Now that the hoped for 40-something white male tea party terrorist is out of the picture, the MSM is downplaying the arrest of the suspected SUV bomber, Shahzad Faisal, a naturalized American citizen of Pakistani descent, apprehended as he was trying to flee the country for Dubai.
On MSNBC late Monday night, “terrorism expert” Evan Kohlman repeatedly dismissed the SUV as hardly a bomb at all claiming it only had gasoline and propane tanks and lacked explosives. Amateur hour of a failed wanna-be terrorist.
What the MSM either fails to realize or refuses to face is that this is at least the second successful terrorist attack on American soil, the first being Maj. Nidal Hasan’s attack at Fort Hood last fall.
Shahzad, a recently naturalized Pakistani, successfully planted his weapon of choice at the location of his choice unmolested and undetected. Only the final detonation of the bomb failed, not the implementation of the attack.
Shahzad allegedly placed a car filled with explosive materials in the center of one of the great iconic centers of American culture in the world, Times Square. He successfully slipped away leaving the car bomb to smolder with perhaps mere moments before detonation. The only thing that prevented the successful killing of Americans was an observant citizen who alerted an NYC police officer to investigate the smoking car. Like shoe bomber Richard Reid and the Christmas Day Underwear Bomber, mechanical failure and quick acting Americans may well have saved the day.
There’s an analogy to The Godfather movie here. Powerful movie producer Jack Woltz wakes up next to the decapitated head of his favorite horse in his bed with him. The Godfather’s operatives have placed the severed horse head in the producer’s bed during the night to send a message. The point wasn’t the killing of the beloved horse; rather it showed Woltz that the Godfather could reach out and touch him at will.
Mr. Kohlman may call the methods “crude” and “homegrown.” Nevertheless the SUV bomber was able to plant fear in the heart of New York City on a Saturday night at will. That alone makes it a successful terrorist attack. And somebody in the MSM should start talking about that before other budding terrorists with overseas links to Pakistani Taliban or Al-Qaeda figure out how to obtain more sophisticated weapons.
Follow Us on Twitter
Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
271 Comments
This author is suggesting the SUV attack "was successful" and that we should be afraid. This criminal bomber did not terrorize many Americans, or New Yorkers, but the author wants us to feel terror nonetheless. She paints our citizens as the victim in the Godfather horse-head "warning" scene, saying we should be shrieking in fear.
There is no country in this world, including the most strictly locked-down police states where people cannot go out and kill others if they want to. Life goes on, even in Israel, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan or the world's most dangerous hot spots, people still go about their business.
Do not let Susan Swift make you afraid. Be alert, be cautious and anticipate events like this, but don't live in terror and don't let non-journalists hype you. America already lost the war on terror when we were duped into ground wars in the mid-east and loss of our civil liberties. Government got too big and came into our lives too much. All you hear about in the MSM is the Times Square bomber. This article wasted your time trying to make a case for what, fearmongering?
[...] This post was mentioned on Twitter by Vince Humphreys, greychampion, Chuck, John Tagliaferro, Cynthia and others. Cynthia said: LAMESTREAM PERPETUATING LIES? RT @BigJournalism: Terrorist Attack? ‘What Terrorist Attack?’ Wonders MSM http://bit.ly/dhZKZu #tcot #tlot… [...]
People should be afraid and the MSM should be ashamed of themselves for not informing the public of the real dangers here. Islamic terrorism is the number one threat to the American way of life. Democrats come in at a close second.
Anticipate. But don't really do anything about it.
That's like Zen, man. Groovy.
Too bad the arselifter's name was Shahzad and not Mahound. The MSM would have gone apoplectic trying to cover that up.
America lost this country when Muslim were let in. Plain and simple keep out Muslims and we would have had five terrorist attempts in the last six months. Nazi, this guy, underwear bomber, Ft hood terrorist, and another terrorist at another military base. Time to get serious before we get Sharah law. If you don't agree with me then you must be a terrorist sympathizer who loves how Muslims threat their females.
