David Weigel at the Washington Independent interviewed Marcus Epstein, organizer of the “Race and Conservatism” event that has been labeled as a “Racist Forum.” He flatly denies allegations that have been made that James O’Keefe worked at the event or had any involvement in the event:
“I’ve made mistakes, which I paid for and addressed,” said Epstein, who has mostly ceased political activity since the 2009 revelation of his arrest in Georgetown. “I don’t want them to be used in false, guilt-by-association smears against others. I met James O’Keefe a number of times. It’s the Beltway — it’s a small circle. It’s the conservative movement. But he did not collaborate with me, definitely not on that event.”
Marcus Epstein
Weigel was also at the event in question, and he confirms that the characterization currently being made that it was a racist rally or forum is misleading and false:
Epstein stood by the content of the event, describing it (accurately, in my view) as a debate, not a forum for Taylor. “I don’t think there’s anything wrong with the event,” said Epstein. “Jared Taylor has debated Queen Latifah and [anti-racist writer] Tim Wise.” At one point, remembered Epstein, Derbyshire laid into Taylor’s tactics and racism, calling him a “sower of discord” and remarking that “we know where sowers of discord end up” — that is, hell.
“I thought that was a bit extreme,” said Epstein, “but there’s nothing wrong with having a debate.”
Epstein concludes:
“I’m used to being smeared, and these guys have more or less successfully harmed my career, so I don’t see what else they could do to me,” said Epstein. “A lot of stuff they said about me wasn’t true, but I definitely made a few mistakes. I just don’t want anyone to use me to smear James O’Keefe.”
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
83 Comments
'David Weigel at the Washington Independent interviewed Marcus Epstein, organizer of the “Race and Conservatism” event that has been labeled as a “Racist Forum.”'
Does Blumenthal & Co even know what a debate is?
Now, how many horses need to open their mouths before the idiots admit to the lies they puked up? Wishful thinking, I guess.
It's obvious to me, from reading about it, what the event was.
It's obvious to anyone with a brain.
Apparently Blumenthal is lacking in that dept. Shocker, huh?
While the world falls apart the Progressive Movement does not know how to handle it.
They are children. If they spent time understanding finance instead of forums then perhaps they would be reporting stories that matter. Every day America let's this cocaine and opium-laced economy continue is another 3 days added to the hangover.
The damned lefties won't EVER admit to any of the wrong things they've said and done; it's just the way it is and always has been.
They are spoiled children. There, fixed it for ya.
Try to find the exchange which occurred last week in Baltimore when hopey spoke at the republican conference and got called out repeatedly by the first term congressman. Ignore, change the subject, blame Bush, … same old liberal same old.
Mark Epstein is the guy who karate-chopped an African-American lady at random and called her the N-word. Is this one of the "mistakes" he's referring to? He's no friend to the conservative movement of Reagan-Epstein's a violent sicko racial separatist, (look him up, and his violent crime, if you think I'm lying) and should not be trusted.
The parsing from Breitbart, Oconnor, and others who support Okeefe is what I would call "beyond Clintonian".
Me thinks thou (Breitbart & O'Keefe) doth protest too much!
LOL
This from the Washington Independent story discussed in this article, and tells you about Epsteins "mistakes".
"""From the U.S. Attorney’s factual proffer:
On July 7, 2007, at approximately 7:15 p.m. at Jefferson and M Street, Northwest, in Washington, D.C., defendant was walking down the street making offensive remarks when he encountered the complainant, Ms. [REDACTED], who is African-American. The defendant uttered, “Nigger,” as he delivered a karate chop to Ms. [REDACTED]’s head."""
What a sick sociopath!! Would YOU attend an event that was organized by this guy?
Mr. Epstein, drop the victim tone. When you fall for the liberal premise of being called a “racist, a homophobe, etc. ” you lose. Gleefully embrace there silly slogans and stick it down there throats. You have nothing to be sorry for, so dust yourself off and reengage.
As far as James O’Keefe the liberal attack is falling into a death spiral, sit back and enjoy the collapse, great fun!
Hey! Where are all those trolls that were here before their false accusations got blown out of the water? They were here like cockroaches just a few days ago to trash James and the rest of us.
Did somebody turn on the light?
Are we going to get a retraction over at Chucky's Little…balls?
Are we going to get a retraction over at Chucky's Little…balls?
There's another, perhaps more accurate, summation of this event posted at something called Vdare, which is linked to on another one of these O'Keefe articles. THey are actually sympathetic to O'Keefe whch is hilarious as they are obviously racist. You guys have Derbyshire laying into the racist, they describe him as talking about how genetics is going to prove racial differences soon.
