'.
I'll tell you what, I did stack up on D cell batteries and water jugs.
I live in a small village in upstate NY, and it the village water system was dependent upon some old IBM PCjr tucked into a back corner some where no one even knew about, it could have temporarily taken down the system.
Those were the kinds of thoughts that kept me up till 3:00 a.m. New Year day. At work IBM was running a world wide computer bulletin board with issues as they popped up. The only one I can remember is a wing of a prison in New Zealand I think, had all the cell door s pop open at midnight. Not that it was a big deal, they just manually closed and locked them.
What I worried about is what if something like that happened at a power plant?
Lately, I've been paying more attention to those Bankruptcy lawyer spiels. Sucks to be me…..
A number of us lurking about here who worked to update systems prior 0 hour have made the same point. We knew what we were up against and tackled it proactively or perhaps it could have lived up the hype and been a real disaster, but that's just it, it was hyped.
Wow, this is comedy gold. Hats off to you for creating such a brilliant cariacature of what an unhinged leftist might say. The crown jewel is listing the alphabet networks. Especially after 8 years of the same naetworks saying "BOOOSH is listening to your phone calls and is going to send homeland security to break down your door and arrest you with special powers they have in the Patriot Act." Yes, the very same Patriot Act that Obama hasn't repealed a single word of.
Would have served to read posts that preceded yours, making the same points. The issue at hand is the media hype. Did the media start hyping this issue 3 years ahead of time? No they didn't, but you and many others here were working on things, acknowledged the situation and resolved the issues. It wasn't worth the hype, and that I believe is the point. Surely you've pinned more than enough medals on yourself for working the issue and don't need any accolades from the author.
IBM needed a new email based application for PCs as they ported their business off the old main frames. So they bought Lotus corp.
They used to operate that way, if they needed a service, they bought the entire corporation, so they could not cancel any contracts when they figured out how much it sucked to work for IBM.
Originally Lotus Notes didn't even come with an email application, that was the first order from their new over lords. They still use it too. IBM sold my division to another company and then contracted for the exact same services we were doing as employees. Same boss, same coworkers, same customers, different pay check.
EdSki … right on! I've grown tired of explaining that y2k was not a hoax, it was a problem fixed in time by many dedicated people, including me! Just glad it went as well as it did. Gee, and we DIDN'T even need BIG BROTHER TO WIPE OUR ASSES and TIE OUR SHOES … Imagine that!
Exactly. When it comes to I/T, management seems to define long range planning as how long is the service contract for the ancient equipment they refuse to replace.
I worked with a team lead once who was the best technical guy I ever met. He knew this stuff inside and out. Great guy too, give you the shirt off his back. Two problems, he never wrote anything down, kept it all in his head, and he'd rather just do a job and get it done rather than take time to train people to do it. We had a reorg, he went in one direction, I went in another with an entire network that he never even told me existed.
18 months of pure living hell trying to figure out how a Nortel works with pretty much zero guidance. Turns out this was pretty much the only group using them.
You're a lexicographal pushover….but, I LIKES YA' !….
My team had worse than Big Brother, we had Big Sister, Kathy driving us.
She was a nice lady, but merciless when it came to completing and documenting tasks in a timely manner. But she lead us through to get it all done in time.
Yes, I remember the Y2K hype. I figured the smart people would fix it, but the press still made an issue out of it as if it were going to stop everything in the world. It was the press that spread the fear of it. I was right. The smart people fixed it. The press still got by with spreading the fear.
I knew it ! My aunt's uncle was almost on that flight, and he died once.
But, he got better and then died later.
;^)
And the most deadly liberal hoax the DDT scare that so far has claimed over 30 million African children under the age of five.
It made for a great excuse to pick up a new shotgun.
Actually I believe FOX tries to educate it's viewers about these people and places and organizations and to present the truth about them though enourmous amounts of research. I think FOX understands that you need to conquer your fears with truth and wisdom, without emotional outbursts and uninformed bloviating.
I mean the guys at FOX can actually talk about Obama without wetting their pants, I mean that should mean something right there.
Ate some killer salsa last night.
If we don't hurry up and get some of Owl Gore's gobal warming we are all going to freeze to death.
9 won't get you 10, I just wished my bank account worked that way.
FYI, the modern calender didn't start with a year zero.
So we are only nine years into the new century, and given the current administration that list will change.
hahahaha! love Shep's bear reports!
I eat killer salsa most everyday. It keeps the swine flu, mad cow disease, killer bees, West Nile virus, and SARS away. Although, it can cause global warming….
No, Paul, only a few scientists falsified their data. All the others relied on the falsified data for their own studies. Then the fraudulent scientists conveniently "lost" the original hard data, so we now have no way of knowing for sure if the earth is warming, cooling, or staying the same.
I have a fully hot rodded 1981 IBM XT 086 10mhz system,still works perfectly with addition of a y2k bios card.I understand Unix machines have another "doomsday" date coming.However 64bit pc's will still be working like 30,000 years from now(assuming there's people and electricity-democrats are running loose)
Y2K, yes you fixed it for a financial securities services, not the whole world so yes it was a major overblown story.
Convenient enough to ignore the things that actually were recovered from Iraq and ignore what went over the line into Syria. The WMD narrative is as weary as it is false, stay classy now.
in the dark
Don't forget catching Mad Cow Disease from eating beef. I worked for the USDA at the time and what HHS never said was that it occurs naturally in about 100,000 (I think, it was a while ago) people in the U.S. in a year. A dozen or so people got the new varient kind from eating beef and that is still a strech based on the science.
IT never gets the recognition it deserves. The thing is, when you are doing your job, nothing goes wrong, so no one notices. IT is a very tough place to be. I just wish more folks appreciated the hard work all of the good folks behind the scenes did, but alas it will probably never come to pass.
This is so sad, and so true, the Libs have a lot to answer for on this one.
Believe it or not, there was actually some reporting about how all you guys were working to avert the problem. After a few months of the hysteria and reading some accounts of what was being done I decided not to worry about it. All of my friends and family (except my bro, who is a computer guy) were freaking out. I took the opportunity to be an a$$ and tell them how stupid they were for falling for that crap. Thanks for the great job , and bailing me out…
It was the last bout of mass hysteria to claim my attention, now I just say "wait and see"
Excellent article up 'till the end. Without arguing the truth or falsehood of global warming, everything else on your list is a scare that came and went and is clearly behind us. Global warming has not been "decided" yet. Incredibly disingenuous, but perhaps you just wanted to use that as a punch-line.
