We can put a face behind the Occupy movement — and it appears to be a wanna-be one percenter. Peter Thottam is the creator of Occupy Los Angeles and is also the progressive force behind Occupy the Rose Parade.

Thottam’s been planning this occupation disruption of the Rose Parade for the last six months — at least that’s how long he’s had the “Occupy the Rose Parade” Twitter feed going.
Ironically, Peter Thottam is a Goldman Sachs alum, an ivy-leaguer, and former corporate lawyer from an international mega law firm, and recent MBA grad. Yale, Boalt Hall Berkeley law and UCLA MBA. Does this sound like a community organizer or a one percenter? While Peter Thottam’s CV reeks of Wall Street elitism, his bio depicts someone grabbing for the corporate brass ring, but strangely unwilling or unable to keep a job at such elite corporate employers as Goldman Sachs or O’Melveny and Myers.
To hear the LA Times summarize Thottam’s political apoplexy, you’d think the guy was a true blue Tea Party Activist, blaming Obama for the last three years of economic misery and destruction:
“The America that’s existed during the bulk of Rose Parades has really been torn apart over the last three years by the unemployment problem, wealth polarization and the middle class shrinking,” Thottam told the Pasadena Sun. (emphasis added)
But what the LA Times and others in the Make-Believe Media apparently missed, or overlooked, are the public records: From the California Bar Journal Discipline Summaries we learn that back in 2004, while a lawyer, Peter Thottam pled guilty to the crime of petty theft. Then, in violation of ethics rules, he failed to report his criminal conviction to the state bar. Once discovered, Thottam suffered the disgrace of having his law license suspended by the California State Bar in 2008.
Thottam is a self-described “progressive attorney, and community activist and organizer” and a failed Democrat political candidate in 2010 for state assembly in California’s 53rd district. Now returned as a lawyer “seeking employment” whose “salary is negotiable,“ my guess is Thottam hopes to capitalize on the Occupy fad to deftly segue himself into politics.
Hey, it worked for Obama.






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?
47 Comments
OK! Let's admit the truth. This whole Occupy thing is run by the Republicans and the Kochs to make fun of the Democratics and our dear President. There can be no other logical explanation.
Keep in mind that "Progressives" are tied to the Obama regime, the Obama agenda and to Saul Alinsky:
Rules for Power Tactics:
1. Power is not only what you have but what the enemy thinks you have.
2. Never go outside the experience of your people.
3. Whenever possible, go outside of the experience of the enemy.
4. Make the enemy live up to their own book of rules.
5. Ridicule is man's most potent weapon.
6. A good tactic is one that your people enjoy.
7. A tactic that drags on too long becomes a drag.
8. Keep the pressure on with different tactics and actions, and utilize all events of the period for your purpose.
9. The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.
10. The major premise for tactics is the development of operations that will maintain a constant pressure upon the opposition.
11. If you push a negative hard and deep enough, it will break through into its counterside.
12. The price of a successful attack is a constructive alternative.
13. Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.
(continued):
Because Alinsky was sensitive to criticism that he wasn't ethical, he also included a set of rules for the ethics of power tactics. You can see from these why his ethics were so frequently questioned.
Rules to test whether power tactics are ethical:
1. One's concern with the ethics of means and ends varies inversely with one's personal interest in the issue.
2. The judgment of the ethics of means is dependent upon the political position of those sitting in judgment.
3. In war the end justifies almost any means.
4. Judgment must be made in the context of the times in which the action occurred and not from any other chronological vantage point.
5. Concern with ethics increases with the number of means available and vice versa.
6. The less important the end to be desired, the more one can afford to engage in ethical evaluations of means.
7. Generally, success or failure is a mighty determinant of ethics.
(continued):
8. The morality of means depends upon whether the means is being employed at a time of imminent defeat or imminent victory.
9. Any effective means is automatically judged by the opposition to be unethical.
10. You do what you can with what you have and clothe it in moral garments.
11. Goals must be phrased in general terms like "Liberty, Equality, Fraternity," "Of the Common Welfare," "Pursuit of Happiness," or "Bread and Peace."
These are just the highlights. There's obviously a lot more to it. Alinsky's book is still available in most college bookstores and on Amazon and is worth reading.
still available? and then some! it's pushed down students' gullets on a lot of campuses. You'll find far more Alinsky than you will the Bible or dispassionate works of history…
Sorry, Peter. Rules aren't just for other people. Learn that and you may be able to keep a job this time.
The next Karl Marx,HAHAHA!
