Turns out roughly 2% of NPR’s funding comes from public coffers. The real money comes from charitable donations to NPR and its public radio affiliates who rely on the NPR “brand” to attract charitable donors and then, in return, pay back to NPR the lion’s share of its operating budget.
So the real threat – the thermonuclear threat – posed by O’Keefe’s video may be the loss of NPR’s all-important tax exempt status. Without tax-exempt status, NPR’s charitable donation well runs dry.
In O’Keefe’s latest video, Ms. Liley reassured the actor posing as a Muslim Brotherhood front group that NPR could legally accept the $5 million dollar gift anonymously to shield the group from government audits disclosing the donor’s identity. On March 1, 2011, she confirmed this in writing via email, as you can see in the video.
NPR’s schmoozing for money from a group claiming ties to the Muslim Brotherhood clearly constitutes a moral outrage, but does it imperil its tax exempt status as a 501(c)(3) non-profit corporation?
The IRS makes clear that “leaders of 501(c)(3)s must not make partisan comments in official organization publications or at official functions,” and that NPR must comply with “information reporting obligations … [generally] met by filing Form 990.” Tax lawyers and CPAs may quibble and debate whether the O’Keefe videos expose prohibited conduct, but NPR unmistakably appreciates the dire threat.
Thus, barely hours after O’Keefe’s video posted, NPR responded:
The statement made by Betsy Liley in the audio tapes released today regarding the possibility of making an anonymous gift that would remain invisible to tax authorities is factually inaccurate and not reflective of NPR’s gift practices. All donations – anonymous and named – are fully reported to the IRS. NPR complies with all financial, tax and disclosure regulations. (emphasis added)
NPR’s statement unambiguously addresses the video’s threat to its tax-exempt status. But this statement fails to clarify potentially critical tax issues, such as: whether NPR unlawfully conspired to cover up the true identity of a donor or otherwise violate IRS reporting requirements, and whether NPR executives’ bashing of the Tea Party movement, the Republican Party, and Jews while soliciting donations constituted “partisan comments” in NPR’s official capacity. Even if the Make-Believe Media miss (or obscure) that point, NPR does not.
NPR’s best hope may be to depict Betsy Liley as an unsophisticated rube, another liberal slackjaw who didn’t check with legal before doing her best to separate these Muslims from their money. Hard to say if she’ll soon join Ron Schiller and Vivian Schiller under the NPR bus — a cynical person might wonder if she knows where too many “anonymous” skeletons are hiding in NPR’s donor closet for that to happen.
Footnote: NPR may have company. It’s been reported that PBS also met with O’Keefe’s Muslim posers. Batten down the hatches, Big Bird.
So now that O’Keefe has toured us inside the moral sausage factory that is NPR, perhaps Representative Peter T. King should consider expanding his domestic terrorist hearings to ask NPR about its “anonymous” donor program.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
46 Comments
Personally I'm enjoying the slow-motion train wreck that O'Keefe & Co. have caused by exposing the duplicity and bias we ALL KNEW existed in these cauldons of liberal hate.
It's funny watching people who make $600K running a "non-profit" wind up on the street. Funny in an "ironic/tough crap" kinda way…
Ummm, it sounds like Betsy was taking the hoax very seriously.
And it also sounds like she knew how to circumvent the law to keep anonymous donors hidden.
I'll never trust public broadcasting again when they say, "This program made possible by a generous grant from the John and Jane Doe Charitable Trust."
Follow the money.
ain't it fascinating how ACORN, UnPlanned Parenthood, & now NPR, all officially act after the fact like they've never dealt with sleazebags before, but it seems their people all already knew how to handle matters. Underaged prostitutes? Sure, no problem- that's all covered on page ___ of our employee manual. Donations from terrorist groups? Yeah, got it right here on pg. ____. All you gotta do is….
one wonders if this crap is really as rare as they want us to believe…
Why are they tax-exempt to begin with????????? Where in the constitution does it say we have to have a "National Public Radio"? George Washington and Ben Franklin would have cut there heads off with there govt propaganda.
Just think alien-they were willing to become PROPAGANDA mouthpieces for the MOSLEM BRUTHA HOODS for a measly 5 Million. Im wondering what they might have done if AQ had doubled the amount of bribe money?
"one wonders if this crap is really as rare as they want us to believe…"
Every time something like this happens, it's a "rogue agent", or an "isolated incident".
Bull. There have been too many "rogue agents" and "isolated incidents" for that hand-waving excuse to be effective any more. The truth is that this is the sort of thing that these organizations do as a matter of day-to-day operations. Of course, with "fellow travelers" in the White House and in charge of the so-called Justice Department, they know that they will never be called to account for their behavior.