Asbestos was a true health hazard. The issue was abused by case-chasing attorneys that were caught fabricating cases out of thin air. As a result we have the perception that it was much ado about nothing…nothing could be further from the truth for those affected.
Let's see…….
in 2005, the head of Saddam Husseins air force (former General Georges Sada) writes a book about the fact that all the Iraqi' "Noookier" (Shout out to Jimha Catuh") nuclear materials were flown into Syria in stripped-down Iraqi commercial airlines, where sakes and begorrah, two years later, Syria starts to build a Nuclear enrichment facility…….from materials that the United Nations IAEC (whatever), doesn't even know exists….till the IDF air force takes it out in 2007….Of course, that never made the NYTimes or the scumMSM….You're obviously so bright, where did those materials come from smart boy, if not from Iraq???? And then you (brain trust that you obviously are) want us to bite on global warming?????Du-oh!
You are wrong about the killer bees. They have killed many people and pets in Texas, Arizona and California. Each morning when I walk my dog in the spring and summer I fear those suckers attacking us. It is a limited, but very serious problem.
Nope, I think you got the whole list. It is refreshing to see that one network has its priorities straight.
Hmm… after a second reading maybe you should drop France and substitute "that Commie gal appointed by Obama". I don't watch much personally, but I'm sure they wouldn't have missed that story. Thanks for the snicker…
If your list was meant as a clever little insult it fell flat, trust me…
Let's see, bad facts…W said WMD's existed, he didn't promise to find them. The WMD's were documented and used on Saddam's own people for years. Their existence was witnessed by anyone conscious at the time, and more to the point by every intelligence agency in operation at the time in the West. Calling someone retarded because they don't agree with you is very impolite. It won't substitute for rational thought either. I don't care if you believe in AGW, just don't expect me to worship at the altar of cap and trade based on fraudulent data, manipulated code in climate models, and a UN official that is so on the take that he should be incarcerated.
Yeah, all that methane you produce as a by-product. Personally I like it cause it actually DOES deter swine flu, West Nile and any other virus dumb enough to attack me. It's all about the sulfur compounds baby! Oh, and it tastes real good too…
Global Warming is an awfully nice punchline, as you put it Rick. pssssh
maybe it's been too long, but Nortel became Bay Networks and they both ran Site Mangler(Manager) graphic interface?? That wasn't fun learning alone, eh?
Shhh! We don't want the libtards to know it will kill viruses!
Uh, what about the 500 TONS of uranium yellow cake found in Iraq and shipped to Canada? All of the trucks that crossed the Syrian border in the months in the run up to the war? #1 is a fact, #2 is a pretty good bet.
"Climate change"? Not thousands, only maybe several dozen, if that. When everybody works off the same data, and that data was poisoned FAR,FAR up the stream it makes it very easy to queer things as it travels down. And I'm sure the huge amounts of grant money or potential prestige didn't influence any of these people who are so above it all.
And of course people who work for big giant energy companies either don't have families, or have cut a secret deal with some evil scientists to somehow make their future generations immune to the effects… Remember, they hate humanity and only care about their own greed and profits.
And don't bother responding that I'm a nut, or need to go to some website. I have been engaged in this issue since 1991 when the commies at the university first tried to suck me in. No sale!
Sincerely,
Retard Extraordinaire
P.S. – Try paying close attention to the media. Every so often the lefty media reports something that seems important and then it quickly disappears. That's usually a hint that you should dig deeper…
I, too, stocked up on water jugs and I bought a large kerosene heater which, to this day, is still in my garage in the original box, never used.
Especially new-born panda bears…
I only take seriously those attorneys endorsed by William Shatner.
Good post. We should be afraid of all those things, except maybe car chases.
Exactly. (from a Y2K "hero", I guess)
I agree. Thank goodness for Fox News Network, Fox Business, Andrew Breitbart for his informative website – and you can't help but throw in the "opinions" of Glenn Beck to open your mind and be well informed.
I work for an engineering firm and do the design for asbestos abatement. Here in NY, the rectum of the northeast, the rules for removal are so stringent that it would make your head spin. Over 100 pages. And that's not just for the insulation – that includes everything from floor tiles to roof caulk. Materials that couldn't harm you unless you ground them up and smoked them. And if you did that then you deserve to be taken out of the gene pool anyway.
Personally I wish they would keep using the stuff. I've seen old asbestos floor tiles next to newer ones and the old ones hold up much better. It's all about the money. Here in NY the Dept of Labor got a lot more money and grew in size to regulate it.
So the MSM promotes one mindless crisis after another while maintaining an eerie silence about things that matter to us and the country. The global warming hoax machine is in a class by itself because it embodies all the dreams and fantasies
that excite central planners and the "lets be more like Europe" intellectuals.
There is a product which is produced from the rear end of male cattle that equates to what you just said. Utter bull-crap. Seriously, you think all the data comes from one or two studies. Where does your nonsense end?
In Wisconsin, chronic wasting disease on the state's deer population was one of the big faux news stories of the last decade.
Uh, I guess we should trust this book writing clown just the same way we trusted Ahmed Chalabi, right? And by the way, what about all of the other multitude of scientists/Baathists etc who have come out and said that the WMD program was effectively dismantled after the first world war, why do you ignore them? You obviously only believe what you want to – facts be damned. I myself am neither a democrat or republican – I try to think independently, you should try that some time instead of approaching these matters as if they're a team sport.
Wrong, wrong, wrong pal. The WMD programs were dismantled in the 90s, thus your post is blather. Saddam may have used very low grade WMD back in the day (poison gas, weaponry which is not exactly the A bomb in terms of a threat), but not in recent times. He was not a threat to the US and only the most base partisan hack would hold on to that position given everything that has now come to light. There was no real intelligence pointing to WMDs, just a couple of Iraqi defectors hunting for Greencards who duped the W. admnistration. Not a difficult thing to do since gullibility and though-free credulousness seems to be a hallmark of the modern Republican party.
I'm glad I won't have to work on or watch the media go crazy about the Y2.1K problem (i.e. the year 2100 is not a leap year).
anyone and everyone has been exposed to asbestos.. it's NOT banned in the USA.. I know it's not good for you but it unavoidable.. I have to say removing it would cause it to become more airborne unless it was sprayed down with something first to saturate it than again with something to seal it before removing it.. back in the day they used it in everything from hair dryers on.. It's like them with the mercury.. heck my sister and I remember when in science class they gave you some to play with.. my ma said the same thing.. or lead in paint, now we have paint that doesn't stick to anything and most likely has chemicals that will in the future be responsible for just as many deaths and side effects as lead than we have the effects of burning coal.. point is they scare you at every turn..