LOL, a know-it-all leftist who knew more than the doctor, result: his mom died two weeks later. Clearly this person is book smart but he has absolutely no common sense, and his flaky history in the workforce is the result of drug abuse. I guess 0bama will have found himself another czar.
Wait, wait… six months? Either this is just a lone weirdo who got lucky when he picked a name, or the Occupy movement was in the planning stages for at least two months before they took over Zucotti Park.
You can either take that as evidence of a conspiracy of some sort, or you can conclude that progressives just suck at planning anything. Given my inclination to assume incompetence before malice, I'm going with the latter.
I hope these people disrupt the Rose Parade and get swarmed by thousands of angry football fans.
I'd like to know why Barack and Michelle Obama were disbarred. I doubt it was for "petty" theft.
After reading this, I'm starting to seriously think that might be the case. GOP support is weakest in urban areas and what faster way to get the people living there to turn against leftism by placing a bunch of anarchist caricatures in their neighborhood?
This is what I thought. A lot of people will be watching with their families, I think this is a stupid idea on the protesters part and am all for it.
When life throws you lemons, make lemonade! Sounds like this guy may be exploiting the Occupy craze as a springboard for a political gig … smart!
Oooh! Oooh! Pick me! I want to organize something subversive and clever for the Republicans!! We are so clever.
can't wait for the video of a ragtag group of Occupiers with panic-stricken looks on their faces running for their lives down Colorado Blvd!
Goldman Sachs alum planning an Occupy for many months before OWS.
You can't make this stuff up!!!
I smell Karl Rove's evil hand at work here.
Only Rove could get Obama and the Democrats to throw their weight and credibility behind the Occupy Movement, then hit the self-destruct button on it and take everyone down!
More sealed records that I hope the next POTUS unseals, and Congress does write a law requiring totally OPEN RECORDS (minus divorce) for ALL National Candidates. Time for SUNSHINE!
Given the income businesses and the City of Pasadena rely on from The Tournament of Roses, I think Mssr. Thottam is going to be responsible for a lot of busted heads. Pasadena ain't Portland.
X.
Thief and lier, this article just described 99% of the lawyers and politicians in the country. Lying, is law school 101. It's the first course you're taught.
Don't give your hard earned money to the marxists, read the communists books here for free: http://kitmantv.blogspot.com/2011/08/saul-alinsky...
Yep, another one of those guys who believes that:
Laws are for others to obey–not him.
What he got arrested for was only wrong because he got caught.
It's someone else's fault that he a) got caught or b) got prosecuted for it
The people who participated in his arrest, prosecution and sentencing were all idiots who pale in comparison to his own spectacular genius and smarts.
LOOOOOOSSSSSSSER!!
I'd like to know that, too. sigh.
I just did a quick search. Michele has let her license lapse (although it's a court-ordered voluntary surrender–but there was no disciplinary action against her), Obama has "voluntarily retired" which I take to mean he will not practice again ever. Apparently there is no disciplinary action against him either.
They seem to have a free pass to do whatever they like anyway from the MSMedia and the rest of the Democratic Party. Let's just hope the rest of the U.S. would like to keep our free-market Democratic Republic, and vote for Anyone-But-Obama 2012!!!
This whole #Occutard has become an excuse for every bitter, lazy, corrupt, needy and semi-mentally ill person to lash out at the true 99%: the hardworking respectable people who just want to live their lives in peace!
I do not know what "Occupying" The Roe Parade means. Are they going to interrupt it in some way? It is way to late to try to enter a float;..the security there is pretty tight.
cool site…..thanks for the link
Everything is political with them, even something nice like the Parade of Roses. Their creepyness knows no boundries.
I did some digging about a year ago and discovered that Michelle Obama's "court ordered inactive status" stemmed from extortion, involving some shady real estate dealings she made while she was the assistant to Mayor Daley of Chicago, one of the most crooked mayors ever. That alone would have prevented any other candidate from becoming the Republican nominee. These Obamas have crime written all over them. They are both crooks, and the people have given them a pass because they have not screamed bloody hell at the media to get to the bottom of all this nonsense. I couldn't stand Obama from the beginning, and I didn't know about any of this until I happened upon it by accident. That's how corrupt the media has become–not just the leftie media, but Fox News, too. They're all in on it. If someone like Romney becomes the nominee, do you think he will bother to bring up any of these dangling questions? Nuh, he won't. That's a big reason why I hope Romney doesn't win the nomination. These allegations are very important and should not be shoved under the carpet. It's not fair to the voters. Here is a link to check out: http://seeingthroughthefog.com/?p=631
I know a bit about Thottam. Hes out at Goldman-Sachs because he was CRIMINALLY CHARGED with stealing from his own investors, thats why he left GS and hasnt either gone back or been invited back. Just another example of how LAW, ACADEMIA, MEDIA AND POLITICS are largely nothing but commie cabals today, and have been ever since the 60s. Lets not forget what Cronkite did("I ended the Vietnam war") or the attempts by SeeBS "60 minutes" in both 2000(the Bush drunk driving story) or in 2004(the FORGED documents , in an attempt to elect a COMMUNIST to the WH, John Scary).
