Rep. James Clyburn (D- SC) went on government-funded radio Monday to advocate for censorship and government controlled “restraint on speech”. He positively yearns for the romantic time of the 1960’s, before the internet, when the government’s “Fairness Doctrine” controlled the free-flow of opinion in our country. Bizarrely, Rep. Clyburn concedes that the 1960’s had some “unfortunate” murders (some would call them political assassinations) but maintains that our society would be better if the government took on the role of censor.
We’ve grown accustomed to high-ranking Democrats calling for restraints on political speech. They always seem to cite Rush Limbaugh, Bill O’Reilly and Glenn Beck and always seem to overlook the far more incendiary rantings of Ed Schultz, Randi Rhodes and the odious Mike Malloy. But in Rep. Clyburn’s NPR interview, two chilling new wrinkles to the speech-squelching movement are revealed.
Number one, why did Rep. Clyburn mention the internet as part of his tirade against free political expression? The “Fairness Doctrine” was created to control the content of radio and television stations. Newspapers and periodicals were never affected because, unlike TV and radio, they are not licensed by the Federal Government. The internet (and the content that appears on it) falls under the same guidelines as newspapers. Or, at least, it did.







Subscribe via RSS
Got a Tip?