WMD's? You mean those things that we were forced to give a 9 month advance notice that we were coming to look for while the UN dicked around? I could have hid the whole country in that time!!
Check your data…there aren't thousands of scientists that agree with global warming. Now the fact that the Earth is getting cooler you'll find more than a thousand!
"that thousands of scientists around the world have falsified their data in some sort of massive global conspiracy"
Um, no. There are no "thousands:" Purest propaganda BS. About sixty. SIXTY. That's all it took. And, yes, they are a conspiracy, a cabal, a ring of collusion: proven beyond a reasonable doubt. And, yes, they did fake their data, and try to cover it up, and silence dissenting scientists.
You, sir, are a sucker. Bought your Carbon Indulgences yet? I hear Fr. Al Tetzel's having a sale…..
As for Iraq: like all liberals, you are a liar. Total cost to date: $690 billion. Yes, that's LESS than Obamapaloosi blew in *one day* with the useless Porkulus- which didn't kill a single terrorist, or liberate a single person from a vile tyranny.
No WMD programs? You still are pushing that? I suggest you read the Iraq Survey Group final report, with particular attention to the missile factory, the uranium centrifuges, the 550 tons of yellowcake, and the bio-agent research labs.
The 500 tons of uranium yellowcake? Seriously? Do you realize that even the Bush administration has gone on record to say that there was no way this could be weaponized – it predated even the first gulf war and was sitting in corroding drums. To turn it into any kind of weapon like material would have required at least a year long program, and even then it is considered doubtful any meaningful amount of nucleur material coudl have been manufactured since the yellow cake was so low grade. So that's why we went to war is it, sacrificing thousands of troops and trillions of taxpayer dollars. I see.
Oh, and by the way, if the REAL WMD was moved to Syria, as you are virtually sure it was, why didn't the Bush administration follow up on it? Are the Syrians our trusted friends? Ever heard of logic? Or evidence? I guess not – hence you are a dubya supporter to the bitter end. Good luck with that.
Let's see…their WMDs were dismantled after World War I, but Atomic weapons weren't invented until World War II….you're really showing your intelligence….keep talking, my kids are cracking up!!
Well, when those 'thousands of scientists' all used the same data from the same source, YES, it was falsified
Bill Clinton also said Iraq had WMD's, and he certainly wouldn't lie. So they must still be out there somewhere.
Both the US and UK administrations have now admitted there was no meaningful WMD in Iraq. Also, if this spurious WMD really was transported to Syria, why wasn't it followed up upon by Bush? Is is safe there? Are the Syrians our close allies? How is it, living in that make-believe bubble of yours?
'The trouble with our liberal friends is not that they're ignorant; it's just that they know so much that isn't so.'
What are you talking about? Your comment doesn't even begin to make sense. Are your kids "cracking up" because they have to listen to you all day? God help them.
I agree with everthing on the list except the car chases.
Ever get sick of typing ignorant lies? In 2007 Harris surveyed 489 randomly selected members of the American Meteorological Society or the American Geophysical Union. 97% agreed that global temperatures have increased during the past 100 years; only 5% believe that human activity does not contribute to greenhouse warming; and 84% believed that global climate change poses a moderate to very great danger."
Furthermore, Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change which colates all of the scientific research on climate change and analyzes it had this to say in its fourth report in 2007:
* Warming of the climate system is unequivocal.
* Most of the observed increase in globally averaged temperatures since the mid-20th century is very likely due to the observed increase in anthropogenic (human) greenhouse gas concentrations.
* Anthropogenic warming and sea level rise would continue for centuries due to the timescales associated with climate processes and feedbacks, even if greenhouse gas concentrations were to be stabilized, although the likely amount of temperature and sea level rise varies greatly depending on the fossil intensity of human activity during the next century (pages 13 and 18).[41]
* The probability that this is caused by natural climatic processes alone is less than 5%.
* World temperatures could rise by between 1.1 and 6.4 °C (2.0 and 11.5 °F) during the 21st century (table 3) and that:
o Sea levels will probably rise by 18 to 59 cm (7.08 to 23.22 in) [table 3].
o There is a confidence level >90% that there will be more frequent warm spells, heat waves and heavy rainfall.
o There is a confidence level >66% that there will be an increase in droughts, tropical cyclones and extreme high tides.
* Both past and future anthropogenic carbon dioxide emissions will continue to contribute to warming and sea level rise for more than a millennium.
* Global atmospheric concentrations of carbon dioxide, methane, and nitrous oxide have increased markedly as a result of human activities since 1750 and now far exceed pre-industrial values over the past 650,000 years
In IPCC statements "most" means greater than 50%, "likely" means at least a 66% likelihood, and "very likely" means at least a 90% likelihood.
No, they didn't all use data from the same source you credulous fool. Research on climate change is ongoing around the world – everywhere from Antarctic ice core analysis, to methane levels in Russians swamps, to CO levels in sea water, tree ring analysis and carbon dating. If you think that scientists are all relying on just one or two data sets in an issue as important and as broadly studies as this then you truly are an ignorant fool who has been misled by the hall-of-mirrors found on right wing websites such as the Drudge Report.
I will predict for you what the next media scare will be: antibiotic resistance. CBS news crews are in Iowa right now looking for footage of hog feeding operations, apparently for a multi-parter on Couric's evening news. Nothing says February sweeps like a trumped up health scare!
Libs have very selective memories. But then again, they have very tiny brains. Did Saddam ever prove that he had dismantled his weapons program? No. Therefore he violated the terms of the Gulf War armistice, and hostilities were renewed. As for no "real intelligence", I seem to recall Colin Powell presenting to the UN satellite photos of weapon facilities being cleaned up and vacated prior to visits from UN weapons inspectors. So what we had was a lunatic dictator who we knew possessed WMD's at one time, and who gassed his own people, but he not only failed to prove that he had destroyed his weapons, but refused to allow weapons inspectors to verify that he had no such weapons or facilities. And he did this for TEN YEARS. I guess Saddam would have to threaten to blow up an abortion clinic before liberals would think it was worth going in and making sure he wasn't a threat.
stocked up on ammo and canned food. I swear I'm not making this up. I got a good deal on the car too. I always wonder when/if that
Well he will probably need it sooner then he thinks with Dear Leader Obama going all Marxist on us..