Oh, this is just beautiful. Blumenthal is in a load of trouble…LIBEL…
http://www.nationalcenter.org/PR-James_O'Kee...
Washington, DC – Kevin Martin of the black leadership group Project 21 and Amy Ridenour of the National Center for Public Policy Research are questioning the accuracy of an article in the left-wing online magazine Salon which implies that independent filmmaker James O'Keefe is a racist.
The article, "James O'Keefe's Race Problem," by Max Blumenthal, cites O'Keefe's attendance at a "Race and Conservatism" panel in 2006 as evidence that, as Blumenthal put it, O'Keefe's "short but storied career has been defined by a series of political stunts shot through with racial resentment."
Black conservative Kevin Martin, one of several panelists at the event, disagrees. In fact, Martin says, O'Keefe approached him after the event and expressed support for Martin's positions, which are certainly not racist:
As a panelist at the Robert Taft Club 'Race and Conservatism' event in 2006, I had the chance to personally meet James O'Keefe after the event ended. He voiced personal support for me and my positions. He also repudiated the radical elements in the room that night.
Marcus Epstein invited me – a black conservative – to a discussion on race issues, not O'Keefe. What transpired was a spirited debate against radical elements of which I and other conservatives were clearly opposed. At no time did I feel intimidated, nor was I ever treated poorly by my hosts. The Blumenthal story is long on accusation and short on facts.
The left is attempting to label O'Keefe as a racist, but this probably has nothing to do with his ideas or associations now or then. I believe it is only because he recently exposed the radicalism of ACORN and the illegal advice its workers chose to give out. By labeling O'Keefe a racist, they likely seek to change the public view of O'Keefe's work from one of exposing corruption and law-breaking to one of a white conservative going after a group empowering the poor and minorities.—
and on and on it goes.
He doesn't look pure white to me he looks kind of like an eskimo
are you guys sure he should be allowed in the "club"
Methinks Blumenthal and Salon doth lie too much!
LOL
Awesome! Another leftiwng racist judging people by their looks.
Keep 'em comin LOL
Adam – Does the garbage you are posting have anything to do with the lies Blumenthal published? Have you retracted your support for his story yet?
I don't believe that most of them can grow up, they passed over that part of their developmental process and it is easier to remain a liberal.
Adam – The event you are describing took place in 2007. The debate took place in 2006. Are you off your meds again?
Are you suggesting people should have known that he was going to assault a woman in 2007 before thet attended an event in 2006? Seriously? That's what you've got?
They have a new assignment, they are busy clicking thumbs right now.
Your headline is totally misleading . Mr Epstein is the one saying that O'Keefe had nothing to do with the event. Mr Weigel just says he can't confirm one way or the other whether O'Keefe was at a merch table or not. Actually he doesn't dismiss the possibility at all, which is probably why you didn't link to his account :
http://washingtonindependent.com/75728/about-jame...
Pretty hilarious that Epstein is supposed to be your credible witness, good luck with that.
The link is in the bigjournalism story above.
I'm sure he was a completely different person less than 12 months prior.
Have you read The Salon article?
That was just ONE of many instances of O'Keefe's racist behavior cited in it, most of which bigjournalism did not even attempt to counter.
Brilliant statement, your IQ is showing…….
Kevin Martin says that O'Keefe came up to him and was very supportive and did not indicate any inclination of acceptance of any extremist viewpoints.
Violette cited the article…which also seemed to indicate that much of the entirety of Blumenthal's innuendo…was made up out of whole cloth.
I think all the digging ought to start there. Take a look at Violette's link. It's pretty damning against Blumenthal, if one accepts what the Project 21 folks say. They were smeared just as badly…it's all pretty disgusting, really.
Let me understand this, lefties:
Obama goes for 30 years to a racist, antisemitic "Church" – and he's the great racial healer.
O'Keefe goes one time to a supposedly racist meeting – and he's the new Adolf Hitler.
Liberals always make me giggle. I know less about Epstein than I do about Andy Stern, Wade Rathke, or Bertha Lewis, but I'm supposed to assume he's evil incarnate? Even if he is, all I have to link O'Keefe to him is that they were at the same conference. What happened to "Release the unedited video!!!"? You see, Liberals believe what they want, and will use any and all excuses to avoid the facts. Sometimes Conservatives do the same. The beauty of being Independent (and not ideologue) is that I don't have to do the limbo to avoid inconvenient facts. O'Keefe was at an event that a racist was at. If the new definition of proof contains that, then Barack Obama was in the same house as a domestic terrorist, so I guess he must be one too. Is that what you're trying to tell me?