Louisiana recently enacted a law to ban sharia. A good move that should be followed by all the states and countries in the Western world.
Full report here http://loganswarning.com/2010/05/05/louisiana-ban...
Louisiana recently enacted a law to ban sharia. A good move that should be followed by all the states and countries in the Western world.
Full report here http://loganswarning.com/2010/05/05/louisiana-ban...
Louisiana recently enacted a law to ban sharia. A good move that should be followed by all the states and countries in the Western world.
Full report here http://loganswarning.com/2010/05/05/louisiana-ban...
Yes, not in a very long time.
Yes, but don't restrict it to just Middle Eastern men. Arselifters can come from anywhere. From Asia to Africa and even Europe. There are also converts. These can be much harder to spot.
As the saying goes, the price of freedom is eternal vigilance.
We are all going to have to face the fact that it is Islam. It's not isolated crazies, it's the entire religion.
Just because something calls itself a religion and worships a God, does not make it sane.
When the goal of a religion becomes to wipe out all other religions, how long are we to tolerate that religion? That's what Islam is about. How can we ignore that?
Recently the Obama Administration has been shifting the focus of Homeland Security away from Muslim terrorists and toward American terrorists (can't be blaming his bros, can we?).
The pillar of honesty, Bill (I did not have sex with that woman) Clinton, blames Americans who advocate smaller government for the actions of Oklahoma City bomber, Timothy McVeigh. At the time of the bombing, then President Clinton blamed radio talk shows (sound familiar?).
Who are these "American terrorists?" A bunch of militia groups exercising their Constitutional rights, running around in the woods playing soldier? Who have they attacked? Who have they hurt?
Perhaps we should take a closer look…
American Terrorists… http://usataxpayer.org/?0032219510
Islam – The Religion of Peace… http://usataxpayer.org/?0088070911
What, nothing going on today over at HuffPo since WaPo is getting all the attention from the progressives, so you decide to do a drive by at Big Journalism?
And as is typical of progressives, just like the knights in the Monty Python movie, 'run away! Run away!"
Islamic terrorisum is the enemy at the gate, and the Democrats are the traitors that will let them in.
All you need to know is that the word 'Islam' means submit.
Submission, actually.
Nor anywhere in the US, Europe or elsewhere in the West.
‘Only white men are evil’,Rev Wright.
I knew that, but the word 'submission' seems like a state of being as compared to 'Submit' , which is an order that if not followed will be punishable by death.
"…Evan Kohlman repeatedly dismissed the SUV as hardly a bomb at all claiming it only had gasoline and propane tanks and lacked explosives."
Kohlmann is well aware of what it takes to make a bomb and fully knows that this, thou poorly built, is a bomb and if detonated, could have been reasonably effective. He also knows that terrorist doesn't necessarily have to have a successful bomb to achieve their objectives which is terror. They want people to fear them because to them fear is strength.
Fear=Terror
Strength through fear=Terrorist
Hey! He's an arselifter. You can't expect too much from them. And their diplomas are like toilet paper to us.
Private William Long? http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1vt5C-K3qes
Wright used to be an arselifter. I suspect O'Bummer's a crypto-arselifter.
It would seem if he wanted to give the image of a bomb he would not have had to use real materials (gas Propane) smoke bombs and a few m 80s would have been convincing enough and less risky to drive down the road with.
I can square it in my head in my most conspiratorial ramblings I come up empty.
One thing I do wonder is how much info would we have gotten from this guy (of course we only have Holders word its good intel) if his family wasn't "under the boot" (love that phrase) of pakistani Interrogators.
The point of "terrorism" is to "terrorize" ordinary people. Shazad did exactly that.
Another point to be made here is that the attack was not carried out in some small town or even big city in the midwest, south, or even the Left Coast. It was done in the city that suffered immensely on 9-11. People there have not gotten over the attack by a longshot (as their strenuous objection to having the KSM trial in NYC readily attests). The target was chosen so as to bring the maximum amount of fear to the maximum amount of people. I'm sure that Shazad would rather have had the bomb explode, but to in any way say he was unsuccessful in terrorizing people is ridiculous.