First of all, Saddam did actually submit a report to the UN which showed in considerable detail that he had ceased any WMD programs. Sedonly, Hans Blix (remember him?) was in Iraq up until Bush ordered him out in early 2003 and he sent back report after report showing that there was no WMD to be found. So who is the one with the short memory jackass? And by the way, even if you were right about Hussein being out of compliance with the terms of the amistice, do you really think that a full-fledget (though half-planned) invasion would be the best way to deal with this supposed (though not actual) failure to comply. And hey, thanks for using the classic line that he "gassed his own people". Was that before or after Rumsfeld shook his hand and sold him weapons so that he could start a brutal war against the Iranians? Honestly, if you thinkt that a two-bit jackass like Saddam Hussein was a threat to the US you need to grow a pair.
Actually most of your list are pretty scary. Say high to Mr Tingle Mathews next time you both get together for some Tea Bagging practice LOL
Don't forget about Michael Moore, ha ha ha, what a jerk!
You are factually demonstrably wrong – most of this was in the report which Saddam submitted in late 2002 but which Bush rejected for no apparent reason. Also, Blix found no evidence of WMD in Iraq. Finally, you are aware that it is virtually impossible to prove a negative, right? For instance, can you prove that yellow kangaroos DON'T get together and play charades in the woods behind your house at night? Where is the evidence that they don't? Prove it.
We don't go to war on the ground of vague possibilities that a country might be a threat. We go to war in the case that there is positive evidence and resaon to believe that they actually ARE a threat. Otherwise we get bogged down in pointless wars like Iraq while the Chinese sit back and laugh at us as they continue growing their economy and building their domestic infrastructure.
Thanks for helping to weaken America RobertB.
I reviewed the stories on yellowcake that I had read previously and my conclusion WAS solid. I dug further and will concede the point. HOWEVER, the stories I relied on at the time were from the MSM!
Bush ignored Syria because it was CNN and FOX that were tracking the movements of large convoys leading up to the invasion and as a wise old soul said "Politics is the art of the possible". Only a right wing crazy like myself would have said go.
Since you chose to insult me… Review some speeches Bush gave prior to getting congressional approval for the invasion (including most of the Dem leadership) and you will see there were some 20 reasons given. Bush didn't NEED anyone's okay because Saddam was in violation of the terms of the 1991 cease-fire. He was being considerate, as well as securing cover since he knew the left-wing snakes would turn on a dime when things became unpopular. But I suppose you are just another left wing twit who says "see, he was wrong on ONE thing" and hence you justify your shrill whining as some sort of moral superiority. I know guys who served and they, to a man, say it was worth it (again, read all of the justifications put forth).
And finally, isn't it obvious that when you pursue a policy based on the "consensus" of experts who have, at best, shaky information, that it can have unforseen and potentially very disastrous consequences. WMD in Iraq was far more realistic than AGW. CO2 and Methane? Billions of creatures EXHALE and FART on a daily basis. Next time the hoaxsters want to fool me they will need something scarier than plant food and flatulence!
Agree totally. Y2K was a danger that was foreseen and fixed. Here and there some programs were overlooked. I recall roughly 3 of perhaps a thousand at our installation. I think someone had written their own elapsed time algorithm and gotten it wrong.
The point of the article is that the media does a lousy job of assessing dangers. And our society demands both solemn concern and viewing with alarm from professionals too..
e.g. Imagine the furor if the NIH had said the West Nile Virus would not be an important public health problem. Or that SARS would not devastate the country.
I give you some credit. You are more clever than most left-wingers. Prove a negative? Like can we prove man-made CO2 emissions don't cause AGW? Obviously, naturally occurring CO2 is benign (and makes up more than 95% of what is "released" each year) and has NO effect, so our miniscule contribution is the difference!
But we should go to war against capitalism and human progress because some socialist eco-freaks have "vague" evidence of a "possibility" that man "might" be causing "climate change".
If AGW were ACTUALLY real, then the evidence would be laid bare for all to see, instead of a bunch of big government collectivists screaming "consensus!". If they had a real case for their crap theory real people would accept it because it would be in their best interest. Logic, reason and the best evidence all scream that "climate change" is BULLSH!T. Keep your snake-oil, I ain't buyin…
And guys, ain't the whole war debate kind of a moot point now? The only remaining question is whether BarryO will screw it up or not….
Gotta go now, the driveway is filling with snow again!
Yeah, bullsh!t! You are a tie-dyed in the wool leftist. I have yet to see a single "independent" thought from you. Lots of talking points and a few logical fallacies. Sorry dude, the people who post here aren't the addled brain leftist dummies you hold court with that worship you and mistake sophistry for "intelligence".
I stocked up on cash. Banks had (and still do) LOTS of old code.
This is a good comment on the media and their tactics. If there isn't a story make one up and flog it to death. They never have to pay for their mistakes. No one ever gets fired.
I believe you, I was doing the same thing as you were. It would have been a COMPLETE disaster if nothing had been done.
Fellow Y2k'er here! I agree, and I feel the same about the CIA, they've probably saved our butts thousands of times. We'll never know.
yeah, this level of protection is getting pretty tiring.
nah – not so much. I know numerous places that still have Y2K every 10 years because their software only has 1 digit for the year. It was never a biggie with them. Just had to use a little more forethought that average, and that's never a bad thing.
Now that I've gotten the Y2K thing off my chest, I definitely agree with the rest of the list, especially Killer Tomatoes! I used that term all the time back then and it make people mad LOL. Two hundred people out of 300 million people get sick, and MILLIONS are lost. ARgggh.
Yea well I did too and I know it wasn't an utter fraud, but the media hype created a seriously dishonest narrative on the issue. The fact that someone was working on it 3 years ahead of time shows quite clearly to me that it didn't deserve the chicken little treatment it received in media and by the masses. This in no way detracts from any of our work on the problem, it's just that people had a perverted idea of the risk and consequences that were actually REAL. The worst case potential was presented ad nauseum.
Airborne particles of asbestos are extremely dangerous. Fully encapsulated asbestos, such as insulation inside a wall is arguably best left alone.
I agree that the work of fine people like yourself was the reason this wasn't the problem it was hyped to be, but tosome of those not in-the-know, it seemed like the end of the world. I bought a car from a guy who literally did think the world was going to end. He bought a double-wide in the middle of nowhere and stocked up on ammo and canned food. I swear I'm not making this up. I got a good deal on the car too. I always wonder when/if that guy decided it was safe to enter society again.
I never get tired of seeing that fantastic photo of Algore. So perfectly sums up all the garbage that is "global warming."
"Exactly. When it comes to I/T, management seems to define long range planning as how long is the service contract for the ancient equipment they refuse to replace."