Indeed it is. Virtually no lawyers anymore has any scruples. Look at F/F. The US attorney there is as much a part of the coverup as LAWYERS Eric the Red AHoleder and Barak Insane Obama.
In casae you dont know-Mocchelle WAS disbarred. She can no longer practice law in the state of Illinios, and liklely that ban will be accepted by other states.
Connie-theres likley enough in Insanes records to charge him criminally-Tony Rezko, Blago, all of them are involved in some wth Barak Insane. David the Ax Hole Rods daddy and grandaddy BOTH wrote for the Communist Party USA newspaper. Dont forget, Jeremiah Wright met in 1986 with Quadaffi-a moslem leader meeting with a "christian" "minister"-Im sorry, but that wont happen, Wright was a black moslem and a communist.
"shady real estate dealings"-Hmm-largest property owner in Southside Altgeld gardens happens to be one VALERIE JARRETT. Might that have been who some of the "shady dealings" might have been with? Remember in 2009, when Obama flew to Copenhagen to try to get the 2016 Summer Olympics for Chicago? Well , guess who stood to make a financial killing if he had succeeded? One VALERIE JARRETT. Might that have something to do with why Valerie is such a high official in his admin, and gets NO media scrutiny whatsoever?
This is a Leftist we're talking about here. He's assuming reality will bow to his desires, like every other progressive on the planet.
This is the 1/10,000th of 1%(George Soros) vs. the 1%. The "99" % are just fools following him. When the OWS speakers call their critics "puppets", they are using a tactic mastered by the Nazis, which is to accuse your opponents of being truly what you, yourself are. George obviously learned well from his Nazi mentors.
This guy seems like a scumbag on several levels. He's an Ivy Leaguer AND and PETTY THIEF? WHAT? WHY?
Oh ya. Just another entitled bonehead. I hope he has a jail cell in his future.
Thank you for mentioning "NAZI" when you mention Soros. He should NOT be allowed to "soft peddal" his NAZI past. Everytime I see his name I add that in.
Look at this realistically, the man has the knowhow to circumvent the fine line between legitimate and illegal, Hes a dangerous man!
I, too, believe that Valerie Jarrett is another criminal in this crooked White House, who should be behind bars. The woman sounds like an uneducated moron to me. I remember the inane comment she made last year when she said that Obama is "cursed" with genius. Still laughing over that bullsh*t comment, considering the guy's not very smart. I've read that it wouldn't take an investigator much time to prove some shady dealings with the Obama house in Illinois. Apparently it was sold to them for a mere fraction of its worth, something that has raised some eyebrows.
No doubt they are all crooks…especially Valeria Jarrett–it actually frightens me that she has so much power. I think she is stupid AND evil.
But, I still can't find anything that is actionable about them–they probably pulled strings and had evidence destroyed (and perhaps people too) to make sure they could never be prosecuted. The only way we can ever really find out the real dirt is if somebody in their regime decided to "tell all". I think there are people who were in the inner circle who have "moved away" from them when they realized how destructive their plans for this country are–and how incompetent they are.
I'm only finding she voluntarily let her license lapse–at the time it had to be through court order. If there is some dirt out there, I want to know about it. These people were never properly vetted by the press and I feel like they are looting the office and this country!
The whole way they've turned the truth on it's head–good is bad, bad is good–is exactly how the Nazi's came to power in Germany. What these Occutards don't realize is that THEY are the bad guys, from a future historical standpoint. They will be described as the "useful idiots" of a couple of megalomaniacs.
Lawyer—liar, not much difference really. One just gets paid more.
Saying Thottam left GS because he was "criminally charged with stealing from his own investors" is fightin' words. What do you have to back up what you say and how do you know it? I'm following up on Thottam and will investigate your sources if you provide them.
hard to remember specifics, but I beleive the Boston Globe and the NY Post both ran stories about him sometime in early 2000s about how he was diverting money meant to be invested into a scam similiar to what Bernie Madoff was running. GS left him off easy , and the local DA apparently didnt follow up with taking him to trial. I do believe he was disbarred, which seems likely why he hasnt been back at GS. Seems like he was a shady lawyer using insider information to set himself up with investors $.
You must be logged in to post a comment.