Jonathan Capehart, the pride of Carleton College, rarely has anything to say that’s worth reading, listening to (he’s a regular on Morning Joe) or thinking about, but occasionally he blunders into something, willy-nilly, as in this piece for the Washington Post blog, “Post Partisan,” about Palin’s recent speech at the Susan B. Anthony dinner:
The last time I saw Sarah Palin speak live was in 2008 when she accepted the Republican Party nomination for vice president. And she gave the performance of her life. The ensuing 20 months for me have been like watching the political equivalent of an actor on ER playing a surgeon. Get that “surgeon” off her lines, and she can’t possibly speak intelligently, if at all, about the intricacies of an operating room. Palin speaks in such broad generalities (“time-tested truths” or “common-sense solutions”) that you’d be crazy to even think about putting the body politic into her care.

This is what passes for thinking among the left these days: why, with this sort of analysis, Capehart has a real chance to become the next Frank Rich. Never mind that Palin’s positions on the issues are far more in tune with what the American public is thinking at the moment. As Matthew Continetti noted in the Weekly Standard:
As I listened to the speech, I was struck by how Palin’s positions are widely shared. She opposes the health care law — so does the public. She’s concerned about the federal deficit — so is the public (see question 10b). She supports the Arizona illegal immigration law — so does the public. She supports the right to life — and the public is moving toward her. She supports the Afghanistan surge and the current course in Iraq — both Obama administration policies.
The problem, as Continetti notes, is that Palin’s negatives are so high (wonder why): (more…)






Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?