Wow. Amazing how true that is. My bro-in-law works as a programming/computer engineer in a small firm that is employed by a major food company in my city with two main factories run by the automation he programs: one with ancient equipment, and one with state-of-the-art equipment. Guess which one he almost never is sent to. Guess which one practically assures him constant gainful employment!
I think you missed THE big faux media scare, you know – the one that cost our treasury several trillion dollars and our military the lives of several thousand soldiers. I'm talking about the Iraqi WMD's that Donald Rumsfeld, Richard Cheney, Condi Rice and George Dubya Bush guaranteed us would be found in a blitzkrieg of media appearances in 2002/2003. Why didn't that one make your list? Hmnnn.
And by the way, if you think that climate change is a "media hoax" and that thousands of scientists around the world have falsified their data in some sort of massive global conspiracy then you are simply retarded.
I fear that might happen. As I am not even an employee of the company I work at, and MY bosses penchant for not writing anything down, I would be in the exact same boat. The prez of the company said it best I guess, "Why change IT, it works."
To me, considering the economic outlook, the MSM might start using FREE MARKETS as the next boogeyman.
Whatever the ultimate truth may be, GWBush had lots of people backing him about the notion of WMD's. Here are several:
Senator John Kerry (D-Mass.)
"According to the CIA's report, all U.S. intelligence experts agree that Iraq is seeking nuclear weapons. There is little question that Saddam Hussein wants to develop nuclear weapons."
Congressional Record, October 9, 2002
Senator Hillary Clinton (D-N.Y.)
"In the four years since the inspectors, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. … It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capability to wage biological and chemical warfare and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Charles Schumer (D-N.Y.)
"[It] is Hussein's vigorous pursuit of biological, chemical and nuclear weapons, and his present and potential future support for terrorist acts and organizations, that make him a terrible danger to the people to the United States."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Jay Rockefeller (D-W.Va.)
"We must eliminate that [potential nuclear] threat now before it is too late. But that isn't just a future threat. Saddam's existing biological and chemical weapons capabilities pose real threats to America today, tomorrow. … [He] is working to develop delivery systems like missiles and unmanned aerial vehicles that could bring these deadly weapons against U.S. forces and U.S. facilities in the Middle East. He could make these weapons available to many terrorist groups, third parties, which have contact with his government. Those groups, in turn, could bring those weapons into the United States and unleash a devastating attack against our citizens. I fear that greatly."
Congressional Record, October 10, 2002
Senator Ted Kennedy (D-Mass.)
"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seeking and developing weapons of mass destruction.”
Remarks at Johns Hopkins School of Advanced International Studies, October 27, 2002
Senator Chris Dodd (D-Conn.)
"There is no question that Iraq possesses biological and chemical weapons and that he seeks to acquire additional weapons of mass destruction, including nuclear weapons. That is not in debate. I also agree with President Bush that Saddam Hussein is a threat to peace and must be disarmed, to quote President Bush directly."
Congressional Record , October 8, 2002
President Bill Clinton
"In the next century, the community of nations may see more and more of the very kind of threat Iraq poses now – a rogue state with weapons of mass destruction, ready to use them or provide them to terrorists, drug traffickers, or organized criminals who travel the world among us unnoticed. If we fail to respond today, Saddam, and all those who would follow in his footsteps, will be emboldened tomorrow by the knowledge that they can act with impunity, even in the face of a clear message from the United Nations Security Council, and clear evidence of a weapons of mass destruction program."
Remarks at the Pentagon , February 17, 1998
"[L]et's imagine the future. What if he fails to comply and we fail to act, or we take some ambiguous third route, which gives him yet more opportunities to develop this program of weapons of mass destruction and continue to press for the release of the sanctions and continue to ignore the solemn commitments that he made? Well, he will conclude that the international community has lost its will. He will then conclude that he can go right on and do more to rebuild an arsenal of devastating destruction. And some day, some way, I guarantee you he'll use the arsenal. And I think every one of you who has really worked on this for any length of time, believes that, too."
Remarks at the Pentagon, February 17, 1998
"Other countries possess weapons of mass destruction and ballistic missiles. With Saddam, there is one big difference: He has used them, not once, but repeatedly. Unleashing chemical weapons against Iranian troops during a decade-long war. Not only against soldiers, but against civilians, firing Scud missiles at the citizens of Israel, Saudi Arabia, Bahrain and Iran. And not only against a foreign enemy, but even against his own people, gassing Kurdish civilians in Northern Iraq. The international community had little doubt then, and I have no doubt today, that left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will use these terrible weapons again."
Remarks at the White House , December 16, 1998
Vice President Al Gore
"[I]f you allow someone like Saddam Hussein to get nuclear weapons, ballistic missiles, chemical weapons, biological weapons, how many people is he going to kill with such weapons? He's already demonstrated a willingness to use these weapons; he poison gassed his own people. He used poison gas and other weapons of mass destruction against his neighbors. This man has no compunctions about killing lots and lots of people."
Larry King Live, December 16, 1998
They also tried Exploding Death Stars!! that would radiate us to death, and Killer Asteroids!! that would crash into Earth and create global havoc!!! I have a feeling those perennial favorites will be resurrected from time to time in the years ahead, during slow news cycles.
[...] Finally, at Big Journalism, a look at “The Top Twelve Faux Media Scares of the Past Decade.” [...]
Why didn't that one make your list?
Because you're just repeating the same old lies instead of what was actually said.
Oh dear, that wasn't the answer you were looking for, was it?
Also, Mr. Hacket, you can try to distract everyone with the whole WMD thing in Iraq all you want. But the fact of the matter is that he was a supporter of terrorists, a brutal, evil dictator and someone who if left to give the finger to the rest of the world like he was doing was only going to continue to embolden the entire terrorist world towards chosing us and the rest of the non-Muslim world as targets.
Iraq was simply a stepping stone towards making the world a more secure place, especially with Iran about to get nuclear capabilities. And as much as you want us to look like the bad guys I will not allow my daughter to become a victim of these evil thugs that want us DEAD AT ALL COSTS. The progressives may think that we can all just hug and get along if we leave them alone, but they have promissed to kill all of us as soon as they get the chance and I for one am not going to ignore that. They are not lying, and anyone who believes that doing nothing is the thing to do is lucky that the rest of us aren’t willing to sit back and wait for them to make good on those promises.
Amazing how many are health related.
You are all so lucky that the government,
is here to help!
yeah, I get a kick out of em too… (i made Snow White laugh today, it was a good day ;~}
Profile , then drill.
