Conor Friedersdorf, subbing for Andrew Sullivan at The Atlantic, is trying to tell you how to talk about Pigford.
In a couple of pieces recently, Friedersdorf focuses on the gap between the number of Pigford claimants and census records of the number of the black farmers. It’s an odd issue to focus on – although Media Matters does it, too – because it doesn’t really prove anything. It’s just floating numbers. What does prove something are the testimonies of Jimmy Dismuke, Willie Head, Eddie Slaughter, Lucious Abrams, and other black farmers who all have first hand knowledge of Pigford fraud.
Of course, Friedersdorf doesn’t mention the black farmers. They aren’t his concern. He’s much more interested in slicing and dicing numbers, comparing reports and – mostly – trying to impugn the motives of people like Andrew Breitbart (and Republicans in general) for covering the story in the first place.
Friedersdorf doesn’t care about the black farmers and their stories, so he can’t imagine anyone else caring, either.
And then the echo chamber begins, with The Atlantic’s Ta-Nehisi Coates discussing the motivation of Republicans while ignoring the actual black farmers and then The American Prospect’s Adam Serwer opining on what Friedersdorf and Coates said, while once again ignoring what the black farmers said. (more…)







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?