What the MSM either fails to realize or refuses to face is that this is at least the second successful terrorist attack on American soil, the first being Maj. Nidal Hasan’s attack at Fort Hood last fall.
—————-
What about the 2009 terrorist shooting at the recruiting office in Arkansas? http://www.foxnews.com/story/0,2933,524998,00.htm...
University of bridgeport in Conneticut, they define themselves thusly.
"An international, doctoral intensive comprehensive university, with award-winning academic programs. At the University of Bridgeport, students can earn degrees in a variety of innovative undergraduate and graduate degree programs."
They're accredited with a 25% foreign student body beyond that perhaps their is an alumnist here who could provide more light.
Agreed. The other thing arselifters have done in NYC, and has gone largely unnoticed, is setting up a moske next to the WTC site. If the significance of this isn't understood, perhaps it might be once people learn that arselifters love to build moskes over the sites of churches, synagogues, temples, etc. of those they've vanquished. Its their way of rubbing it in.
Why didn't the car-bomb go off? GOD !
I know a family from TX who was within 50 feet of the black suv parked in Times Square. A family whose
teen-aged daughter had won a trip to NY City with a group of students, exceptional students from small
town America. Her parents had gone as chaperones on the trip. We thank GOD their family is still intact,
and will thank Him every time we see or think of them for quite some time.
We won't think of Janet Napalitono, Mike Bloomberg, Eric Holder, or Ray Kelly. We will thank the street ven-
dors who called the tip in, although frankly if the bomb had been properly executed they would have been
toast, so to those who wish to make hero's of them, Please, spare me. They are good citizens, no more.
Bridgeport University, forever more remembered as Terrorist U, where Faisal Shahzad (D, Conn)
completed his MBA. Wow I feel sorry for their current students.
Time to turn several of their Depts upside down and shake vigorously. Are there more still within?
I really get the vibe that with all the 24 hour news outlets available now, there really isn't enough "real" news to fill the void so the same stories get hyped to death and you end up with media apathy. Reporters that get lazy and bored. You kill two people while driving drunk it's page 10 news, drive through the wall all of their house and kill them while they're watching American Idol it's page 1. This isn't unique to terrorism. It's the state of American journalism, this whole slightly inept "lone bomber" narrative has been done before and they want something fresh and exciting. It's as if they want some "Dr. Evil" grand scheme to be foiled so that they can be motivated to report on it. It's pretty sad really given that lives are on the line. I would suggest that next time Al Quaeda should strap a bomb to a kid and float him over the mid-west in a small UFO shaped ballon, I hear that still sells newspapers…..
Apologists like you will be the downfall of this country. Sleep well.
Makes me wonder if this passes for terrorism training in Pakistan, why can't their army finish them off in a couple of weeks?
My 16 year old daughter was there with her aunt, her cousin and her cousin's boyfriend 2 hours before it was found.
The only learned about it on the radio on their way out of the city.
fantum,
100% Agree! We are being misdirected… NObama is just an illusionist.
On the militias… Its not illegal to have a guilty mind without guilty actions.
I agree WACO was a disastrous massacre perpetrated by the US Gov. Clinton, Kerry… are all murderers.
We are being stalked by our government. It is coming after us and we (as a whole) are too blind and numb to see it.
What unstackthedeck seems to miss with his diatribe is the simple fact that with the left in power, too much of our resources in regards to homeland security go to a narrative of fixation on right-wing nuts instead of Middle Eastern men. The mantra should be fool me once shame on you, fool me twice shame on me instead of this pc notion of non-stereotyping that the present admin takes. Agree with Ann Coulter that our security policy now is…cross your fingers or hope to die.
Too bad the arselifter's name was Shahzad and not Mahound. The MSM would have gone apoplectic trying to cover that up.