You realize that all these revelations you're tossing around – the low grade yellow cake, the dismantled weapons programs, the Iraqi deception of weapon inspectors – only came to light because we invaded Iraq. You're a wealth of information that was made possible because of the invasion you condemn. You're one of the best advertisements in support of the war out there right now. Thank you, and God Bless.
Dude you just took the words right out of my mouth! 12/31/1999 at midnight I was sitting at work making sure all my code was going to work. I worked on Y2K for three years!
We had to dump a whole line of legacy mid level computers used world wide whose original programming began with punch cards and used Motorola 680xx processors, but most of our customers upgraded so it was good for the quarterly numbers.
There were actually quite a few more for this list.
1-DDT accused of killing eagles and falcons (bogus)
2-Cyclamates "causing" bladder cancer (also bogus)
3-Nitrites in bacon & ham causing cancer (guess what?)
4-Freon causing a "hole" in the ozone layer (yet again!)
5-Acid rain (yet another one)
6-Movie house popcorn is killing people because it's made with coconut oil which is high in cholesterol!
This is all because we are being scammed daily–mostly by people who want to control how we live, what we eat, what we drive, how much money we make and how much we pay in taxes to support those "less fortunate." It's ALL BS of the worst sort.
For me the Y2K issue was a non-issue. By the time Y2K rolled around I didn't have any mission critical software or hardware that was susceptible to the date problem. I did make a nice chunk of change charging customers for Y2K compliance statements. Organizations that had to scramble to prepare were just paying for not staying current.
Climate Change is an oxymoron. Of course the climate changes! Always has always will. Let's call it by it's original name, Anthropogenic Global Warming, which proved problematic since the planet has been cooling. These warming and cooling trends run in roughly 30 year cycles. Hansen caught the tail-end of the cooling with his "Ice Age" scare and had to back pedal so long that by the time he switched to warming, he didn't have time to extract the money before the cooling started again.
As cons go, this was a good one but timing is everything in the long con. Personally, I would have gone with methane as the culprit since it is much more difficult to disprove.
My predictions: Fresh water shortages and food shortages.
I must admit that you're a real hoot, Paul. You just listed all the arguments that the IPCC gave to bolster THEIR case for AGW and we know that their data had always been falsified from the get-go, thanks to those copied e-mails out of Great Britain. Check just ONE of their examples. The charts showing the rise of CO2 and the rise of temperatures (which Al Gore's book AND film reversed) proved that CO2 rises FOLLOWED rises in temperatures–not preceded them. Absolute proof that increased CO2 didn't CAUSE higher temperatures but were the RESULT of higher temps. Also, not a single one of the so-called "scientists" who've been touting AGW has ever been able to explain the measured FACT that temperatures have also been rising on Mars and Jupiter's upper atmosphere. In fact, when faced with questions about it, AGW true believers invariably change the subject. The fact is, AGW is bogus. Temperatures did rise between 1900 and 1998–by about 1.8 degrees C. BFD! They have been going DOWN ever since. In fact, I've still got about 2' of "global warming" on my driveway from Christmas eve.
Pappa – the scitech news section answered the Mars and Jupiter questions you propose. The Voyager spacecrafts have left our solar system on opposite sides of our sun. They have sent back evidence that our sun's magnetics and solar winds create a 'heliosphere (magnetic bubble) around our solar system. But the Voyagers have also found a magnetic cloud outside of that heliosphere that is compressing it. The believe that as this heliosphere is compressed by this magnetic cloud that it will affect the terrestrial climates within the solar system.– but then of course, this can't be true. Because it's concensus science and concluded that AGW is caused by man.. pretty much like it was concesus and concluded that the earth was flat.
True. However, I caught myself in a logical fallacy that I need to correct. The fact that CO2 levels followed rises in temperature is NOT "proof" that they resulted from higher temps. It's one of those Post Hoc Ergo Propter Hoc mistakes that I fault others for. I apologize. All it proves is that CO2 wasn't RESPONSIBLE for higher temps…not necessarily the reverse.
The sequal to attack of the killer tomatoes was not Attack of the killer tomatoes II it was called The Return of the Killer Tomatoes! followed by Killer Tomatoes Strike Back! and Killer Tomatoes Eat France. Also i can't believe you implied any sequal to AotKT to be greater then the original.
1) Not only did George Bush rely on the Repubs for intel into WMD's in Iraq, but senator John Kerry and Hilary Clinton were among the many other democrats in both the house and senate that came forward publicly weeks before the invasin expressing that Iraq is a huge threat and WMD's were over there. They ran when they realized the public didn't approve
2) Climate change is not a media hoax you are correct, it is propaganda used to create a one government world, a problem that is natural but being used for political purposes.
3) When you say "retarded" are you refering to mentally disabled? That is very offensive to people born with disabilities, but they aren't worried about global warming so I guess that makes them smarter than you
4) There are record clod temps all around the world for the 2nd year in a row, I mean really dude, wake up. If its warm outside its Global Warming, if its cold now all of a sudden its Climate change. What next if the tempature is normal will it be called, global satbilization? Do you know what that word means?
There's two kinds of technical people that keep secrets. Those that do for job security (I despise those type of people), and those who just aren't inclined to document work (I dread those kind of people).
My opinion has always been write everything down. I've been fairly paid for the work, so I should fairly document for others what I've done.
Ah, the punch cards. I got into the industry just as it was weaning itself off those. They were still every where. We used them a book marks, scratch pads, even for propping up the short leg on a table. A million and one uses.
I remember the 68000 Motorolas. I did a ton of ASM programming on those. Much nicer than Intel with all that segmented register crap.
Agreed. But the panic did serve the IT departments in many cases: I allowed them extra money for system upgrades and system tightening/renovation that they might not have been able to talk upper management out of for several years otherwise. In short, even not really threatened systems got better and more reliable in many companies, and, yes, government agencies.
I agree with 'nother Jeff–asbestos is extremely harmful when the fibers ARE BREATHED IN (such as my husband's grandfather who got asbestosis from handling asbestos infused insulation everyday in the shipyards for TWENTY years). The point is, you're most likely to BREATHE them in, if you're taking them out of an enclosed wall. When I was in high school (early nineties) they spent about two years removing the asbestos insulation from our roofs and walls–the funny part is, the workers all wore masks. The students and teachers walking around it and having it sucked into our air conditioning system didn't. Good for the workers, they were safe, but about 3500 other people were potentially exposed. I think that's the only point trying to be made here.