By the way, Barack was also good friends with a number of anti-semites (including a former spokesman for the PLO), so I guess he's a bigot as well. You're right Adam, this game is fun! Thanks!
"Would YOU attend an event that was organized by this guy?"
No, but then again I wouldn't attend a fundraiser organized by a terrorist. I also wouldn't let a felon help buy my house. So I guess O'Keefe is almost as sick and twisted as Barack Obama, huh?
[ Eli's Hammer ] Well I'm gonna suprise you kiddies this time and go on the side of FREE SPEECH.
Screw anyone who says you can't listen to any damn person you want…because you can.
And SHOULD.
How else are you going to know if they are a danger, or just a toon?
I always get a little suspicious of those who attempt to tell others what to hear.
What do you get if you let other people do your thinking?
Ans: Other people's thinking!
So what if James O'Keefe listened to Hitler or Gandhi. As long as he knows enough to not kiss Hitler and not beat Ghandi.
They stunt at the Federal Building makes me wonder…ah hell, I'll give ol' James this one.
Free Speech (and Free listening) wins out over appearances…just don't get caught pillow talking the bad-guy.
[ Eli's hammer ]
Yet you're willing to believe the Salon article which doesn't have a single witness (credible or not). As has also been posted, black Conservative Kevin Martin was speaking at the event and has said O'Keefe was a fan of his.
So you ignore the people who were there and instead believe people who weren't (and have an ideological agenda). Congratulations….you have just entered moonbat land.
Does Blumenthal & Co even know what a debate is?
No he is another leftover slimeball from Clinton. Remember it was Clinton, Carville,Begala and that jerk Stephydopalis who perfected trashing anyone who criticized Bubba. Whether it was true or not. Politics was bad up to Bubba but they are the ones that drove it totally in the gutter. Thank you Bubba. Now go dry off that Cigar Ewwww.
THe photographer who shot the photo of O'Keefe at the event is the witness.
Here’s how I came across the story: On Jan. 27, the photographer (who goes by the name Isis) from the One People’s Project called to ask me if I had any photos of the event. She remembered seeing me there — it was one of several RTC events I attended, including one where Rep. Ron Paul (R-Texas) spoke. I explained that I didn’t, but compared my version of the event with hers. She told me that she had photos of the event, but the full photos had been taken by the FBI in a raid. All she had on hand were cropped headshots of people who were at the event.
So someone named "Isis" who claims her photographs of the event were taken by the FBI in a raid (wow, there's some credibility for you) says she thinks she had a full picture of him at the event. The writer from the Independent doesn't remember O'Keefe doing anything (other than attending), but she says if only her photos hadn't been seized by the FBI, they would have shown him manning the table (which EVERYONE else either says didn't happen, or that they have no recollection of).
Seriously, I've got more proof that Obama was born in Kenya. {sigh}
…and that 'one instance' Salon FAILED EPICALLY to source or verify (as has been demonstrated). Calls into question anything and everything else they wrote or "suggested" in their smear.
Not to you, of course, but it does to thinking, non-racists like O'Keefe.
Prove it.
Provide your source. Put up or shut up.
They're grasping at straws. This was supposed to be the "nail in the coffin." They didn' expect people to, you know, actually contact their "sources" and check their facts for them.
Because they obviously didn't check their facts.
"Isis" sounds pretty credible to me :
"I just spoke to Isis, an independent photographer who covered the event, and who frequently reports on extreme right-wing gatherings in the Washington area. Isis told me she saw O’Keefe seated at a literature table filled with racist tracts (see photograph of table above), and that O’Keefe was actively engaged in the organization of the event (which was promoted on the neo-Nazi chat site Stormfront).
“I saw O’Keefe seated at the literature table,” Isis told me. “He was there and he was supporting the event. It looked like Luke Pelican [my note: Pelican has been a member of the racist hate group MSU YAF] and O’Keefe were helping Marcus Epstein with everything. They were clearly part of his little posse.”
Isis observed that the audience treated Kevin Martin, a black conservative speaker added at the last moment to provide cover for Taylor and Derbyshire, with palpable hostility. “So many of the people in that event were like [racial separatist] Michael Hart; they were the Jared Taylor crowd. And when Kevin Martin was trying to speak you could sense the hostility. Besides, how you are going to have a fair debate with two white supremacists and one black conservative who didn’t even know what he was getting into?”