Where in the constitution does it say we need a tsunami warning center?
The rabidly anti-American Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and the Ford Foundation are real donors and a bigger concern.
No more government Indoctrination funded by we tax payers! Thanki you James O'Keefe! Keep exposing the Socialist Democrats.
After this please monitor the 2,000 Mosques in America where the jihadits are hatched.
I guess you never heard of NATIONAL DEFENSE? ID like to think a public safety issue would be covered under that-By your "logic" I guess we shouldnt have Tornado,Flash Flood,Hurricane or Ice Storm warnings? You leftists really ARE that stupid , arent you?
Yeah! And where in the Constitution does it say your belt and shoes must match, eh? What a dolt!
What's even more amusing to me is that while NPR is scrambling here and there trying to do damage control, O'Keefe sits and waits…………….for the perfect moment to release another video on these idiots. THAT is hilarious.
We would be doing CPB ,PBS & NPR a favor by removing all funding , this would release the shackles of
big government and give them the ability to pursue more profitable avenues…Even if these 2 entity's cease
to exist, (pbs & npr) many of their shows would be picked up within private (for profit ) broadcasting …
The CPB ( Corporation for Public Broadcasting ) was created in 1967 to manage the funds of the other 2 , so in reality they're just a layer of bureaucracy that doesn't need to exist …
yup; and PBS is in the crosshairs now – fantastic. They should be cutoff just for letting Bill Moyers get rich and puke up his hate and bile for two plus decades.
I get a kick out of "Antique Roadshow" but I bet THEY could survive as a regular TV series. Same with Sesame Street, etc.
I wonder how much Saudi $$$$ is polluting PBS/NPR?
I read an article about how much money they are pouring into English universities – it's astounding. They're simply buying off potential sources of any negative exposure, but of course English universities have long been hotbeds of communism – so Sharia should fit right in – just another totalitarian philosophy.
That is exactly what 'provide for the public welfare' clause comes in. The FDA is another example.
It's fitting that, as I'm reading this, I have Limp Bizkit's cover of "Faith" playing on Rhapsody. It takes a strong people, NPR, but it's time to show them that door.
YO, NPR…GET THE F*** OUT!
THATS AN EXCELLENT POINT ! ~
The United States Constitution contains two references to "the General Welfare"
Of course NPR can keep it's tax exempt status! They simply need to open up their books. That should be no problem. It's NPR! The voice of the righteous!. I am sure they can provide donor lists, even those considered anonymous, for these donors to appear under oath in NPR's defense. No problem, right? They should be chomping at the bit to defend the great NPR. After all, who's going to provide us with interviews from the Indigo Girls, Limbaugh?
After all of that proves that NPR is a clean as new driven snow than sure,,,,,,,, they can keep their tax exempt status!
Why the fuss people? It should be no problem. Right NPR?
Sesame Street is no longer "educational" anyway.
It is propaganda – preeducation, indoctrinating children in the progressive, multi-culti, gimme mine worldview that will be so useful to them and to the prog movement as they grow into adult government-tit-sucking mooches.
Kill Elmo, Big Bird, Ernie, Bert and Cookie Monster.
Kill them all.
Let them peddle their b.s. in the free-market.
I'm sure AlGore's got a timeslot he can spare them.
Let me see here…Social Justice Manual, Volume 2, Section 9….ah yes, here it is.
Sure we can do that. No problem.
Today's program brought to you by the letters L, I and E.
…and the number 2
I don'y have little ones and I was a teenager when Sesame Street premiered so honestly i have no idea what they present, but I'm not surprised (obviously) that it's part of the indoctrination machine. "Progs"/liberals are shameless.
Now Al Jeezera is bringing a "children's network" to America. Brainwashing them young it seems.
I predict NPR and PBS will be defunded. (Which will necessarily do away with the CPB – and good riddence).
NPR will become the new Air America.
They may even have some success, since they are starting with a ready-made audience base.
Good.
As long as they're not taking my money to spew their progressive b.s., more power to them.
But what the hell are they going to produce to replace all the programming hours they filled with their endless begging?
JamesB –
Here's an article describing just one of Sesame Street's more egregious violations, with a video clip.
And this from the article:
In the clip of the sketch that originally aired two years ago without controversy, Oscar the Grouch is playing a reporter for the "Grouch News Network," also known as "GNN," which certainly sounds familiar. After Oscar conducts an interview in which he shares hugs and kisses with his royal interview subjects, an irate viewer calls him to complain that his coverage of the news wasn't quite grouchy enough, saying "From now on, I am watching Pox News," adding, "Now there’s a trashy news show!"