With such great psychic ability to predict the future, I'm surprised Ron hasn't grown rich off of betting on sports (that's his main expertise, right? Sports. Not science or medicine, but sports is the thing he actually knows something about, right?)
The rest of us poor mortals are stuck trying to make the best guesses we can given the information we have at the time. Often we are wrong, because we are imperfect creatures. That's why public agencies, like food inspection agencies, tend to live by the creed "better safe than sorry", preferring to make the mistake of overprotecting rather than risking people's lives by underprotecting them. One could just as easily compile a contrary list of health tragedies that happened because public officials were asleep at the switch.
Being responsible for saving and protecting human lives is a tough burden, no matter whether its a doctor, fireman or health inspector, and its not one that a sports reporter is likely to easily understand. We are fortunate to live in a part of the world with safe food, safe water and relatively free from contagious disease. Not all parts of the world are so fortunate. This situation does not happen by luck but by the vigilance of the public services we've put in place to protect our health and safety, so kindly cut these unsung public heroes a little slack.
One of the first laws of logic is that correlation does not equate causation.
Yes, carbon emissions are up. And yes, global temps were up for most of the past 100 years.
But that doesn't necessarily mean that a caused b.
Further, solar activity has also been higher during the same period.
So unless and until the scientific community can prove that carbon emissions are more responsible than the natural cycle of the sun, they should lay off the chicken little routine.
At this point, it is logically possible (and frankly more likely) that the warming period was natural and that our activity had little to do with it.
Hear! Hear! I was station in the Azores for two years during the '80's and am now banished as well from donating blood. It's infuriating. How many people have developed BSE after a blood transfusion?
Let's take dive into the deep end of this pool:
How many have been infected with AIDS after receiving a blood transfusion? Why no ban on blood donations from that sector of society that is the predominant carrier of that disease?
Add all assholes named "Brad" to that list. It scares me that idgets like that can get access to a computer.
Unfortunately, the original Jeff didn't seem to read the full section that covered Asbestos… you're certainly right 'notherJeff, ripping that stuff out of the walls wasn't a great idea.
The asbestos panic caused more trouble than it was worth.
Every school in America had asbestos ceilings. I spent more than 40 years in those buildings and am stilhere. If they wanted to do something about it they would have removed it from every single school. Still there.
He said this decade (which is next year) … but you said DDT and I think that would make the ALL TIME media hoax list, also possibly the most dangerous news media hoax of all time considering all the people who have actually died because of it …. and are still dying. All because of "green and save-the-planet" BS.
is this "Paul" Hackett or Buddy Hackett???????????
[...] most interesting and sometimes dangerous phenomenon. Thus I was pleased to see the article entitled The Top Twelve Faux Media Scares of the Past Decade in Andrew Breitbart’s new site, [...]
I just read an article at Media Matters – the WATCHDOG liberal site. The title of the article is "BigJournalism's big scoop: Asbestos is a 'supposed carcinogen'". I wrote on their comments section(which will be screened first since I am a newbie) that this article only talks about the link from asbestos in buildings and deaths – which is true, there are none.
But you should read the comments. Talk about sheep.
I've even heard one of you idiots try to tell us that man-made CO2 "is chemically different" from the "natural" kind! What a bunch of morons! Life on Earth simply CANNOT exist without the stuff. The more CO2, the more green plants. The more green plants, the more animal life–including humans! Wake up and smell the coffee, Paul. You've been brainwashed.
Jan 19, 2036 – but it's a fairly minor problem. It's to do with 32 bit systems and we'll probably all be on 64 bit by then.
They can't donate blood either.
It's not an uncommon attitude from people who have lived in a an urban environment their entire lives. I had a colleague once express sincere concern for my folks who had just moved to take over the family farmland. He was worried about how they would cope with all the darkness. I kid you not.
Oh, it wasn't that Y2K wasn't a real issue. It's just that enough people knew about Y2K that we had plenty of time to fix it. And it never amazed me that even with all the stories about people and institutions working to fix the problem and succeeding, the media kept reporting like those stories were all happening in total isolation. It felt like they were saying, "Sure, Company Y fixed their computers, but Companies K and 2 have not. Therefore, we're still going to have a catastrophic global meltdown."
You are referring to your original post …. right?
Antibiotic resistance is a problem, but not for those reasons (I assume you mean use in food animals). Antibiotic resistance is a potential problem because of all the ijits who go to the doctor with a simple cold (or other mild virus) and get sent away with antibiotics as a pacifier. Antibiotics won't work on a virus, and I'm glad that my doctor is the sensible sort who acknowledges this and never prescribes them as a placebo.
That's the line..Besides, since the planet is now cooling, maybe we can just say Al Gore fixed this, give him another Peace Prize, or something, and we can get back to driving SUV’s.
It's OK with me
I'm adding this note to let everybody know what I think of my Florida senator.
If we get Crist we are so done. Vote for Marco.
Senator Bill Nelson doesn't believe he has to read and understand every bill he votes for.
Senator Bill Nelson believes it is RIGHT to hide bad laws in good unrelated bills so he can spend our money on pork projects to help his re-election. He likes spending taxpayer money.
Senator Bill Nelson believes he can pass any law he desires without constitutional authorization.
Senator Bill Nelson is a bad senator and should be voted out of office.
Thank you for correcting me!
Of course if they just switch over to NTP (Network Time Protocol – tcp 123) they could avoid it all.
[...] top 12 media scares of the last [...]
Jesus, where to start? CO2 is only 'benign' if it is found in our atmosphere in a quantity that allows human life to flourish on this earth. Most of us would consider oxygen 'benign' but walk into a room with a 50% oxygen content, strike a match and watch what happens (hind, don't try this).
Look, you are poorly informed, CO2 has a huge warming effect on the atmosphere – this can be scientically demonstrated by increasing the amount of CO2 in a test tube that is subjected to a light source and watching the heat rentention of the test tube rise dramatically. It's not my job to explain the basic science of this to you, but honestly, if you are basically ignorant of the science why are you blathering away as if you're ill-informed attempts at "gotchas" are going to convince anyone who actually DOES understand the science.
Even the American Petroleum Institute now admits that anthropogenic global warming is real, they have based that assesment on the data. Why don't you stop playing silly partisan politics about this issue – your arguments about ordinary people not accepting this issue being evidence that the science is wrong is utter nonsense. The physical world doesn't give a crap about public opinion or your partisan prejudices (how Republicans turned climate change into a partisan issue is utterly beyond me, by the way). For hundreds of years ordinary people thought the earth was flat and that astronomers who said we lived on a globe circling a star were crazy. How did thaact work out?