America lost this country when Muslim were let in. Plain and simple keep out Muslims and we would have had five terrorist attempts in the last six months. Nazi, this guy, underwear bomber, Ft hood terrorist, and another terrorist at another military base. Time to get serious before we get Sharah law. If you don't agree with me then you must be a terrorist sympathizer who loves how Muslims threat their females.
The MSM will down play anything that doesn't fit their political view. You can't look to them for truth or accurate reporting of the facts.
And now with the militia case apperantly loosing steam, what about the resources used there? I hope they were not wasted.
You be afraid if you want, I am not. If you are admitting 9-11 changed your core values, then you admit al Qaeda won, they successfully changed the US! Just like they wanted to. Not me, I still believe we should not live in fear of a bunch of thugs in hiding because we are stronger and smarter and more resilient. We will outlast them and we should keep our pre9-11 principles intact. As Reagan believed, we do not torture, we don't need to, we have morality on our side.
The proper response to 9-11 was to take out OBL. The Taliban was in the White House negotiating pipeline deals with Bush weeks before 9-11. Next thing you know we are spending our unborn kids money to fight them to a standstill for eight years only to pay them now not to kill us.
And guess what, Islamic terrorism has killed less Americans in the last ten years than not wearing our seat belts has in the last one year. Sure you got your priorities straight?
“If at first you don’t succeed…” Be certain that these goons are not done with Times Square.
I guess we could conclude that this terrorist was a "Homegrown democrat". Yes?
Let me see if I follow your logic:
We should ignore Presidents Obama and Clinton. Speech that the government sees as having the potential to incite violence shouldn't be vilified. The potential for violence exists everywhere, every day anyway. Why curb fringe, extreme rhetoric when it will have absolutely no effect? Curbing the rhetoric will not relieve the danger in hot spots here or in Israel, Iraq, etc. So why bother?
Instead, as you suggest, we should just be aware that terrorism and acts of violence can happen. We should just go about our business and allow extreme, violence inciting speech to go unchallenged. We should take a reactive rather than proactive approach.
Obama's call for civil debate is just plain fear-mongering. We should be alert but we should not let Presidents hype us into believing extreme speech has the potential to ignite violence. Radical speech about dangerous government does not terrorize many Americans, or New Yorkers, but the government wants us to feel terror nonetheless.
Did I get it right?
Let me see if I follow your logic:
We should ignore Presidents Obama and Clinton. Speech that the government sees as having the potential to incite violence shouldn't be vilified. The potential for violence exists everywhere, every day anyway. Why curb fringe, extreme rhetoric when it will have absolutely no effect? Curbing the rhetoric will not relieve the danger in hot spots here or in Israel, Iraq, etc. So why bother?
Instead, as you suggest, we should just be aware that terrorism and acts of violence can happen. We should just go about our business and allow extreme, violence inciting speech to go unchallenged. We should take a reactive rather than proactive approach.
Obama's call for civil debate is just plain fear-mongering. We should be alert but we should not let Presidents hype us into believing extreme speech has the potential to ignite violence. Radical speech about dangerous government does not terrorize many Americans, or New Yorkers, but the government wants us to feel terror nonetheless.
Did I get it right?
I don't see how one person pointing out it was a failed attack means the MSM isn't calling this a terror attack. Seems to me to be grasping at straws and looking for any tick tacky thing to slam the media's perceived bias.
Is it just the wimpy progressive nature of the media, or is it that they are just tired of the same story, pointing to the same religion and region of the world, with the same results?
All you need to know is that the word 'Islam' means submit.
First of all, Barry is NOT a Christian. His so-called church accepts Muslims and only preaches Marxisum.
Don't forget the army recruiter in Little Rock who was murdered in broad daylight, a quarter mile from an elementary school.
Don't forget the army recruiter in Little Rock who was murdered in broad daylight, a quarter mile from an elementary school.