Isis said she had a long conversation with Martin after the event. “He was not happy at all. He said Epstein told him to dress down and dress casual. And the other two speakers were in suits, looking like two professional white guys and poor Kevin, he was totally set up. Jared Taylor spent the whole time talking about statistics about racial differences and how blacks were less intelligent. He said it in front of Kevin,who was freaked out.”
You guys want it soooo badly. The story just won't obey. That dishonest hearsay is being used as "proof" and reprinted in MSM articles should only prove that these media outlets are not to be trusted. But, instead, you're clinging to the lie like it'll come true if you just clap hard enough. Your Tinkerbell is dying.
Maybe he's got a Media Matters article … *snort*
I didn't see anything about the attack.
"Isis" sounds credible to you because he/she is saying what you want her/him to say. But there is still no proof and several other people saying it's not true.
Kevin Martin has also responded negatively to this smear article. He seems to disagree with Isis's account as well. No doubt you will continue to find the basically anonymous Isis more credible than the guys who are going on record.
… as long as he knows enough not to bow to the Japanese Prime Minister or hug Hugo Chavez … I mean who would do something that stupid? Uh … er … *cough*. Moving on.
I agree with you, though. A private citizen should be able to listen to whatever anyone is saying. It doesn't mean they offer support by listening. It could just be research. Or not. I think Palmtree's frequent visits here mean he's a closet conservative. It's pretty obvious. I see him over there by the literature table right now.
You noticed that too? It seems like this site is their target. I haven't noticed it on any other Big….
I don't really want to touch this one. This Epstein guy should be avoided like the plague. I find it unfortunate that O'Keefe had any association with him whatsoever. However, this is not a case of guilt by association. This attempt to label O'Keefe a racist is nothing short of libel.
Isis sounds credible to me because her account seems very plausible. It makes sense that there would be hostility towards Mr Martin at a gathering of racists. It makes sense to me also that they would bring in a black speaker at the last minute to deflect criticism. Conservatives try that one a lot.
O'Keefes involvement also seems plausible to me because of his obvious animus towards black people. Maybe he wasn't involved. I still think his presence there indicates a sympathy for the attitudes expressed there.
How interesting that "Isis" knew who James O'Keefe was in 2006, and he made such an impression on her that she remembered that when she photographed the event, she happened to notice so many details about who attended and who organized it (evidently she didn't actually spend a lot of time actually photographing, since she spent so much time taking down details about who appeared to be organizing).
It's SO unfortunate that the FBI happened to raid her and take all of her photographs that could have verified anything she claimed. Instead, she has 1 head shot of O'Keefe, which shows him doing nothing improper. I'm sure there's nothing to be skeptical of in a situation like that.
Then again, I KNOW a felon helped Barack Obama buy his house (with Rod Blagojevich's wife handling the transaction) and that Obama steered millions in state contracts to Rezko (the felon in question). So I guess you can choose to believe Isis despite a complete lack of credibility and proof, while I'm guessing you completely ignore the facts with Obama and his sleazy behavior. I have no doubt that you completely ignore all the criminal activities committed by ACORN. Because that's how you roll.
Is it also credible that she would remember O'Keefe (who was a complete nobody back then) for three years before relating the story to an anonymous blogger? Of course you do. We'd expect nothing less (we certainly wouldn't expect anything more from you either).
Ok, let's parse Adam.
1. "Debate" = "forum".
2. "Not manning a table" = "manning a table".
3. A man who lied about O'Keefe's manning the table is to be believed, but multiple men who say he wasn't, are not.
4. A "conference" (="forum") was of a racist organization on a college campus, but somehow, it escaped PC oversight!
5. Attending a debate makes you side with whatever vile and nasty position is being debated! Well, there goes free speech? Now what will we do with all those people who attend a debate with a Klansman? Surely they don't all agree with the Klan?
Your logic is infantile.
Adam, you're a moron. As others have pointed out, Epstein's attack happened AFTER the conference. Get that through your little head, little man. And do you really know what people who organize your conferences are going to do in the future? If you do, by all means, get the heck off this site and march down to the FBI. They could really use a guy with the powers of prediction. *laughs*
Well she has a photo of O'Keefe at the event, that might jog her memory a bit. Also he has been in the news a lot lately, you know? I think I might remember someone I shot a photo of in 2006 if I saw them on TV and read about them.
A+ job on changing the subject, conservatives are so consistent with that.
