I think we should have Republican debates every day. Every day.
We should demand the candidates meet in one place every 24 hours and just pound each other early and often. If they can’t make it, they attack each other on Skype. Now, two debates a day might be a little much, but I’m open to that option as well, just as long as it helps the media destroy the carcass of the last Republican standing.
I have some thoughts on how this could be done and some of the questions that could be asked. I have been inspired by George Stephanopoulos and his questions in New Hampshire. Specifically, his brilliant question to Mitt Romney on whether states should be allowed to ban contraceptives. I was so happy to hear that question because it’s so relevant to us here in Nevada. I hope during the next debate somebody asks about prostitution and contraceptives. Nevada holds its caucus Feb 4th and there are certain counties in this state where they are just itching to get an answer to that burning question.
There are loads of great questions that could be asked in these new Daily Debates.
Since there are Vietnam Era questions being asked at the debates, I hope before voters cast ballots in South Carolina the candidates are asked for their opinions on the Louisiana Purchase. Perhaps they can go after Ron Paul on this issue saying his isolationism is inconsistent with the 1803 Purchase. S. Carolina was not part of the Louisiana Purchase, but that doesn’t matter, I just think it would serve the voters well to know the answers to these vital and relevant issues. Louisiana is a swing state and a wrong answer here by one of the Republicans could wipe them out!
Perhaps ESPN, ESPN 2 and ESPN Classic can hold debates as well. With Daily Debates, everybody can get into the act. Lib sports guy Kenny Mayne could grill Romney on his favorite sports team(s). “Detroit Tigers or Boston Red Sox?” Since there is no right answer he could cause Romney to lose votes in both Michigan and Massachusetts, then somebody could pull up the file video of him wearing a San Diego Padres hat and call him a triple flip-flopper.
The History Channel could do debates and ask Rick Perry what he would think of sending troops to Canada to battle the British in the War of 1812. If he says he would have opposed the move, then he can be attacked for bring anti-James Madison. If he says he would’ve approved, then he can be compared to that other War Monger from Texas who lived in the White House way back in the early days of this millennium.
The ideas are limitless and enlightening.
National Geographic could show Newt Gingrich on the couch with Nancy Pelosi and then grill the rest of the candidates on why they hate polar bears and snail-darters.
The media could also find a network that would love a Jon Huntsman debate entirely in Chinese and Romney could answer in French. That might be so popular it could be on pay-per-view. Wrap it around the next UFC fight.
This game plan would help us all forget about trillions of wasted dollars, gun running to Mexico, and un-Constitutional recess appointments—silly little things like that.
With all the minute-by-minute analysis that would undoubtedly come from the Activist Old Media they could tell the Republican candidates who they should gang up on next. Pick a front runner, then knock him down.
Of course the Republicans could end the madness by just saying no to endless debates and stupid questions and turn the attention back on the corrupt White House, but why would they want to do that?
“Coming up at 11, Rick Santorum stumbles on debate question about SPF numbers on sun tan lotion, could this cost him the Florida vote?”







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
17 Comments
Personally, I've tuned out. The MSM, including Fox, has made this a circus of bad, broken down rides (questions). And having the likes of Mc@ss, his daughter and other irrelevant peeps chime in ruins any meal or snack …not to mention what it does to my mood.
I've made my decision, although I am not enamored by any of the Republican nominees.
We need a REAL Republican on those debates http://www.daybydaycartoon.com/2012/01/08/
The damn commies have infiltrated the faculties of all our colleges. It is impossible to graduate with a Bachelor of Arts degree in Debating without a bias of idiocy. We must do something. It has gotten way out of hand.
Would that they stopped these "debates" moderated by people who don't want them elected, and spent that money and effort, instead, on infomercials educating the American public about the horrors of this administration's agenda, particularly its consequences if allowed to be fulfilled.
I've yet to decide…..
However, I'm going to hold my nose, once again, and vote for the last man standing…..
All the debates have shown me is that we're in big trouble….
God, save the Republic…..
We voted last week (absentee ballots), holding our noses all the way to the mailbox.
Was the 4th time I've had to disinfect my mailbox with Lysol …seems I have to do this every election.
Nicely put…sarcasm is such a beautiful gift and wonderful skill to have
I know what you mean. I'm sure there's a Grand Plan(TM) at work that is beyond the comprehension of us lowly plebes, but right now it sure looks like the GOP is committing Suicide By Debate.
We needed just one person – ONE – to stand up for us and not mince words and rip into Obama, and they're all still fumbling around and letting those hobbit moderators push them around.
Obama and those that support him are our enemies, and enemies are to be fought and beaten. Unless we get someone willing to fight, we're screwed.
Hilarious and true this column. Republicans need to pay attention and see what the media is doing to them
Well, strictly speaking, you're more likely to feel a burning if you don't use a contraceptive, but otherwise, I see your point.
Daily debates or picture a mallet in each contenders hand for the Republican version of Human Political "Whack a Mole"…. I am not amused.
The enemy is Obama… someone at the RNC should maybe pass that information on…. ppppppssssst.
Ron. You slacker.
You forgot to mention the synchronization of street lights at Sunset & PCH and the distribution of water meters in Kahului.
Damnit! What is wrong with you? How will this country ever survive?
Though I see the point made in the article, I also think these multiple debates have helped each candidate improve on their performance.
The MSM will always find a way to tear down our candidates (it's become almost a boring sideshow) but debate performance will be huge this year and practice makes perfect.
It's nice to dream, isn't it Mr. Futrell?
The format and a lot of the queries raised during these "debates" has been abysmal. The questions are too often silly, and oriented to social issues and questions of "morality" and "ethics" which I doubt they really give a hoot about anyway. While these topics are important, Paul correctly re-oriented them to the fact that they aren't as vital as discussing the political issues, viz, monetary policy, foreign policy, economic philosophy, military philosophy, jobs, etc.
The media will continue being in control of the narrative and the questions they ask are calculated to fit that narrative. The candidates themselves must break through their inference, inuendo and assumptions to reach the ears of the American people.
While the media worries about condoms being transported between states our economy continues to slide off the cliff. Their choice of what to emphasize in these "debates" is telling.
I think I'll take the easy way out and just vote for the most honest candidate. It'd be nice to have an honest President.
Bonus points that he wants to end the income tax.
You must be logged in to post a comment.