You don't seem to understand the difference between healthy fear and a blind panic. Healthy fear makes you observant and diligent. The Taliban were given a chance to give up Bin Laden and they made their choice. In all due fairness I've never heard of a seat belt that has parked an IED on a street where it would kill and maim innocents, I don't think their is one seat belt that has ever flown a plane into a building, but if not wearing your seat belt is what fuels your nightmares, so be it, I choose to let my healthy fear keep me vigilante against terrorists.
Be alert, be cautious and anticipate events like this…
You don't need to tell this to us, you need to tell it to pandering, bowing, historical-relativist, affirmative-action third rate clown currently running our country into the ground, our his politically correct sexually ambiguous, low IQ Secretary of Homeland Security, who has also attempted to make us afraid….of our returning soldiers, of all things.
What a rose-colored world you dupes live in.
My best guess is its the same training program for both….. Just sayin'…..
I agree with Buford, we never should have given the Muslim the time of day. Reagan gave Osama bin Laden money, arms, training and support all through the 80s and it bit this country in the ass big time. Then Reagan gave Saddam Hussein arms too, illegal chemical weapons….I hated how friendly the Bush family got with the Saudis, it seemed like they were making so much money together that they forgot about us Americans.
Reagan never should have let those hairy, smelly Mujahadeen in the Oval Office (http://j.mp/avQbCq) – they probably stole stuff on the way out….the most insulting thing is that Cheney was just in Saudi Arabia this week, still palling around with the guys that threat their females! If you don't agree with me and buford, you must be a terrorist so get serious.
No, just that we can deal with 9-11 and fight extremists without living in fear. We can take problems head on.
Look at that picture above this author just compared you to. Don't take that lying down – you are not a hysterical bitch and this country can fight terrorism without living in fear. We can fight them using technology and brains and covert infiltration, financial leverage, overseas allies, good detective work and especially ending our dependence on their oil.
But sending troops to fight the Taliban for eight years was stupid and sending troops to Iraq was a violation of our US laws and treaties, and as the Iraq Group found, made matters worse.
I disagree, I work in Times Square, I watch the wave of MANY people both NEW YORKERS and TOURISTS walking through there everyday and just the thought that a car containing gasoline and propane exploding and killing all who are in it's path is terrifying. Everyone who I spoke to about this incident agrees how terrifying it is.
I also disagree with your suggestion to be cautious and to anticipate events like this: incident's like this CAN'T be anticipated – only prevented. The author is correct that failed bomb plots need d to be taken seriously and I would like to add by our local, state and federal governments.
Susan Swift has done a great service is highlighting the significance of this event. Also the NYPD has done a great job in capturing the culprit and restoring peace within Times Square.
You obviously lack the mental faculties to comprehend the big picture of what such an incident means. I am embarrassed for you and it was a waste of time reading your reply.
He knows damn good and well that even something as small as a firecracker, packaged right and detonated in a specific location, would cause some devastating results. Maybe not so much from the initial blast but secondary events like panic people running into traffic or over each other.
Question
This guy was trained as a bomb maker in Packistan has a BA in Computer Science and Engineering and an MBA, Yet bought the wrong fertilizer?
Something Stinks and it ain't smokebombs
Yes, its much of a muchness. What it doesn't mean is peace, as some arselifters and their dhimmis will claim.
He only minored in shopping.
But yeah, it's almost like he made an "almost" bomb. On purpose.
Does that mean O'Bummer's half evil?
Does that mean O'Bummer's half evil?
OK, so its better quality toilet paper. But its still toilet paper.
Agreed. The other thing arselifters have done in NYC, and has gone largely unnoticed, is setting up a moske next to the WTC site. If the significance of this isn't understood, perhaps it might be once people learn that arselifters love to build moskes over the sites of churches, synagogues, temples, etc. of those they've vanquished. Its their way of rubbing it in.
Why didn't the car-bomb go off? GOD !
I know a family from TX who was within 50 feet of the black suv parked in Times Square. A family whose
teen-aged daughter had won a trip to NY City with a group of students, exceptional students from small
town America. Her parents had gone as chaperones on the trip. We thank GOD their family is still intact,
and will thank Him every time we see or think of them for quite some time.
