Comments on: The Attack On Coal Continues: Trashing Coal Ash Recycling

By: beren

beren — Sat, 01 May 2010 14:03:41 +0000

Water retention causes for more information about Where would you recommend?

By: Search The Internet » Palin v. Obama: ‘Real’ American v. the ‘Citizen of the World’

Tue, 02 Mar 2010 11:31:15 +0000

[...] he was explaining the necessity for putting the coal business out of business for the good of global climate goals or telling people they couldn’t just drive their SUVs [...]

By: » Palin v. Obama: ‘Real’ American v. the ‘Citizen of the World’ - Big Journalism

Fri, 26 Feb 2010 18:19:08 +0000

[...] he was explaining the necessity for putting the coal business out of business for the good of global climate goals or telling people they couldn’t just drive their SUVs [...]

By: Lorben

Lorben — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 17:43:07 +0000

Damn droughts anyways! Climate change you know!

By: Patrick Chester

Patrick Chester — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 10:16:35 +0000

….maybe their civilization fell before they could make another calendar.

By: Ozark Lee

Ozark Lee — Fri, 26 Feb 2010 09:11:22 +0000

Gee, several years ago the ecos were touting the superiority of "fly ash" concrete for the highways around Kansas City and how it was responsible recycling. In my opinion the "fly ash" portions of the road were rough – they didn't finish well – but then again they were on a fairly steep grade.

To its credit, although the "fly ash" concrete never got better, it has held up remarkably well. By Kansas City, Missouri standards, in comparison to the rest of crumbling Kansas City, Missouri roads, it has been stellar. The pilot project was on Southwest Trafficway from 31'st Street to the I-35 intersection.

…Lee

By: Yonderthehill

Yonderthehill — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:16:42 +0000

The people of the Sierra Club are idiots, simply put. If you tell them that farting is a greenhouse gas, they'll say it's time to regulate farting as toxic to the environment and the air we breathe. Now, hold that farting or the Sierra Club complain to the EPA. LOL.

By: Hank

Hank — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 16:13:47 +0000

How is it that coal can sit in the ground for billions of years without being considered a threat. But once someone digs it up and burns the carbon out of it, the minerals that remain are suddenly too toxic to get get dumped back into the hole that coal was mined from?

It's the old moonshine argument. That home distilled whiskey contains wood alcohol that will make you go blind. But where does the wood alcohol come from? It's part of the fermenting process. It's in beer and wine too in exactly the same quantities as well as the "taxed" whiskey you buy in a store. Just a lie, a scare tactic created by the gov. to discourage consumption of UNTAXED liquors. And I bet if the gov. finds a way to tax coal ash, suddenly that will be safe too.

By: htos1

htos1 — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 14:48:32 +0000

Obama DID state he was going to stick it,collectively,up our azzes.I take him at our word.One question:Why do all marginally functioning socialist SELL so much energy and we can't?What's up w/that?And why do other countries get to have abundant cheap energy(a la nuclear) and we can't?Two words:G0******d democrats and their "useful idiots"

By: newrouter

newrouter — Thu, 25 Feb 2010 05:59:40 +0000

you should have noted that tva is the federal gov't. improve the environment privatize the tva.