And how do you know that that summation is accurate? You don't even provide the link. Pray tell, what did you search on? Until you cough up the goods, your statement can't be believed. Vdare is actually a paleoconservative/American culture thing. If they were racists, I doubt they'd link to or quote from Michelle Malkin. So the odds are against you, palmtree. Care to keep digging?
You state that it "seems credible to you" because of "his obvious animus". So your perception is true because of another perception you have. Logical fail. You lose, palmtree.
First of all, I'm not a Conservative, dumb-ass. A+ on making assumptions you know absolutely nothing about (something Liberals are known for).
Second, how stupid are you? She saw him in the news, so remember she had a picture of him, then clearly remembered him at a table distributing literature 3 1/2 years earlier? Seriously? OK, I take it back, it might be that you're more gullible than stupid, but from here I can't tell.
Third, you STILL haven't addressed the fact that her claim of proof conveniently disappeared in an FBI raid. Can you explain why the FBI decided to raid her and confiscate all her pictures (or when)? Can you explain why you so find someone who's property was confiscated by the FBI (and a person whose real name you don't even know) to be credible beyond reproach (or the testimony of so many others at the event)?
Fourth, if you're telling me that you'd remember one person you'd never met before (or never heard of) 3 1/2 years later, then I'm flat out calling you a liar. A random face in the crowd that you remember totally (even details about how he was in someone else's "posse")? Why don't you try pedaling that crap on the Daily KOS where it belongs.
Oh yeah, and try answering my questions this time, douchebag.
The only person who is standing by her story is "Isis", whose memory of an event four years ago seems strangely precise, and whose pictures were all confiscated by the FBI makes for quite a convenient dodge, doesn't it? But this is the courtroom of public opinion where lefty smears tend to be more effective than in a court of law. Nowhere else would you have one anonymous source win against five or so people willing to go on record and testify the opposite.
Yup, that link nails it cold. Attendance does not mean agreement, lefties — or does that mean that you agree with every politician you go to demonstrate against? Ain't logic something?
By the way, since you're so desperate to believe "Isis," could you explain why her version of the events is completely contradicted by Kevin Martin? I guess since we don't actually know her name (only that she's subject to routine raids by the FBI), I can understand why you'd believe her half-ass story. {/sarcasm}
As a panelist at the Robert Taft Club ‘Race and Conservatism’ event in 2006, I had the chance to personally meet James O’Keefe after the event ended. He voiced personal support for me and my positions. He also repudiated the radical elements in the room that night.
Marcus Epstein invited me – a black conservative – to a discussion on race issues, not O’Keefe. What transpired was a spirited debate against radical elements of which I and other conservatives were clearly opposed. At no time did I feel intimidated, nor was I ever treated poorly by my hosts. The Blumenthal story is long on accusation and short on facts.
And the lies by left continue on, and on, and on, and on, and on, etc. Someday they will grow up, but I am holding my breath on that one!
Keep of the good fight Larry!
Prue!!!
Palmtree, Mr. Martin has refuted Isis's claims, but you're still clinging to them.
You think "his presence there indicates a sympathy for the attitudes expressed there"? Why? Only because you want it to. Kevin Martin has indicated the opposite from his actual experience with O'Keefe. You have nothing to go on except your deepest wishes that this smear be true.
Fake but accurate? That does seem to be the typical line from you guys these days.
All of Noam Chomsky's proof tends to disappear in government raids, too. It's the way with these people.
Yes this sick idiot was arrested. And that's the point – he was arrested, charged and pleaded guilty. I certainly wouldn't want to be associated with him in the same way i wouldn't want to be associated with racists priests and former terrorists.
Provide the link.
Actually, i'd argue that no weblink in the internet would be "accurate, summation" of any event ever. Still, considering that Birthers still get a voice in the media, and for the posterity of an opinion (as, with all the internet, only opion) here's a link to the summation palmtree talks about.
http://www.vdare.com/misc/060907_carter.htm
I'd hate the above link if i didn't see the same conclusions stated with no evidence elsewhere in MSM…
If you notice the dates the Race and Conservatism panel occurred prior to this incident in 2007. Was James supposed to be clairvoyant?
Who? These are the same idiots who pretended O'Keefe didn't exist while he was destroying their foot soldiers at ACORN.
Now he's "a Klansman" or something.
Idiotic, fact-challenged, transparent, desperate and hilarious. That's where the left is. No wonder their President is underwater.