We won't think of Janet Napalitono, Mike Bloomberg, Eric Holder, or Ray Kelly. We will thank the street ven-
dors who called the tip in, although frankly if the bomb had been properly executed they would have been
toast, so to those who wish to make hero's of them, Please, spare me. They are good citizens, no more.
I'm guessing that this is your idea of sarcasm.
Seriously, what do you propse we do? Beyond mere anticipation, that is.
Now do you see America what our schools are producing…..pure idoits who cannot think for themselves and have aquired a metal disorder upon turning 21. There all around us, its up to parents now to educate their children, it must be done, dinner tables are a good start, checking their homework and beating down the liberal doors…or else, you get this.
That's the guy. The media kept as hush hush as they could on it, but it was a black guy who'd converted to Islam and had been ranting about killing the great satan, just rolled in and shot the hell out of the guy. It was one of the first real terrorist attacks here since 9-11. If you thought "this couldn't happen here", this was a huge wakeup call. That a small po-dunk place like my town in arkansas could be attacked by islamic jihadists was the last thing anyone expected.
I really get the vibe that with all the 24 hour news outlets available now, there really isn't enough "real" news to fill the void so the same stories get hyped to death and you end up with media apathy. Reporters that get lazy and bored. You kill two people while driving drunk it's page 10 news, drive through the wall all of their house and kill them while they're watching American Idol it's page 1. This isn't unique to terrorism. It's the state of American journalism, this whole slightly inept "lone bomber" narrative has been done before and they want something fresh and exciting. It's as if they want some "Dr. Evil" grand scheme to be foiled so that they can be motivated to report on it. It's pretty sad really given that lives are on the line. I would suggest that next time Al Quaeda should strap a bomb to a kid and float him over the mid-west in a small UFO shaped ballon, I hear that still sells newspapers…..
I suspect I could have made an effective bomb from those ingredients, plus a few easily obtained and otherwise innocent seeming items. I'd rather use a few other things that would be more effective, but…
Any place the arselifters infest is fair game. So, if you see them around, you have to watch your back. They simply can't be trusted. And with the US now in the grip of PC nonsense, you can't even complain without being labelled a racist. Once their numbers build, the US will end up like Europe. Rape gangs, women walking around in tents, entire suburbs taken over and declared no-go zones.
"America already lost the war on terror when we were duped into ground wars in the mid-east and loss of our civil liberties"
Loss of WHAT civil liberties, twit?
And don't just try to slough off with "the Patriot Act." Let's hear WHICH provisions of the act 'take away our civil liberties."
[...] Yeah, let’s not focus on the fact that we’re at war with a whole culture of Islamic terrorists who declared war on Western civilization and want us all dead. And then there’s the idiots who want to downplay it, since it didn’t fit the ‘tea bagger’ narrative: On MSNBC late Monday night, “terrorism expert” Evan Kohlman repeatedly dismissed the SUV as hardly a bomb at all claiming it only had gasoline and propane tanks and lacked explosives. Amateur hour of a failed wanna-be terrorist. http://bigjournalism.com/sswift/2010/05/06/terrorist-attack-what-terrorist-attack-wonders-msm/ [...]
Makes me wonder if this passes for terrorism training in Pakistan, why can't their army finish them off in a couple of weeks?
This was ONLY a terrorist attck when the suspect was a white male. Once yet ANOTHER Muslim was arrested, it was no longer a story to the MSM.
will pay $$$$$ for pictures of bo when he use to smoke crack………………………………….. will not pay for pics of him smoking diick, he never quit
You don't seem to understand the difference between healthy fear and a blind panic. Healthy fear makes you observant and diligent. The Taliban were given a chance to give up Bin Laden and they made their choice. In all due fairness I've never heard of a seat belt that has parked an IED on a street where it would kill and maim innocents, I don't think their is one seat belt that has ever flown a plane into a building, but if not wearing your seat belt is what fuels your nightmares, so be it, I choose to let my healthy fear keep me vigilante against terrorists.