Your last line only demonstrates how totally simple minded you are about this topic. Oh, it still gets cold in winter? Wow, climate change must then be a hoax.
Not even worth a response. Just go educate yourself on this issue – the science of climate change is about the dangerously high levels of CO2 in our atmosphere – currently about 50% higher than any level experiences on the planet in at least 70,000 years. Your comment that CO2 is a natural substance, etc. is totally beside the point in a way that is so obvious to any thinking person that you only make yourself look absurd by stating it.
Well, Paul, only a bug-witted idiot would refuse to acknowledge that those "independent scientists" who wrote the executive summary of the IPCC report totally IGNORED the actual text of the document which said, in essence, that there wasn't sufficient data (despite your so-called "several thousand studies") to conclude that human activity was contributing enough CO2 to make the case for AGW. If you bother to read ALL of the IPCC report, and not just the executive summary, that'll become plain to you. In fact, a great number of those responsible for the report are among those who are now finding fault with the whole religion that AGW has become.
Pinatobou, by itself, spewed more CO2 into the atmosphere during its most recent eruption than ALL the human-generated CO2 in the previous 10 years. What do you think happens to atmospheric CO2? It doesn't just float around up there. Green plants EAT the stuff–including, by the way, oceanic flora in the millions of tons of plankton, which ultimately feed ALL oceanic fauna. In fact, it could be accurately said that CO2 is the basis of all life on the planet. Like most liberal true-believers, when you can't refute the FACTS you invariably resort to name-calling. There are almost infinitely more scientists who question AGW than those who are wedded to it so they can pad their own purses. Read something besides the New York Times.
Actually, Jon, it wasn't "Repubs" who provided the intel stating that Hussein had WMD's and was seeking to grow his stocks. It was EVERY intelligence agency on the planet saying so. Right before the resumption of the war in 2003, the future commanding general of our forces in Iraq met with both Mubarrak of Egypt and the king of Jordan to consult with them and assure them of our good intentions towards their countries and BOTH of them warned him to be on guard because "Hussein had stockpiles of poison gas and biowar agents and would surely use them."
The fact that you can't get through your first sentence without categorizing me as a "leftist" demonstrates who the partisan is here knuckhead. Next time try to come up with a counter-argument based on evidence and reason isntead of hurling empty insults – then you might have a little more credibility dumbass.
Jesus, where to start? CO2 is only 'benign' if it is found in our atmosphere in a quantity that allows human life to flourish on this earth. Most of us would consider oxygen 'benign' but walk into a room with a 50% oxygen content, strike a match and watch what happens (hind, don't try this).
Look, you are poorly informed, CO2 has a huge warming effect on the atmosphere – this can be scientically demonstrated by increasing the amount of CO2 in a test tube that is subjected to a light source and watching the heat rentention of the test tube rise dramatically. It's not my job to explain the basic science of this to you, but honestly, if you are basically ignorant of the science why are you blathering away as if you're ill-informed attempts at "gotchas" are going to convince anyone who actually DOES understand the science.
Even the American Petroleum Institute now admits that anthropogenic global warming is real, they have based that assesment on the data. Why don't you stop playing silly partisan politics about this issue – your arguments about ordinary people not accepting this issue being evidence that the science is wrong is utter nonsense. The physical world doesn't give a crap about public opinion or your partisan prejudices (how Republicans turned climate change into a partisan issue is utterly beyond me, by the way). For hundreds of years ordinary people thought the earth was flat and that astronomers who said we lived on a globe circling a star were crazy. How did thaact work out?
Your last line only demonstrates how totally simple minded you are about this topic. Oh, it still gets cold in winter? Wow, climate change must then be a hoax.
The IPCC data is based on several thousand studies conducted entirely independent of the IPCC in over 50 countries. Given that inconvenient fact your post is a pill of bull manure. Go ahead and live in your wingnut world where you think that all of the climate scientists on the planet are taking part in some sort of conspiracy to falsify data – in doing so all you do is make Republicans look like ignorant fools
You win the prize for the dumbest comment on this issue yet. Utter twaddle like the totally-off-the-point blather you posted above really makes me worry about the intellectual future of this nation.
Where are you and what is wrong? You haven't been on here lately, is everything ok?
Hello my dear,
Did post a few yesterday, kinda busy today though. I have been following you, though not officially for a few days now. I have a bug about "following". An odd quirk I suppose.
My explanation? Not that one is owed, but I spied a little spider the other day and I like the web she weaves – so far… I am single and decided to pursue the thread a little. To my surprise, she moved first and my heart has been atwitter since. Nothing concrete, but she seems like a good Christian girl with solid values and a sincere heart (hope she accepts my vision as equally valid, I AM a believer after all!). Priorities… you understand. Wish me luck!
Hope all is well with you and yours. I have enjoyed your posts. They range from insightful to thoughtful agreement and with a bit of juicy humor in between. Keep it up! …. Still lovin' that logo, the Star of David is a beautiful thing!
My best always,
GaltFan (Paul)
Move slow and cautious. I will pray she will be the love of your life for I know the love of my life has been with me for over thirty years and it is a beautiful thing. I would wish this for any kind soul! I do so understand!
I too understand about the following quirk, but with tonight's victory I didn't see you anywhere and I got concerned. It must be the mother in me. It does not just go away! God bless!
Lorrie! ;^)
L,
Thanks, dear. Glad you got it. Message received and understood. Brother was taking pics for spider as mine are few, and as we (spied and spider) have yet to meet (net, you understand). Look forward to further communication on open threads or otherwise. Friendship is priceless.
As for the Brown-IN? I will post soon.
Bless you for caring!
P
I’m having a little bit of trouble viewing your site in Firefox, but it may just be my computer. Apart from that, I love your site. I plan on browsing around and reading some more posts!
What a wonderful blog! Please continue this great work I will be sure to check back regularly
Great post and a fabulous read. You have raised some logical points. Great work, keep it up. I adore returning back to this web-site and reading the good content you always have available.
Go Saints! Become a fan of facebook page here: Colts Will Lose Super Bowl 2010!
Morning, cyberspace with the site. info, specially from the major news corperations with the big slants to the left or right. Did you see last nights O’Rielly factor? haha, that was rediculous! Sorry, I am rambling along once again. Have a Good day!
“For what is a man profited, if he shall gain the whole world, and lose his own soul? or what shall a man give in exchange for his soul?”
I Love this show. So many great things in it. If you havent tried it it , i say atleast check out the pilot. I cant wait for next episode