Actually, if I read it correctly, "Isis" only weighs in through Max Blumenthal. So we have a guy saying "I talked to so-and-so and she said such-and-such happened but she has no proof but she has these pics that were taken at the event". And we know they were taken at the event … how? She's supposedly cropped them so you can't see any background.
I think the ultimate in hilarity would be to find that same pic of James O'Keefe from some different event complete with background.
Isis = Lucy Ramirez
No wonder Palmtree is so enamored.
Sure , lets dig. I'm happy to see people on here defend Vdare. Maybe you would like to defend Stormfront next?
As far as whether the Debyshire stuff is accurate, I'm quite sure he has talked about his dubious genetic theories before, so I have no problem seeing that story is accurate.
call me dumb ass , liar , douchebag , and then I'm supposed to answer your questions?
Mr. Conner,
You must remember that the Democratzi's are the Party of the Three D's: Distract, Distort, Deceive. They distract our attention by meeting behind closed doors, they distort the truth at every turn, then they deceive by changing the information that was given out in the first place. Our "Liar-In-Chief" is a master at the Three D's as he learned it all from Saul Alinsky's book, Rules for Radicals and by studing at the feet of the 'creators of the Cloward-Piven Strategy.
So now you're claiming that "Isis" the photographer is a made up person who doesn't exist? Hey , why don't you run with that one.
Well, you're wrong about a lot. It was a debate, not a meeting. Kevin Martin is on record saying O'Keefe approached him and supported his side of the debate.
Also, Epstein has not claimed friendship with O'Keefe, only acquaintance. There's a big difference.
Kevin Martin has debunked Isis's account, particularly the part that was about him.
It's not "he said, she said" when one anonymous person says someone felt 'this way' and that very person goes on record saying 'no I didn't'.
I don't know why you're clinging so hard to this thing. I said it before, but you guys defending Blumenthal have 'fake but accurate' written on your foreheads.
"Isis" could answer some questions about his/her photos and involvement. Such as, why in the world did the FBI take all the photos that could prove her account? Let's just start with that one.
Now, are you saying Lucy Ramirez isn't real? Cuz there are Democrats still saying she is.
Well, I guess part of this comes down to he said she said. Personally, I think Mr Martin is full of s*** . But that's just an opinion of course.
We know O'Keefe was there, and that he was friends with Epstein. It's not hard to believe he was helping out with the event.
As far as what this event says about O'Keefe, well that's just opinion too I guess. I thought he had racial issues hen I first heard about him going to a mostly black organization in black neighborhoods dressed like a pimp, with a young white girl dressed as a whore named "kenya". To me, that sounds like someone who wants to push peoples racial buttons in a truly nasty way.
What I don't think is just my opinion is the fact that this was a controversial meeting, organized by a since discredited guy (Epstein) , and no reputable republican would have gone within a hundred miles of it.
Right, a debate between Taylor, who even this site won't quite defend, Derbyshire, who believes genetics proves black people inferior, and Martin , an obscure figure brought in to provide cover. Organized by Epstein , who is clearly a racist nut. That's a classy event for sure. O'Keefes association with this event is a disaster for him and Breitbart and they know it.
increases, keep adding more and more money making programs to your site.
hi there! I am new to the board and just wanted to introduce myself
A guy apparently opened fire on middle school students with a rifle. The math teacher, David Benke, stopped him and probably saved dozens of childrens’ lives at the risk of his own life. This man is a true hero.
You can read the news article here http://news.yahoo.com/s/ap/us_colo_school_shooting – Teacher tackles gunman supected in school shooting[/url] [IMG]http://www.youvoid.info/piczz/k/n.gif[/IMG]
We should all take a moment of silence for this man. Thank you.
[...] first attacked O’Keefe for allegedly “attending a white supremacist forum.” But then Larry O’Connor revealed that the organizer of “white supremacist event” was half-Jewish and half-Korean. Yeah, [...]
При полном отсутствии ветра она казался огромным зеркалом, так неподвижна и гладка была ее беспредельная поверхность.
И вот сейчас я внезапно вспоминаю, что тот самый Ильин ждал меня и хотел что-то мне сообщить.
Сквозь маленькие, под самой крышей, оконца с разбитыми стеклами утренний свет заполняет склад.
Констебль сунул свисток в губы и с остервенением выдохнул воздух.
hello people. I’m honestly into shoes and I have been looking for that singular make. The prices as regards the boots were around 200 pounds on every page. But finally I set this area selling them for half price. I absolutely want those [url=http://www.menspradashoes.net]prada sneakers[/url]. I will definetly order them. what can you say about it?
You must be logged in to post a comment.