My best guess is its the same training program for both….. Just sayin'…..
Maybe since it is "hardly a bomb at all" Mr. So-Called Expert Kohlman would like to light it off and just stand there next to it….. After all its not a REAL bomb now is it? Idiots studying to be cretins I SWEAR!!!
I agree with Buford, we never should have given the Muslim the time of day. Reagan gave Osama bin Laden money, arms, training and support all through the 80s and it bit this country in the ass big time. Then Reagan gave Saddam Hussein arms too, illegal chemical weapons….I hated how friendly the Bush family got with the Saudis, it seemed like they were making so much money together that they forgot about us Americans.
Reagan never should have let those hairy, smelly Mujahadeen in the Oval Office (http://j.mp/avQbCq) – they probably stole stuff on the way out….the most insulting thing is that Cheney was just in Saudi Arabia this week, still palling around with the guys that threat their females! If you don't agree with me and buford, you must be a terrorist so get serious.
No, just that we can deal with 9-11 and fight extremists without living in fear. We can take problems head on.
Look at that picture above this author just compared you to. Don't take that lying down – you are not a hysterical bitch and this country can fight terrorism without living in fear. We can fight them using technology and brains and covert infiltration, financial leverage, overseas allies, good detective work and especially ending our dependence on their oil.
But sending troops to fight the Taliban for eight years was stupid and sending troops to Iraq was a violation of our US laws and treaties, and as the Iraq Group found, made matters worse.
Speaking of toilet paper, check out this report –
http://www.themedialine.org/news/news_detail.asp?...
Its hilarious! Menopausegate! LOL!
Yes, that's what arselifters are doing in Iraq and elsewhere. Wait for crowds to gather after the first bomb or for the military or medics to respond and then set off another bomb to kill more.
It's called secondary devices.
The meth/drug cookers often set several of them up around their labs to catch the Emergency Services personal in the U.S. They like to do stuff like put carpet over a hole filled with stakes, tie balloons filled w/ gas or some other flammable liquid to the ceilings, replace metal gas pipes with PVC, tie up shotguns triggered by tripwires and the good old fashion pipe-bomb. That's one of the reasons why you will see, if the incident commander has any brains, the fire department let buildings that are possible labs burn instead of risking personal in extinguishing it. The other reasons is the chemicals used to make meth are dangerous as hell to begin with and it gets rid of another lab with the building gone.
It's a man-caused disasterist attack.
It's a man-caused disasterist attack.
How can we anticipate. This man was removed from the Terrorist watch list by the Obama administration. The Bush Administration did anticipate that he was a threat, the Obama Administration decided he was not. Why was that? Did the Obama Administration "Anticipate" that he was no longer a threat? How did that work out for us?
[...] » Terrorist Attack? ‘Wһаt Terrorist Attack?’ Wonders MSM – Bі… [...]
Garmin 1490t GPS System…
[...]the time to read or visit the content or sites we have linked to below the[...]…
1.) Layout…
2.) [...]Here is a good example of a clean layout…
acne…
[...]I ACTUALLY appeared to be extremely pleased to find this particular web-site.I want to thank you for your effort for the [...]…
Miss America 2011…
[...]listed below are a handful of hyper-links to webpages which I link to since we think they are well worth checking out[...]…
1.) More…
2.) [...]if you want to read a bit more then I recommend the following[...]…
Sexcam…
[...]Sexcam mit gratis Testzugang[...]…
family Solicitors…
[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]…
Car Service…
[...]while the sites we link to below are completely unrelated to ours, we think they are worth a read, so have a look[...]…
Best VPN Router…
[...]here are some links to sites that we link to because we think they are worth visiting[...]…
Travel Deals…
[...]these internet sites might not be entirely relevant towards our website however we certainly feel you all should see them[...]…
You must be logged in to post a comment.