What's is very interesting is that BO does not see the defunding of NPR as necessary.
It's only as rare as we have tapes documenting their behavior.
You mistake conservatives for proggies.
While we may disagree with their donation habits, we don't aim to prevent them from doing so. It is their money and they can do what they wish. However, taking money from an enemy of the country is most definitely a crime.
make them pay their fair share, libs love talking about that.
it's shockingly unfair to commercial radio stations that "public radio" and NPR can take "donations" from major corporations that look/smell/taste like advertisements … yet allowing the corporation to take the write-off. Talk about unfair competition!!!! Take away NPR's tax exempt status and let it compete like other radio stations — you'll see NPR go extinct quickly.
Hey NPR, cut your losses and go private and sink or swim on your own. My suspicions are that it will go the way of Air America. Bye, bye.
And being willing to hide the source makes it a bigger crime.
I wasn't aware of NPR's tax exempt status. Like its government funding, it should be taken away immediately. Let them support themselves by selling advertising like their brothers in arms at MSNBC.
You're on the wrong thread, Dimjimsees11…
Have even more no problem with this, do you…?
Looks like Elmo will be out on the street soon, too…!
BWAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA…!!!!
One thing I like about O'Keefe is he doesn't throw all the videos out there at once, he just dribbles them out. Good work James!
It is just soooo darn SWEET to see the left being undone by the very tactics they have used for years. Couldn't happen to a nicer bunch.
Long live James O'Keefe et al and their hidden video cameras and microphones.
I think that is a wonderful predicament and a great question, JoeInMichigan.
How about some "Best of Begging Episodes". I can hear/see it now…"Here's one from Dec. 1985, remember when that evil Hollywood Actor tried playing the role of our President? Well, here are Peter, Paul and Mary to sing, "Where have all the Liberals gone?"
That night's episode raised $427.30 – It would have been more but 3 checks totalling $38.55 bounced plus the coffee and donuts, and pizza for our staff came to $128.74 and of course the 9 on-air talent/camera, lighting and key grip plus our 11 telephone answering mannequins cost the corporation $874.32. Oh yes, what a great night that was, Dec 12, 1985….
What's interesting about that? I'd have been shocked if he had any sensible response to what is going on…
However, as NCAA's March Madness heats up, watch for our hoops guru Prez fillout his bracket impeccably, if you don't mind that he can't spell Syracuse, Gonzaga or Duke!
Yes, and at least on TV, these corporate sponsors get major big time mention. Oh and PBS prides itself on claiming to be commercial -free. Okay, so why do the programs all end 4-5 minutes before the top or bottom of the hour? Believe me, they don't go dark for 4-5 minutes!
NPR needs to lose our tax money to help pay for their prapaganda machine.
The beauty of the O'Keefe videos, to me at least, is that by the time the first one comes out, the featured organisation now realises that more are on the way. In political terms, it means they are well and truly screwed. This new media makes the old-school 60 Minutes stuff seem positively tame by comparison. We don't have to wait for Sunday night for the intrepid investigative reporter. These days, WE are the investigators. There's hope yet.
I know – GAMESHOWS!
How about Name That Paleontologist?
For prizes, they can award contestants all that leftover crap – the Why yes, I AM an NPR Snob cup holders, mouse pads, shoulder bags, etc.
I love how they say the SENIOR DIRECTOR OF INSTITUTIONAL GIVING (emphasis mine!) doesn't know what she's talking about. If she doesn't know than who does? Liars.
You mean crapaganda machine right?
NPR's tax exempt status is not in jeopardy – nor has the idea been proposed by any formal body – though the sentiments expressed here suggest it should be. It doesn't matter that in 40 years, nobody has ever found any wrong-doing by NPR, not even the liberal bias you all so fervently claim. Interesting, too, that the folks who follow this site find something admirable in James O'Keefe's methods. For example, editing tapes to produce lies and deceive everyone. That seems to suit those who choose to believe that this is what mainstream media has been doing all these years, whether it's true or not (it isn't). What's important above all else, of course, is the cause – and yours is the only noble one. What this all boils down to, then, is akin in a moral sense to the reparations paid to Native Americans or the descendants of former slaves. White Americans have been downtrodden so long that in order to level the playing field, ordinary standards and values should be ignored.
Thanks for sharing. i really appreciate it that you shared with us such a informative post..
Assignment, Essays, Coursework Writing, Admission Essay Writing
You must be logged in to post a comment.